Recommendations & Conclusions
29 items
1
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We are deeply disappointed that the 555 group action litigants, who took the Post Office Ltd. (POL) to court and who exposed the Horizon scandal, should be worse off than other victims of Horizon who would otherwise not be in a position to make claims. It is a perverse situation …
Read more
We are deeply disappointed that the 555 group action litigants, who took the Post Office Ltd. (POL) to court and who exposed the Horizon scandal, should be worse off than other victims of Horizon who would otherwise not be in a position to make claims. It is a perverse situation that the prolonged legal proceedings and the resulting delay to POL’s decision to settle have reduced the compensation the 555 were entitled to. Both the Post Office Ltd. and the Minister accept that this is unjust. We agree with the POL CEO, Nick Read, that it will be impossible for the POL to move forward until this issue is fully addressed. Our view is that the responsibility for addressing this injustice lies with the Government. Consideration should be given to recompense the legal fees of the 555 as an initial payment whilst full determination is considered.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will make funding available to ensure postmasters who took part in the Group Litigation Order (GLO) case are not financially disadvantaged by their decision to litigate against the Post Office. They will be able to access similar compensation to that available to their …
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
2
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We demand that the Government as a matter of urgency commit to ensuring that the 555 are fully compensated for all of their losses on the same basis as other victims of this scandal receiving compensation. (Paragraph 17) Prosecuted Sub-postmasters and ‘unsafe’ convictions
Read more
We demand that the Government as a matter of urgency commit to ensuring that the 555 are fully compensated for all of their losses on the same basis as other victims of this scandal receiving compensation. (Paragraph 17) Prosecuted Sub-postmasters and ‘unsafe’ convictions
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it acted by announcing funding to ensure GLO postmasters are not financially disadvantaged, will have similar compensation to non-GLO peers, and is consulting on delivery.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
3
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted in Part
We are deeply concerned that, despite the efforts that the Post Office Ltd. (POL) has made to contact them, so few sub-postmasters have approached POL to begin the process of overturning ‘unsafe’ Horizon convictions. POL has conceded that this might be to do with the trauma caused by the Horizon …
Read more
We are deeply concerned that, despite the efforts that the Post Office Ltd. (POL) has made to contact them, so few sub-postmasters have approached POL to begin the process of overturning ‘unsafe’ Horizon convictions. POL has conceded that this might be to do with the trauma caused by the Horizon scandal and the Minister accepted that it might also be related to mistrust of POL and the Government. Those directly affected by the scandal and those representing them have also pointed to a clear lack of trust between themselves and POL. If this scandal is to be addressed, it is crucial that all its victims receive justice.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will not set up a new independent body but will work with existing independent bodies like the Criminal Cases Review Commission to contact postmasters with Horizon-related convictions and offer support.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
4
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted in Part
We recommend that the Government urgently set up an independent intermediary body as a trusted first point of contact for those wrongly convicted because of Horizon, in particular for the 576 convicted sub-postmasters who have not yet come forward. The independent body should be appropriately resourced to support these victims …
Read more
We recommend that the Government urgently set up an independent intermediary body as a trusted first point of contact for those wrongly convicted because of Horizon, in particular for the 576 convicted sub-postmasters who have not yet come forward. The independent body should be appropriately resourced to support these victims to begin the process of overturning convictions and seeking the compensation they are entitled to. POL and BEIS should co-operate fully with this body. It is crucial that, if such a body should be established, it has proper engagement with the sub-postmaster community and their representatives.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will not set up a new independent body but will work with existing independent bodies, such as the CCRC, to contact postmasters and offer support.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
5
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
The Government must confirm how long it expects it to take for final settlements to be made to sub-postmasters after they have received their interim payments. The Government should set out what criteria they are using to determine final payments, alongside indicative examples of what claimants can expect in terms …
Read more
The Government must confirm how long it expects it to take for final settlements to be made to sub-postmasters after they have received their interim payments. The Government should set out what criteria they are using to determine final payments, alongside indicative examples of what claimants can expect in terms of overall compensation, which should include compensation for consequential losses.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Post Office aims to make interim payments within 28 days and final settlements are determined through individual negotiations. The government will provide principles informing the offers made and the approach adopted.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
6
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We recommend that the Government provides monthly updates on the number of interim payments made, the number of final payments made, and the range of Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report 23 amounts paid out to reach full, fair and final settlements. Because of the nature of the …
Read more
We recommend that the Government provides monthly updates on the number of interim payments made, the number of final payments made, and the range of Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report 23 amounts paid out to reach full, fair and final settlements. Because of the nature of the Horizon scandal, transparency on these issues is crucial to restoring trust.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agreed with the Post Office that it will publish monthly updates on the number of interim payments made and the number of final payments made on its website, and share the latest management information data with the Select Committee each month to enable …
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
7
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We are concerned that some sub-postmasters have been denied interim compensation payments despite having had their convictions overturned. The Post Office Ltd. (POL) and the Minister noted that this is because the reliability of Horizon evidence is not central to those individual claimants’ cases. The Horizon story has centred to …
Read more
We are concerned that some sub-postmasters have been denied interim compensation payments despite having had their convictions overturned. The Post Office Ltd. (POL) and the Minister noted that this is because the reliability of Horizon evidence is not central to those individual claimants’ cases. The Horizon story has centred to a large extent on a lack of transparency and trust. It is imperative that POL decisions on compensation are scrutinised by BEIS and are open and transparent.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that interim compensation payments are available if specific criteria are met and that three claims have been declined because Horizon evidence was not essential to the prosecution.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
8
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
We recommend that the Government provides regular updates when compensation is refused for sub-postmasters who have had their convictions overturned, the reasons for this and if subsequent compensation is sought and awarded. The Government should ensure that POL provide us with details of the mediation for those seeking compensation after …
Read more
We recommend that the Government provides regular updates when compensation is refused for sub-postmasters who have had their convictions overturned, the reasons for this and if subsequent compensation is sought and awarded. The Government should ensure that POL provide us with details of the mediation for those seeking compensation after overturning a conviction, including the process, how independence is achieved, the numbers using it, and what the outcomes have been. We also recommend that BEIS explains its role in signing off this mediation process and the nature of the oversight that it and UK Government Investments (UKGI) are providing. (Paragraph 29) The Historical Shortfall Scheme
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government provides information regarding interim compensation payments, the criteria for eligibility, and the number of claims declined. It describes the confidential form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and BEIS's role in providing funding, agreeing on significant decisions, and monitoring progress towards settlements.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
9
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We are concerned that a firm involved with the discredited HBOS Reading scandal is involved with the Historical Shortfall Scheme, and that the Post Office Ltd. (POL) CEO was unaware of the issues surrounding the HBOS compensation scheme. Though Herbert Smith Freehills may have experience in establishing such schemes we …
Read more
We are concerned that a firm involved with the discredited HBOS Reading scandal is involved with the Historical Shortfall Scheme, and that the Post Office Ltd. (POL) CEO was unaware of the issues surrounding the HBOS compensation scheme. Though Herbert Smith Freehills may have experience in establishing such schemes we are not reassured by the Minister or the POL CEO’s arguments that the issues associated with the HBOS scheme do not necessarily question their role in the Historical Shortfall Scheme.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government claims the Historical Shortfall Scheme differs from the HBOS Reading Scheme because consequential losses are in scope, there are opportunities to appeal, and there is an independent advisory panel.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
10
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
In responding to this report, we expect the Government to explain how the Historic Shortfall Scheme differs from the HBOS Reading scheme and what safeguards have been built in to avoid the problems that the latter scheme experienced.
Government response AI summary
The government claims the Historical Shortfall Scheme differs from the HBOS Reading Scheme because consequential losses are in scope, there are opportunities to appeal, and there is an independent advisory panel.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
11
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
Offers to claimants should only be full and final where claimants have received independent advice and have exhausted their rights to recourse to the Historical Shortfall Scheme’s alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. We ask the Government to seek clarity from the Post Office Ltd. (POL) on the basis on which …
Read more
Offers to claimants should only be full and final where claimants have received independent advice and have exhausted their rights to recourse to the Historical Shortfall Scheme’s alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. We ask the Government to seek clarity from the Post Office Ltd. (POL) on the basis on which offers are made, in particular whether claimants were aware before agreeing to take part in the Scheme of its terms of reference and methodology and what rights, if any, were waived.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government explains that postmasters waive no rights by joining the Scheme and settlement is full and final only if the offer is accepted, outlines the Scheme's process in its Terms of Reference, and clarifies that claimants are reminded to seek independent legal advice.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
12
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
We ask POL to explain how it ensures that the ADR process is fully independent from the Scheme, how many claimants have used it, and what the outcomes have been. We also recommend that the Government provide us with details of BEIS and UKGI’s oversight role in the Scheme’s ADR …
Read more
We ask POL to explain how it ensures that the ADR process is fully independent from the Scheme, how many claimants have used it, and what the outcomes have been. We also recommend that the Government provide us with details of BEIS and UKGI’s oversight role in the Scheme’s ADR process. We specifically note that 22 offers have been turned down by claimants and we recommend that the 24 Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report Government confirm whether these rejections ended up in the Scheme’s ADR process and, if so, what the outcomes are. We recommend that BEIS explains its role in assessing those offers that have been rejected.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the recommendation and refers to the Historical Shortfall Scheme's three-stage Dispute Resolution Procedure, including Good Faith and Escalation Meetings, but does not commit to any new actions beyond existing processes.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
13
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
Bearing in mind the nature of the Horizon scandal—including the deep mistrust of its victims of the Post Office Ltd. (POL), BEIS and UKGI, its historical nature and issues surrounding the availability of records and a flawed IT system—we would have expected very careful engagement with those who would be …
Read more
Bearing in mind the nature of the Horizon scandal—including the deep mistrust of its victims of the Post Office Ltd. (POL), BEIS and UKGI, its historical nature and issues surrounding the availability of records and a flawed IT system—we would have expected very careful engagement with those who would be expected to use the Historical Shortfall Scheme. It was imperative that those using the Scheme, often without access to legal or expert support, were put at the heart of the process.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government accepts the Committee’s recommendation.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
14
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
In response to this report, POL and BEIS should provide details of who was consulted in drawing up the Scheme, what issues were raised by those consulted, and how those issues were addressed. We also recommend that POL and BEIS set out what opportunities were given to claimants to raise …
Read more
In response to this report, POL and BEIS should provide details of who was consulted in drawing up the Scheme, what issues were raised by those consulted, and how those issues were addressed. We also recommend that POL and BEIS set out what opportunities were given to claimants to raise concerns after the Scheme was opened and how those concerns were addressed.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it accepts the recommendation regarding details of who was consulted in drawing up the Scheme and what opportunities were given to claimants to raise concerns.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
15
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
It is imperative that any victim of the Horizon scandal receives compensation that puts them back in the position they would have been in had the scandal not occurred, whilst also taking accounting of the distress the scandal caused them. We are therefore troubled by the suggestion that the Historic …
Read more
It is imperative that any victim of the Horizon scandal receives compensation that puts them back in the position they would have been in had the scandal not occurred, whilst also taking accounting of the distress the scandal caused them. We are therefore troubled by the suggestion that the Historic Shortfall Scheme will pay out little in consequential losses to the severe detriment of the claimant. The Government must explain how consequential losses will be assessed under the Scheme with a range of indicative examples that draw on offers that have already been made.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it accepts the recommendation regarding compensation for victims of the Horizon scandal.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
16
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
We share concerns about the process by which claims to the Historic Shortfall Scheme are assessed and then reviewed by the Independent Panel. Bearing in mind that the Post Office (POL) bears a major part of the responsibility for the Horizon scandal, it seems perverse that POL is making initial …
Read more
We share concerns about the process by which claims to the Historic Shortfall Scheme are assessed and then reviewed by the Independent Panel. Bearing in mind that the Post Office (POL) bears a major part of the responsibility for the Horizon scandal, it seems perverse that POL is making initial recommendations regarding claims.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it accepts the recommendation regarding concerns about the process by which claims are assessed.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
17
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
The involvement of POL in any part of the Scheme is questionable because of the history of the Horizon scandal. It is worth remembering that a key criticism made of POL at the height of the scandal was that effectively it acted as judge, jury and executioner when deciding on …
Read more
The involvement of POL in any part of the Scheme is questionable because of the history of the Horizon scandal. It is worth remembering that a key criticism made of POL at the height of the scandal was that effectively it acted as judge, jury and executioner when deciding on convictions of sub-postmasters.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it acted by announcing funding to ensure GLO postmasters are not financially disadvantaged, will have similar compensation to non-GLO peers, and is consulting on delivery.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
18
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
We recommend that that the Government in consultation with POL set out the reasons for involving POL in assessing claims, how this was discussed with stakeholders and how they dealt with any concerns stakeholders may have raised regarding POL’s involvement. We also recommend that POL set out what steps have …
Read more
We recommend that that the Government in consultation with POL set out the reasons for involving POL in assessing claims, how this was discussed with stakeholders and how they dealt with any concerns stakeholders may have raised regarding POL’s involvement. We also recommend that POL set out what steps have been taken to ensure independence, including how robust challenge is achieved and the numbers of initial recommendations rejected or amended by the Independent Panel. We further recommend that Government explains how BEIS and UKGI are providing oversight of the Scheme with practical examples of how, if at all, it has intervened to ensure independence.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts the Committee’s recommendation.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
19
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
We are disappointed that so few claims have been processed by the Historic Shortfall Scheme considering it was closed over a year ago. The conclusion of only 30% of Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report 25 claims does not represent significant progress. There is a danger that every …
Read more
We are disappointed that so few claims have been processed by the Historic Shortfall Scheme considering it was closed over a year ago. The conclusion of only 30% of Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report 25 claims does not represent significant progress. There is a danger that every delay will lead to many sub-postmasters continuing to suffer financially while more may sadly die before they receive justice because of the age profile of the victims.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the committee's disappointment with the slow processing of claims under the Historic Shortfall Scheme.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
20
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
The fact that the Post Office and BEIS officials admitted that they underestimated the number of potential claims is telling and indeed, troubling, and suggests that they may not have appreciated the true extent of the Horizon scandal. We acknowledge that the Post Office and the Minister expect to have …
Read more
The fact that the Post Office and BEIS officials admitted that they underestimated the number of potential claims is telling and indeed, troubling, and suggests that they may not have appreciated the true extent of the Horizon scandal. We acknowledge that the Post Office and the Minister expect to have processed the vast majority if not all claims by the end of 2022. The Minister and his officials have confirmed that the UKGI representative on the Post Office Board and the BEIS’s Post Office Team will hold Post Office Ltd.’s “feet to the fire”. Both BEIS and UKGI should be held accountable for this oversight role.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it accepts the recommendation that both BEIS and UKGI should be held accountable for their oversight role.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
21
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We recommend that the Government ask POL to set out and share stretching monthly targets and outturns on how the backlog of claims is being addressed. We also recommend that BEIS and UKGI in their oversight role give monthly updates on what actions they are taking to ensure these targets …
Read more
We recommend that the Government ask POL to set out and share stretching monthly targets and outturns on how the backlog of claims is being addressed. We also recommend that BEIS and UKGI in their oversight role give monthly updates on what actions they are taking to ensure these targets are agreed and met.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights the Post Office's increased capacity and targets for initial offers, including Minister Scully's ambition and Nick Read's commitment and states that while it agrees to provide updates on actions taken to ensure targets are agreed and met, it proposes doing so on …
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
22
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
It is worrying to hear that many of the claims awarded so far may be towards the low end of the compensation scale. To dispel any fears that Horizon victims are not being compensated fairly we recommend that the Government ask the Post Office to provide information showing the spread …
Read more
It is worrying to hear that many of the claims awarded so far may be towards the low end of the compensation scale. To dispel any fears that Horizon victims are not being compensated fairly we recommend that the Government ask the Post Office to provide information showing the spread of average claims paid out so far with a commitment to sharing such details going forward to ensure transparency and trust in the Scheme. We also recommend that the Government is explicit about how BEIS and UKGI are providing oversight of the appropriateness of offers made to claimants.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has committed to publishing information showing the spread of average claims paid out so far with a commitment to sharing such details going forward to ensure transparency and trust in the Scheme. BEIS oversight of the appropriateness of offers made to claimants takes …
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
23
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
The absence of records held by the Post Office Ltd. (POL) and other relevant organisations, such as HMRC, DWP and the Royal Mail Group, along with an absence of local suspense accounts for individual POL branches, raises serious questions as to how victims of Horizon are supposed to identify and …
Read more
The absence of records held by the Post Office Ltd. (POL) and other relevant organisations, such as HMRC, DWP and the Royal Mail Group, along with an absence of local suspense accounts for individual POL branches, raises serious questions as to how victims of Horizon are supposed to identify and evidence the losses they suffered. POL and BEIS told us that the Historic Shortfall Scheme’s Independent Panel would take this into account when assessing claims.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government stated it accepts the recommendation regarding the absence of records and how victims can evidence losses.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
24
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We recommend that POL shares details, with relevant examples, of how it takes the absence of information into account when it makes its initial recommendations for claims and how the Independent Panel reflects on such cases. We recommend that POL sets out how many claims have been refused by the …
Read more
We recommend that POL shares details, with relevant examples, of how it takes the absence of information into account when it makes its initial recommendations for claims and how the Independent Panel reflects on such cases. We recommend that POL sets out how many claims have been refused by the Scheme or rejected by claimants, where an absence of information has been relevant. We also recommend that BEIS and UKGI confirm what safeguards it agreed when signing off the Scheme for cases were there was a lack of records.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges challenges in evidencing claims due to lack of records and describes the Scheme's design to address this, including classifying unquantified claims and involving an Independent Advisory Panel. It also details the number of 'no award' claims and rejected offers.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
25
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We ask the Government to confirm that the burden of proof should not rest solely with the claimant, not least because POL itself hasn’t kept appropriate records, including itemisation of which postmasters paid what amounts to individual suspense accounts. The fact these funds were merely added to the overall profits …
Read more
We ask the Government to confirm that the burden of proof should not rest solely with the claimant, not least because POL itself hasn’t kept appropriate records, including itemisation of which postmasters paid what amounts to individual suspense accounts. The fact these funds were merely added to the overall profits of the Post Office during those applicable years should be sufficient to agree that claimants must be given a significant level of benefit of the doubt when compensation is being calculated.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government accepts that the burden of proof should not rest solely with the claimant in the Historical Shortfall Scheme and that claims may be accepted even with evidential uncertainty if considered fair in all the circumstances.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
26
Conclusion
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
It is deeply troubling, given the historical nature of Horizon, its complexity as a flawed IT system and in many cases a lack of records, that some claimants seem 26 Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report to be preparing claims and accepting offers without appropriate legal and forensic …
Read more
It is deeply troubling, given the historical nature of Horizon, its complexity as a flawed IT system and in many cases a lack of records, that some claimants seem 26 Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report to be preparing claims and accepting offers without appropriate legal and forensic accounting support. If claimants accept offers that have not fully covered their losses, this in itself is a scandal, and justice will not be done.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has agreed with the Post Office to publish information on its website regarding interim payments and provide monthly management information to the Select Committee, but will delay publication of final settlement ranges to protect claimant privacy.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
27
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Acknowledged
We recommend that the Government liaise with the Post Office to establish how many of the 2,500 claimants have been offered support through the Scheme, at which point support was offered, if costs were covered, how much was paid on average, and what the nature of that support was and …
Read more
We recommend that the Government liaise with the Post Office to establish how many of the 2,500 claimants have been offered support through the Scheme, at which point support was offered, if costs were covered, how much was paid on average, and what the nature of that support was and who provided it. We also recommend that BEIS and UKGI set out what oversight they provided of any support that was given through the Scheme, how they ensured that it was independent and how it was evaluated.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government says the Post Office is committed to providing adequate support to all applicants, including a well-being helpline, training for support staff, and a Historical Matters Remediation Team. The government provides oversight through regular meetings with the Post Office and challenges to the process.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
28
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted in Part
We have recommended in this Report that the Government set up a properly resourced independent intermediary to assist sub-postmasters seeking to overturn convictions and seek compensation. We recommend that this same body should also be tasked with assisting sub-postmasters who are accessing the Historic Shortfall Scheme. This should include providing …
Read more
We have recommended in this Report that the Government set up a properly resourced independent intermediary to assist sub-postmasters seeking to overturn convictions and seek compensation. We recommend that this same body should also be tasked with assisting sub-postmasters who are accessing the Historic Shortfall Scheme. This should include providing claimants with access to forensic accountants and legal experts who can offer advice to help ensure that claims are as robust as possible, that offers take account of all the losses suffered and that claimants do not suffer significant detriment because records have not been kept by the Post Office or other relevant organisations.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government expresses concern that setting up an independent body would cause further delays, but it has advised the Post Office to take further action, including appointing an intermediary body to provide independent advice, assistance with routes to compensation, legal advice, and strengthened emotional and …
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade
29
Recommendation
Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon…
Accepted
We look forward to receiving estimates from BEIS of the total expected cost of the Horizon scandal and a full breakdown, including any costs paid by the Post Office Ltd. (POL) itself. We also look forward to seeing the Government’s estimate of how much it would cost to reach a …
Read more
We look forward to receiving estimates from BEIS of the total expected cost of the Horizon scandal and a full breakdown, including any costs paid by the Post Office Ltd. (POL) itself. We also look forward to seeing the Government’s estimate of how much it would cost to reach a fair settlement with the 555, which we have recommended. We were surprised to discover that in December 2021 BEIS had identified a £685.6 million direct grant to POL for the Post Office Historical Matters subsidy scheme and that this was not referenced in evidence to our Committee. The Government must explain whether this direct grant is to cover the whole estimated cost of the Horizon scandal and whether this includes money assigned for achieving a fair settlement with the 555. (Paragraph 72) Post Office and Horizon - Compensationn interim report 27
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government claims it has already provided the requested information in a letter from the Minister, clarifying that the £685.6 million is maximum budget cover for compensation, not a direct grant to the Post Office and detailing what it includes.
Read full response →
Department for Business and Trade