Select committee: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee

Conclusion 7

Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon - Compensation: interim report Published 17 Feb 2022 Paragraph 28 Addressed to Department for Business and Trade
Conclusion (the committee's words)
We are concerned that some sub-postmasters have been denied interim compensation payments despite having had their convictions overturned. The Post Office Ltd. (POL) and the Minister noted that this is because the reliability of Horizon evidence is not central to those individual claimants’ cases. The Horizon story has centred to a large extent on a lack of transparency and trust. It is imperative that POL decisions on compensation are scrutinised by BEIS and are open and transparent.

From: Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee, Eighth Report - Post Office and Horizon - Compensation: interim report (HC 1129), paragraph 28, 17 February 2022

Government response

The government responded to the whole report on 27 April 2022 (deadline 17 April 2022).

Summary written by Accountability Index from the government's response. It is not the government's own words.

The government accepts several of the Committee's recommendations on transparency and the Historical Shortfall Scheme, but does not propose to set up the recommended new independent body for wrongly convicted postmasters.

  • On the 555 group litigants, the government says it "will make funding available" so they are "not financially disadvantaged" by litigating, and will announce the results of informal consultation to Parliament "in the coming weeks".
  • On an independent body, it is "concerned that setting up such a body would take significant time". It is instead working with existing bodies such as the CCRC, and has encouraged the Post Office to appoint an intermediary body.
  • It "accepts" the recommendation on monthly updates on payments, to be published on the Post Office website, with the range of final settlement amounts released only once "a critical mass of settlements has been reached" for privacy reasons.
  • On targets for Historical Shortfall Scheme offers, it accepts the recommendation but suggests BEIS updates on oversight actions "on a quarterly, rather than monthly basis".

Read the government's response ↗ Report an error