Select Committee · Public Accounts Committee

High Speed 2: Progress at Summer 2021

Status: Closed Opened: 7 Jun 2021 Closed: 14 Dec 2021 11 recommendations 19 conclusions 1 report

One year ago the Public Accounts Committee reported that the High-Speed 2 rail project was “badly off course” with project managers “blindsided by contact with reality” , as it raised serious concerns about the official account that had been provided to the Committee, over time, of the project’s health. The Committee is now recalling senior … Show more

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Seventeenth Report- HS2 Summer 2021 HC 329 22 Sep 2021 30 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

2 items
29 Conclusion Seventeenth Report- HS2 Summer 2021 Not Addressed

In May 2021, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman published a report that found that...

In May 2021, the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman published a report that found that HS2 Ltd had misled and failed to communicate promptly and effectively with a family whose home was being purchased to make way for the railway.68 HS2 Ltd told us that although it had not accepted … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government's response addressed a separate recommendation (labelled '6') regarding community engagement and environmental issues, stating they had written to the Committee and significant improvements have been made, rather than directly engaging with conclusion #29's specific observations about HS2 Ltd's past communication failures and current …
Read full response →
HM Treasury
30 Conclusion Seventeenth Report- HS2 Summer 2021 Not Addressed

HS2 Ltd told us that there had already been significant activity from environmental protests at...

HS2 Ltd told us that there had already been significant activity from environmental protests at various sites along the Phase One route. Most notably, protesters tunnelled beneath land owned by HS2 Ltd at Euston. HS2 Ltd told us that this disruption had cost it in the region of £75 million … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government's response addressed a separate recommendation on community engagement and environmental issues, stating steps taken and improvements, rather than directly engaging with conclusion #30's specific observations about protest costs and HS2 Ltd needing more government support to manage them.
Read full response →
HM Treasury

Oral evidence sessions

2 sessions
Date Witnesses
24 Jun 2021 Bernadette Kelly · Department for Transport, Clive Maxwell · Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Mark Thurston · HS2 Ltd View ↗
21 Jun 2021 Craig Wakeman · West Midlands Combined Authority, Sir John Armitt · National Infrastructure Commission, Sir Mark Worthington · HS2 Ltd View ↗

Who gave evidence

6 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Bernadette Kelly · Permanent Secretary Department for Transport 1
Clive Maxwell · Second Permanent Secretary Department for Energy Security and Net Zero 1
Craig Wakeman · Head of Transport Implementation and Lead HS2 Man… West Midlands Combined Authority 1
Mark Thurston · Chief Executive HS2 Ltd 1
Sir John Armitt · Chair National Infrastructure Commission 1
Sir Mark Worthington · Independent Construction Commissioner HS2 Ltd 1

Correspondence

5 letters
DateDirectionTitle
25 Oct 2021 Correspondence from Mark Wild, CEO, Crossrail Ltd, re Crossrail progress update…
20 Jul 2021 Correspondence from Bernadette Kelly, Permanent Secretary, Department for Trans…
20 Jul 2021 Correspondence Mark Thurston, Chief Executive Officer, High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd…
21 Jun 2021 Correspondence from Bernadette Kelly, Permanent Secretary, Department for Trans…
10 Jun 2021 Correspondence Mark Thurston, Chief Executive Officer, High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd…