Select Committee · Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee

The Elections Bill

Status: Closed Opened: 20 Jul 2021 Closed: 16 Jun 2022 27 recommendations 23 conclusions 1 report

The Committee has launched an inquiry to examine all aspects of the Elections Bill.

Clear

Reports

1 report
Title HC No. Published Items Response
Fifth Report - The Elections Bill HC 597 13 Dec 2021 50 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

10 items
2 Conclusion Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

As the Government itself acknowledges, the time available for legislative change is limited and the...

As the Government itself acknowledges, the time available for legislative change is limited and the matter of consolidating electoral law a long and widely recommended, but challenging undertaking.

Government response AI summary
The government agrees in principle that electoral law would benefit from consolidation and acknowledges it will be a long-term project, but states its immediate priority is delivering manifesto pledges and strengthening electoral integrity.
Read full response →
4 Recommendation Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

The Committee urges the Government to set out a timetable for undertaking a wholesale review...

The Committee urges the Government to set out a timetable for undertaking a wholesale review and consolidation of electoral law. (Paragraph 24) Public and parliamentary consultation and scrutiny

Government response AI summary
The government agrees in principle that electoral law would benefit from consolidation as a long-term project but defers setting a timetable, stating its immediate priority is to deliver manifesto pledges and strengthen electoral integrity.
Read full response →
36 Conclusion Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

The Committee would support any measures that increase transparency in the way the Electoral Commission’s...

The Committee would support any measures that increase transparency in the way the Electoral Commission’s compliance with the Statement is assessed by the Speaker’s Committee.

Government response AI summary
The Government noted that the recommendation is addressed to the Speaker's Committee, which has the autonomy to set its own procedures.
Read full response →
37 Conclusion Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

The Speaker’s Committee may wish to develop the use of SMART objectives in monitoring and...

The Speaker’s Committee may wish to develop the use of SMART objectives in monitoring and assessing the Electoral Commission’s compliance with the Statement. Furthermore, reports should clarify the consequences of any disagreement(s) between the Electoral Commission and the Speaker’s Committee. Read more

Government response AI summary
The Government noted that the recommendation is addressed to the Speaker's Committee, which has the autonomy to set its own procedures.
Read full response →
38 Recommendation Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

Noting the importance in maintaining the perceived and actual independence of the Electoral Commission, the...

Noting the importance in maintaining the perceived and actual independence of the Electoral Commission, the body which scrutinises the Electoral Commission’s compliance with the Statement and will play a key role in the consultation process (including providing any objections to the disapplication of the consultation procedures) must itself be seen … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government notes that this recommendation is addressed to the Speaker’s Committee, which is responsible for setting its own procedures.
Read full response →
43 Conclusion Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

The Government has not clarified whether more resources and training will be provided to the...

The Government has not clarified whether more resources and training will be provided to the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Public Prosecution Service in Northern Ireland (PPS) to investigate alleged criminal offences under PPERA.

Government response AI summary
The government states it keeps the roles and powers of the police and prosecution authorities under review for effectiveness, and that further work must be done, but does not clarify whether more resources or training will be provided.
Read full response →
44 Recommendation Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

The Government should set out how it will “support the police as necessary to enforce...

The Government should set out how it will “support the police as necessary to enforce electoral regulation proactively and effectively”, as committed by the Government in its letter to the Committee of 7 October 2021, including what resources it will make available to the police to investigate and bring forward … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government states it keeps the Electoral Commission's role and police/prosecution powers under review and that further work is needed, but does not set out how it will support the police or what resources will be made available as requested.
Read full response →
45 Recommendation Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

We urge the Government to commit to review, monitor and report on potential criminal breaches...

We urge the Government to commit to review, monitor and report on potential criminal breaches under PPERA and their enforcement, which would assist in bringing forward any further legislative changes to either the civil and/or criminal sanctioning regimes. The Government should publish its findings and lay a Statement in Parliament … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government states it keeps the Electoral Commission's role and police/prosecution powers under review and that further work is needed, but does not commit to annually reviewing, monitoring, reporting on criminal breaches, publishing findings, or laying a statement in Parliament.
Read full response →
46 Recommendation Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

The Government should also commit to undertaking a review of the civil sanctioning regime for...

The Government should also commit to undertaking a review of the civil sanctioning regime for electoral law offences and its interplay with criminal prosecutions under PPERA and the RPA, providing a timetable for consultation and review of the CSPL’s recommendations in this regard. (Paragraph 202) Regulation of Expenditure Read more

Government response AI summary
The government states it keeps the Electoral Commission's role and powers under review and that further work is needed on electoral law changes, but it does not commit to undertaking a specific review of the civil sanctioning regime or provide a timetable for consultation.
Read full response →
48 Recommendation Fifth Report - The Elections Bill Deferred

The Government’s response to the CSPL report on electoral finance regulation provides no indication of...

The Government’s response to the CSPL report on electoral finance regulation provides no indication of which of its recommendations (not already included in the Bill) the Government is likely to adopt (via amendment), prioritise for consultation or when or how the Government proposes to give legislative effect to recommendations that … Read more

Government response AI summary
The government states that the Elections Bill already implements some CSPL recommendations and that 'further work must be done' to consider others, but it does not provide the requested clarity on its next steps, specific adoption plans, or a timetable for future legislative action.
Read full response →

Oral evidence sessions

2 sessions
Date Witnesses
14 Sep 2021 Chloe Smith · Cabinet Office View ↗
7 Sep 2021 Angela Kitching · Age UK, Dr Jessica Garland · Electoral Reform Society, Dr Sam Power · School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex, Helen Mountfield QC · Matrix Chambers, Louise Edwards · Electoral Commission, Pete O’Doherty · City of London Police, Peter Stanyon · Association of Electoral Administrators, Professor Justin Fisher · Brunel University London, Professor Toby James · University of East Anglia (UEA), The Lord Evans of Weardale KCB DL · Committee on Standards in Public Life View ↗

Who gave evidence

11 witnesses
WitnessOrganisationSessions
Angela Kitching · Head of External Affairs Age UK 1
Chloe Smith · Minister of State for the Constitution and Devolu… Cabinet Office 1
Dr Jessica Garland · Director of Policy and Research Electoral Reform Society 1
Dr Sam Power · Senior Lecturer in Corruption Analysis School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex 1
Helen Mountfield QC · Barrister Matrix Chambers 1
Louise Edwards · Director of Regulation Electoral Commission 1
Pete O’Doherty · Assistant Commissioner City of London Police 1
Peter Stanyon · Chief Executive Association of Electoral Administrators 1
Professor Justin Fisher · Professor of Political Science and Director of Br… Brunel University London 1
Professor Toby James · Professor of Politics and Public Policy University of East Anglia (UEA) 1
The Lord Evans of Weardale KCB DL · Chair Committee on Standards in Public Life 1

Correspondence

9 letters
DateDirectionTitle
27 Apr 2022 From cttee Letter to Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing …
25 Apr 2022 To cttee Letter from Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housin…
20 Apr 2022 From cttee Letter to Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing …
1 Mar 2022 To cttee Letter from Matt Stringer, Chief Executive Officer, Royal National Institute of…
11 Jan 2022 To cttee Letter from Tom Brake, Director, Unlock Democracy et al on the Elections Bill r…
22 Oct 2021 From cttee Letter to Rt Hon Michael Gove MP, Secretary of State, Department for Levelling …
21 Oct 2021 To cttee Letter from Kemi Badenoch MP, Joint Minister of State for Equalities and Levell…
14 Sep 2021 To cttee Letter from Chloe Smith MP, Minister of State for the Constitution and Devoluti…
7 Sep 2021 From cttee Letter to Chloe Smith MP, Minister of State for the Constitution and Devolution…