Select Committee · Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee

Biosecurity and animal welfare

Status: Open Opened: 9 Jan 2025 64 recommendations 49 conclusions 4 reports

Animal and plant diseases and pests have far-reaching impacts on the environment, agricultural and horticultural sectors, trade, human health, animal welfare, and the food that we eat. The UK’s animal and plant biosecurity capability is in a period of significant change: the Animal and Plant Health Agency’s critical infrastructure – notably its Weybridge headquarters – …

Clear

Reports

4 reports
Title HC No. Published Items Response
1st Report - A sustainable veterinary workforce HC 270 5 Jun 2026 18 Pending
5th Report - UK-EU agritrade: making an SPS agreement work HC 1661 5 Feb 2026 43 Responded
4th Report - UK-EU trade: towards a resilient border strate… HC 1279 15 Sep 2025 27 Responded
3rd report - Biosecurity at the border: Britain's illegal m… HC 1296 8 Sep 2025 25 Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

10 items
7 Recommendation 3rd report - Biosecurity at the border:… Rejected

Consult on and introduce a permanent, straightforward personal import policy for EU products.

Defra must consult on a permanent personal import policy for the EU by April 2026. It should prioritise safeguarding British farms and should be straightforward enough to be understood by travellers and to be enforced. The current temporary ban on most meat and dairy imports should not be lifted until …

Government response. The government rejects the recommendation to consult on a permanent personal import policy for the EU, stating they have no current plans to do so due to the deferral of personal import rules until 2027 and the implications of the …
12 Recommendation 3rd report - Biosecurity at the border:… Rejected

Responsibility for tackling illegal meat imports is fragmented, lacking clear ownership and leadership.

There is currently no identifiable or effective ownership of the issue of illegal meat imports. Responsibility is so fragmented across agencies that outdated, inefficient ways of working have been allowed to persist and the scale of the crisis has been able to escalate to an intolerable degree. This is an …

Government response. The Government does not accept the recommendation to establish a bespoke taskforce, believing adequate oversight can be achieved through existing routes.
13 Recommendation 3rd report - Biosecurity at the border:… Rejected

Establish a taskforce for illegal imports of animal products, led by the Minister for Biosecurity.

A taskforce for illegal imports of animal products should be established by November 2025, led by the Minister for Biosecurity, to provide oversight of the strategy’s design and implementation and to drive improvements. The taskforce should at least include the Chief Veterinary Officer; representatives from the Animal and Plant Health …

Government response. The government rejects establishing a taskforce for illegal imports, deeming it disproportionate in the immediate short term. They intend to focus on a revised strategic approach for the Short Straits with existing partners and may revisit the recommendation later.
19 Recommendation 3rd report - Biosecurity at the border:… Rejected

Require Defra to implement a plan for fining and prosecuting repeat animal product smugglers.

Defra must deliver a plan to immediately start fining and prosecuting repeat offenders and those who are attempting to smuggle significant amounts of animal products. (Recommendation, Paragraph 46) The Port of Dover

Government response. The government rejects the recommendation for a Defra-led plan to fine and prosecute offenders, stating that enforcement powers do not sit with Defra. They encourage enforcement authorities to use existing sanctions and will work with relevant agencies to consider options …
4 Recommendation 4th Report - UK-EU trade: towards a res… Rejected

Require Defra to assess intentional non-compliance within the BTOM and outline corrective steps.

In the review proposed above, Defra should work with relevant Government departments and non-departmental delivery partners to assess the scale and nature of intentional non-compliance and outline the steps it will take to address this. These lessons should also be applied to any future UK-EU trading arrangements. (Recommendation, Paragraph 10)

Government response. The government rejects conducting the proposed review to assess intentional non-compliance, but agrees with the principle of investigating and addressing such issues, citing existing departmental actions and capabilities.
20 Conclusion 4th Report - UK-EU trade: towards a res… Rejected

Dissatisfaction with inland BCP plant checks persists; PoD inspections could improve system efficiency.

Industry has expressed dissatisfaction with the current system of SPS checks on plants and plant products conducted at inland Border Control Posts (BCPs), citing concerns around value for money, inspection standards, and biosecurity. While a future SPS agreement with the EU may significantly reduce or remove the need for such …

Government response. The government rejects reintroducing Place of Destination (PoD) inspections, stating the scheme was temporary, concluded in April 2024, and did not meet necessary biosecurity standards or legislative requirements for permanent facilities.
14 Conclusion 5th Report - UK-EU agritrade: making an… Rejected

Ensure uninterrupted day-to-day functions amidst potential SPS negotiation failure

The Government and EU leadership broadly support reaching an SPS agreement, and it is currently feasible that the June 2027 ambition can be met. However, the Government must consider what will happen if negotiations take longer or ultimately fail, ensuring that day-to-day functions such as biosecurity, border operations, and regulatory …

Government response. The government rejects the recommendation, stating that negotiations are underway and current border and biosecurity measures will remain in place until a deal is reached or negotiations fail.
15 Recommendation 5th Report - UK-EU agritrade: making an… Rejected

Set out detailed contingency plans for SPS negotiations, ensuring continuity of core border functions

The Government should set out, in response to this report, its contingency plans for the SPS negotiations, recognising that an SPS agreement is not guaranteed. These should set out how core functions such as biosecurity, border operations, and regulatory oversight will continue if negotiations take longer or fail, and how …

Government response. The government rejects the recommendation, stating that negotiations are underway and current border and biosecurity measures will remain in place until a deal is reached or negotiations fail.
16 Conclusion 5th Report - UK-EU agritrade: making an… Rejected

No clear explanation received for addressing internal market issues from Precision Breeding Act

The Committee did not receive a clear or satisfactory explanation of how the Government intends to address UK internal market issues created by the England only Precision Breeding Act. (Conclusion, Paragraph 51)

Government response. The government rejects the recommendation and says that Defra officials have regularly engaged devolved governments on the Precision Breeding Act, implementing Regulations and SPS negotiations related to precision breeding, and will continue to do so.
17 Recommendation 5th Report - UK-EU agritrade: making an… Rejected

Provide a clear, time-bound strategy for addressing UK internal market trade barriers

In response to this report, the Government should provide the Committee with a clear, time bound strategy for addressing market barriers to trade within the UK, including structured engagement with devolved governments and options for mutual recognition, common frameworks or targeted legislative changes to ensure that supply chains can function …

Government response. The government does not accept the recommendation, stating that negotiations with the EU on an SPS Agreement are underway and Defra officials have regularly engaged devolved governments.

Oral evidence sessions

8 sessions
Date Witnesses
30 Jun 2026 Abigail Seager · Defra, Dr Suzanne Eckford · Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD), Lea Reynolds · Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD) View ↗
17 Mar 2026 Dr Rob Williams · British Veterinary Association, Professor Caroline Argo · SRUC Veterinary School, Professor Matt Jones · Harper and Keele Veterinary School, Professor Tim Parkin · Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons View ↗
9 Dec 2025 Baroness Hayman of Ullock · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Dr Christine Middlemiss CB · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Mark Thompson · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Professor Nicola Spence CBE · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs View ↗
21 Oct 2025 Geoff Ogle · Food Standards Scotland (FSS), Katie Pettifer · Food Standards Agency (FSA) View ↗
6 May 2025 Gareth Baynham-Hughes · Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Spencer Draper · Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, The Baroness Hayman of Ullock · Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs View ↗
25 Mar 2025 Katrina Walsh · International Meat Trade Association, Nichola Mallon · Logistics UK, Nigel Jenney · Fresh Produce Consortium, Sally Cullimore · Horticultural Trades Association (HTA) View ↗
4 Mar 2025 Dr Christine Middlemiss · Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, Dr Jenny Stewart · Animal and Plant Health Agency, Dr Jude McCann · Farming Community Network, Lizzie Wilson · National Pig Association, Richard Griffiths · British Poultry Council, Sarah Tomlinson · TB Advisory Service View ↗
4 Feb 2025 David Smith · Border Force, Helen Buckingham · OneResolution, Lucy Manzano · Dover Port Health Authority View ↗

Correspondence

50 letters
DateDirectionTitle
23 Jun 2026 Correspondence from Baroness Hayman, Minister for Animal Welfare and Biosecurit…
5 Jun 2026 Correspondence to Baroness Hayman regarding concerns about access to veterinary…
3 Jun 2026 Correspondence from Baroness Hayman on preparations for a future Sanitary and P…
19 May 2026 Correspondence from the Agricultural Engineers Association regarding Silsoe Spr…
28 Apr 2026 Correspondence from Association of Port Health Authorities to the Chair relatin…
14 Apr 2026 Correspondence from the Chair of the Animal Sentience Committee relating to the…
14 Apr 2026 Correspondence from the Ashford Borough Council Corporate Director for Port Hea…
24 Mar 2026 Correspondence from Marsha De Cordova MP in her capacity as Leader and Co-Chair…
24 Mar 2026 Correspondence from the Animal Sentience Committee regarding their two new repo…
17 Mar 2026 Correspondence to Ashford Port Health Authority relating to non-attendance of c…
17 Mar 2026 Correspondence from the Dogs Trust regarding changes to the Companion Club, dat…
17 Mar 2026 Correspondence from Paul Kissack, Permanent Secretary, Defra, re update on Defr…
17 Mar 2026 Correspondence from Baroness Hayman, Minister for Biosecurity, Borders and Anim…
13 Feb 2026 Correspondence from Michael Seals, Animal Sentience Committee regarding having …
28 Jan 2026 Correspondence from Baroness Hayman, Minister for Biosecurity, Borders and Anim…
28 Jan 2026 Correspondence from Baroness Hayman, Minister for Biosecurity, Borders and Anim…
13 Jan 2026 Correspondence from Michael Seals, Chair of the Animal Sentience Committee, reg…
13 Jan 2026 Correspondence from Ann Cuthbert regarding systemic regulatory failure in the o…
13 Jan 2026 Correspondence to the Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Aff…
16 Dec 2025 Correspondence to Baroness Hayman of Ullock, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of S…