Themes | Social Care | The Accountability Index

Unsupervised High-Risk Residents

High-risk residents being left unsupervised, potentially due to insufficient staffing or inadequate alert systems, increasing the risk of harm.

50 items 10 sources 2 inquiries

Strongest theme matches

Mixed across source types and ranked by classifier confidence plus text match strength.

Indicative ranking
PFD report
77match
John Wherlock
Mar 2018 · Avon
The coroner noted insufficient ward cover due to staff taking breaks simultaneously, leaving the deceased unsupervised before a fall. The report also highlights that this practice continued despite being identified in a serious incident report.
Matched on terms: high, unsupervised
PFD report
77match
Edith Alden
Apr 2024 · Norfolk
Concerns include inconsistent falls prevention care plans and risk assessments, staff being unclear on mitigation, and insufficient supervision for high-risk residents in communal areas and bedrooms. The coroner also noted potential inadequacy of staffing levels.
Matched on terms: high, resident
PFD report
73match
Doris Douthwaite
Sep 2018 · Manchester (South)
The coroner noted that vulnerable residents were left unsupervised in communal areas, with no clear policy for monitoring. Concerns were also raised about an unclear falls risk assessment tool and a lack of investigation into a resident's multiple falls.
Matched on terms: resident, unsupervised
PFD report
73match
Janet Smith
Apr 2023 · Leicester City and South Leicestershire
The coroner noted concerns regarding insufficient staffing levels at the care home, where two carers for 17 residents meant individuals were left unmonitored, potentially contributing to a resident's fall.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
69match
Ruth Gregory
Jan 2019 · Manchester (South)
The coroner noted that residents were regularly unsupervised in communal care home areas, creating a risk of resident-on-resident incidents leading to trauma. Information on risk management and supervision arrangements was absent.
Matched on terms: resident, unsupervised
PFD report
65match
Alois Piska
Dec 2014 · Portsmouth & South East Hampshire
The coroner identified inadequate staffing levels at Harry Sotnick House, which meant residents in communal areas were not supervised at all times.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
65match
Tarik Drakes
Mar 2023 · Dorset
Insufficient staffing and monitoring at Dorset Lodge permits unmonitored entry by non-residents and drug use within the premises. Additional concerns include agency staff not conducting key worker sessions and a non-functional out-of-hours emergency contact.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
61match
Lee Rigby
Jan 2016 · Manchester (West)
The coroner noted support workers lacked keys to premises, potentially leaving residents unobserved when admitting other staff, and raised concerns regarding the adequacy of staff numbers, risk management procedures, and staff training related to care plans.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
61match
Christine Neild
Oct 2020 · Greater Manchester South
Concerns were raised regarding easily accessible non-food items for a resident lacking insight, an unescalated prior incident of ingesting non-food items without risk assessment, and the absence of sensors to alert night staff to residents wandering.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
61match
Stephen Verrall
Oct 2021 · South London
The coroner noted the Care Quality Commission does not routinely check window restrictors during inspections. Concerns were also raised about St John's Nursing Home, where residents without capacity could leave unaccompanied due to unstaffed reception areas on weekends.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
57match
Marion Glover
Dec 2020 · South Manchester
The care home design allows residents with cognitive illnesses to freely leave the building unnoticed, as the main exit is unlocked during the day and there is no observation of the foyer area. This raises concerns about the suitability of the accommodation for individuals with such conditions.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
57match
Philip Ellis
Nov 2021 · County Durham and Darlington
The deceased was able to leave the service premises unsupervised and obtain drugs, breaching the service's own rules. Additionally, a serious incident review into the supervision failures had not been undertaken by Free the Way.
Matched on terms: unsupervised
PFD report
57match
Thomas Smith
Jul 2022 · Bedfordshire and Luton
The coroner identified insufficient staff knowledge and training on synthetic cannabinoid dangers in mental health settings. Additionally, the system for assessing risks during s.17 leave was inadequate, as escorting staff lacked access to vital patient information.
Matched on classifier match
PFD report
57match
Diane Poole
Jan 2025 · Liverpool and Wirral
The report highlights concerns regarding a faulty emergency exit door and a lack of staff awareness about its operation, prompting a request for confirmation that corrective actions are ongoing.
Matched on terms: high
PFD report
57match
Paul Reeves
May 2025 · Inner North London
Concerns were raised about the supported accommodation's unclear role in medication supervision and a significant lack of communication between its staff and the mental health unit regarding changes in a resident's mental state and the escalation of deterioration.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
57match
Evelyn Chancellor
Jul 2025 · North London
The coroner noted concerns regarding the sufficiency of staff to ensure resident safety, particularly when staff members are engaged in activities that may divert their attention from residents.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
57match
Francis Leech
Jun 2026 · Worcestershire
Care and behavioural support plans for a resident with escalating aggressive behaviour were not updated, reflecting staff's lack of understanding and management's absence of a system for updates. The internal investigation also did not identify these plan deficiencies.
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
53match
John Follon
Oct 2024 · South Wales Central.
The coroner noted concerns that the alarm system allows staff to silence alarms before checking patients during night shifts, leaving patients potentially unmonitored. Infrequent monitor checks further increase the risk of patients remaining unmonitored for significant periods.
Matched on classifier match
Committee recommendation
52match
#41 - Fourth Report: Home Office preparedness for COVID-19 (Coronavirus): institutional accommodation
Home Affairs Committee
It is troubling that nearly 40% of those remaining in immigration detention should have been categorised as meeting Levels 2 or 3 of the Adults at Risk policy indicating significant vulnerability and, potentially, that they are at high risk from Covid-19. Government guidance on the operation of the adults at risk policy indicates that evidence meeting the standard...
Matched on terms: high
PFD report
49match
Jane Dyson Gabbitas
Dec 2013 · West Yorkshire (Western)
The SHARE accommodation unit lacked a clear system to record and monitor patient absences. This raised concerns that future deaths could occur if action is not taken to track and appropriately respond to prolonged or inappropriate absences.
Matched on classifier match
PFD report
49match
Amar Majid
Nov 2014 · Coventry
Inadequate toilet checking procedures and confusion over protocols for prolonged occupancy led to a significant delay in discovering a person in distress.
Matched on classifier match
PFD report
49match
Jane Bell
Mar 2016 · Blackpool and Fylde
The coroner identifies insufficient arrangements for constant poolside supervision at the hotel, noting concerns that reliance on CCTV monitored by reception staff with other duties and infrequent patrols may not ensure adequate visibility of the pool.
Matched on classifier match
Committee recommendation
48match
#1 - Third Report - Exempt Accommodation
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee
An unknown but significant number of residents’ experiences of exempt accommodation are beyond disgraceful. Taxpayers’ money is being spent on uncapped housing benefit on the understanding that residents, who are usually vulnerable, receive some care, support, or supervision—yet it is clear that some people’s situations actually deteriorate as a result of the shocking conditions in which they live....
Matched on terms: resident
PFD report
45match
Ryan Williams
Nov 2018 · Bedfordshire & Luton
The coroner noted a lack of supervision for members of the public at station premises, raising concerns about the absence of oversight at unmanned stations, especially for vulnerable individuals.
Matched on classifier match
PFD report
45match
Susan Perry
Nov 2022 · South Wales Central
The coroner identified that keys to locked medication cupboards were kept in easily accessible, unlocked locations, risking service users accessing medication. There was no evidence that this practice had been changed or addressed across other similar accommodations.
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
MAI-55 - Risk-based visitor restrictions for radicalising prisoners
Manchester Arena Inquiry
I recommend that the Home Office consider introducing a system based on a robust assessment of the risk a prisoner poses for radicalisation of others. This system should allow for proportionate restrictions to be applied to visitors to that person. Controls such as prohibiting vulnerable visitors where justified or ensuring conversations are supervised should be among the options...
Matched on classifier match
CQC action
45match
Clatterbridge Hospital
Should Do
The diagnostic imaging services should ensure that appropriate changing facilities are in place so that patients are not left alone in controlled areas when not undergoing a scan.
Matched on classifier match
NCEPOD recommendation
41match
Treat as One
Treat as One
Matched on classifier match
CQC action
41match
Stamford & Rutland Hospital
Must Do
The service must ensure the ward areas are secured and monitor people leaving the area.
Matched on classifier match
HSSIB recommendation
40match
Insulin: supporting safe self-administration for patients in the community with a disability
How does your organisation identify and code patients – who may be more vulnerable to harm from insulin due to their circumstances – for increased monitoring? This may include patients who have their medications delivered to their home, who do not have family nearby, or who are housebound.
Matched on classifier match
LGO / SPSO decision
39match
22-005-424 - Norfolk County Council
LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Mr B complained a care home allowed his mother’s husband to take her out unsupervised ignoring a best interest decision and putting her at risk. The Council arranged Mrs C’s placement at the care home. We have discontinued our investigation because there are ongoing court proceedings.
Matched on terms: unsupervised
Committee recommendation
36match
#195 - Manage key OCG operators under enhanced security, segregating them from general prison population
Justice Committee
Individuals identified as key OCG operators must be managed under enhanced security protocols and, where possible, segregated from the general prison population to prevent them from exploiting vulnerable prisoners and staff to maintain their “clean profile”. The practice of merely transferring these individuals between prisons, which leads to spikes in violence and drug use in the prison to...
Matched on classifier match
LGO / SPSO decision
35match
20-007-142 - Durham County Council
LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Summary: The Council failed to offer an appropriate remedy for the identified failings in the care provided to Mr Y at a residential care home.
Matched on terms: resident
Inquiry recommendation
32match
1 - CCTV and monitoring
Thirlwall Inquiry
All cots and incubators in all neonatal units should be fitted with baby monitors (in-cot cameras with livestreaming video), so that parents can observe their baby remotely at any time. The funding for this should be centrally managed and ring-fenced, to ensure consistency and implementation across all neonatal units at speed. By 31 March 2027, NHS England should...
Matched on classifier match
CQC action
32match
Kettering General Hospital
Must Do
The servicemust ensure the paediatric emergency department is safely managed. This includes but is not limited to ensuring waiting areas are safe and risks are assessed and mitigated; ensuring there is appropriate visual supervision of patients at all times.
Matched on classifier match
PHSO casework decision
27match
P-001389 - A nursing home in the Lincolnshire area
Closed After Initial Enquiries
Mrs U complained the nursing home failed to safeguard her stepfather, leading to him leaving unattended twice and suffering falls, one causing a fractured hip, and inappropriately shaving his hair.
Matched on classifier match
PHSO casework decision
27match
P-003086 - Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Closed After Initial Enquiries
Staff left her father alone when at risk of falling, leading to falls and a brain bleed. His CT scan was overlooked, delaying diagnosis before his death.
Matched on classifier match
LGO / SPSO decision
26match
24-007-965 - Reading Borough Council
LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s school transport policy, allegations of sub-contracting, and issues with the taxi-driver leaving her child unsupervised and leaving her before she was received into the care of an adult. We consider further investigation will not add to that carried out by the Council. Nor would it lead to a...
Matched on terms: unsupervised
LGO / SPSO decision
23match
21-003-429 - London Borough of Southwark
LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Summary: Miss X complained about the Council commissioned care provider’s actions when her mother went missing at the care home. The Council and care provider investigated the concerns, identified faults and put actions in place to prevent the faults recurring. The Council has already apologised to Miss X. In addition, it has agreed to make a payment to...
Matched on classifier match
LGO / SPSO decision
23match
23-018-594 - Cheshire East Council
LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council disallowing the complainant’s mother to leave her care own against her wishes. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise our discretion. We cannot investigate the complainant’s other concerns about alleged defamatory statements made against him during legal proceedings. This is...
Matched on classifier match
LGO / SPSO decision
22match
201800052 - Trust Housing Association Ltd
SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)
Mrs C complained that the housing association unreasonably failed to inform her of future service change when they offered her a tenancy. Mrs C signed a tenancy agreement for sheltered accommodation run by the association. Shortly after moving into the accommodation she was advised that the service provision was likely to change due to changes to funding provided...
Matched on classifier match
LGO / SPSO decision
18match
201705622 - Dumfries and Galloway Council
SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman)
Mrs C complained to the council about social work involvement in the care her late mother received whilst in a care home. Mrs C considered that the way the council handled her complaint was unreasonable and that the action plan they created as a result of the complaints investigation did not adequately address the failings identified. We upheld...
Matched on classifier match
LGO / SPSO decision
9match
24-020-664 - Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council failed to safeguard him from abuse. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
Matched on classifier match
← Back to all themes