Source · IMB Annual Report
Brinsford
AI-generated report summary HMP Brinsford, a resettlement prison for young men (18-22 with temporary extension to 29), operates at full capacity of 577, with an average population of 529. The report highlights improvements in self-harm reduction and healthcare provision, but raises significant concerns about low staffing levels impacting safety, the ongoing increase in violence, and the critical lack of purposeful activity places. There are also persistent issues with infrastructure, property management, and delays in transferring prisoners with severe mental health needs.
Year: 2024
Published: 15 Jul 2025
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 529
Recommendations: 19
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 0 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 400 | — |
| Prisoner assaults | 484 | — |
| Assaults on staff | 8 | — |
| Use of force | 127 | 123 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryHMP Brinsford has seen a reduction in self-harm due to effective staff teamwork and offers a good healthcare service. Improvements have been noted in prisoner movement, reception, and induction processes. The social visitors' room provides a welcoming environment, and the new care leavers' flat offers valuable support. The prison has made progress in preventing drugs from entering the establishment and has established strong links with employers, leading to successful employment events.
Key concerns
Staffing levels at times are very low, which can affect the safety of the prisoners and staff.
Incidents of violence have continued to increase, with not enough being done to combat gang-related violence.
There are insufficient purposeful activity places available and prisoners are reluctant to attend them, causing frustration.
Ongoing care for prisoners with severe mental health needs is a concern, as they are staying in the establishment too long and need dedicated mental health care due to delays in transfer to secure hospitals.
Prisoner property is still a cause for concern due to the transient nature of arrivals and moves, and loss of property on transfer remains slow and unreliable to resolve.
Investment in infrastructure of residential wings is needed, including flexible heating systems, refurbishment of cells, and repair of faulty windows.
Source wording under review
The Crown Prosecution Service does not follow up and prosecute sufficiently on assaults reported by the prison.
Delays in the court system mean prisoners are on remand for longer.
Recommendations
Recruitment and retention of staff across the Prison Service.
Government response
I recognise the Board’s concerns regarding the recruitment and retention of staff across the Prison Service. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) carefully monitors resourcing levels through a number of processes which provide the appropriate level of information for staffing decisions to be made. There is a centralised recruitment model for Prison Officers and targeted interventions are applied to those prisons with the most need. HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) continues to enhance its recruitment processes to ensure that those it attracts, and recruits, have the relevant skills and attributes needed to meet the demands and expectations of the role. This includes ensuring the assessment tools help provide a realistic job preview, filter unsuitable applicants at the earliest stage, and allow only the most suitable applicants to progress. To support retention, HMPPS have introduced a Retention Toolkit which identifies local, regional, and national interventions against the drivers of attrition. This toolkit is utilised by establishments to ensure that they are embedding bespoke Retention Plans. The workforce planning processes also help prison groups to manage their current staffing levels as well as making accurate projections about their future needs. In regard to HMP/YOI Brinsford specifically, I am pleased to report that staff retention has improved, with resignation rates reducing from 9.69% in July 2024 to 5.79% in April 2025, this being amongst the lowest rates for a Category C Resettlement Prison. The introduction of the New Colleague Mentor has helped integrate new staff into the establishment and the ongoing staff wellbeing initiatives are contributing to these improved retention figures.
Recommendation 2
The Crown Prosecution Service does not follow up and prosecute sufficiently on assaults.
Government response
I was concerned to read that the Board considers the Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) follow-up and prosecution of serious assaults, both prisoner-on-prisoner and those against staff, to be insufficient. It is of utmost importance that all assaults are dealt with swiftly and appropriately. I can reassure you that the HMPPS Prison Safety Group is working closely with the Police and the CPS to ensure those who commit violent offences in prison are successfully prosecuted. To support prosecutions, over 13,000 Body Worn Video Cameras are available across public sector prisons, meaning every Band 3-5 officer can wear a camera whilst on shift. This helps to provide high-quality evidence to support the progression of effective prosecutions. HMPPS have also established a Crime in Prisons Team to further disrupt and deter crime and ensure the evidence and investigations lead to improved criminal justice outcomes. Following the appointment of the Crime in Prison Co-ordinator (CiPCo) at HMP/YOI Brinsford in January this year, there have been remarkable improvements in identifying and referring prison-based crime. I am aware that the CiPCo role has already strengthened multi-agency coordination and is helping embed best practice across the estate. The partnership working has resulted in evidence packages being both timely and produced to the required standards, resulting in more cases being investigated and progressed to the CPS. The CPS are providing clear reasoning when not pursuing a prosecution and the CiPCo role serves as an essential conduit for improving transparency for victims and staff. The Police’s recent commendation nomination for the CiPCo at HMP/YOI Brinsford serves as a strong endorsement of the significant impact of this work.
Recommendation 3
Delays in the court system mean prisoners are on remand for longer.
Government response
I share your concerns regarding the delays in the court system and the particular impact of these on remand prisoners. The Government has already taken a number of measures to address the backlog. The first phase report of the Independent Review of the Criminal Courts commissioned by the Lord Chancellor and led by Sir Brian Leveson was published on 9th July 2025. The review was undertaken to consider the merits of longer-term reform, as well as reviewing the efficiency and timeliness of court processes. The report made a number of recommendations to build upon the measures already put into place. Our measures included increasing Magistrates Court sentencing powers from 6 months to 12 months’ imprisonment for single triable-either way offences and funding 110,000 sitting days in the Crown Court this financial year, which is a record high. The Spending Review settlement will provide additional investment of up to £450 million per year for the courts system by the end of the Spending Review period and the MoJ is working closely with His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service to understand the impact of the recommendations and establish timelines for implementation.
Recommendation 4
Investment in infrastructure of residential wings to provide flexible heating system is needed.
Government response
HMPPS is continually reviewing the investment required across the estate. These proposals will be underpinned by the data collected in recent condition surveys which assess the fabric, cells, and critical assets at each prison. These will inform long-term forward maintenance registers, which can then be prioritised against future capital budgets. All requests from the establishment will be considered, noting that demands for maintenance are much greater than the available funding. Therefore, once a bid for a project is received, HMPPS has to prioritise works very carefully to make best use of that funding, focusing on risk to life and risk to capacity and decency. The Board will be aware of the numerous projects underway or completed at HMP/YOI Brinsford totalling in excess of £5 million. Future works include the Fire Safety Improvement (FSI) programme which is currently forecasted to commence in 2026. In March 2025, further bids were made to upgrade both the heating management system (BMS) and water infrastructure and for replacement of all the old windows with vented cellular accommodation windows.
Recommendation 5
Improvements to dedicated mental healthcare so that prisoners can access services in a timelier way is necessary.
Government response
A national Rapid Review Framework is being established to drive forward actions to improve the timeliness of prison transfers to secure mental health hospitals across the estate. Regionally (Midlands-wide) there is a monthly strategic working group across Health and Justice Commissioning, Specialised Commissioning and Provider Collaboratives that has developed a Regional Action Plan to focus on key areas such as bed capacity, clinical prioritisation, data collection and scoping of new models of delivery (e.g. rapid assessment, treatment, and remission). A fortnightly, clinically led operational group meets to discuss patient-specific cases and actions required across all partners to ensure timely transfer to secure beds. The West Midlands Health and Justice Commissioning team continue to chair a fortnightly call with the commissioners and providers of secure mental health services to discuss and support the timely assessment and transfer of prisoners, although the availability of suitable beds does remain a constraining factor. Visits to the Health Care Centre are undertaken by the Governor at HMP/YOI Brinsford several times a week to monitor timescales and moves for prisoners waiting a mental health bed with the Head of Healthcare and healthcare staff.
Recommendation 6
Lack of investment in infrastructure – most cells need refurbishment and there are windows that don’t open.
Government response
HMPPS is continually reviewing the investment required across the estate. These proposals will be underpinned by the data collected in recent condition surveys which assess the fabric, cells, and critical assets at each prison. These will inform long-term forward maintenance registers, which can then be prioritised against future capital budgets. All requests from the establishment will be considered, noting that demands for maintenance are much greater than the available funding. Therefore, once a bid for a project is received, HMPPS has to prioritise works very carefully to make best use of that funding, focusing on risk to life and risk to capacity and decency. The Board will be aware of the numerous projects underway or completed at HMP/YOI Brinsford totalling in excess of £5 million. Future works include the Fire Safety Improvement (FSI) programme which is currently forecasted to commence in 2026. In March 2025, further bids were made to upgrade both the heating management system (BMS) and water infrastructure and for replacement of all the old windows with vented cellular accommodation windows. Through the Clean, Rehabilitative, Enabling, and Decent (CRED)programme; investment in a Band 6 Clean and Decent Lead and the re-introduction of the cleaning officer role, The prison has worked to improve both cell refurbishment and decency across the site. Living conditions have improved as a result, however it is acknowledged that this area requires further attention. The maintenance contractor’s local performance is now positive and all Key Performance Indicators are being met.
Recommendation 7
Concern about lack of body worn video camera use and faulty equipment.
Government response
To support prosecutions, over 13,000 Body Worn Video Cameras are available across public sector prisons, meaning every Band 3-5 officer can wear a camera whilst on shift. This helps to provide high-quality evidence to support the progression of effective prosecutions.
Recommendation 8
Address the increase in violent assaults during prisoner movement.
Recommendation 9
Not enough is being done to combat gang-related violence.
Recommendation 10
Enhance key worker sessions to reduce reliance on peer support for self-harm prevention.
Recommendation 11
Monitor and manage levels of self-isolation to ensure adequate support.
Recommendation 12
Review the increased use of PAVA to ensure it is not being deployed as a first line of defence over other methods.
Recommendation 13
Improve the quality of photocopied prisoner correspondence, including allowing for colour copies.
Recommendation 14
Implement effective strategies to prevent the increase in 'hooch' finds.
Recommendation 15
Address the poor condition of beds and mattresses and ensure the consistent availability of clean bedding and towels.
Recommendation 16
Investigate and address reasons why Black and mixed ethnicity prisoners are disproportionately placed in the CSU.
Recommendation 17
Prioritise and maintain key worker sessions despite staff shortages.
Recommendation 18
The Board is still concerned about the amount of stockpiling of ‘canteen’ products in cells. It notes that this can lead to bullying and hiding contraband. There doesn’t seem to be any control of the amount prisoners can store.
Government response
HMPPS note the Board’s concerns about the handling of prisoners’ property. This is an area to which HMPPS is currently giving further attention. Careful consideration is being given to the findings in the IMB National Thematic Report on how property loss impacts on prisoners, as well as those received from Independent Prisoner Complaint Investigations following a thematic review of the property complaints they have received in the last five years. Since receiving the reports, Governors and other senior leaders have been reminded of the most important property handling points. This includes the need to ensure compliance with volumetric control limits.
Recommendation 19
Purposeful activity places reviewed to allow more opportunity to all prisoners.
Government response
Novus is contractually and ethically committed to deliver education that supports prisoner rehabilitation and reduces reoffending. Education providers are not penalised for withdrawals, rather they are judged against success rate targets which are calculated by the percentage of learners starting a course against the percentage who complete a course. This is in line with education practice in the community. The Prison Service is responsible for commissioning courses and for allocating learners at site level and not the education supplier. The provider faces financial penalties if they do not run courses that have been commissioned by the site and on the Annual Delivery Plan. There is no financial incentive not to run courses with the fear that prisoners may withdraw. This system is designed to encourage flexibility and persistence. It is acknowledged that due to national overcrowding issues, there may have been continued cases of prisoners being transferred to HMP/YOI Brinsford prior to completing courses in their residing establishment and instances of these courses not being available in the establishment to proceed with. Prisoners should not be transferred whilst they are attending an Offending Behaviour Programme (OBP) and will be placed on hold when they are imminently due to start or are already on a programme. HMPPS does not however hold individuals from transfer when they are not on or about to commence an accredited OBP. Access to OBPs is prioritised by closeness to release and risk level in custody and depends on both the priority of an individual and the capacity of places available at a time. Accredited programmes generally run with eight places per group and depending on the intensity level can on average run for between ten weeks up to six months. Prisoners may be required to move on to alternative prisons, sometimes for other progression opportunities and there may be opportunities to access accredited programmes at an alternative site as there are 75 prisons planned in 2025/26 to operate the newly accredited Building Choices OBPs, plus five prisons running Democratic Therapeutic communities.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions | 11 | 10 |
| Canteen, facility list, catalogues | 3 | 1 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, incentives scheme, sanctions | 8 | 4 |
| Equality | 3 | 2 |
| Finance, including pay, private monies, spends | 4 | 4 |
| Food and kitchens | 2 | 2 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 19 | 6 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection, restrictions | 14 | 16 |
| Miscellaneous | 12 | 0 |
| Property during transfer or in another facility | 11 | 10 |
| Property within the establishment | 23 | 5 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, time out of cell | 5 | 6 |
| Sentence management, including HDC (home detention curfew), ROTL (release on temporary licence), parole, release dates, re-categorisation | 24 | 9 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 13 | 11 |
| Transfers | 14 | 6 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 2
· Respect 2
· Activity 1
· Release 3
Individual at Brinsford · Homicide
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Other reports for Brinsford
Population 545
· Concerns
Population 556
· Self-harm 333
· Concerns
· Self-harm 336
· Concerns
· Concerns
· Self-harm 344
· Concerns