Source · IMB Annual Report
Brinsford
AI-generated report summary HMP/YOI Brinsford, a YOI and Category C resettlement prison, held an average of 545 prisoners during the reporting year. While the environment is generally considered safe and healthcare provision good, the Board has significant concerns regarding the persistent delays in mental health transfers, the poor condition of the estate, and inadequate education and purposeful activity. Key worker compliance is low due to staffing issues, and violence between prisoners increased to 528 incidents.
Year: 2025
Published: 5 Dec 2025
Type: Prison · Cat YOI, Category C Resettlement
Population: 545
Recommendations: 5
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 1 | — |
| Prisoner assaults | 528 | 484 |
| Assaults on staff | 96 | 81 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board believes the environment is, on the whole, safe, and commends staff for their hard work supporting individuals who self-harm using a holistic approach. Prisoners are generally treated fairly and humanely, with managers dealing swiftly with unprofessional conduct. Healthcare needs are well met by Practice Plus Group, whose staff are commended for their teamwork. Staff-prisoner relationships are generally good, and a decrease in serious staff assaults is noted. The review of the incentives scheme is welcomed, and the IMB has seen a significant fall in property-related applications. The chaplaincy team is highly visible, supportive, and an integrated part of prison staff.
Key concerns
There remains a problem in relocating prisoners with mental health problems to more suitable mental health facilities. All transfers to a secure mental health facility from HMP Brinsford continued to exceed the 28-day stipulated time frame.
The management of prisoner property, particularly on transfer between establishments, continues to cause many problems. A national policy and procedure has been in place for some time, but there is little or no improvement.
The ‘new’ heating system is not up to standard.
The education contract is still not fit for purpose. It has always proved very difficult to hold the provider to account and to ensure that the prison gets good education provision. Not enough is being done to motivate or encourage prisoners to attend regularly or consistently.
The overall condition of Brinsford is still very outdated and in a poor state of repair. Previous improvements and decoration were short-term solutions and completed to a poor standard. Brinsford still needs a great deal of investment to return it to an acceptable standard.
The showers in the healthcare centre are not fit for purpose.
Activity places are limited and not ‘meaningful’. Brinsford has been a resettlement prison for more than three years, but purposeful activity has not increased and the activities have not improved.
There are still too many transfers between establishments. Bringing in prisoners from other establishments too regularly makes the gang problem more difficult to manage and the churn of prisoners destabilises the safety of the prison.
When a prisoner needs to be moved urgently, it seems to be very difficult to find a place elsewhere.
Too frequently, prisoners are moved to HMP Brinsford when in the middle of a course at their previous prison, which is not on offer in Brinsford. Similarly, transfers further from family lead to denying prisoners valuable family support through regular social visits.
Following the problems encountered in relation to the building of two new residential units, the prison grounds have been left with temporary car park, temporary boarding and holes in the ground.
Despite an increase in violence in the prison and the high incidence of illicit items entering the prison.
Gang culture remains a cause of friction between prisoners and often leads to premeditated violence. It can also result in prisoners being afraid of being on wings and mixing with other prisoners.
There remains a minority of prisoners who self-harm, and they often need specialist support.
The number of self-isolators is higher than in previous reporting years. Prisoners tell us that they self-isolate due to the nature of their offences and because of debt.
The Board is particularly concerned about violence towards staff. In the reporting year, there were 96 assaults on staff, with six recorded as serious.
There were 56 in-cell fires over the reporting year, which seems very high and potentially dangerous for the whole prison.
Officers have not been professional in their dealings with prisoners on occasions.
The Board is of the view that prisoners need to be occupied, which is not always evident. Idleness and frustration can, and often do, lead to violence. Prisoners are testing established limits, and the lack of appropriate intervention by officers contributes to increased non-compliance. The Board has observed prisoners not wearing the appropriate protective clothing at the servery, as well as vaping, swearing and eating food, all whilst supervising officers ignore this behaviour.
Prisoners’ property remains a problem area: all too frequently, property goes missing, especially on prisoner transfer.
Key work over the reporting year has been poor, with an average compliance rate of 8.16% in February, 6.23% in December and 9.22% in January.
Prisoners remain restrained longer than necessary because officers do not check for compliance.
The Board is seriously concerned about the failure to ensure a basic standard of accommodation for prisoners.
The rehabilitative work and preparations for release are deficient and, therefore, not fit for purpose. We have previously raised this issue with the Governor, but there is little evidence that anything has changed.
The education provided does not meet the needs of the prison population most of the time. We have raised our concerns about the poor education standards and low-level engagement of the prisoners with the Governor throughout the reporting year.
Novus, the contracted education provider, has failed to ensure that all lessons are delivered, especially when vocational course teachers have been absent.
We do not believe that prisoners are motivated to attend or that enough has been done to encourage better attendance in education.
Naloxone is a drug that can be given quickly to treat an opiate overdose. The target set by the drug and alcohol group (DAG) is for 30% of band 2 to band 5 operational grades to be trained in administering nasal Naloxone. This is the minimum percentage required for an establishment to have sufficient coverage of trained staff on site at any one time. At the time of writing the report, in July 2025, the prison has 267 operational members of staff between the band 2 and band 5 grades. Therefore, 81 staff members need to be trained to achieve the 30% minimum target; they currently only have 66. However, only 22 of these have signed the training checklist. Collecting the remaining 44 signatures is a priority in July as, without the signatures, they technically only have 22 trained staff members, which puts them significantly below target. With only 22 signed checklists, Brinsford sits at only 8%. Staff seem reluctant to sign the training register.
Officers show poor control over incidents by, for example, not clearing the area of other prisoners.
Body worn video camera use has increased throughout the year. However, there are times when they are not switched on. On average, they are switched on 55-60% of the time. The Board believes this should be greater.
Despite investments in CCTV, there are still some ‘blind spots’ and cameras that are too far away from the incident.
During the reporting year, the use of drones bringing in illicit paraphernalia increased, with prisoners removing windows from their frames to be able to reach packages.
There remains a large ingress of drugs, mobile phones and USBs.
Cell toilets and sinks are in poor condition, throughout the prison but particularly in the CSU. This is exacerbated by poor cleaning regimes.
The cells in the CSU are in particularly poor condition, especially the toilets and sinks but also the beds and the floors.
Shower facilities on some wings are of a very poor standard and refurbishment work has not been of a satisfactory standard. In particular, ventilation is poor, leading to a buildup of mould.
Faulty or damaged in-cell phones are also very slow to be dealt with because (BT) will only attend the site when there is a minimum of five repairs to be actioned. Consequently, some prisoners wait a disproportionate length of time for a repair.
There have been issues with rodent infestations across the year.
Prisoners have lost faith in the internal laundry service. Issues early in the reporting year resulted in lost or stolen items and, consequently, prisoners are reluctant to send items to the laundry, preferring to wash and dry them in cells.
Food service quality can be variable and portions insufficient. Food service has, on occasion, been observed to be poorly supervised by officers, which leads to discrepancies in portion size and items being held back.
There were three instances where a prisoner’s stay in the CSU exceeded 42 days (63 days; 56 days; and 47 days ongoing, at end of reporting year), the time limit allowed without external authorisation.
Access to radios is occasionally impacted by low stocks, as the wind-up and solar-charged models in use are not robust and are easily damaged. Replacement stock is costly, and orders often delayed.
The major problem for neurodiversity support is the lack of funding and purchasing; £1500 per annum is insufficient to purchase ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) coaching courses, training and resources.
Some enhanced prisoners have complained that they are unable to book the additional social visits they are entitled to due to lack of capacity in the visiting hall. This frustration is compounded when there is non-attendance by visitors who fail to cancel their booking, leaving spaces unused.
Recommendations
The Board is of the view there remains a problem in relocating prisoners with mental health problems to more suitable mental health facilities. All transfers to a secure mental health facility from HMP Brinsford continued to exceed the 28-day stipulated time frame. Will the Minister take steps to ensure that sufficient secure hospital places are available?
Government response
I share the Board’s concern about men who are acutely unwell waiting too long for specialist hospital care. The new Mental Health Act 2025 creates a statutory 28-day time limit for transfers from prison to secure mental health hospitals. A Mental Health and Justice Strategic Advisory Group, chaired by the National Medical Director for Mental Health and Neurodiversity, is overseeing delivery and reporting regularly to Ministers. Regionally, both Midlands Provider Collaboratives have strategic and operational action plans focused on bed capacity, clinical prioritisation, improved data and new delivery models. There are also fortnightly clinically led operational meetings that track individual cases until transfer. I expect these arrangements to translate into consistent compliance with the statutory time limit, and I will continue to ask for clear, published progress against that standard. The significant reforms of the Sentencing Act 2026, which received Royal Assent recently on 22 January 2026, will provide further options to the Courts and will help inform future requirements for the prison estate at a strategic level. Locally, I recognise the burden that delayed transfers place on staff in HMP/YOI Brinsford’s healthcare centre and on residential units. Senior leaders and healthcare partners are reviewing waiting lists together and escalating cases through the regional governance I have described. I am grateful to the staff who continue to support men compassionately while specialist beds are found.
Recommendation 2
The management of prisoner property, particularly on transfer between establishments, continues to cause many problems. A national policy and procedure has been in place for some time, but there is little or no improvement. When will the minister review the policy and ensure its implementation?
Government response
I recognise the frustration and anxiety caused when property goes missing. The Prisoner’s Property Policy Framework was revised and reissued on 17 November 2025, adding clearer guidance on sending excess property, handling laundry and completing cell clearance certificates, precisely the areas the Board has flagged as the most frequent points of failure. Senior leaders across the estate have been reminded of the essentials of sound property handling, including the importance of volumetric control so that what is within limits travels with the individual. Locally, HMP/YOI Brinsford has tightened processes at enhanced gate security and at reception, introduced streamlined clothing parcel arrangements and added weekend cover to issue property promptly. Encouragingly, your data show a reduction in property related applications to the Board compared with last year. We will keep the revised national framework under review, and I will expect the Governor and Prison Group Director to sustain and evidence further improvement.
Recommendation 3
We have noted in our two previous reports that the ‘new’ heating system is not up to standard. When will the Prison Service commission an urgent review to find a better way of heating and controlling the heat within the prison?
Government response
Heating system performance and temperature control A bid to replace heat exchangers across the site has been made and is in the investment pipeline. This sits alongside wider works being prioritised across the estate on a risk-based basis. The establishment will continue to make operational adjustments to mitigate extremes while the bid progresses.
Recommendation 4
From the Board’s continued observations, the education contract is still not fit for purpose. It has always proved very difficult to hold the provider to account and to ensure that the prison gets good education provision. Not enough is being done to motivate or encourage prisoners to attend regularly or consistently. When will a review be commissioned to look at the education services provided to ensure they better meet the needs of prisoners at HMP Brinsford?
Government response
Fitness of the education contract, motivation and attendance HMPPS is procuring a new Core Education contract for the West Midlands, scheduled to launch in September 2026. This contract will introduce a Governor commissioned curriculum tailored to the needs of HMP/YOI Brinsford’s population with consistent screening and assessment for functional skills, reading, English for Speakers of Other Languages and additional learning needs. Careers, Information and Guidance services have already been implemented and are delivered by the Growth Company supporting prisoners from reception through to release with induction, reviews, pre-release sessions, employer events and peer mentoring. Digital systems are being expanded to improve access to secure online content and to track progress more effectively. The Dynamic Purchasing System remains available to Governors to commission local, practical provision that meets the needs of their cohort. An evaluation and monitoring strategy is being developed to assess the impact of these changes on engagement and reoffending. In the meantime, the Governor continues to use local commissioning to provide vocational courses and practical learning opportunities that prisoners find motivating.
Recommendation 5
The overall condition of Brinsford is still very outdated and in a poor state of repair. Previous improvements and decoration were short-term solutions and completed to a poor standard. Brinsford still needs a great deal of investment to return it to an an acceptable standard. How - and when - will the Prison Service address this issue?
Government response
Condition of the prison and investment in infrastructure HMP/YOI Brinsford requires significant investment to bring accommodation and facilities up to an acceptable standard. A site wide fire safety project is in design and development and the national pipeline of works for HMP/YOI Brinsford includes upgrades to the building management system, replacement of the incoming water main and pipework, a site-wide closed circuit television upgrade, replacement of all old windows, remediation of V1 and V2 gates, heat-exchanger replacement and refurbishment of showers in Residential Units 2, 3 and 4. These proposals are underpinned by the condition surveys and will be prioritised against future capital budgets. While these major works progress, the prison continues to invest locally through the Clean, Rehabilitative, Enabling and Decent programme, which has improved cell standards and cleanliness and reduced graffiti through regular assurance checks.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Property during transfer | 1 | 11 |
| Property in establishment | 8 | 23 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 2
· Respect 2
· Activity 1
· Release 3
Individual at Brinsford · Homicide
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Other reports for Brinsford
Population 529
· Self-harm 400
· Concerns
Population 556
· Self-harm 333
· Concerns
· Self-harm 336
· Concerns
· Concerns
· Self-harm 344
· Concerns