Source · IMB Annual Report
Brinsford
AI-generated report summary HMP/YOI Brinsford, accommodating young men and Category C prisoners, demonstrated effective management during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a significant reduction in self-harm and assaults. Despite a highly restricted regime, prisoners were treated fairly, and healthcare provision was generally good. However, persistent issues, including delays in mental health transfers, an inadequate education contract, and poor property management, remain key concerns, many of which are long-standing.
Year: 2020
Published: 29 Jan 2021
Type: Prison · Cat YOI, Category C
Recommendations: 4
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 0 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 344 | 849 |
| Prisoner assaults | 322 | 419 |
| Assaults on staff | 28 | 56 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryBrinsford remains a safe prison, particularly during lockdown, with reduced levels of self-harm and violence. Prisoners have been treated fairly and humanely, appreciating additional benefits like extra telephone credit. Healthcare services are generally good, with staff commendable for their work with vulnerable patients and effective pandemic management. The chaplaincy team also contributes positively to the atmosphere.
Key concerns
The ongoing problem of relocating prisoners with mental health problems to more suitable treatment centres, an unacceptable concern highlighted in annual reports for several years.
The deficiencies of rehabilitative work and preparations for release have been the subject of frequent comment in recent annual reports.
There remain concerns that some difficult category B prisoners are spending long periods at Brinsford, despite local efforts to relocate them to a more suitable environment. This is often due to the reluctance of other establishments to take them. These difficult prisoners can spend a long time isolated in the CSU because of issues that render them unsuitable to mix with others on a normal regime. The Board believes that either the population management unit or the Prison Group Director’s office should accept responsibility for prioritising these transfers. This has been highlighted in the last three annual reports.
The ability to retain possession and control of prisoners’ property when transferring to the prison remains poor. At best, the control is inconsistent, and often frustrating to prisoners, who fail to get competent, accurate or even legible responses to their complaints via the complaints system.
Little has changed since last year, when the Board’s report said:
The education contract is not fit for purpose. Too many classes are cancelled and the number of courses on offer is much lower than Brinsford needs. The provider needs to be challenged and made to deliver what the residents need. Investment in education would have a positive effect on violence and self-harm, as residents would be occupied during the day and better qualified on release.
Based on rota visits and monitoring observations prior to the COVID-19 lockdown, and the withdrawal of education service provision by Novus during the lockdown, the Board now has to raise these same concerns.
The fabric of the prison is poor, and currently needs more investment in maintenance and refurbishment.
The number of incidents requiring the use of force remains high. Senior managers have recognised this and have set up regular meetings to review each case. The Board has observed (acknowledged by the prison) that there is a need to improve the quality of the paperwork for use of force incidents.
Access to drugs has continued to be a concern, with prisoners often one step ahead of security activity to prevent the influx of prohibited items.
The key worker programme introduced last year had a good start. However, the scheme’s success stuttered as time went on, and has almost disappeared during the pandemic regime. The Board considers it a priority for this programme to be resurrected as soon as possible.
Limited provision by the Probation Service, causing significant problems with sentence planning and risk assessment during the COVID-19 crisis.
The Board is disappointed that short offending behaviour courses or rolling programmes are not available in Brinsford. This means that sometimes prisoners are released without having attended a rehabilitation course, although these are provided within the community. This should be an essential process before release.
Approximately 26% of the population are remand prisoners at any given time. Remand prisoners do not fall within the scope of any services provided, so are not eligible for any offence-focused interventions or OMU services. They do not have a sentence plan.
It is worth noting that the number of ‘care leavers’ within the prison is around 25%. The Board considers that more support can and should be made available to help these individuals avoid the revolving door of release and return to prison in the future.
Recommendations
Can the minister provide a date for the introduction of a new information technology system worthy of the 21st century, which can replace the current inefficient and cumbersome paper-based systems in place?
Government response
While digital improvements are being explored, the nature of that work means that any digital changes are likely to take longer to develop.
Recommendation 2
What steps will the Prison Service take to review the relevant contracts to address these issues, to support the efforts of the local leadership team?
Government response
HMPPS take a very pro-active role in managing the Prison Education Framework (PEF) contract. The contract is designed around a hybrid model that acknowledges the role that Governors have in holding the provider to account locally whilst the HMPPS Contract Team can ensure contractual obligations are met both by the provider and the establishment. The PEF contracts have a range of supplier obligations plus quarterly performance payments linked to the quality of the teaching which require the provider to meet suitable levels of performance or face financial penalties. Service level 3, which is the Teacher Quality Management Plan (TQMP) requires Governors to sign off Novus performance on a quarterly basis. Monthly performance meetings with the use of the Curious Management Information System are used to monitor and challenge performance prior to sign off. During Contract Year 1 (April 2019 - March 2020) HMP/YOI Brinsford did not approve the TQMP for two of the four quarters. Since the introduction of the Notice to Improve, and continued monitoring of performance, the prison has approved all TQMPs for Contract Year 2.
Recommendation 3
As the COVID-19 restrictions are eased and education provision is restarted, what steps will the Prison Service take to ensure that the contract requires the provider to deliver meaningful and beneficial education to prisoners?
Government response
Turning to your repeated concerns about the education provider, as outlined in my response of 3 June 2020 a Notice to Improve for Lot 15 (the West Midlands lot, which includes HMP/YOI Brinsford) was formally communicated in May 2020, with the provider (Novus) producing an action plan to improve performance. This plan focuses on the quality and quantity of the Novus provision, with specific actions and targets for the recruitment and retention of staff, as well as the improvement of the quality of provision. These actions are reviewed both locally and regionally alongside the HMPPS National Quality and Contract Management Teams. Weekly meetings are held with Novus to discuss progress and all actions are scrutinised in detail. Monthly meetings are also chaired by the HMPPS Prison Group Director with attendance from the HMPPS Contract Management Team and Ministry of Justice (MoJ) Commercial colleagues, where there are further reviews of progress against the improvement plan. Due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, and with a further period of national lockdown, HMPPS will continue to work with Novus on the actions that are achievable despite local or national restrictions. The ongoing review of the action plan has had a positive impact on Novus’ recruitment activity, resulting in the four vacancies identified in May 2020, now all being filled. HMPPS will continue to monitor and push for improvements from the provider at both HMP/YOI Brinsford and in the overall West Midlands Lot to ensure learners receive the education and support they need. The prison’s Learning and Skills Manager is currently engaging in discussions with the local education manager and Novus Lot Manager about the curriculum for the new contract year. The majority of the courses being considered are orientated towards employment both within the prison and also on release or release on temporary licence. These courses reflect both labour market information and input from serving prisoners through a needs’ analysis. It is intended that the prison will offer a blended learning route that links education into prison-based academies, where prisoners will be able to gain both practical skills and the underlying knowledge. These academies will also then feed into paid employment within the prison and through partnerships being developed with New Futures Network, potentially into paid employment on release.
Recommendation 4
What changes to the curriculum will be introduced?
Government response
The prison’s Learning and Skills Manager is currently engaging in discussions with the local education manager and Novus Lot Manager about the curriculum for the new contract year. The majority of the courses being considered are orientated towards employment both within the prison and also on release or release on temporary licence. These courses reflect both labour market information and input from serving prisoners through a needs’ analysis. It is intended that the prison will offer a blended learning route that links education into prison-based academies, where prisoners will be able to gain both practical skills and the underlying knowledge. These academies will also then feed into paid employment within the prison and through partnerships being developed with New Futures Network, potentially into paid employment on release. The courses under review include barbering, window fitting, catering, landscaping/horticulture, Mentoring Level 2 and 3, carpentry, construction skills and multi-skills (plumbing, tiling, electrical). In addition, to ensure that all prisoners are able to access education, there will be some provision for in-cell study, supported by a structure of study groups and one-to-one tutor time. As mentioned above, existing prison work parties will also benefit from an outreach service for maths and English. All courses will be subject to robust quality management through lesson observations, learning walks and prisoner feedback. Closer links will be formed with the PE staff to build physical education into the curriculum and allow some joint enterprise to take place.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions | 2 | 11 |
| Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) | 2 | 1 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, IEP, sanctions | 1 | 6 |
| Equality | 0 | 4 |
| Finance, including pay, private monies, spends | 1 | 5 |
| Food and kitchens | 0 | 1 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 7 | 15 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions | 8 | 7 |
| Property during transfer or in another establishment or location | 5 | 12 |
| Property within this establishment | 8 | 8 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell | 1 | 8 |
| Sentence management including home detention curfew, release on temporary licence, parole, release dates, recategorisation | 10 | 14 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 9 | 15 |
| Transfers | 5 | 23 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 2
· Respect 2
· Activity 1
· Release 3
Individual at Brinsford · Homicide
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Individual at Brinsford · Self-inflicted
Other reports for Brinsford
Population 545
· Concerns
Population 529
· Self-harm 400
· Concerns
Population 556
· Self-harm 333
· Concerns
· Self-harm 336
· Concerns
· Concerns