Source · IMB Annual Report
Liverpool
Year: 2024
Published: 28 Jul 2025
Type: Prison · Cat B
Population: 830
Recommendations: 12
Key concerns
Positive findings
HMP Liverpool, a Category B reception prison, continued to improve in some areas under new leadership despite persistent staffing challenges. Concerns escalated regarding prisoner safety, including increased self-harm, violence, and use of force, alongside significant delays in mental health transfers and regime delivery. The prison also struggles with the entry of illicit items and maintenance issues with its Victorian infrastructure.
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 8 | 7 |
| Self-harm incidents | 557 | 400 |
| Use of force | 469 | 334 |
| Drug finds | 530 | — |
Positive findings
The Board notes the continued process of change and improvement under the new Governor, with positive progress in many areas. Relationships between staff and prisoners are generally good, with examples of cooperative activities and fundraising. The chaplaincy provides excellent multi-faith support, and prisoners give positive feedback. There was a reduction in internal outstanding complaints and a perceived improvement in property issues. Healthcare KPIs showed significant improvement in the latter half of the year, and prompt responses for mental health crises were observed. Work to support neurodiverse prisoners and substance misuse services by CGL were also praised.
Key concerns
Staffing
Repeated
The constant struggle to find staff resources to deliver the expected service, leading to frequent regime cancellations and poor delivery of key worker contact.
Safety
Increase in reported self-harm incidents, from 400 to 557 per year.
Safety
Increase in violence on both prisoners and staff, with peaks in July and August.
Safety
Increase in use of force (UoF) incidents from 334 in 2023 to 469 in 2024.
Safety
Use of body worn video cameras (BWVC) is still not comprehensive and the CCTV infrastructure is prone to failure, impacting monitoring of incidents.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Failure to go beyond minimum regime and leaving prisoners locked in cells for prolonged periods has been too frequent an occurrence in 2024, with only 35% of meaningful activity sessions delivered.
Equality/Diversity
Repeated
There remains a lack of accessible cells (two) for prisoners with disabilities.
Mental Health
Repeated
Inhumane length of time prisoners with severe mental health issues are kept in the Care and Separation Unit (CSU) awaiting transfer to appropriate hospital beds.
Complaints/Property
Repeated
Outstanding prisoner complaints from other establishments remain a persistent concern to the Board, causing frustration and unresolved issues.
Other
Repeated
Prisoners’ property going missing during transfer between establishments and within the establishment is a frequent cause of frustration, despite updated policies.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
The prison failed to achieve targets for key worker sessions, even the reduced target set for ‘amber red’ status.
Education/Purposeful Activity
Repeated
Delays in systems to allocate prisoners to work or education, and failure to achieve targets for education and vocational training provision.
Resettlement/Release
The number of unemployed prisoners climbed to 35% by December, and 18% of released prisoners still have no fixed abode on the first night.
Substance Misuse
Repeated
Illicit items (drugs, mobile phones and weapons) continue to be found in significant quantities, indicating a worsening problem and persistent routes of contraband into the prison.
Estate/Conditions
Refurbishment of G wing and new workshops were abandoned due to the collapse of the main contractor, leading to 115 cells and 230 bedspaces being unavailable and an uncertain completion timescale.
Estate/Conditions
Slow response times from the maintenance contractor and frequent breakdowns of electro-mechanical services and IT infrastructure, impacting security, safety, and decency of accommodation.
Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Addressee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Despite assurances in response to concerns raised last year, the delay in relocating prisoners with severe mental health issues continues. When does the minister expect this to change?
Repeated
Response
As noted in your report, the collapse of the construction contractor in summer 2024 delayed the completion of G Wing and the new workshops. A bid has now been submitted for the external refurbishment of Workshops 1, 2, 5, 6 and 7. All requests are considered carefully, noting that demands for maintenance across the estate exceed available funding. HMPPS prioritises works based on risk to life, capacity and decency. The Governor has confirmed that, unfortunately, the pause in construction has impacted the delivery of purposeful activity given the workshops were intended to support a range of rehabilitative functions. In the interim, the prison has increased part-time workspaces by reducing full-time allocations, ensuring sufficient activity for the current population. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 1 | When does the prison service expect to complete both the refurbishment of G wing, which is currently not available for use and the new workshops, that were abandoned with the collapse of ISG, the construction contractor in the summer of 2024? | HMPPS | |
| 1 | Does the Governor have any target date of being able to provide keyworker sessions as set out in the Manage Custodial Sentence Policy Framework (an average of 45 minutes per prisoner per week)? | Governor / Director | |
| 2 |
Staff absence is still an issue at HMP Liverpool, affecting daily staffing levels and resulting in frequent regime cancellations for prisoners. Does HMPPS accept that measures taken to date have been ineffective and that it needs a different approach?
Repeated
Response
Staff absence continues to present operational challenges. HMP Liverpool has appointed a senior manager as Attendance Lead, supported by weekly attendance management meetings involving Human Resources Business Partners and Human Resources Performance Managers. The first line managers have now completed the necessary and essential training to improve confidence and consistency in managing attendance. The site has applied for Human Resources Technical Consultancy support to assist with grievance and performance management and requested a dedicated case manager to further strengthen attendance processes. A climate assessment is also underway, with findings to inform the local people plan and business strategy. Despite improvements earlier in the year, absence rates remain high. Average Working Days Lost (AWDL) decreased month-on-month until September 2024, before rising in March 2025. As of June, AWDL had reduced but there were high staff absences in August. The Governor continues to monitor long-term cases and is ensuring Formal Health and Attendance Review Meetings to support resolution. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 2 | What local actions will the governor consider for improving staff attendance, which is seen as a root cause of the poorest service delivery areas? Repeated | Governor / Director | |
| 3 |
The Prison Service is aware of the inhumane length of time some prisoners have been in the CSU at HMP Liverpool whilst waiting for transfer to an appropriate mental health establishment. In the absence of any change will the Prison Service seek to bring additional resources to the site?
Repeated
Response
HMP Liverpool is staffed to the levels set for a Category B local prison and the CSU is managed appropriately. Prisoners with severe mental illness are occasionally located in the CSU when safety risks prevent placement on residential or healthcare units. Separate regimes are provided where possible and individuals are regularly seen by the Integrated Mental Health Team. NHS England continues to work with wider healthcare systems to secure timely placements. A temporary mental health team on site supports short-term risk management planning. While this is not a long-term solution, it reflects a collaborative approach to ensuring appropriate care. In the past year,16 patients were transferred, six of whom were moved within the recommended 28-day timeframe. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 3 | The use of body worn video cameras is a potential benefit for staff and prisoners alike. Will the prison enforce the mandatory wearing of this equipment, as required by the National Policy Framework? | Governor / Director | |
| 4 |
Illicit items (drugs, mobile phones and weapons) continue to be found in significant quantities. This leads to significant disruption within the prison and potentially fails to keep the public safe. Will the Prison Service set a timescale for implementing any aspect of the following, as set out in its response to the 2023 annual report: ‘HMPPS are exploring options to mitigate this growing risk [drones], including technological deployments and resourcing to maximise their impact, and work closely across government to assess the effectiveness in a rapidly changing technological landscape’?
Repeated
Response
HMP Liverpool is working in close partnership with Merseyside Police, Probation Services, Serious and Organised Crime Team (SOCT), North West Regional Organised Crime Unit (NWROCU) and the National Drone Team to address the threat of illicit items, particularly those linked to drone-based conveyance. A quarterly multi-agency problem-solving forum and monthly drone-specific meetings have led to joint operations and community arrests. Within the prison, known drone-linked individuals are proactively targeted through intelligence-led searches. Over the past 12 months, 106 drone sightings were recorded, with 30 parcels successfully intercepted. Suspected areas and cells are isolated and searched at the earliest opportunity. Physical security enhancements have been made to windows and a funding bid has been submitted to install protective netting in high-risk areas. Nationally, HMPPS is investing over £40 million in physical security across 34 prisons, including anti-drone measures at 15 priority sites. A trial of anti-drone wire solutions is underway in the Long-Term High Security Estate (LTHSE). HMP Liverpool continues to receive support through vulnerability assessments, contingency planning and guidance. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 5 |
Prisoners are still not receiving responses to complaints from other establishments within the timeframes specified in Prison Service policies. Will the Prison Service reconsider its approach to policing the implementation of this policy? In addition, does the Prison Group Director (PGD) have an option of imposing financial sanctions when those prisons that fail to respond are privately run?
Repeated
Response
The Prisoner Complaints Policy Framework (PCPF) mandates that monitoring data be collected locally to drive performance and identify weaknesses. Where agreement cannot be reached between establishments, complaints must be escalated to the relevant Prison Group Director (PGD) or Director’s line manager. HMP Liverpool currently has no outstanding complaints from other prisons. The site has implemented a robust escalation process whereby unresolved complaints are referred via the Deputy Governor to the relevant counterpart. There has been no need to escalate beyond this level in recent months. Privately managed prisons are also required to meet response timelines, monitored by contract management teams. While most contracts do not include financial penalties for late responses, commercial levers may be used to improve performance where serious concerns arise. The Performance, Assurance and Risk group in HMPPS provides second-line assurance through audits and surveys, but compliance with complaints policy is monitored locally within operational reporting lines. |
HMPPS | Noted |
| 6 |
Prisoners’ property during transfers is still going missing and is not managed effectively by the Prison Service, despite the updated Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework. The Board has raised this issue with the Prison Service for several years through our annual reports. What action will the Prison Service take to eliminate prisoners’ property being lost or mislaid between transfers, as previous approaches have not eliminated the problem?
Repeated
Response
HMPPS continues to give attention to the handling of prisoner’s property as we recognise that this continues to be an issue. Over the past year, only one complaint regarding lost property from HMP Liverpool was submitted to the contractor. If volumetric limits are exceeded and there is insufficient space on the escort vehicle, responsibility for transferring remaining items rests with the sending prison. Locally, HMP Liverpool conducts cell clearances promptly and uses body-worn video to record property. Where prisoners are restrained, staff are encouraged to pack belongings in their presence. Property held in reception is stored securely and sent to the receiving establishment by courier or internal transport. Prisoners may also receive property during visits and within their first month at the establishment. The prison responds to exceptional circumstances on a case-by-case basis. Nationally, HMPPS is reviewing thematic reports and consulting with prisons to improve compliance and reduce loss. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 7 |
Given the age and nature of HMP Liverpool, will the Prison Service improve the maintenance response times, both planned and delivered, to ensure the prison provides consistently decent and safe accommodation? In addressing this issue, will the service consider that employing a dedicated responsive maintenance manager could be self-financing by eliminating waste and over charging, and making prison operations more efficient?
Response
Amey UK is the facilities management provider for HMP Liverpool. A structured hierarchy is in place to oversee service delivery, including the Area Property Operations Manager (APOM), Regional Property Operations Manager and Head of Property Operations, the APOM post, previously vacant, has now been filled. Performance is managed through weekly site meetings and monthly Key Performance Indicator (KPI) reviews. Where service failures occur, a Performance Improvement Plan is implemented, and contractual penalties may apply. KPIs cover 16 areas, including reactive maintenance, planned preventative maintenance, health and safety and stock management. Value for money is ensured through fixed-rate contracts, quote comparisons and scrutiny by property services and the Ministry of Justice Commercial team. Additional works above £750 require APOM approval and those exceeding £10,000 require three quotes. Monthly KPI moderation ensures transparency and accountability. Recent investment includes a flooring replacement project in the Weights Room and a feasibility study for window grilles on the F Wing. All future proposals will be informed by recent condition surveys, which assessed infrastructure across the estate. A refresh team has been introduced to improve decency across the site, although facilities management remains a concern. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 8 |
Will the Prison Service invest in resetting the CCTV equipment to a usable monitoring performance standard and maintain it at this level?
Response
The CCTV system at HMP Liverpool is now fully operational following sustained investment of over £200,000 in the past two years. Monthly site-wide health checks are conducted and shared with the APOM. Amey has appointed a mobile CCTV expert to support ongoing servicing and repairs. Sub-contractor engagement has been strengthened to ensure timely resolution of issues. The system is now functioning as expected and appropriate mechanisms are in place to maintain it at a usable monitoring standard. If issues arise, they are resolved promptly and that the system is now reliable for operational use. |
HMPPS | Implemented |
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Activity and education | 2 | 12 |
| Adjudication and incentives | 12 | 16 |
| Allegations against staff | 6 | 9 |
| Catering | 3 | 5 |
| Chaplaincy | 0 | 1 |
| Discrimination | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs and alcohol | 0 | 0 |
| Foreign Nationals | 1 | 0 |
| Healthcare | 66 | 97 |
| Lifer and IPP issues | 1 | 1 |
| Property | 32 | 44 |
| Security, intelligence and risk management | 14 | 12 |
| Sentence management and release | 15 | 13 |
| Staffing | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 210 | 250 |
| Visits | 10 | 12 |
| Work and pay | 2 | 2 |
Related inspections & investigations
11 Aug 2025
HMIP · Unannounced
16 Dec 2016
PFD
Mark Lilliott · State Custody related deaths; Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Other reports for Liverpool
Report details
- Establishment
- Liverpool
- Type
- Prison · Cat B
- Report year
- 2024
- Published
- 28 July 2025
- Responsible body
- HMP Liverpool
- Recommendations
- 12
- MoJ rating (2024/25)
- 2 — Concern
Population
| Population | 830 |
| Operational capacity | 800 |
Service providers
Education
Novus
Family Support
Partners of Prisoners (POPs)
Healthcare
Spectrum Healthcare
Healthcare Commissioning
NHS England North West Health and Justice Group
Hospitality Training
Marston’s Brewery
Listener Scheme
Samaritans
Mental Health Services
Merseycare
Substance Misuse (commissioner)
NHS England Health and Justice
Substance Misuse (sub-contractor)
Change, Grow, Live (CGL)