Safety
There is still a level of violence, which places Swaleside at the head of its comparator group, so no-one should become complacent as this level of violence is still unacceptable.
Estate/Conditions
It has become increasingly apparent that a number of concerns from residents stem directly from the poor performance of GFSL in executing their tasks in terms of poor condition, maintenance or routine repairs.
Food/Catering
Repeated
The Board still deems it essential that the requirement to support HMP Standford Hill residents is removed from Swaleside. The Board reiterates this year that the kitchen at Swaleside was originally designed to cater for about 650 residents, and was upgraded in its early years to allow for some expansion. However, a further problem arises in having to cater additionally for residents at HMP Standford Hill, bringing the total number of meals prepared to around 3000 daily. The Board have recommended that this added work should be removed from Swaleside, which we repeat.
Education/Purposeful Activity
As with many other facilities within the prison, workshop sizes were designed to cater for around half of the current operational capacity. This fact, together with the lack of current work in some shops, low allocation numbers and low attendance numbers, means that too many residents do not have meaningful employment, and therefore remain unoccupied and inadequately prepared for release. This is not reflective of a training prison.
Equality/Diversity
The amount of vocational training is woeful, particularly for men convicted of sexual offences (MCOSO) and vulnerable residents, which makes one cynical about the definition of ‘Category B Trainer’.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
It is of concern that, despite the apparent unemployment around the prison population, there is an almost daily failure to meet the required allocation to workshops and education. It seems to the Board that there is a failure to apply the discipline necessary to ensure that residents are required to engage in employment or education for their own benefit
Equality/Diversity
The lack of meaningful and rewarding work, generally, and in particular for B and H wing residents shows a real level of inequality.
Estate/Conditions
Hygiene/cleanliness around the prison leaves a lot to be desired. The showers on some wings remain well below sanitary standards, as do serveries and self-cook areas. Wing window cages are filling up with litter and the areas around the outside of some wings are regularly smothered with rubbish thrown from windows – as this includes a lot of waste food products, it only helps to worsen the rat problem.
Safety
The apparent easy acquisition of mobile phones and weapons by some residents, not only increases violence and causes problems for others, but may also exacerbate debt problems and cause self-harm and suicide attempts, and is also the root cause of residents electing to stay behind their doors.
Resettlement/Release
Importantly, residents have not always been able to be transferred to their local resettlement prison within about 12 weeks of their release date as intended.
Safety
One aspect that has been detrimental to the safe running of the prison has been the number of adjudications not proceeded with. At one point (in February 2020) this reached 44% of all adjudications in the rolling year, as opposed to a national average of 4%.
Healthcare
There is an unacceptable number of cancelled outside hospital appointments which, apart from the distress that it causes patients, places a burden on the public purse and wastes NHS time which could usefully be used for other patients.
Healthcare
The lack of in-cell telephony in the inpatients department (IPD) and in some cells in the CSRU needs to be addressed.
Resettlement/Release
Nevertheless, those directly released deserve to have the appropriate help to achieve similar employment and accommodation opportunities afforded to those residents released from resettlement prisons. This does not happen.