Source · IMB Annual Report

Eastwood Park

AI-generated report summary This IMB annual report for HMP/YOI Eastwood Park for the year ending October 2020 highlights the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on prison operations and monitoring. While staff efforts and communication were generally commendable, concerns persist regarding rising self-harm incidents, ongoing violence towards staff, and the continuous flow of illicit substances. The Board remains particularly concerned about the prolonged segregation of a brain-injured prisoner and the lack of appropriate secure specialist facilities for women with complex needs.

Year: 2020 Published: 23 Feb 2021 Type: Prison · Cat Female Closed Local Prison, YOI Population: 343 Recommendations: 9 Key concerns Positive findings

Safety statistics

Incidents during reporting year
IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody2
Use of force223303

Positive findings

AI-generated summary
The HMIP inspection report focusing on the COVID-19 pandemic was broadly positive, with six out of seven mentions of good practice relating to Eastwood Park. The Board observed staff working in highly professional and caring ways, and noted that prisoners' health needs were generally well met with services adapting well to COVID-19 challenges. The reception area was clean and bright, with new prisoners speaking positively about their initial experiences. There was a downward trend in overall violence, and significant improvements in cleaning standards and a reduction in outstanding minor maintenance jobs. The efforts by catering staff were outstanding, maintaining a full menu throughout the crisis. Communication between Governor/staff and prisoners during the COVID-19 crisis was particularly good. The prison was proactive in supporting prisoners potentially affected by the Black Lives Matter movement, and the chaplaincy's pastoral presence was highly valued. The quality of the complaints procedure received recognition from HMIP, and staff made excellent efforts to provide basic opaque bags for prisoners' chattels upon release.

Key concerns

14 items
Safety Levels of self-harm have risen, despite a reduced prison population. Source wording under review
Safety The Board remained concerned about the levels of violence towards staff.
Substance Misuse There continued to be an inflow of illicit substances into the prison.
Mental Health Repeated The plight of a brain-injured prisoner who has been segregated for well over two years and has, in effect, been in solitary confinement for this period, with little long-term progress.
Healthcare Waiting times for the dentist increased as a result of the COVID-19 restrictions and the reduction in the service being provided. Prisoners used the telephony service for triage, and the dental team was responsive in providing the appropriate treatments.
Mental Health The rise in the number of women being sent to prison for their own safety owing to mental health issues, despite prisons not being equipped to deal with such complexity.
Resettlement/Release Prior to the COVID-19 crisis, the Board carried out a monitoring exercise as part of a national project. The findings on resettlement were of concern and showed that there were still significant gaps in provision. Prisoners continued to be released without suitable housing, and where work had taken place within the prison, it was often undermined by the lack of support in the community.
Regime/Time Out of Cell Education, work opportunities and offending behaviour interventions were less available as a result of the impact of lockdown.
Equality/Diversity Repeated The Board remains firmly of the opinion that, while specialist establishments are available for men who have brain injuries, there are no secure units for women with similar injuries. This is discriminatory and therefore unlawful. We have great concern about the length of time that it is taking to get the prisoner transferred to accommodation more suited to her needs.
Other Differences in sentencing practice with the Sentencing Council appear to show that a prison sentence is partly determined by postcode, raising concerns about the delivery of justice.
Estate/Conditions Replacement windows and fire doors were manufactured by prison industries in 2018 and 2020, respectively, and then taken into store while a separate bid was made to determine if funding for installation was available. It was difficult to understand how HMPPS could deliver best value by funding the manufacture, delivery and storage of these badly needed replacement windows and fire doors but then refuse to provide funding to install them.
Estate/Conditions The remote and opaque method of deciding which maintenance works bids will receive funding.
Equality/Diversity The small number of discrimination incident report forms (DIRFs) being submitted, which may indicate underreporting.
Estate/Conditions The poor suitability of mattresses, especially for older prisoners and those with health needs.

Recommendations

9 items · 4 repeated

Recommendation 1

Addressee: Ministry of Justice

In her reply to our previous annual report, the minister stated that the new offender management unit (activities centre) building remained a priority project, and that (subject to caveats) work on it was likely to start by the first quarter of 2021. Is this still the expectation?

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
With regard to the project to install a new Offender Management Unit at HMP/YOI Eastwood Park, this should have started before March but due to unforeseen issues in the contract tendering this has been delayed. The project will, however, commence in the 2021/2022 financial year and the Governor will keep you updated on progress.

Recorded status: In progress

Topic: Estate

Recommendation 2

Addressee: Ministry of Justice

The IMB at Eastwood Park has raised concerns with the minister about a prisoner with an acquired brain injury who had been segregated in HMP Downview and HMP/YOI Eastwood Park for 827 days up to the end of this reporting period. While we understand that normal location is not a possible alternative in her case, because of her behaviour, is it acceptable to provide secure specialist establishments for men with brain injuries and highly complex needs but none for women?

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
I fully understand that Board’s concerns about the long-term segregation of .
Minister Frazer wrote to you on 17 February regarding the individual’s circumstances and
providing assurances that appropriate action has and continues to be taken to enable her complex needs
to be met. I have received your further letter of 26 March on this matter and a response will be sent in due
course. I also understand that the Board is receiving regular updates through attendance at the local
multi-disciplinary meetings about the individual’s circumstances.
In terms of adult secure Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) services, these are more specialised secure services
and currently apply to males only as the number of females requiring this service is extremely small.
Where a female patient requires this type of service, they would access a female adult secure service
(relevant to the level of security they require based on the risk they present) and an appropriate package
of care from a specialist team with expertise in ABI would be put in place to support the placement, taking
into consideration individual, clinically assessed need. As with all adult secure services commissioned
capacity will be kept under review taking into consideration demand, however, ongoing indicative
numbers at this time would suggest that the approach described above would continue to be the favoured
option due to the very low numbers of women who require adult secure ABI services.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons and HM Inspectorate of Probation, with support from HM Inspectorate of
Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services, have been asked by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to conduct
an independent evidence review on neurodiversity in the criminal justice system (CJS). The review is part
of MoJ’s commitment that everyone who encounters the CJS is treated fairly, including people with
neurodiverse conditions. The findings will help the MoJ to develop effective policy to improve awareness
of neurodiversity in the CJS. There are four strands to the work: a call for evidence; a series of round-
table events; consultation with practitioners; and feedback from those involved in the CJS. A report of the
findings is due to be published in summer 2021.

Recorded status: Noted

Topic: Mental Health

Recommendation 3

Addressee: Ministry of Justice

In her reply to our previous annual report, the minister stated that a funding commitment had been made to develop the first residential women’s centre. Has this project progressed, and when does the minister think there will be an impact on the prison population?

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
Further to Minister Frazer’s response of 29 May 2020 to the Board’s last annual report up to £800,000
seed funding has been allocated for preparations to establish the first pilot Residential Women’s Centre in
Wales, subject to securing further funding. The Centre will offer an alternative to short prison sentences
by providing safe accommodation for vulnerable women with complex needs who would otherwise receive
short custodial sentences. No decisions have been made on the location in Wales, but HM Prison and
Probation Service (HMPPS) will work with the Welsh Government and delivery partners in Wales to
ensure the location is appropriate.

Recorded status: In progress

Topic: Resettlement

Recommendation 4

Addressee: Ministry of Justice

Will the minister address the differences in sentencing practice with the Sentencing Council as they appear to show that a prison sentence is partly determined by postcode?

Source text verified

Government response
Your report indicates that there are differences in sentencing practice based on postcode. Sentencing is a
matter for our independent courts, but it is important to recognise that imprisonment rates in any given
area will not just be a result of sentencing practice; account must be taken of factors such as differences
in crime rates, types of crimes committed, police numbers and successful prosecutions. The Sentencing
Council for England and Wales aims to promote greater transparency and consistency in sentencing,
while maintaining the independence of the judiciary. The Council issues guidelines on sentencing, which
the courts must follow unless it is in the interests of justice not to do so.

Recorded status: Noted

Topic: Other

Recommendation 5

Addressee: HMPPS

In response to our previous report, we were advised by the minister that the prison group director for the women’s estate had contacted NHS England about co-commissioning a national needs assessment to improve the services for women with mental and physical health issues. Has this progressed?

Repeated Source text verified

Government response
The National Women’s Prisons Health and Social Care Review (Women’s Review) has been jointly
commissioned by NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSE/I) and HMPPS. Its purpose is to improve
health and well-being outcomes for women in prison and upon their release, to reduce health inequalities
and ensure equity of access to the full range of health and social care services across the Women’s
Estate. It will achieve this through a better understanding of the current ability of, and challenges faced by
the Women’s Estate and prison health and social care services in delivering high quality care, treatment
and support of women in prison in England. One of the key lines of enquiry is to undertake a review of the
needs analysis of all 12 women’s prisons, identifying needs across the population to guide
commissioning. The Health Review is due to formally report back in December 2021 but will also be
taking certain recommendations forward prior to that date where there is the opportunity to do so.

Recorded status: In progress

Topic: Healthcare

Recommendation 6

Addressee: HMPPS

Is it considered to be best value for Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) to fund the manufacture of urgently needed replacement windows and fire doors by prison industries in 2018 and 2020, respectively, and then deliver and take them into store at Leyhill and Eastwood Park prisons, only subsequently to decline funding to install them?

Source text verified

Government response
Where windows have been identified as requiring replacement either due to damage or being at the end
of their life cycle, these would either be dealt with on an individual basis using local Prison Maintenance
Group funding, or if several windows are required, this would be submitted as a bid for funds. Whilst
Prison Industries can provide replacement windows free of charge, funding is still required for the
installation of the windows and this would be based on risk. It is acknowledged that Prison Industries were
requested to produce windows for HMP/YOI Eastwood Park. As it is not unusual for orders to take until the
following financial year to be fulfilled, funding for installation is now sought once the product has been
delivered. Maintenance funding is limited and must be based on risk. At the present time there are other
works considered to be of a greater priority for the current available funding for the prison. The windows
are therefore being held in storage at HMP Leyhill until funding becomes available for their installation. It is
also recognised that a full fire door assessment needs to be undertaken to establish the extent of the work
required. Whilst the local prison Health and Safety (H&S) Team has initially undertaken a survey, Gov
Facility Services Ltd (GSFL) has recently appointed a member of staff who is qualified to assess fire doors
and they will be working with the H&S Team to conclude this work.

Recorded status: Noted

Topic: Estate

Recommendation 7

Addressee: HMPPS

Due to the remote and opaque method of deciding which maintenance works bids will receive funding, can HMPPS be more open about how such decisions were arrived at?

Source text verified

Government response
The general process for local funding allocation is for the Service Delivery Manager, in conjunction with
the Regional Estates Manager and GFSL Site Manager, to discuss concerns on site which can be
rectified with local project works under £150 thousand. This is based on risk, for example the loss of
accommodation attributed to a leaking roof.

Recorded status: Noted

Topic: Estate

Recommendation 8

Addressee: Governor / Director

Will the Governor look into the reasons for the small number of discrimination incident report forms (DIRFs) being submitted?

Source text verified

Recorded status:

Topic: Equality

Recommendation 9

Addressee: Governor / Director

Will the Governor review the suitability of mattresses, especially for older prisoners and those with health needs?

Source text verified

Recorded status:

Topic: Accommodation

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation (including transfers) 41 38
Food 7 13
Healthcare (including mental health and dentistry) 40 46
Learning and skills and purposeful activity 4 6
Legal (including complaints/adjudications) 17 21
Other 16 11
Property 31 79
Staff/prisoner relationships (including bullying) 41 43
Total 197 257

Related inspections & investigations

4 Sep 2023 HMIP · IRP
17 Oct 2022 HMIP · Unannounced
PPO fatal incident Clare Dupree · Other non-natural
PPO fatal incident Daniella Sawyer
PPO fatal incident Taylor Atkinson · Self-inflicted
PPO fatal incident Shannon Woodhall
PPO fatal incident Siobhan Osborne
4 Dec 2024 PFD Kayleigh Melhuish · State Custody related deaths | Suicide (from 2015) | Mental Health related deaths

Other reports for Eastwood Park

2025 Published 18 Mar 2026 Population 351 · Self-harm 4,479 · Concerns
2024 Published 21 Mar 2025 Population 366 · Self-harm 4,204 · Concerns
2023 Published 14 Mar 2024 Population 387 · Concerns
2022 Published 10 Mar 2023 Population 246 · Concerns
2021 Published 12 Mar 2022 Population 370 · Concerns