Source · IMB Annual Report
Onley
AI-generated report summary HMP Onley, a Category C prison, operated under pandemic restrictions for the reporting year ending March 2022, with an average population of 650. Despite staff shortages and challenges in regime delivery, the prison maintained stability and reported no deaths in custody. Key concerns highlighted include persistent delays in prisoner transfers, insufficient access to offending behaviour programmes, ongoing issues with property management, and a need for improved mental health support and estate maintenance. The Board also noted challenges with food provision and medication access.
Year: 2022
Published: 26 Jul 2022
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 650
Recommendations: 9
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 0 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 227 | 182 |
| ACCT cases opened | 188 | 96 |
| Prisoner assaults | 47 | 49 |
| Assaults on staff | 61 | 70 |
| Use of force | 334 | 319 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board commended the Governor and SMT for their professionalism in implementing Covid-19 mitigation measures and managing the prison calmly despite staff shortages. Enhanced security measures, including improved searching and drone alerts, were welcomed. Improvements were noted in cell bell response times and the removal of razor blades to reduce self-harm. Positive staff-prisoner relationships, the establishment of a drug recovery unit, and plans for education provision development were also highlighted. All education vacancies were filled by January 2022, and the prison gained a new contract with WasteCare.
Key concerns
In last year’s annual report, the Board stated that there was a pressing need for increased capacity in category D (open) prisons. This situation still remains and there were a significant number of ‘cat D’ prisoners at HMP Onley throughout the reporting year.
The shortage of officers and probation staff needs to be addressed. Recruitment and retention of staffing is an ongoing issue at HMP Onley. Can serious consideration be given to adding HMP Onley to the enhanced payment scheme? Quality and dedicated staff are leaving, and there are difficulties in recruiting staff, due to competitive salaries within the local area.
Delays in moving non-category C prisoners from HMP Onley, specifically C to B re-categorised prisoners often remaining in segregation for significant periods, and C to D re-categorised prisoners waiting too long for open conditions due to lack of accommodation.
Source wording under review
The Board has serious concerns over the lack of access to programmes. This leads to a prisoner’s inability to reduce their risk of reoffending and progress, and significantly impacts on their ability to move to a category D establishment.
The management of prisoner property remains a significant problem. There are often long delays in property being received from the sending prison even after the complaints process has been followed. If more resources were available to investigate missing property, prisoner frustration levels may be reduced.
The Board in previous reports has mentioned the poor state of the windows in the older parts of the prison. Can Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) please advise when this essential work will be carried out, as we are of the opinion this has a detrimental effect on decency standards and needs addressing as a priority.
The Board wishes to be advised when the enhanced gate security (EGS) bag scanner will arrive on site and be operational. This essential equipment this has been awaited since September 2021.
The Board is of the opinion there would be considerable benefit in finding a way to integrate the reporting of complaints to healthcare with general prison complaints providing confidentiality is maintained. This would provide a more comprehensive overview of prisoner concerns across the establishment.
It is vital that the purpose of HMP Onley, as a training and resettlement prison, retains priority. More workshops and instructors need to become involved with the prison to support successful resettlement.
During the reporting year, the Board was very concerned regarding the response time to prisoner cell bells. On most wings there were instances when response times to cell bells exceeded five minutes. There were a few occasions when it took 30 minutes or more to answer a cell bell. This was verified by the analysis summary report documented in the safety meeting minutes dated 28 October 2021. Response times are monitored daily by the wing custodial managers who highlight factors contributing to cell bells taking longer than five minutes to be answered. This information is fed back to the residential governors. The Board is pleased to be informed that cell bell response times are improving. The Board will continue to closely monitor cell bell response times.
The Board received complaints during the hot summer periods that some cells were unbearably hot and stuffy. Poor cell ventilation due to the Perspex windows, a poorly regulated heating system and hot water running through the pipes during the night were the main factors. Prison staff responded and the heating was subsequently turned off at night to allow the cells to cool down.
Recruiting prisoners to work in the kitchen was difficult and led to staff shortages and some complaints about food quality. Mouldy food and small meal portions were examples provided to the Board. Meals were also reported to arrive at times different to that advertised and to what was ordered from the menu. Some prisoners complained that an inappropriate substitute meal was provided on occasions. The Board understands that some food-related complaints were due to supplier issues. The situation could have been resolved by providing advance warning of changes to the menu. It is important that appropriate substitute meals, that meet dietary needs, are provided and where possible food preferences are met. A revised menu sheet containing foods that reflect cultural events was launched during the reporting year. Some prisoners cook food in their cell kettle which is not desirable. There are no wing cooking facilities or microwaves. Tinned food and packet rice are examples of food items available to purchase from the canteen. The Board has brought this to the attention of the head of business assurance.
Prisoners with complex mental health needs being held in the CSU for long periods due to a lack of secure mental health accommodation for transfers.
During the months of July, August and September, there were 368 charged adjudications. Of these, 189 (51%) involved White men, which is disproportionate compared to the White prison population (33%). Of the 189 charged, 116 (61%) were proven. It was identified that a specific group of White men were responsible for this disproportionality. Fifteen White men were responsible for 85 charged adjudications. In general terms, no other disproportionality was identified although age and disability were close to within range. The Board will continue to closely monitor.
The dispensing hatch on the main prison corridor is open only between 8am and 9.30am and 3.45pm and 5.30pm. This means night medication is not received at a clinically appropriate time. The Board is informed this is due to staff shift patterns. Prisoners who fail to report to the medicines hatch are promptly identified and their medication is subsequently reviewed by either healthcare or the mental health care team in conversation with the prisoner.
There are, however, a number of prisoners in dual occupancy cells that have no secure medicines storage facility. This issue was identified in Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) inspection in 2019 and is a concern of the Board. We are aware that Mirtazapine has been found on occasions in the possession of prisoners not prescribed this medication.
There is no professional counselling service at HMP Onley. Counselling techniques and skills are incorporated into many therapeutic and psychological interventions. The psychiatrist, chaplaincy, Listeners and Samaritans offer valuable support. The chaplaincy and the MHCT both identify, however, that there is a need for a ‘professional’ counselling service and talking therapies to improve mental health and emotional wellbeing outcomes.
There were 23 prisoners on the waiting list for the TSP and 22 for the Resolve programme in February 2022. The backlog of prisoners waiting for a suitability assessment was 86. The Board is concerned that the number of prisoners waiting to attend an intervention course will affect their progression towards gaining category D status.
Recommendations
There is a pressing need for increased capacity in Category D (open) prisons, as there were a significant number of ‘cat D’ prisoners at HMP Onley throughout the reporting year.
Government response
I note the Board’s continued concerns about category D (open prison) spaces. HM Prisons and Probation Service (HMPPS) recognises the high demand for category D places for adult males has resulted in many of these prisoners being held in closed conditions and how this affects their access to services such as release on temporary license (ROTL). Further to last year’s response, I can confirm that we intend to deliver 660 additional open prison places through the expansion of the category D estate. These expansions will be delivered through adding one or two 60-bed units at five existing category D prisons. They are HMPs Ford (120 places), Hatfield (60 places), Leyhill (120 places), Springhill (120 places), Standford Hill (120 places) and Sudbury (120 places). All sites were carefully selected based on demand and utilising relevant information. At HMP Onley, I understand that since January 2022 there has been an improvement in the prison’s ability to move prisoners to open conditions once assessed as suitable.
Recommendation 2
The shortage of officers and probation staff needs to be addressed. Recruitment and retention of staffing is an ongoing issue at HMP Onley. Can serious consideration be given to adding HMP Onley to the enhanced payment scheme? Quality and dedicated staff are leaving, and there are difficulties in recruiting staff, due to competitive salaries within the local area.
Government response
Turning to recruitment and retention of prison officers and probation staff, there is no defined enhanced payments scheme that covers both prisons and probation. Market Supplements are currently in place for Band 3 Prison Officers and Band 2 Officer Support Grades (OSGs) in some prisons where recruitment and retention is most challenging. Decisions around adding prisons to the suite of those receiving Market Supplements is subject to the approval of HM Treasury, and the bar for obtaining such approvals is set high. HMPPS has been challenged by both HM Treasury and the Prison Service Pay Review Body (PSPRB) to reduce the reliance on Market Supplements (which are technically time limited) and to establish a more sustainable approach to pay. In this context the Government has recently announced a pay award which gives at least a 4% increase to all prison staff, and significantly more than this to OSGs and Prison Officers who are on modernised pay arrangements. This is expected to positively effect both recruitment and retention. Separate talks with recognised trade unions around the probation pay award are ongoing. The recruitment of trainee probation officers onto the Professional Qualification in Probation (PQiP) learning programme is not an issue as PQiP vacancies are successfully filled at the twice-yearly intakes. The lack of probation officers working in HMP Onley may therefore be attributable to a number of other factors, including the challenge of opening a new prison (HMP Five Wells), and I understand the shortages have now been addressed. Prison Officer recruitment is supported by a number of initiatives, including a fast-track scheme to support armed forces staff and veterans to become prison officers. Additionally, the First Deployment National Start campaign offers an incentive package for hard to recruit to prisons. There is currently an ‘always on’ approach to recruitment activity for HMP Onley which is also receiving a tailored approach to recruitment advertising through a variety of channels. This is to help raise awareness of HMPPS as an employer in the local community and highlight the breadth of roles available. To improve prison officer retention, work is being undertaken to embed an outreach strategy to ensure all candidates are engaged with prior to joining the service, and that they have the opportunity to visit the prison and ask any questions that they may have around the role and HR issues. Additionally, HMPPS has implemented a ‘supporting each other’ initiative which includes New Colleague Mentor and Buddy Schemes which are being implemented across all prison regions throughout 2022–23. HMP Onley has also been selected to trial two pioneering pilot schemes that will widen the appeal of the role to a wider demographic. For probation staff, HMPPS launched three career pathways for staff approaching retirement to help encourage them to remain in service for longer if they choose to do so. A national and standardised approach to exit interviews has been introduced to understand the key drivers of attrition across the Probation Service to better target improvement activity.
Recommendation 3
More prompt action is needed in moving non-category C prisoners from HMP Onley, ensuring re-categorised C to B prisoners are moved within 72 hours and C to D prisoners are moved without undue delay to open conditions.
Government response
Category C to B transfers: The National Allocation Protocol (NAP) was introduced to support national offender flows. Reception prisons will no longer be able to accommodate routine transfers of prisoners who are categorised to a higher security category. Arrangements should be made to transfer these prisoners to establishments of a higher security category within the training or resettlement estates. Prisoners who have been re-categorised from C to B in the category C estate and have more than 28-days time left to serve should transfer to a prison in the Long Term and High Security Estate. If a transfer cannot be secured, the escalation route within the NAP should be followed.
C to D transfers: The availability of category D spaces has been impacted by the requirement to close a number accommodation blocks in the open estate over the course of 2021 which no longer met statutory fire safety standards. The impact on the overall open estate has been managed through replacing some of these places, particularly in the south, with existing temporary accommodation which was on some sites already as part HMPPS’ Covid contingencies and in other sites, with new temporary accommodation. HMPPS is also investing £3.8 billion over the next three years to deliver 20,000 additional, modern prison places including 2,000 temporary prison places across England and Wales by the mid-2020s. As mentioned in the Minister’s letter, this portfolio of work will deliver 660 additional places through expansion of the category D estate at a number of sites across the country.
C to D transfers: The availability of category D spaces has been impacted by the requirement to close a number accommodation blocks in the open estate over the course of 2021 which no longer met statutory fire safety standards. The impact on the overall open estate has been managed through replacing some of these places, particularly in the south, with existing temporary accommodation which was on some sites already as part HMPPS’ Covid contingencies and in other sites, with new temporary accommodation. HMPPS is also investing £3.8 billion over the next three years to deliver 20,000 additional, modern prison places including 2,000 temporary prison places across England and Wales by the mid-2020s. As mentioned in the Minister’s letter, this portfolio of work will deliver 660 additional places through expansion of the category D estate at a number of sites across the country.
Recommendation 4
The Board has serious concerns over the lack of access to programmes. This leads to a prisoner’s inability to reduce their risk of reoffending and progress, and significantly impacts on their ability to move to a category D establishment.
Government response
As part of the rolling down of the Resolve programme, the guidance provided to prisons was that the Thinking Skills Programme (TSP) would be the medium-risk offer for prisoners convicted of violent offences, or in cases where the offender presents with Learning Disabilities and Challenges, the New Me Strengths (NMS) course. For prisoners assessed as high or above risk level should continue to be considered for Kaizen, or where the offender presents with Learning Disabilities and Challenges, Becoming New Me Plus (BNM+). For prisoners convicted of gang-related, Identity Matters is available. For intimate partner violence offences, Building Better Relationships, Kaizen, BNM+, and NMS are all available. Accredited offending behaviour programmes however are not suitable for all individuals. Those individuals identified as eligible and motivated to undertake an accredited offending behaviour programme, that is not delivered at HMP Onley, can be referred to a relevant specialist delivery site. HMP Onley continues to offer TSP in the interim whilst the prison reviews its population needs and considers the interventions required to best meet this need, including Kaizen and Identity Matters programmes (one-to-one gang related programme).
Recommendation 5
The management of prisoner property remains a significant problem. There are often long delays in property being received from the sending prison even after the complaints process has been followed. If more resources were available to investigate missing property, prisoner frustration levels may be reduced.
Government response
The new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework was published on 1 August 2022 with an implementation date of 5 September 2022. The Framework is the result of extensive consultation, including with the IMB. It has been designed with procedural justice at its core and aims to ensure consistency and fairness and enhance prisoners’ satisfaction with processes and outcomes. Given the nature of property, and the movement of prisoners between establishments, the Framework looks to provide greater direction and standardisation on a national basis. It strengthens processes in relation to the main problem areas identified by IMBs and staff including the handling of valuable property, managing cell clearances, compliance with volumetric control and forwarding on excess property following a prisoner’s transfer.
Recommendation 6
Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) should advise when essential work on the poor state of windows in the older parts of the prison will be carried out, as it has a detrimental effect on decency standards and needs addressing as a priority.
Government response
As mentioned in last year’s response, a major capital bid to replace all the windows on A to E wings and G and H wings was given initial approval in January 2019. This will be considered for delivery when the programme of works for 2023/24 is developed over the autumn. In the meantime, HMPPS will continue to repair windows and broken panes of glass. As the Board will appreciate, demands for maintenance are greater than the available funding even with the significant increases achieved in the last two Spending Reviews. We therefore have to prioritise works very carefully to make best use of that funding, focusing on risk to life and risk to capacity, decency and sustainability.
Recommendation 7
The Board wishes to be advised when the enhanced gate security (EGS) bag scanner, awaited since September 2021, will arrive on site and be operational.
Government response
A procurement exercise re-commenced for a national X-Ray baggage scanner contract for supply and maintenance earlier this year. HMPPS can advise that the tender is in the final stages, with testing of the machines and necessary evaluations to be undertaken shortly. We are on track for awarding the contract late summer/early autumn. Rollout of the scanners to HMP Onley and other identified Enhanced Gate Security (EGS) sites will start thereafter, to be completed by the end of the current financial year. We will work with the successful bidder to finalise an installation schedule once the contract is in place and will be contacting individual sites to make arrangements in due course. HMPPS would like to assure the Board that we are working at pace to progress the procurement as quickly as possible to complete the EGS programme.
Recommendation 8
There would be considerable benefit in finding a way to integrate the reporting of complaints to healthcare with general prison complaints, provided confidentiality is maintained, to provide a more comprehensive overview of prisoner concerns across the establishment.
Recommendation 9
It is vital that the purpose of HMP Onley, as a training and resettlement prison, retains priority. More workshops and instructors need to become involved with the prison to support successful resettlement.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Adjudications | 24 | 13 |
| Canteen/clothing | 15 | 15 |
| Confidential Access | 16 | 15 |
| Correspondence | 17 | 21 |
| Diet/food | 12 | 11 |
| Discrimination | 6 | 1 |
| Drugs/alcohol | 5 | 1 |
| Education/training/work | 13 | 9 |
| Employment/wages | 7 | 7 |
| Equality | 2 | 1 |
| External appeals/legal | 14 | 16 |
| Facilities/kit | 12 | 11 |
| Finance | 17 | 10 |
| General complaints | 28 | 23 |
| Healthcare | 44 | 42 |
| Parole/recall | 14 | 11 |
| Pay/earnings | 4 | 6 |
| Property | 170 | 135 |
| Safety | 13 | 15 |
| Security | 2 | 2 |
| Total | 501 | 449 |
| Visits/family ties | 11 | 14 |
| Wellbeing | 4 | 0 |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 2
· Respect 2
· Activity 1
· Release 2
Paul Cartwright · Self-inflicted
Stephen Gedge · Natural causes
Jonathan McCarthy · Natural causes
Other reports for Onley
· Self-harm 416
· Concerns
Population 737
· Self-harm 393
· Concerns
Population 726
· Self-harm 258
· Concerns
Population 740
· Self-harm 223
· Concerns
Population 645
· Self-harm 184
· Concerns
Population 730
· Self-harm 319
· Concerns