Inquiries · Recommendations

Public Inquiry Recommendations

1,814 tracked recommendations 35 inquiries 903 match current filters Page 14 of 19

Recommendations issued by UK statutory and non-statutory inquiries, with their tracked government response and supporting evidence.

Clear

Browse by inquiry

35 inquiries with tracked recs
Inquiry Recs Accepted
Mid Staffs Inquiry 290 281
Manchester Arena Inquiry 169 169
IICSA 107 96
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry 106
Grenfell Tower Inquiry 104 104
Infected Blood Inquiry 103 102
Hyponatraemia Inquiry 96 96
Fuller Inquiry 92 71
Leveson Inquiry 92 77
Vale of Leven Inquiry 75 75
Baha Mousa Inquiry 73 72
Southport Inquiry 67
RHI Inquiry 45 44
COVID-19 Inquiry 44 24
Morecambe Bay Investigation 44 44
Brook House Inquiry 33 28
Bichard Inquiry 31 31
Angiolini Inquiry 30 29
Post Office Horizon Inquiry 27 25
Jermaine Baker Inquiry 26 22
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry 24 21
Daniel Morgan Panel 23 21
Cranston Inquiry 18
Paterson Inquiry 17 15
HIA Inquiry 12 12
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry 11 11
Anthony Grainger Inquiry 9 9
Al-Sweady Inquiry 9 9
Hillsborough Panel 9 5
Fingerprint Inquiry 9 9
ICL Inquiry 7 6
Litvinenko Inquiry 5 5
Azelle Rodney Inquiry 3 3
Billy Wright Inquiry 3 3
Penrose Inquiry 1 1

Recommendations

903 of 1,814 · page 14 of 19
Code Recommendation Inquiry Response
R9 Integrated workforce plans
Each facility or service should have an integrated workforce plan that includes all allied health professionals (AHPs) and all staff involved in …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R10 Access to allied health professionals
It is critical for the wellbeing of people with learning disabilities and autistic people that they are well supported by, and have …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R11 Meaningful daily activities
Like anyone else, people with learning disabilities and autistic people require a variety of meaningful activities on a daily basis to enhance …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R12 Person-centred care plans with family involvement
Care plans must be live, person-centred documents. This requires joint ownership with people with learning disabilities and their families rather than simply …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R13 Full staff access to care plans
All staff involved in delivering care, including healthcare assistants (HCAs), must have full access to the care plan.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R14 Restraint and seclusion observation records
Observation records detailing all use of restraint and seclusion should be completed by the individual observing. In HSCT facilities, if the observer …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R15 Independent care plan reviews
Care plans should be regularly evaluated to assess their impact on people’s wellbeing. This is the responsibility of the care team and …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R16 Missed care incident reporting
If a care plan cannot be delivered due to issues, such as staffing shortages, this should be recorded as ‘missed care’ using …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R17 Co-production training
Creating a co-produced care environment, where people with learning disabilities, families and professionals work collaboratively, requires a fundamental shift in practice. As …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R18 Co-production processes and clinical audit
Specific processes rather than policies should be designed to ensure there is good communication with families and carers to ensure co-production takes …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R19 Amend Quality Standards for shared decision-making
The 2006 Quality Standards for Health and Social Care should be amended to require HSC organisations to provide all people with learning …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R20 Independent advocacy for service users and families
Properly trained independent advocates should be made available to service users and families to support effective communication with staff and for raising …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R21 Human rights officer in learning disability services
All providers of learning disability services should appoint a human rights officer, as seen in Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R22 Easy Read documents
All documents relevant to the service user’s experience and intended for their information must be made available in Easy Read format.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R23 Regular property and finance compliance checks
All organisations taking responsibility for property and/or finance for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should institute regular checks of adherence …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R24 Clear records and disclosure policies
Policies must be specific as to records to be kept and for routes to disclosure for relevant family members and people with …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R25 Accessible financial records
The records kept must be easy to manage by staff and easily comprehensible to others, including people with learning disabilities and autistic …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R26 Six-monthly financial accounts to families
Information about the use of cash and other property and six-monthly accounts (or such period as appropriate upon discharge of the person) …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R27 RQIA assurance of property processes
RQIA should examine the provider organisation’s internal assurance processes and make recommendations where they are insufficient.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R28 Restraint Reduction Network principles
The Restraint Reduction Network identifies six principles to avoid the use of restrictive practice. While there is evidence that some Trusts have …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R29 Psychology input to reduce restrictive practices
All facilities providing residential services for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should provide sufficient psychology input for each patient, to …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R30 NED champion for restraint reduction
HSCTs should appoint a non-executive director (NED) to act as a champion for restraint reduction, with a mandate to hold executive directors …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R31 Restraint education effectiveness metrics
The effectiveness of the education programme for staff in relation to restraint reduction should be measured through defined data metrics. This is …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R32 Balanced performance measures including restrictive practices
HSCTs should implement a comprehensive set of balanced performance measures across all services for people with learning disabilities, including those commissioned from …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R33 Statistical process control charts
To ensure meaningful interpretation of these trends, all HSCTs should adopt statistical process control (SPC) charts, as developed by Walter Shewhart in …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R34 Debriefing policies for aggressive behaviour and restraint
All HSCTs should develop two clear operational debriefing policies. The first should apply to both staff and people with learning disabilities and …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R35 Inpatient facilities on risk register
Given the elevated risk of inappropriate use of restrictive practices with individuals with learning disabilities and/or autistic people, BHSCT and all HSCTs …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R36 Seclusion as extraordinary intervention with serious event audit
Use of seclusion should be considered an extraordinary and exceptional intervention. Each intervention should be subject to a serious event audit, conducted …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R37 Human rights-based restrictive practices training
Education and training on the use of restrictive practices should be grounded in human rights principles and the dedicated human rights specialist …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R38 Clear pathways for raising concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with clear, written information outlining the available pathways for …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R39 Guidance on recording and presenting concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with a short description of how best to record …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R40 Record all complaints in electronic system
In HSCTs all complaints, regardless of whether they are resolved immediately at ward level, should be recorded in the Trust’s electronic complaints …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R41 Inform complainants of complaint management process
Complainants should immediately be informed of how their complaint will be managed (locally or through the corporate complaints process) along with a …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R42 Regular updates on complaint progress
Complainants must be regularly updated and informed of the progress of any investigation, including when the process concludes without a specific finding.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R43 Red-rated complaints shared with all NEDs
All complaints managed at corporate level and rated as red (using the red, amber and green (RAG) rating matrix) should be shared …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R44 Proactive quality assurance beyond complaints
Complaints alone are a poor indicator of quality of care, particularly in a vulnerable population such as those admitted to MAH. A …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R45 Incident trend analysis on board dashboards
Incident reports of any violent or aggressive behaviour by either people with learning disabilities and autistic people or staff should be analysed …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R46 Lived experience feedback via external agency
Where people with learning disabilities can participate, the provider should actively seek their lived experience feedback in relation to staff attitudes and …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R47 Quarterly family feedback via external agency
The provider should actively seek family or carer feedback on the service user’s experience on a quarterly basis via an external agency …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R48 Holistic safeguarding governance review
HSCTs must review and improve governance of safeguarding to ensure that findings from different safeguarding investigations are considered holistically, synthesised and presented …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R49 CCTV in high-risk learning disability settings
Hospital settings for people with learning disabilities and autistic people are very high-risk environments for abuse and poor practice, partly because those …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R50 CCTV guidelines for residential and day services
Guidelines should be agreed in relation to providing CCTV systems in residential and day services where requested. Guidelines should be agreed by …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R51 CCTV in non-public areas only in best interests
The installation of CCTV in non-public areas should be considered only where this will be in the best interests of the individual …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R52 CCTV policies agreed with staff residents and families
Policies governing the use of CCTV should be agreed only after consultation with staff, residents and their families using the service.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R53 CCTV viewing circumstances
Policies should include careful consideration of the circumstances in which the CCTV should be viewed; for example, that it should be viewed …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R54 Independent CCTV viewers
Viewers of the CCTV should be independent of the setting, i.e. not involved in day-to-day care of the residents.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R55 External CCTV oversight
Oversight of the CCTV analysis should sit outside the setting in which the CCTV is recording, and should include audits of referrals …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R56 CCTV referral guidance for police
Policies should include clear guidance and definitions of behaviour and circumstances in which information should be passed to PSNI about possible offences.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R57 Regulator access to CCTV
Policies should be clear about the circumstances in which a regulator, such as RQIA, could access the CCTV.
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
R58 CCTV for staff training consideration
Those drafting the policy should consider whether CCTV could ever be used for staff training and, if so, how this would be …
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) Response Pending
‹ Prev Page 14 of 19 Next ›