Inquiries · Recommendations
Public Inquiry Recommendations
1,814 tracked recommendations
35 inquiries
903 match current filters
Page 14 of 19
Recommendations issued by UK statutory and non-statutory inquiries, with their tracked government response and supporting evidence.
Browse by inquiry
| Inquiry | Recs | Accepted |
|---|---|---|
| Mid Staffs Inquiry | 290 | 281 |
| Manchester Arena Inquiry | 169 | 169 |
| IICSA | 107 | 96 |
| Muckamore Abbey Inquiry | 106 | — |
| Grenfell Tower Inquiry | 104 | 104 |
| Infected Blood Inquiry | 103 | 102 |
| Hyponatraemia Inquiry | 96 | 96 |
| Fuller Inquiry | 92 | 71 |
| Leveson Inquiry | 92 | 77 |
| Vale of Leven Inquiry | 75 | 75 |
| Baha Mousa Inquiry | 73 | 72 |
| Southport Inquiry | 67 | — |
| RHI Inquiry | 45 | 44 |
| COVID-19 Inquiry | 44 | 24 |
| Morecambe Bay Investigation | 44 | 44 |
| Brook House Inquiry | 33 | 28 |
| Bichard Inquiry | 31 | 31 |
| Angiolini Inquiry | 30 | 29 |
| Post Office Horizon Inquiry | 27 | 25 |
| Jermaine Baker Inquiry | 26 | 22 |
| Edinburgh Tram Inquiry | 24 | 21 |
| Daniel Morgan Panel | 23 | 21 |
| Cranston Inquiry | 18 | — |
| Paterson Inquiry | 17 | 15 |
| HIA Inquiry | 12 | 12 |
| Scottish Hospitals Inquiry | 11 | 11 |
| Anthony Grainger Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| Al-Sweady Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| Hillsborough Panel | 9 | 5 |
| Fingerprint Inquiry | 9 | 9 |
| ICL Inquiry | 7 | 6 |
| Litvinenko Inquiry | 5 | 5 |
| Azelle Rodney Inquiry | 3 | 3 |
| Billy Wright Inquiry | 3 | 3 |
| Penrose Inquiry | 1 | 1 |
Recommendations
| Code | Recommendation | Inquiry | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| R9 |
Integrated workforce plans
Each facility or service should have an integrated workforce plan that includes all allied health professionals (AHPs) and all staff involved in …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R10 |
Access to allied health professionals
It is critical for the wellbeing of people with learning disabilities and autistic people that they are well supported by, and have …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R11 |
Meaningful daily activities
Like anyone else, people with learning disabilities and autistic people require a variety of meaningful activities on a daily basis to enhance …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R12 |
Person-centred care plans with family involvement
Care plans must be live, person-centred documents. This requires joint ownership with people with learning disabilities and their families rather than simply …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R13 |
Full staff access to care plans
All staff involved in delivering care, including healthcare assistants (HCAs), must have full access to the care plan.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R14 |
Restraint and seclusion observation records
Observation records detailing all use of restraint and seclusion should be completed by the individual observing. In HSCT facilities, if the observer …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R15 |
Independent care plan reviews
Care plans should be regularly evaluated to assess their impact on people’s wellbeing. This is the responsibility of the care team and …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R16 |
Missed care incident reporting
If a care plan cannot be delivered due to issues, such as staffing shortages, this should be recorded as ‘missed care’ using …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R17 |
Co-production training
Creating a co-produced care environment, where people with learning disabilities, families and professionals work collaboratively, requires a fundamental shift in practice. As …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R18 |
Co-production processes and clinical audit
Specific processes rather than policies should be designed to ensure there is good communication with families and carers to ensure co-production takes …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R19 |
Amend Quality Standards for shared decision-making
The 2006 Quality Standards for Health and Social Care should be amended to require HSC organisations to provide all people with learning …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R20 |
Independent advocacy for service users and families
Properly trained independent advocates should be made available to service users and families to support effective communication with staff and for raising …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R21 |
Human rights officer in learning disability services
All providers of learning disability services should appoint a human rights officer, as seen in Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R22 |
Easy Read documents
All documents relevant to the service user’s experience and intended for their information must be made available in Easy Read format.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R23 |
Regular property and finance compliance checks
All organisations taking responsibility for property and/or finance for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should institute regular checks of adherence …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R24 |
Clear records and disclosure policies
Policies must be specific as to records to be kept and for routes to disclosure for relevant family members and people with …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R25 |
Accessible financial records
The records kept must be easy to manage by staff and easily comprehensible to others, including people with learning disabilities and autistic …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R26 |
Six-monthly financial accounts to families
Information about the use of cash and other property and six-monthly accounts (or such period as appropriate upon discharge of the person) …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R27 |
RQIA assurance of property processes
RQIA should examine the provider organisation’s internal assurance processes and make recommendations where they are insufficient.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R28 |
Restraint Reduction Network principles
The Restraint Reduction Network identifies six principles to avoid the use of restrictive practice. While there is evidence that some Trusts have …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R29 |
Psychology input to reduce restrictive practices
All facilities providing residential services for people with learning disabilities and autistic people should provide sufficient psychology input for each patient, to …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R30 |
NED champion for restraint reduction
HSCTs should appoint a non-executive director (NED) to act as a champion for restraint reduction, with a mandate to hold executive directors …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R31 |
Restraint education effectiveness metrics
The effectiveness of the education programme for staff in relation to restraint reduction should be measured through defined data metrics. This is …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R32 |
Balanced performance measures including restrictive practices
HSCTs should implement a comprehensive set of balanced performance measures across all services for people with learning disabilities, including those commissioned from …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R33 |
Statistical process control charts
To ensure meaningful interpretation of these trends, all HSCTs should adopt statistical process control (SPC) charts, as developed by Walter Shewhart in …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R34 |
Debriefing policies for aggressive behaviour and restraint
All HSCTs should develop two clear operational debriefing policies. The first should apply to both staff and people with learning disabilities and …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R35 |
Inpatient facilities on risk register
Given the elevated risk of inappropriate use of restrictive practices with individuals with learning disabilities and/or autistic people, BHSCT and all HSCTs …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R36 |
Seclusion as extraordinary intervention with serious event audit
Use of seclusion should be considered an extraordinary and exceptional intervention. Each intervention should be subject to a serious event audit, conducted …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R37 |
Human rights-based restrictive practices training
Education and training on the use of restrictive practices should be grounded in human rights principles and the dedicated human rights specialist …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R38 |
Clear pathways for raising concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with clear, written information outlining the available pathways for …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R39 |
Guidance on recording and presenting concerns
People with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families should be provided with a short description of how best to record …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R40 |
Record all complaints in electronic system
In HSCTs all complaints, regardless of whether they are resolved immediately at ward level, should be recorded in the Trust’s electronic complaints …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R41 |
Inform complainants of complaint management process
Complainants should immediately be informed of how their complaint will be managed (locally or through the corporate complaints process) along with a …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R42 |
Regular updates on complaint progress
Complainants must be regularly updated and informed of the progress of any investigation, including when the process concludes without a specific finding.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R43 |
Red-rated complaints shared with all NEDs
All complaints managed at corporate level and rated as red (using the red, amber and green (RAG) rating matrix) should be shared …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R44 |
Proactive quality assurance beyond complaints
Complaints alone are a poor indicator of quality of care, particularly in a vulnerable population such as those admitted to MAH. A …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R45 |
Incident trend analysis on board dashboards
Incident reports of any violent or aggressive behaviour by either people with learning disabilities and autistic people or staff should be analysed …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R46 |
Lived experience feedback via external agency
Where people with learning disabilities can participate, the provider should actively seek their lived experience feedback in relation to staff attitudes and …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R47 |
Quarterly family feedback via external agency
The provider should actively seek family or carer feedback on the service user’s experience on a quarterly basis via an external agency …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R48 |
Holistic safeguarding governance review
HSCTs must review and improve governance of safeguarding to ensure that findings from different safeguarding investigations are considered holistically, synthesised and presented …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R49 |
CCTV in high-risk learning disability settings
Hospital settings for people with learning disabilities and autistic people are very high-risk environments for abuse and poor practice, partly because those …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R50 |
CCTV guidelines for residential and day services
Guidelines should be agreed in relation to providing CCTV systems in residential and day services where requested. Guidelines should be agreed by …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R51 |
CCTV in non-public areas only in best interests
The installation of CCTV in non-public areas should be considered only where this will be in the best interests of the individual …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R52 |
CCTV policies agreed with staff residents and families
Policies governing the use of CCTV should be agreed only after consultation with staff, residents and their families using the service.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R53 |
CCTV viewing circumstances
Policies should include careful consideration of the circumstances in which the CCTV should be viewed; for example, that it should be viewed …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R54 |
Independent CCTV viewers
Viewers of the CCTV should be independent of the setting, i.e. not involved in day-to-day care of the residents.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R55 |
External CCTV oversight
Oversight of the CCTV analysis should sit outside the setting in which the CCTV is recording, and should include audits of referrals …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R56 |
CCTV referral guidance for police
Policies should include clear guidance and definitions of behaviour and circumstances in which information should be passed to PSNI about possible offences.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R57 |
Regulator access to CCTV
Policies should be clear about the circumstances in which a regulator, such as RQIA, could access the CCTV.
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |
| R58 |
CCTV for staff training consideration
Those drafting the policy should consider whether CCTV could ever be used for staff training and, if so, how this would be …
|
Muckamore Abbey Inquiry (2026) | Response Pending |