JB-15.14 Accepted

Require trained CMP manager for covert monitoring posts

Jermaine Baker Inquiry · Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · Issued 5 July 2022 · Addressed to: College of Policing

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation, 15.14

CMPs should not be established without the appointment of a properly trained CMP manager, whose responsibility it should be to appoint a team of CMOs, once satisfied from proper assessment as to their qualifications and ability.

Jermaine Baker Inquiry, Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · 5 Jul 2022 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

- The Metropolitan Police Service stated on 28 October 2022 that guidance had been issued reaffirming the Surveillance Manual of Standards 2021 position that only trained officers may perform CMP roles and no CMP should be established without an accredited CMP Manager (MPS Response to Jermaine Baker Inquiry, October 2022).
- The College of Policing updated APP-AP in August 2023 incorporating the requirement for a properly trained CMP manager to be appointed before establishing a CMP (College of Policing APP-AP update, August 2023).

Response — verbatim from government

Metropolitan Police Service — initial response

MPS formally responded on 28 October 2022 (paras 24-25). Guidance issued reaffirming Surveillance MoS 2021 position: only trained officers may perform CMP roles; no CMP without accredited CMP Manager.

Metropolitan Police Service · 28 Oct 2022 Written response →

College of Policing — follow-up

College of Policing updated Authorised Professional Practice – Armed Policing (APP-AP) in August 2023 incorporating requirement for properly trained CMP manager appointment before CMP establishment.

College of Policing · 1 Aug 2023 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 1 Aug 2023 Status as of College of Policing APP-AP update (August 2023): Completed Source →

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.