JB-15.13

Training on note-taking for covert monitoring officers

Jermaine Baker Inquiry · Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · Issued 5 July 2022 · Addressed to: College of Policing

Government responseMetropolitan Police Service: Noted (Oct 2022)National Police Chiefs Council: Noted (Oct 2022)

DeliveryNo statement from College of Policing found

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation, 15.13

The training referred to in paragraph 15.11 must emphasise the importance of covert monitoring officers (CMOs) making accurate notes of: (a) what they have heard; and (b) what they have passed on.

Jermaine Baker Inquiry, Report into the Death of Jermaine Baker · 5 Jul 2022 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry asked for covert monitoring officer training to emphasise accurate note-taking. In October 2022, the Metropolitan Police Service stated that accurate note-taking and organised dissemination systems are explored in its covert monitoring post awareness course and H2 training (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022). That same month, Chris Haward, National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC) Lead for Surveillance, stated that surveillance standards would be strengthened to require staff to maintain an accurate contemporaneous record of what they have heard and what they have passed on (Chris Haward response, Oct 2022). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of October 2022 (Metropolitan Police Service response, Oct 2022).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 2 Oct 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation asks for cultural or behavioural change, which is difficult to verify from published sources alone. The record above reflects policy commitments rather than measured outcomes.

Government response

●Metropolitan Police Service · Noted · 28 Oct 2022

Words of: Metropolitan Police Service, Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations, 28 October 2022

In both the H2 training and the CMP operatives awareness course, the issues of accurate and consistent note-taking, together with effective and organised dissemination systems are comprehensively explored, as referenced within the Surveillance MoS.

Response document: Public Inquiry into the Death of Jermaine Baker: Update on Recommendations

●National Police Chiefs Council · Noted · 20 Oct 2022

Words of: Chris Haward, NPCC Lead for Surveillance, in a letter to Abigail Scholefield, Fieldfisher, solicitors to the Inquiry, 20 October 2022

This is already reflected in the previous MOG and current MOS. However, it will be strengthened to reflect this recommendation as shown below. Covert Audio Intrusive Surveillance & Covert Monitoring Posts Audio Monitoring Record (Extract) CMP staff are responsible for maintaining an accurate, bound and page-numbered / electronic contemporaneous monitoring record throughout the monitoring and recording period of: (a) What they have heard (b) What they have passed on The Audio Monitoring Record (AMR) provides a chronological record of events summarising the product of the covert surveillance device. Consideration must be given to the need for the SIO / TFC or CMP Manager to have immediate access to important sections of the record while monitoring or transcription is in progress. This may be passed on for briefing purposes by the use of a carbon copy form or digital platform at the required Government Security Classification. See also 15.15 response about recording information and decisions.

Response document: Jermaine Baker Public Inquiry (NPCC Lead for Surveillance response to the Inquiry)

Site note: This is the letter of 20 October 2022 from Chief Constable Chris Haward (Lincolnshire Police), NPCC Lead for Surveillance, who signs it. A document-properties block on its last page names another officer as author; that block is a template left in the file, not a second author.

Delivery

No statement on delivery from College of Policing has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.