Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Alexander Davidson

Ref: 2019-0149 Date: 2 May 2019 Coroner: Laurinda Bower Area: Nottinghamshire Responses identified: 2 / 4 View PDF

NHS 111 pathways use unsuitable language for children and cause confusion, while GP surgeries experience delays in uploading 111 notes. There is also a lack of standardized lipase/amylase testing for children and inconsistent ED return patient reviews.

Date 2 May 2019
56-day deadline 23 Sep 2019 est.
Responses identified 2 of 4
Child Death (from 2015) Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
NHS 111 pathways use unsuitable language for children and cause confusion, while GP surgeries experience delays in uploading 111 notes. There is also a lack of standardized lipase/amylase testing for children and inconsistent ED return patient reviews.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) The NHS 111 telephone triage service uses the NHS Pathways computer system to triage patients via pre-determined question/answer based algorithms. The pre-determined questions are the same whether the caller is an adult or a child. Alex struggled to comprehend some of the medical terminology used during these calls. Call handlers are not permitted to deviate from the prescribed wording of the pre-determined questions, and this created confusion and inconsistency in the patient’s answers. Consideration should be given as to how young and/or vulnerable patients can be assisted to provide accurate information about their symptoms.

(2) The NHS Pathways algorithm for triaging vomiting and diarrhoea symptoms is unclear as patients may fail to understand what is meant by ‘soil’ or ‘coffee ground’ vomit. Consideration should be given to how this important diagnostic feature can be explored during telephone triage, especially when the patient is young and/or vulnerable.

(3) The NHS 111 telephone triage service provides an electronic copy of the patient triage notes to the patient’s GP within minutes of the call ending. There was a delay of 7 days in the GP surgery uploading the 111 triage document to Alex’s patient record. This prevented Alex’s GP from reviewing the triage note prior to his consultation with the patient. There is no guidance as to expected practise with regards to the timely updating of electronic patient records, and as a result delays are all too frequent.

(4) Adults presenting to their GP or Emergency Department with abdominal symptoms receive a lipase and/or amylase blood test as part of the standard package of blood testing. The levels of each of these enzymes can be used to diagnose pancreatitis. Patients under the age of 18 years are not offered this testing as standard, on the basis that pancreatitis is rare in paediatric patients. I heard anecdotal evidence of some doctors at Kingsmill Hospital now add this test to the standard admission bloods for older teenage patients who present with non-specific abdominal symptoms but the NICE guidance (September 2018) is not explicit in this regard. I heard evidence as to the increasing prevalence of gallstone pancreatitis in young people, in line with an increase in childhood obesity. Consideration ought to be given to a national approach for lipase/amylase testing in young people with relevant symptoms.

(5) Patients who make an unscheduled return to the Emergency Department within 72 hours of discharge are required to have a review undertaken by an ED Consultant, or a ST4 trainee or above in the absence of a Consultant on the ‘shop floor’: RCEM Guidance June 2016. Some hospitals will admit returning paediatric patients for observations but practise seems to vary doctor-to-doctor and across Trusts. Consideration ought to be given to a national approach.

##DW<<corAddress>> Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>>

Responses

2 respondents
NHS England NHS / Health Body
18 Jun 2019 PDF
Action Planned

NHS Pathways reviewed the question regarding dark brown or black vomit and concluded removing 'coffee-grounds' could result in over-referral. As part of routine review and governance procedures, they are conducting a review of the gastrointestinal suite of pathways, with changes planned for Release 19 (deployed May 2020). (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Leila Inquest into the death of Alexander James Davidson

I am writing in response to a Regulation 28 report received from HM Senior Coroner, dated 2nd May 2019. This follows the death of Alexander James Davidson who sadly passed away on 26th February 2018. This was followed by an investigation and inquest which concluded on 5th March
2019. NHS Pathways is the clinical decision support software used by all 111 service providers, and some 999 ambulance service providers including Derbyshire Health United. I am , RGN, RSCN, BSc, SPQ and am writing in my capacity as Deputy Clinical Director, NHS Pathways, NHS Digital.

HM Coroner has raised the following matters of concern with regards to NHS Pathways:

1. The NHS 111 telephone triage service uses the NHS Pathways computer system to triage patients via pre-determined question/answer-based algorithms. The pre-determined questions are the same whether the caller is an adult or a child. Alex struggled to comprehend some of the medical terminology used during these calls. Call handlers are not permitted to deviate from the prescribed wording of the pre-determined questions, and this created confusion and inconsistency in the patient’s answers. Consideration should be given as to how young and/or vulnerable patients can be assisted to provide accurate information about their symptoms: and
2. The NHS Pathways algorithm for triaging vomiting and diarrhoea symptoms is unclear as patients may fail to understand what is meant by ‘soil’ or ‘coffee ground’ vomit. Consideration should be given to how this important diagnostic feature can be explored during telephone triage, especially when the patient is young and/or vulnerable.

enquiries@nhsdigital.nhs.uk

NHS DIGITAL’S RESPONSE

For information, I have provided below a short summary of the functions that NHS Pathways performs and the governance that underpins it. I have also attached to this letter a Coroner’s Information Pack which provides further details and may be useful for your future reference.

Function of NHS Pathways

NHS Pathways is a programme providing the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) used in NHS 111 and half of English ambulance services. This triage system supports the remote assessment of over 16.5 million calls per annum. These calls are managed by non-clinical specially trained call handlers who refer the patient into suitable services based on the patient’s health needs at the time of the call. These call handlers are supported by clinicians who are able to provide advice and guidance or who can take over the call if the situation requires it. The system is built around a clinical hierarchy, meaning that life- threatening problems assessed at the start of the call trigger ambulance responses, progressing through to less urgent conditions which require a less urgent response (or disposition) in other settings.

Governance of NHS Pathways

The safety of the clinical triage process endpoints resulting from a 111 or 999 assessment using NHS Pathways, is overseen by the National Clinical Governance Group, hosted by the Royal College of General Practitioners. This group is made up of representatives from the relevant Medical Royal Colleges. Senior clinicians from the Colleges provide independent oversight and scrutiny of the NHS Pathways clinical content. Alongside this independent oversight, NHS Pathways ensures its clinical content and assessment protocols are consistent with the latest advice from respected bodies that provide evidence and guidance for medical practice in the UK. In particular, we are consistent with the latest guidelines from

• NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence)
• The UK Resuscitation Council
• The UK Sepsis Trust

To specifically answer the concerns raised:

The NHS 111 telephone triage service uses the NHS Pathways computer system to triage patients via pre-determined question/answer-based algorithms. The pre- determined questions are the same whether the caller is an adult or a child. Alex struggled to comprehend some of the medical terminology used during these calls. Call handlers are not permitted to deviate from the prescribed wording of the pre- determined questions, and this created confusion and inconsistency in the patient’s answers. Consideration should be given as to how young and/or vulnerable patients can be assisted to provide accurate information about their symptoms:

enquiries@nhsdigital.nhs.uk

NHS Pathways agree that the predetermined questions within the triage algorithms must elicit accurate information from patients regardless of age and vulnerability. Some questions are the same for all age groups where the question itself doesn’t need to be age specific, however there are also many age specific questions throughout the algorithms. Call handlers are permitted to deviate from the exact wording presented by the system to a certain extent as each question has supplementary text called ‘supporting information’; the purpose of which is to guide the call handler to form additional probing questions or alternative ways of phrasing a question if a patient/caller might not understand what’s being asked. Call handlers receive communication skills training to equip them with the skills to be able to adapt their questioning style according to the different needs of different patient groups. Adapting the approach is an important part of a call handler’s role. However, age is not the only reason for a lack of comprehension and therefore, irrespective of a patient’s age, call handlers are trained to avoid jargon and to be alert for signs that a patient/caller hasn’t understood what’s being asked. To this end, call handlers receive significant training in questioning and listening skills during initial core training and through ongoing training updates. This is supported and monitored through monthly call audit. This training and on-going monthly call audit are all mapped to the NHS Pathways Competencies. An excerpt of the relevant competency (competency 3.1) in relation to ‘listening’ is shown below:

‘3.1 Listens carefully throughout the call and retains this information This means picking up everything that the caller says. It also means picking up on everything else that is communicated by the caller, aside from the actual words they use. This includes the caller’s demeanour, for example do they sound breathless, confused, disorientated, in pain, weak etc. It also means picking up on things like speech patterns and pauses or vague responses. It means picking up feelings such as fear, frustration, anger and anxiety.’

Although call handlers are permitted to re-word questions, it is important that they don’t change the clinical essence of what’s being asked. The supporting information provides additional guidance about the clinical intention of a question and the different ways this might be described. An excerpt from the relevant competency (competency 2.1) which guides training and audit in this area, is shown here:

‘2.1 Conveys questions skilfully Whilst retaining the clinical meaning, it is essential to phrases questions in a way that callers can understand. It would be entirely possible to convey the clinical meaning of a question accurately but have a situation where the caller does not understand what is being asked, which clearly renders the question useless. Therefore, skill is needed in phrasing questions so that they are easily understood. This means that the call handler needs to be adaptable according to the needs of the situation and should use the supporting information to guide them in forming alternative ways of asking the same question.

Jargon should be avoided. Jargon is terminology that relates to a specific activity, profession or group. In the context of telephone triage, it means avoiding the use of medical jargon or terminology which is service or system specific.’

Furthermore, call handlers receive significant training in telephone-based communication skills, as well as monthly audit against communication focused competencies. An excerpt of the relevant competency (5.3) is shown here:

enquiries@nhsdigital.nhs.uk

‘5.3 Adapts approach according to the needs of the situation This means recognising when the situation demands a different type of communication and changing the approach accordingly. For example, if a person is hard of hearing it may be necessary to speak more slowly, use shorter sentences or increase the volume. It may also involve utilising translation services where required.’

In addition to the competencies and skills training listed above, which if met should allow a call handler to communicate successfully with the majority of callers of all ages and vulnerabilities, there is an option to Early Exit triage and transfer to a clinician to provide assistance to vulnerable adults and children. The following are examples of when triage exit routes are used to transfer calls to a clinician:
• The contact is a child and unable to answer questions.
• There is difficulty obtaining adequate information (e.g. a caller who seems very vague or unable to focus on the questions being asked or a caller who is incoherent or extremely difficult to communicate with).
• The caller has difficulty deciding which symptom is troubling them the most.
• A diagnosed condition or medical language complicates the situation.

The NHS Pathways algorithm for triaging vomiting and diarrhoea symptoms is unclear as patients may fail to understand what is meant by ‘soil’ or ‘coffee ground’ vomit. Consideration should be given to how this important diagnostic feature can be explored during telephone triage, especially when the patient is young and/or vulnerable.

The question (see example below) currently asks whether there has been ‘dark brown or black vomit, like coffee-grounds’. Supporting information is available to assist call handlers when extra probing or rephrasing of the question is required. The supporting text states ‘This means the individual has brought up or vomited dark brown or black material that looks like soil or coffee-grounds. Blood that has been in the stomach often looks like this’.

enquiries@nhsdigital.nhs.uk

In 2018 NHS Pathways reviewed the question that asks about dark brown or black vomit in view of the concern that callers may not be familiar with the term ‘coffee-grounds’. Removing the 'coffee-grounds' description could result in over referral as dark/black fluid alone without texture ('bits') could be drinks (e.g. cola, coffee, Guinness) or other dietary intake that has been vomited. The reference to coffee-grounds is a texture that is reasonably specific to haematemesis and this is commonly used in health-related literature, whereas cola is not. NHS.uk also refer to coffee-ground appearance only. In 2016 NHS Pathways added reference to ‘soil’ in the ‘supporting information’ of the question asking about vomiting blood. NHS Pathways are, as part of routine review and governance procedures, conducting a review of the gastrointestinal suite of pathways (including the diarrhoea and vomiting pathways), with changes planned for Release 19 (which will be deployed May 2020). As part of this review, the clinical evidence related to haematemesis will be reviewed with consideration also given as to whether user research will be helpful in improving triage questions and the identification of haematemesis.

I am happy to answer any further enquiries from HM Coroner.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Other
18 Jun 2019 PDF
Action Planned

NICE will reconsider the scope of their guideline on pancreatitis (NG104) when it is next reviewed, to consider lipase/amylase testing in young people. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Bower, Thank you for your letter of 8 May concerning the death of Alexander James Davidson. You suggest that consideration should be given to a national approach for lipaselamylase testing icyoung people with relevant symptoms and t0 the arrangements foraeviewing Paediatric patients who make an unscheduled return to an Accident and Emergency Department within 72 hours of discharge Our guideline on pancreatitis (NG104) notes (in section 1.2) that "Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is confirmed by testing blood lipase or amylase levels; which are usually raised hraised levels are not found, abdominal CT may confirm pancreatic inflammation". Howeever, because the purpose of the guideline is to recommend treatments following diagnosis of acute pancreatitis, the accuracy of lipase or amylase in young people is not considered in it: Nevertheless; in the light of your letter, we "Il reconsider the scope of the guideline when it is next reviewed. NHS England and NHS Improvement rather than NICE are jointly responsible for helping NHS providers to achieve the right levels and mix of staff, including in Accident and Emergency Departments.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 27 August 2018, I commenced an investigation into the death of Alexander James Davidson.

The investigation concluded at the end of an inquest heard over two days on 4 and 5 March 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was that Alex died as a result of natural causes from:

1a. Multiple Organ Failure & Peritonitis 1b. Infected Pancreatic Pseudocyst (Operated) 1c. Gallstone Pancreatitis
2. Steatosis of the Liver; Ischaemic Bowel; Elevated BMI > 30kgm-2
Circumstances of the death
Alexander James Davidson was born in Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, on 5 August 2000. He was aged 17 years and 6 months when he died at the Queens Medical Centre on 26 February 2018. Alex was previously fit and well before suddenly taking ill with abdominal pain on 17 January 2018. Between that date and his admission to the Queens Medical Centre on 8 February 2018, Alex made contact with his GP on three occasions, had four telephone triage assessments undertaken by the NHS 111 service and two admissions to his local Accident & Emergency Department at the Kingsmill Hospital,

##DW<<corAddress>> Tel ##DW<<corTel>> | Fax ##DW<<corFax>> Mansfield. Alex’s symptoms of sudden onset acute abdominal pain, tachycardia, and vomiting and diarrhoea were attributed either to stress or to a bout of gastroenteritis. At no stage prior to 8 February 2018 was gallstones or pancreatitis considered as a differential diagnosis. When Alex was eventually admitted to the Queens Medical Centre Emergency Department on 8 February 2018, he was found to be septic as a result of an infected and necrotic pancreatic pseudocyst, which had evolved as a complication of gallstone pancreatitis, a rare condition in someone of Alex’s age. Despite medical intervention, Alex did not survive. The inquest explored the medical treatment and intervention that Alex received in the six weeks prior to his death. The medical evidence concluded that the pancreatic pseudocyst had likely formed by the time Alex began vomiting on 18 January 2018, and from that point onwards, it was unlikely he would survive even with treatment on account of the high mortality rate associated with this condition.
Copies sent to
Mansfield and Ashfield CCG and the Department of Health

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2019-0149
Date of report
2 May 2019
Coroner
Laurinda Bower
Coroner area
Nottinghamshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 2 of 4
2 responses not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 23 Sep 2019 (estimated).

Sent to

NHS England
NHS Pathways
N.I.C.E
Roundwood Medical Centre

Source links