Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Pippa Gillibrand

Ref: 2026-0042 Date: 27 Jan 2026 Coroner: Victoria Davies Area: Cheshire Responses identified: 4 / 4 View PDF

A critical lack of national guidance exists for home births, covering midwife training, competency, staffing, equipment, and transfer thresholds, alongside an absence of outcome data collection.

Date 27 Jan 2026
56-day deadline 24 Mar 2026 est.
Responses identified 4 of 4
Child Death (from 2015)

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
A critical lack of national guidance exists for home births, covering midwife training, competency, staffing, equipment, and transfer thresholds, alongside an absence of outcome data collection.
View full coroner's concerns
1. There is no national guidance in respect of home births and in particular the model of care. Linked to this, there is therefore no guidance on:
a. The training that a midwife should undergo to ensure they are competent to manage a home birth, given the inherent risks involved when there is no hospital team behind you in an emergency.
b. The number of deliveries a midwife should have done in a hospital setting before being able to safely manage a home birth and/ or the number of deliveries a community midwife should be involved in to maintain their skills.
c. The threshold for transfer to hospital.
d. Safe staffing and equipment levels, without which the service should be suspended.
e. The supervision which should be provided during a home birth, for example through a midwife in the hospital accessing the notes.
f. A system for back-up should electronic systems fail i.e. whether paper notes should be provided as a routine.
g. Information which should be provided to expectant parents around the risks of home birth/ the experience of the team to enable them to make an informed choice.
2. There is no national or local collection of data around home births such as number resulting in transfer to hospital, number involving injury to mother or baby. Such data would allow expectant parents to make an informed choice as to the risks of a home birth.

Responses

4 respondents
NHS England NHS / Health Body
27 Jan 2026 PDF
Action Taken

• On 26 November 2025, NHS England wrote to all NHS maternity providers in England asking them to urgently review the safety and quality of their homebirth services. • NHS England urged them to consider issues such as the operational running of their service and care planning and risk assessment. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Pippa Isobel Waller Gillibrand who died on 5th September 2024.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 27th January 2026 concerning the death of Pippa Isobel Waller Gillibrand on 5th September
2024. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Pippa’s parents, wider family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Pippa’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

Your Report raised the concerns that there is currently no national guidance in respect of home births and the model of care, nor is there a national or local collection of data around home births, such as the numbers resulting in transfer to hospital, or involving injury to mother or baby. Such information would enable expectant parents to make an informed choice as to the risks of a home birth.

HM Coroner may already be aware that NHS England previously received a Regulation 28 Report dated 5 November 2025 from Joanne Kearsley, Senior Coroner for the Manchester North area. This Report raised very similar concerns to those raised in this case, and NHS England responded to the Report on 24 December 2025. For completeness, and for the benefit of Pippa’s family, NHS England has responded to your Report in full. However, there is an element of duplication in terms of the information which was provided by NHS England on 24 December 2025. No disrespect is intended to the Coroner or family in this regard.

On 26 November 2025, NHS England wrote to all NHS maternity providers in England asking them to urgently review the safety and quality of their homebirth services. In particular, we urged them to consider the following issues:

• The operational running of their service: including how it ensures that prompt midwifery care is available 24 hours a day; that staff are properly equipped, trained, prepared and skilled for providing birth and neonatal care in a home setting; that staff have senior multi-disciplinary support available to National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

5th March 2026 2

them at all times and have sufficient rest periods; and that potential transfer and extraction processes are clear and planned for each birth.

• Care planning and risk assessment: including systematic assessment of complexity and risk; how the multidisciplinary team (MDT) ensures a personalised approach to women in planning care in light of any identified issues (particularly when homebirth is not recommended); how the MDT continues to maintain good communication at all stages of care with women and between all teams including ambulance services; and how dynamic risk assessment is managed and responded to throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period.

• Governance and oversight: including how governance is structured to ensure robust oversight of homebirth services by the whole organisation, so the executive board of each NHS Trust has appropriate oversight; that there is an audit programme that covers outcomes and clinical and operational guidance and leads to continual improvement; and that there is comprehensive homebirth guidance including standard operating procedures for all stages and aspects of care.

The National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence (NICE) uses available evidence to develop guidance to improve health and social care, including the Guideline on Intrapartum Care (published 29 September 2023 and updated on 14 November 2025). While not dedicated to homebirths, the guidance does cover the care of women and their babies during labour and immediately after birth in all settings and addresses issues around planning the place of birth.

We acknowledge that the current intrapartum care guidance does not provide sufficient clarity to women, staff and services as to how to safely support requests for and the provision of homebirth services. NHS England will continue working with partners including NICE, the Royal College of Midwives, the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Nursing & Midwifery Council, Maternity & Newborn Safety Investigations, the Care Quality Commission, and the General Medical Council to develop further resources that enable services to consistently support commissioners, providers and women and families.

In December 2025, NHS England convened partner organisations and their representatives, and initiated work to develop resources that rapidly close this gap in the guidance. We already expect maternity provider Trusts to have operating procedures in place for planning births at home, and this should include potential transfer processes. We have written to all maternity providers on 26th November 2025 reminding them of those expectations and the action to be taken. A copy of this letter has been included with the response to the Coroner. Where Trusts may not have appropriate operating procedures for planning births at home and managing high-risk pregnancies, we would expect this to be identified and escalated using the Perinatal Quality Oversight Model (2025). This model provides a structured approach for identifying and responding to safety concerns across Trusts, Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), and neonatal operational delivery networks.

3

We agree that women should be informed about all material risks, as has been established through the Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board judgment of the UK Supreme Court. Health professionals must take “reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment and of any reasonable alternative or variant treatments”.

For all women, communication around risk should be personalised. Donna Ockenden, in her review of the maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, made it clear that staff must ensure that women undergo a risk assessment at each contact throughout the pregnancy pathway and that “risk assessment must include ongoing review of the intended place of birth.” NHS England asked Trusts to implement this at the time. All pregnant women should also be offered a personalised care and support plan where such information is recorded, alongside the decisions they make about their care.

The General Medical Council (GMC) has issued guidance around decision making and consent, to support healthcare professionals in their conversations with patients and service users to help share the information needed to make decisions and to ensure informed consent is given.

The Royal College of Midwives (RCM) has separately issued guidance around informed decision making and care outside of guidance. The Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC) has also issued principles for supporting women's choices in maternity care. Employing Trusts are responsible for ensuring that their midwives and obstetricians practice in line with this guidance.

The NMC also maintains standards of proficiency for all midwives, which represent the skills, knowledge and attributes they must demonstrate. While the number of births attended is not alone a reliable indicator of a midwife’s fitness to practice intrapartum care, we will work with the NMC to consider the requirements for post-registration standards, that have a specific focus on homebirths, as part of the development of resources mentioned above.

Midwives providing care at home must be able to respond to developing emergencies on their own, sometimes without the support of multi-disciplinary teams and immediate access to hospital facilities, until additional assistance is provided from the ambulance service. Such midwives are expected to undergo regular training in this. NHS England will work with other organisations to ensure that multi-disciplinary team training simulation for obstetric emergencies includes at least one scenario starting in a community/homebirth setting, in addition to the yearly training competency required by all NHS midwives within the NHS England » Core competency framework version two (2023).

Following the meeting with national stakeholders in December 2025, ongoing work is taking place to develop resources that will fill the current gap in the guidance. We anticipate that those resources will touch upon all the matters of concern you have raised, including:

• safe working practices.
• midwifery competence, training and education. 4

• risk assessment and care planning.
• clinical care standards, IT and equipment.
• transfer of care including working with ambulance services, escalation and multi-disciplinary team involvement.
• informed decision making, communication and public information.
• personalised approaches to planning care, particularly when homebirth is not recommended.
• provision of comprehensive homebirth guidance, including standard operating procedures for all stages and aspects of care.

We acknowledge that this does not provide evidence of the number of women who have been transferred from home to hospital during labour or after birth, or of their and their baby’s outcomes. We will explore whether existing data gathering systems can be updated to provide regular reporting on outcomes associated with homebirths and will go out to tender to develop a longer-term solution to this evidence gap.

Local actions

Cheshire and Merseyside Integrated Care Board (ICB) have advised us, via NHS England’s North West Regional Team, that the Local Maternity and Neonatal System (LMNS) has contacted Warrington & Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust’s Deputy Director of Nursing & Care regarding this case. They have scheduled a meeting with the Chief Nurse at the Trust where they will discuss the actions taken by the Trust since the incident. The LMNS have already raised the Trust’s workforce model with them and will be supporting them with further work on this as a result of their own diagnostic report. Should the Coroner require further information regarding the outcome of this meeting, we recommend contacting ICB / LMNS or Trust directly.

As part of the Warrington and Halton Hospitals (WHH) enhanced perinatal surveillance, known locally as ‘Joint Oversight and Support’ (JOS), the LMNS will review individual guidelines associated with homebirths, including training needs analysis, home birth guidelines, escalation, guidelines in relation to midwifery staffing and management of the homebirth service, including a review of the Whole Time Equivalent midwifery workforce and on call requirements.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Pippa, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.

5
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Other
11 Mar 2026 PDF
Disputed

• NICE stated that home birth is covered in its guideline on intrapartum care (NG235). • The guideline covers eligibility, informed choice, and midwife support for home births. • The guideline includes recommendations that support further discussion with an appropriately trained senior or consultant midwife and/or a senior or consultant obstetrician (if there are obstetric issues) if such a discussion is wanted. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Davies, 

Re: Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths in respect of Pippa Isobel Waller GILLIBRAND

I write in response to the sad death of Pippa Isobel Waller Gillibrand. I would like to express my sincere condolences to Pippa’s family.  

Patient safety leads at NICE have carefully considered your report with respect to the areas for which NICE is responsible, and I have addressed each point in turn.

1. There is no national guidance in respect of home births

Home birth is covered in NICE’s guideline on intrapartum care (NG235). The risks and benefits of home birth compared to birth in an alongside midwifery unit, freestanding midwifery unit and hospital are covered, with information for counselling detailed in tables 6 to 9. The guideline provides comprehensive guidance on intrapartum care, including (but not limited to) home births. The guideline covers:

• Eligibility. Home birth might be considered for women with low-risk, uncomplicated pregnancies. This includes those without medical or obstetric complications and differentiates in terms of risk factors between nulliparous and multiparous women (recommendation 1.3.1).

• Informed Choice. Women should be supported to make informed decisions about their place of birth. This includes discussing risks, benefits, and available support (recommendation1.3.3-5).

• Midwife Support. Care during home birth should be provided by trained midwives, with access to emergency transfer protocols if complications arise. 10

Within the guideline, medical conditions and other factors that may affect the choice of planned place of birth are not given as contraindications to home birth but indicate where care in an obstetric unit would be expected to reduce risk to the mother or the baby. There are also recommendations that support further discussion with an appropriately trained senior or consultant midwife and/or a senior or consultant obstetrician (if there are obstetric issues) if such a discussion is wanted by the midwife or the woman. See recommendations 1.3.9 to
1.3.11 and tables 6 to 9.

NICE’s guideline on intrapartum care covers assessment in the first stage of labour in any setting, including the observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should led to the transfer of the woman to obstetric-led care, noting also that multiple risk factors may increase the urgency of the transfer, particularly if they have a cumulative effect. The guideline notes the more frequent observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should be undertaken in the second stage.

We therefore conclude that the subject of home births is appropriately covered in the current guidelines. The recommendations guide clinical practice and support women to make an informed choice about their care based on discussions with trained staff about the risks and benefits.

a. There is no guidance on the training that a midwife should undergo to ensure they are competent to manage a home birth

Training of midwives and the attainment and assessment of competencies are not within NICE’s remit. I recommend that you address these concerns to the organisations responsible for training and regulation of midwives (such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) and NHS England’s Workforce, Training and Education Directorate).

b. There is no guidance on the number of deliveries a midwife should support to attain or maintain their midwifery skills

Please see the response to point 2 above.

c. There is no guidance on the threshold for transfer to hospital from a home birth.

We do not agree. The intrapartum care guideline (NG235, recommendations 1.8.11-12 and
1.8.20) lists the observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should lead to the transfer of the woman to obstetric led care, noting also that multiple risk factors may increase the urgency of the transfer, particularly if they have a cumulative effect. The guideline notes that more frequent observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should be undertaken in the second stage.

However, it is also the case that local and patient specific factors (such as geography, distance from the obstetric unit, the availability of support and other factors) need to be taken into account when deciding on the need for patient transfer.

11

d. There is no guidance on safe staffing and equipment levels for home birth

NICE’s guideline on safe midwifery staffing for maternity settings (NG4) covers safe midwifery staffing in all maternity settings, including at home and in the community.

It aims to improve maternity care by giving advice on monitoring staffing levels and actions to take if there are not enough midwives to meet the needs of women and babies in the service. It provides recommendations on organisational requirements; setting the midwifery establishment; assessing differences in the number and skill mix of midwives needed and the number of midwives available; and monitoring and evaluating midwifery staffing requirements. The guideline also provides recommendations on assessing the skill mix of available maternity staff against care requirements. 

We provide several tools and resources to assist NHS commissioning bodies to implement our recommendations. For intrapartum care (NG235), these include a tabulated comparison of the different places of birth containing an estimate of the risks to the mother and the baby. There is also a link to endorsed resources produced by NHS England that support the implementation of the recommendations in this guideline.

Further, the Royal College of Midwives have just published a safe staffing document with recommendations Safe staffing = safe care - Royal College of Midwives (RCM)

e. There is no guidance on ‘supervision which should be provided during a home birth’.

We are unclear what this refers to. If this relates to ‘support’ for the attending midwives rather than supervision, we believe this is a concern about professional support and supervision, which is outside of NICE’s remit. As discussed above the NMC and RCM, will be better placed to consider the report and respond

f. There is no system for back-up should electronic systems fail

Responsibility for managing the delivery of NHS care rests with the appropriate commissioning body. We believe, therefore, that NHS England (NHSE) is best placed to consider this point.

g. There is no Information which should be provided to expectant parents around the risks of home birth or the experience of the team to enable them to make an informed choice (about whether to have a home birth).

NICE provides a number of tools and resources to support NG235, including a tabulated comparison of the different places of birth. This includes an estimate of the risks to the mother and the baby. There is also a link to endorsed resources produced by NHSE that support the implementation of recommendations in the NICE guideline on intrapartum care. These include the statement that ‘Very few mothers die or are injured as a result of birth, wherever they have their baby. Few babies die or are injured as a result of the birth itself, wherever the baby is born’

12

It is, however, true that NICE does not provide information on the required experience of the midwifery team for supporting home births, but this is outside our role. This is an issue for the NMC and the RCM to consider.  

2. There is no national or local collection of data around home births.

The Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS) collated by NHSE is a national source for homebirth statistics in England. It records the planned and actual place of birth, including home births. The Office for National Statistics Birth Registrations also records place of birth, which includes home births.

MBRRACEUK: Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK, collects data for maternal deaths, perinatal deaths, and serious maternal morbidity, but does not publish routine statistics on home births or maintain a dataset designed to analyse homebirth trends. However, if a maternal or perinatal death occurred following a home birth, the place of birth would be captured as part of the case record. Maternity and Newborn Safety Investigations (MNSI) collects data on serious incidents – this includes homebirth incidents when reported, but it does not track home births nationally.

NICE does not collect routine data around home births. This is likely to be commissioned by NHSE and supported by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). These organisations will be better placed to respond to the concerns raised here.  

Finally, we note that the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists have not been identified as an interested party in your report. You may find it helpful to appraise them of this case and seek their views.

I hope that the information above is helpful in clarifying the guidance that we have published that is of relevance to the circumstances of this very sad event. I also hope that the suggestions of other organisations who may be able to comment is useful.

I would like to reiterate my sincere condolences to the family of Pippa Gillibrand.
Department of Health and Social Care Central Government
19 Mar 2026 PDF
Action Planned

• Officials made enquiries with NHS England to address the coroner's concerns. • NHS England will be issuing a substantive response addressing the specific matters of concern raised. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Ms Davies, Thank you for the Regulation 28 report of 27 January 2026 sent to the Secretary of State / the Department of Health and Social Care about the death of Pippa Gillibrand. I am replying as the Minister with responsibility for Women’s Health and Mental Health. Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Pippa’s death, and I offer my sincere condolences to Victoria and her family. The circumstances your report describes are deeply concerning and it is a tragedy that Pippa died from a brain injury sustained due to an avoidable delay in her delivery. This should never have happened. You raise concerns over the lack of national guidance for home births, particularly the model of care, as well as concerns that there is no national or local collection of data around home births. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England to ensure we adequately address your concerns, and I understand there is work underway to develop national standards and a clear framework for homebirth services. As operational responsibility for issuing guidance and collecting data around home births sits with NHS England, they will be issuing a substantive response addressing the specific matters of concern raised. All women deserve access to safe care during childbirth. All staff should receive training that is tailored to their specific setting, including homebirths and how to manage emergencies at point of care. NHS England will speak further to what action is being taken to ensure this is the case, but I want to say how sorry I am that this did not happen for Victoria and Pippa. I understand that NHS England has written to all services and systems asking them to review their service provision, to prevent future tragedies and ensure that women can safely deliver babies across all settings. It is not acceptable that problems are not always identified effectively or quickly enough such as in the case of Victoria and Pippa, and issues such as these are why the Secretary of State asked Baroness Amos to carry out a national independent investigation in NHS maternity and neonatal care. The investigation will help us understand the systemic issues behind why so many women, babies and families experience unacceptable care, and the final report and recommendations are due to be published in June 2026. 15

The government is also setting up a National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, chaired by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. The Taskforce will address the recommendations of the investigation by developing a new national action plan to drive improvements across maternity and neonatal care.

Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention, and I am sorry again for the failings in care experienced by Victoria which led to the tragic loss of baby Pippa. This is not acceptable and we are taking your concerns very seriously.
NHS England NHS / Health Body
PDF
Action Planned

• NHS England is asking for an urgent review of the safety and quality of homebirth services. • The review should consider the operational running of the service, care planning and risk assessment, and governance and oversight. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear colleagues, Urgent review of homebirth services following Prevention of Future Deaths report We are writing to bring to your immediate attention the Prevention of future deaths report issued by the Senior Coroner for Manchester North after the tragic deaths of Jennifer Cahill and her child Agnes Cahill following a homebirth. The report raises a number of concerns and we are asking you to urgently review the safety and quality of your homebirth services. We would like you to consider the following issues which were highlighted in this case: The operational running of your service: including how it ensures that prompt midwifery care is available 24 hours a day; that staff are properly equipped, trained, prepared and skilled for providing birth and neonatal care in a home setting; that staff have senior multi- disciplinary support available to them at all times and have sufficient rest periods; and that potential transfer and extraction processes are clear and planned for each birth. Care planning and risk assessment: including systematic assessment of complexity and risk; how the multidisciplinary team (MDT) ensures a personalised approach to women in planning care in light of any identified issues (particularly when homebirth is not recommended); how the MDT continues to maintain good communication at all stages of care with women and between all teams including ambulance services; and how dynamic risk assessment is managed and responded to throughout pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period.

7

Copyright © NHS England 2025 2 Governance and oversight: including how governance is structured to ensure robust oversight of homebirth services by the whole organisation, so the executive board has appropriate oversight; that there is an audit programme that covers outcomes and clinical and operational guidance and leads to continual improvement; and that there is comprehensive homebirth guidance including standard operating procedures for all stages and aspects of care. Trusts have a continuing responsibility to offer homebirth as a choice for women. Where this review identifies concerns, please take prompt action to address them to ensure your homebirth service remains safe and high quality. While no formal response is required, we expect that the outcome of the review be reported to your Trust board and that you contact your regional NHS England team immediately if you identify any safety concerns requiring urgent attention.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 22 July 2025 I commenced an investigation into the death of Pippa Isobel Waller GILLIBRAND aged 11 Days. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 January 2026. The conclusion of the inquest was that: Narrative Conclusion - Pippa Gillibrand died as a result of a brain injury sustained due to an avoidable delay in her delivery.
Circumstances of the death
[Pippa's mother] was pregnant with her first child and was receiving antenatal care from Warrington Hospital. She decided to opt for a home birth as her preferred choice for delivery and this was agreed by the team. On Friday 23 August, a discussion took place between senior members of the midwifery team about staffing for the community teams going into the bank holiday weekend, as they were short staffed. Changes were made to the rota to include moving a member of staff from the hospital team to community on Sunday 25th, to ease the pressure on the team. There was no discussion about suspending the homebirth service, and there were no midwives from the home birth team on the on call rota that weekend, which was unusual. On 25 August 2024, a bank holiday weekend, [her mother] went into labour and called the birth suite to notify them. Her and her husband were told that the home birth team were out with another birth, and that they could come into hospital if they wanted to. Pippa's parents decided to wait. They were not told that there was only one home birth team, or that there was only the equipment for one team. Having heard the evidence, I found that at this point, there should have been an assessment and discussion as whether it was appropriate for [Pippa's mother] to continue as a home birth, or whether she should have been told that the team were unavailable, and she should come into hospital. One balance, given the staffing and that the allocated team were already engaged in another birth, with the equipment, her mother should have been told to come into hospital, and the home birth service suspended. Approximately 2 hours later, the parents made a further call to the birth suite informing them that waters had broken and requesting assistance. A decision was made for one of the community midwives, not part of the home birth team but with home birth experience, to attend to assess. Having heard the evidence as to the options available at this time and the risks/ consequences of each option, I found that should have been asked to come into hospital. An hour later, a community midwife attended at home and assessed her, followed shortly after by the arrival of a second midwife. Neither of these midwives were part of the home birth team. Both were team leaders for two of the other community teams. They would be on call for home births as the second midwife to support the home birth team, but this was not their day to day role. As community midwives, their only involvement in labour and delivery as a general rule would be when on call for the home births, and this was roughly around 3 a year per home birth midwife. Midwife 2 had more experience in previous roles as she had previously worked with the home birth service, and had more experience than a ‘standard’ community midwife. Midwife 1’s experience was significantly less and she said she had worked as a community midwife since 2016, with an average of 1-2 births a year. A decision was made that care for would continue at home as the safest option, as she was now fully dilated. In the next 30 mins, Pippa's heart rate was recorded at 9am, 9.15 and 9.30, not at 5 minute intervals as mandated by the guidance. The reason given for this was that the midwives were involved in setting up equipment, trying to get their laptops to work and discussing the staffing issues for the day and plan for that. Laptop connectivity was an issue and affected the recording of notes. Due to issues getting on the system, the fetal heart rate was not plotted on a partogram as it should have been, which would have assisted in monitoring and looking at trends. No paper notes/ partogram was available to the midwives, them having been removed when the Trust switched to electronic recording. Connectivity issues had been raised in the past. A third midwife arrived to bring tubing for entonox and the plan was for her to stay to replace midwife 1. She expressed her concern about this to both of the other midwives, on the basis she had no home birth experience and was worried that, if something went wrong, there was no immediate assistance available outside the door. I found that midwife 3 did in fact have more frequent and recent experience of intrapartum care than her 2 colleagues, as she worked in the hospital on a regular basis, and as such it was a reasonable decision for her to stay once the plan was for the home birth to continue, but she should not have been put in the position she was in, given her concerns. At 9.36 the fetal heart rate was heard again and felt to be normal, but was not heard for the full minute as a contraction started. Between 9.40 and 9.49 midwife 2 listened to the heart rate 3 times, after each contraction. Each time she was not able to listen for a full minute and she felt this was due to the time it was taking to allow to move between contractions and then find the heart rate. She did not hear any concerning features but could not rule them out as she was not able to hear for the required time. From 9.50 onwards, midwife 2 was struggling to listen to the heart rate for more than 20-30 seconds a time, which was much less than previously. What she could hear was still around 130bpm, but again she could not rule out any concerning features in the period that she could not hear. At 10am a decision was made to transfer to hospital and an ambulance was called. On arrival at hospital, was taken to theatre and baby Pippa was delivered by forceps in a poor condition. She was taken to the neonatal unit and later transferred to the Liverpool Women's Hospital for ongoing care. Despite treatment efforts, scans identified that Pippa had suffered a severe irreversible brain injury and her care was re-oriented to comfort care. She died in hospital on 5 September 2024. The evidence, which I accepted, was that had been brought to hospital sooner, in line with the issues in care identified, issues in identifying Pippa’s heart rate would have been acted upon and, on balance, Pippa would have been delivered earlier. The delay in delivery more than minimally, trivially or negligibly caused or contributed to her death. I heard evidence that the home birth team within the Trust is made up of 5 community midwives. They would each have a case load of patients who they would see ante-natally and post natally, and during labour and delivery. On average there are around 15-20 homebirths per year at the Trust, and so as a crude average, each home birth midwife will assist with around 3 home deliveries a year, plus occasionally assisting on the MLU if needed but this is not often. The second on call midwife is from the community team and may have less exposure to labour and delivery. Since Pippa's death, Warrington Hospital have re-modelled their home birth service such that it is now staffed by midwives from the midwifery led unit, who have far more recent experience and exposure to labour and delivery. They have a clear guideline that only one home birth can be safely managed at a time.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0042
Date of report
27 January 2026
Coroner
Victoria Davies
Coroner area
Cheshire

Responses identified

Responses identified 4 of 4
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 24 Mar 2026 (estimated).

Sent to

Department of Health and Social Care
National Institution for health and care excellence
NHS England
Secretary of State for Health & Social Care

Source links