F36

Use of information for effective regulation

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: CQC

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say in progress (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says in progress (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

A coordinated collection of accurate information about the performance of organisations must be available to providers, commissioners, regulators and the public, in as near real time as possible, and should be capable of use by regulators in assessing the risk of non-compliance. It must not only include statistics about outcomes, but must take advantage of all safety related information, including that capable of being derived from incidents, complaints and investigations.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

In September 2024 commentary published in February 2026, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England reported that implementation was ongoing, highlighting coordinated data collections such as the NHS Federated Data Platform, Care Quality Commission Insight tools, and the Learn from patient safety events service (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In its review published in February 2026, the Thirlwall Inquiry legal team noted that the government had accepted the recommendation, summarising earlier progress updates from 2014 and 2015 regarding national data systems (The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team, Feb 2026).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

About this summary
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The record above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted.
The Health and Social Care Act 2012, requires the Health and Social Care Information Centre to establish and operate a system for the collection or analysis of information in connection with the provision of health services and adult social care in England, if so directed by the Secretary of State or NHS England. The Informatics Services Commissioning Group, established in 2013, has been set up to enable the Health and Social Care Information Centre to become the focal point for data collected at the national level and that it increasingly becomes a checkpoint for those seeking new data collections.
The Health and Social Care Information Centre publishes more than 130 statistical publications annually via its website. It also publishes a range of national indicators and metrics many of which are available publicly through its indicator portal. This includes, for example, the Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator, indicators from the Quality Outcomes Framework and measures from the NHS Outcomes Framework.
In addition, a range of metrics are collected and published by other organisations across the health sector that relate directly to the quality of patient care. This includes data on infection control published by Public Health England and information on safety incidents that are published by NHS England. From November 2013, NHS England will increasingly make such information accessible through NHS Choices in order to bring together the most reliable and relevant data from national web services and act as a ‘front door’ to the best information on health and social care on the internet.
Published data can be readily accessed by regulators to assess the risk of non-compliance. Where needed, however, additional data can be made available to regulators, for example, through local arrangements such as direct memoranda of understanding with the appropriate data collector.
Published Official Statistics are subject to the UK Statistics Authority’s Code of Practice for Official Statistics34 (January 2009) which expects that statistical reports should be released as soon as they are ready to avoid unnecessary delays and that such publication should take into account the needs of data users and the public.
In the light of this, and other similar recommendations in the Review, we expect that the Health and Social Care Information Centre should explore options and make proposals for using standard reporting formats that can be made more available to all organisations, in line with the ‘do once and use many times’ principle, with a view to improving consistency of analysis across the system.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say in progress · 27 Feb 2026

The Health and Social Care Information Centre was replaced by NHS Digital, which merged with NHS England.

There are currently multiple coordinated collections of data for different audiences. They inform the actions of regulators and include outcomes but also wider information. These include: • Model Hospital: benchmarked insights across the quality of care, productivity and organisational culture to identify opportunities for improvement.

• NHS Federated Data Platform: software to improve the sharing of data currently stored in separate systems.

• NHS England’s own approach to monitoring performance in trusts.

• CQC’s Insight tools: to monitor quality of care and indicate risks

• CQC Inspection reports

Through the Learn from patient safety events (LFPSE) service, health and social care staff can:

• Record information about things that could have or did affect the safety of patients, or things that have gone well, in order to support learning and safety improvement

• Access, review and update event records they have permission to edit, and undertake governance activities to support local patient safety response and improvement

• View and download data about what patient safety events have been recorded within their own organisation, or by organisations within their Integrated Care Board (ICB) or region to the new Learn From Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service according to their level of access

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Implemented - Ongoing”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 36, PDF page 442-443.

●Department of Health and Social Care says in progress · 11 Feb 2015

The National Information Board ensures that the Health and Social Care Information Centre is the focal point for data collected at the national level and that it increasingly becomes a ‘gateway’ for those seeking new data collections. The Centre will continue to look for opportunities for standardising outputs in the context of the dissemination activities (for example to support the Care Quality Commission’s new inspection and intelligent monitoring activities), and it will work with its partners to explore how this approach might support their work.

In addition, a range of metrics are collected and published across the health sector that relate directly to the quality of patient care. This includes data on infection control (Public Health England), safety incidents (NHS England) and patients’ feedback reported on the NHS Choices website and, in future, through a national Health & Social Care Digital Service, which will be replacing NHS Choices. This new online service will bring together the most reliable and relevant data from national web services and act as a ‘front door’ to the best information on health and social care on the internet.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

Site note: The Inquiry addressed this recommendation to the Care Quality Commission, not to the Department of Health. The annex gives this update in the Department's publication and does not say who wrote it, so the row is the Department's report of the progress made on it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 27 Feb 2026

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government referred to the Health and Social Care Act 2012 which required the Health and Social Care Information Centre to establish and operate a system for the collection of analysis of information in connection with the provision of health services and adult social care in Engand. The Health and Social Care Centre was established in April 2013 and the Government said it published more than 130 statistical publications annually via its website, as well as a range of national indicators and metrics, many of which were available publicly through its indicator portal.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that the National Information Board ensured that the Health and Social Care Information Centre was the focal point for data collected at the national level, and the Centre would continue to look for opportunities for standardising statistical outputs. The Government said that a Health & Social Care Digital Service would be replacing NHS Choices, which would bring together data from national web services.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 18.2 No. 36, PDF page 442-443.

Earlier findings (1)

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government referred to the Health and Social Care Act 2012 which required the Health and Social Care Information Centre to establish and operate a system for the collection of analysis of information in connection with the provision of health services and adult social care in England. The Health and Social Care Centre was established in April 2013 and the Government said it published more than 130 statistical publications annually via its website, as well as a range of national indicators and metrics, many of which were available publicly through its indicator portal.

In the February 2015 Culture Change report, the Government said that the National Information Board ensured that the Health and Social Care Information Centre was the focal point for data collected at the national level, and the Centre would continue to look for opportunities for standardising statistical outputs. The Government said that a Health & Social Care Digital Service would be replacing NHS Choices, which would bring together data from national web services.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 36, PDF page 405-406.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.