Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Agnes Sansom

Ref: 2020-0002 Date: 7 Jan 2020 Coroner: Jeremy Chipperfield Area: County Durham and Darlington Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Patient record systems failed to communicate urgent information in a timely manner, and vulnerable patients were forced to share walking aids on hospital wards, creating safety risks.

Date 7 Jan 2020
56-day deadline 3 Mar 2020
Responses identified 1 of 1
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Patient record systems failed to communicate urgent information in a timely manner, and vulnerable patients were forced to share walking aids on hospital wards, creating safety risks.
View full coroner's concerns
The following circumstances create the risk of other deaths:

(i) existing patient record systems fail to ensure that important and urgent information is brought, in a timely way, to the attention of those who need it; and

(ii) vulnerable patients are obliged to share walking aids on hospital wards

Responses

1 respondent
County Durham and Darlington NHS NHS / Health Body
2 Mar 2020 PDF
Action Taken

Following review, physiotherapists now record changes in mobility or interventions in the Nervecentre system to ensure all staff are aware, in addition to maintaining detailed paper records. A buffer stock of walking aids has also been implemented for out-of-hours emergency use. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Mr Chipperfield Re: Agnes Gwenlllan Sansom am writing in response to Regulation 28 Report To Prevent Future Deaths, which you issued to County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust on 6th January 2020." You raised two matters of concern that create the risk of other deaths and will respond t0 each in turn; Existing patient record systems fail to ensure that important and urgent infonation Is brought; in & timely way, t0 the attention of those who neod it The root cause analysis report has been reviewed and we have concluded that a misleading choice of words have been used as follows: "The matron advised that nursing staff primarily utilise Nervecentre (an electronic patient record) accessed by & hand held device &8 the main source of information during & shift rather than the patient"s paper health record". It is not factual t0 describe Nervecentre a8 an electronic patient record: The Trust does not have an electronic patient record in place. Nervecentre is an electronic observations system which ig also used for some patient risk assessments; including falls risk assessment and mobility gallery: Detailed patient care records are multi-disciplinary and in paper format within the Trust: Both nursing and physiotherapy records, along with medical entries are recorded contemporaneously within the paper record, In relation to Ms Sansom the physiotherapist had recorded within the paper record, placed mobility advice above the bed and handed over this advice verbally to the nursing staff. On further discussion with the nursing staff they have confirmed that this is the accepted procese, however; have also said that as Nervecentre Is a hand held device they will on occasion refer to the mobility gallery within Nervecentre also. safe compassionate . joined-Up care

NHS] County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust To address this issue physiotherapists now record in the mobility gallery in Nervecentre if they identify change in mobility or change in interventions required This does not replace the detailed paper record but ensures that all staff are aware of this whether accessing paper records or Nervecentre: "vulnerable patients are obliged to share walking aids on hospital wards" During traditional working hours walking aids are provided by physiotherapists following assessment of the patient We have implemented a buffer stock of walking aids in the hospitals to ensure there is an adequate supply out of hours. Ideally the buffer stock should not be used as it is preferable that patients requiring a walking aid have a physiotherapist assessment first;, however, if someone presents who does require a walking frame out of hours we have ensured that there is a buffer stock available for emergency use_ hope that you find actions taken by the Trust to be adequate to address the issues that you have raised, but please do not hesitate t0 contact me if you require further information_

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On Twentieth August 2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of

Agnes Gwenllian SANSOM, aged 95

The investigation concluded at the end of inquest on 6th January, 2020. The conclusion of the inquest was:

I a Hospital Acquired Pneumonia I b Fractured Neck of Femur (Repaired) I c Frailty of Old Age

II Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction, Stroke
Circumstances of the death
The deceased was admitted to University Hospital of North Durham on 15th July 2019. She was known to be at risk of falling and of suffering serious injury or death in the event of falling.

The deceased was obliged to share a zimmer frame with another patient on the ward.

On 18th July, a physiotherapist assessed the deceased and observed that she (i) was likely to rise from her bed and mobilise unaided (contrary to nursing advice); and (ii) required supervision when mobilising. These observations were recorded in the deceased’s “Patient Health Record” (a paper document).

Had the physiotherapist’s observations been known to nursing staff or to the Ward Manager, action should have been taken to prevent unaided mobilisation.

Nursing staff relied only upon the Electronic Patient Record System (EPRS) for information about the deceased. The EPRS contained none of the physiotherapist’s observations and no alert as the importance of the same. Neither nursing staff nor Ward manager acted to prevent unaided mobilisation.

Unaided mobilisations continued after the physiotherapist’s assessment and during one such incident, on 20th July, the deceased fell, thereby sustaining the injury which led to her death.

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2020-0002
Date of report
7 January 2020
Coroner
Jeremy Chipperfield
Coroner area
County Durham and Darlington

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 3 Mar 2020.

Sent to

County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust

Source links