F181

Enforcement of the duty Statutory duties of candour in relation to harm to patients

Mid Staffs Inquiry · Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · Issued 6 February 2013 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care

Government responseDepartment of Health and Social Care: Accepted in part (Nov 2013)

DeliveryDHSC and NHS England say partially delivered (Feb 2026)Department of Health and Social Care says partially delivered (Feb 2015)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

A statutory obligation should be imposed to observe a duty of candour: On healthcare providers who believe or suspect that treatment or care provided by it to a patient has caused death or serious injury to a patient to inform that patient or other duly authorised person as soon as is practicable of that fact and thereafter to provide such information and explanation as the patient reasonably may request; On registered medical practitioners and registered nurses and other registered professionals who believe or suspect that treatment or care provided to a patient by or on behalf of any healthcare provider by which they are employed has caused death or serious injury to the patient to report their belief or suspicion to their employer as soon as is reasonably practicable. The provision of information in compliance with this requirement should not of itself be evidence or an admission of any civil or criminal liability, but non-compliance with the statutory duty should entitle the patient to a remedy.

Mid Staffs Inquiry, Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry · 6 Feb 2013 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended statutory duties of candour for healthcare providers and registered professionals. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England stated in commentary of September 2024, published in February 2026, that a statutory duty applies to regulated healthcare providers and can be enforced by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), while the obligation for individual professionals remains non-statutory (DHSC and NHS England, Feb 2026). In September 2026, the Thirlwall Inquiry found that "the discharge of the duty of candour, organisational and professional, is patchy" (The Rt Hon. Lady Justice Thirlwall DBE, Sep 2026).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

Report-level response context

Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.

Government response

●Department of Health and Social Care · Accepted in part · 19 Nov 2013

Speaker not recorded. Source: Department of Health, Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, volume 2 (Cm 8777-II), November 2013

Accepted in principle.
As set out in recommendation 174, the Government will introduce an explicit duty of candour as a Care Quality Commission registration requirement. The duty would apply to health and adult social care providers of regulated activities. This duty will be enforced using the Care Quality Commission powers. The Care Quality Commission consulted on the potential introduction of a Duty of Candour in its document A new start – Consultation on changes to the way Care Quality Commission regulates, inspects and monitors care. Its consultation response, published in October 2013, showed respondents were strongly in favour of a statutory duty. As a mark of the Government’s commitment to the duty of candour, the Care Bill puts a requirement on the Secretary of State to include a duty of candour in the requirements for registration with the Care Quality Commission. The Department of Health will consult on the regulations setting this duty which would require providers to inform people of the incident, provide an explanation, and where appropriate an apology. The Department will seek advice from experts on how to improve the reporting of patient safety incidents, including whether or not the threshold for the statutory duty of candour should include moderate harm. The final details will be set out in new regulations, which provide the flexibility to amend or vary the regulations over time as the new duty is established.
As a further incentive for Trusts to promote a culture of openness across their organisation, the Government will consult on proposals about whether Trusts should reimburse a proportion or all of the NHS Litigation Authority’s compensation costs when they have not been open about a safety incident. Where the NHS Litigation Authority finds that a Trust has not been open with patients or their families about a patient safety incident which turns into a claim, it could have the discretion to reduce or remove that Trust’s indemnity cover for that claim. The NHS Litigation Authority will continue to make compensation payments due to patients. Trusts who were not open with their patients could be required to reimburse the NHS Litigation Authority for a proportion or all of the payment.
The Government agrees that the professional values of individual clinicians are critical in ensuring an open culture in which mistakes are reported, whether or not they cause actual harm. General Medical Council, Nursing and Midwifery Council and other professional regulators will be working to agree consistent approaches to candour and reporting of errors, including a common responsibility across doctors and nurses, and other health professions to be candid with patients when mistakes occur whether serious or not, and clear guidance that professionals who seek to obstruct others in raising concerns or being candid would be in breach of their professional responsibilities. The Department of Health will ask the Professional Standards Authority to advise and report on progress with this work. The professional regulators will develop new guidance to make it clear professionals’ responsibility to report ‘near misses’ for errors that could have led to death or serious injury, as well as actual harm, at the earliest available opportunity and will review their professional codes of conduct to bring them into line with this guidance. The professional regulators will also review their guidance to panels taking decisions on professional misconduct to ensure they take proper account of whether or not professionals have raised concerns promptly.

Response document: Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. Volume Two of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Response to the Inquiry's Recommendations

Site note: This is volume two of "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777-II), the government's response to the Inquiry's 290 recommendations, published by the Department of Health on GOV.UK on 19 November 2013 and dated to that day here. The PDF the row links to is the accessible edition, whose title page reads "January 2014". The Department of Health has been the Department of Health and Social Care since January 2018. The volume says it includes accounts from each of the national organisations the recommendations name, but it does not mark which passage each organisation wrote, so every row is filed under the Department that published it.

Delivery

●DHSC and NHS England say partially delivered · 27 Feb 2026

There is a duty of candour professional and statutory, The statutory duty of candour is a general duty to be open and transparent with people receiving care which applies to all health and social care providers that the CQC regulates. Regulation 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulation 2014.The CQC can take enforcement action for breaches of the regulation.

There is also a professional duty of candour, and although not statutory, every health and care professional has a professional responsibility to be open and honest when things go wrong.

Please see our response to recommendation 21 above for further detail on the statutory Duty of Candour, including DHSC’s review.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Partially Implemented – Closed”. Table row: section 18.2 No. 181, PDF page 513-514.

●Department of Health and Social Care says partially delivered · 11 Feb 2015

The Department of Health s put in place a new statutory duty of candour as a requirement for registration with the Care Quality Commission. This has applied to NHS organisations since November 2014 and will come into effect for other organisations from April 2015. .

As stated in the update to recommendation 175, eight of the UK professional regulators issued a joint statement on candour in October 2014 and the General Medical Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council are consulting on joint draft explanatory guidance for the professional duty of candour.

From: Culture Change in the NHS supporting Annex (annex to Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries)

Site note: This is the supporting annex published on 11 February 2015 with "Culture change in the NHS: applying the lessons of the Francis Inquiries" (Cm 9009), attached to the GOV.UK page as "Culture change in the NHS supporting annex". The annex has no title page; that title is GOV.UK's and the PDF's own. Its table has four columns (No., Recommendation, Hard Truths Government response, Progress update), and the row carries the Progress update cell. No column says which organisation wrote an update, so the row is filed under the Department of Health (now the Department of Health and Social Care), which published it.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

●Thirlwall Inquiry · 15 Sep 2026

In a nutshell, the discharge of the duty of candour, organisational and professional, is patchy.

From: Report of the Thirlwall Inquiry: Countess of Chester Hospital, 2015 to 2018, Volume III (accessible)

●Thirlwall Inquiry legal team · 15 May 2024

This recommendation was accepted by the Government in principle.

In the January 2014 Hard Truths report, the Government said it would consult on proposals about where trusts should reimburse a proportion or all of the NHS Litigation Authority’s compensation costs when they had not been open about a safety incident.

Reg. 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 imposed a duty of candour on health service bodies. It did not impose a statutory obligation on individual medical practitioners or nurses.

A joint statement was issued on behalf of the Chief Executives of the statutory regulators of healthcare professionals (including the General Medical Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council) in October 2014 stating their common approach to the professional duty of candour.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 16.2 No. 181, PDF page 478-479.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.