IHRD-94 Accepted in Part

Clinical Negligence Litigation Reform

Hyponatraemia Inquiry · Report of the Inquiry into Hyponatraemia-related Deaths · Issued 31 January 2018 · Addressed to: Northern Ireland Executive

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation

The interests of patient safety must prevail over the interests engaged in clinical negligence litigation. Such litigation can become an obstacle to openness. A government committee should examine whether clinical negligence litigation as it presently operates might be abolished or reformed and/or whether appropriate alternatives can be recommended.

Hyponatraemia Inquiry, Report of the Inquiry into Hyponatraemia-related Deaths · 31 Jan 2018 Source PDF →

Response — verbatim from government

Northern Ireland Executive

Under consideration. No government committee established to date to examine clinical negligence litigation reform.

Northern Ireland Executive · 1 Mar 2018 Written response →

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

  • 6 Feb 2026 · Northern Ireland Executive No government committee has been established to examine clinical negligence litigation reform. No progress in 8 years. View source → Not Implemented

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.