Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Theo Young

Ref: 2020-0094 Date: 20 Apr 2020 Coroner: Karen Henderson Area: Surrey Responses identified: 3 / 4 View PDF

Concerns were raised regarding the conduct, investigation, and conclusions made by the HSIB.

Date 20 Apr 2020
56-day deadline 13 Jul 2020 est.
Responses identified 3 of 4
Child Death (from 2015) Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Concerns were raised regarding the conduct, investigation, and conclusions made by the HSIB.
View full coroner's concerns
in relation to the role of the HSIB in their conduct, investigation and conclusion:

Responses

3 respondents
the Department of Health and Social Care Central Government
21 May 2020 PDF
Action Taken

HSIB has made changes to its investigation methodology and processes to enable them to share early learning with Trusts following the investigation into Theo’s death. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Dr Henderson

Thank you for your letter of 20 April 2020 to Matt Hancock about the death of Theo Benjamin Young. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for patient safety and maternity.

Firstly, I would like to say how deeply sorry I am for the tragic death of baby Theo and for the failings in care detailed in your report. That Theo’s death could have been avoided is extremely distressing and I offer my most heartfelt condolences to his parents and all those affected by his death. I am determined that we do all we can to learn from Theo’s death to ensure the safety of health services and prevent such deaths from occurring again.

Your report raises important matters of concern in relation to the conduct by the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) of investigations under its Maternity Investigation Programme, and specifically the investigation carried out into Theo’s death.

It may be helpful if I explain that HSIB was established in April 2017 to conduct independent investigations of serious patient safety incidents in NHS-funded care across England, with a specific focus on system-wide learning and improvement. In 2018, HSIB‘s remit expanded to include the investigation of maternity incidents under qualifying criteria set out in legislation1.

HSIB has dual accountability. HSIB reports to NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSEI) on operational issues and to the Department of Health and Social Care on performance. Quarterly accountability meetings, that I chair bi-annually, monitor progress and review performance against agreed key performance indicators for HSIB’s national and maternity investigation programmes.

1

evelopment_Authority__HSIB__Directions_2018.pdf

In relation to HSIB’s important work on the Maternity Investigation Programme, I am aware that investigation processes, such as obtaining family approval and accessing medical records, have affected the overall timescales, causing a backlog of reports. However, HSIB is taking measures to improve performance, including the adaptation of some investigation processes and additional support from clinical advisors and I am advised the backlog is reducing.

My officials, together with NHSEI, have considered the concerns in your report carefully and assurance has been sought from HSIB of the processes in place for maternity investigations, as well as its conduct of the investigation into the death of Theo Young.

I agree with you that it is vitally important that learnings are identified and shared as quickly as possible. As HSIB has explained in its response to your report, it recognises the vital importance of rapid learning, with opportunities within the investigation process for Trusts to identify and address immediate safety risks. For example:

• NHS trusts are advised to complete rapid 72-hour reviews to enable the identification and mitigation of immediate safety risks;

• HSIB investigators escalate immediate safety risks where they are identified to senior Trust management and seek assurance that they are addressed; and,

• HSIB investigators provide regular written updates on investigations to Heads of Midwifery. In addition, roundtable reviews and quarterly thematic reviews are held with Trusts that have active HSIB investigations to share learning from HSIB’s wider Maternity Investigation Programme.

HSIB advises that its investigation into Theo’s death provided the Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust with opportunities to identify and address immediate safety risks in its maternity services.

You may also wish to note that NHS Trusts are expected to identify learnings in cases of stillbirth or neonatal death through use of the National Perinatal Mortality Review Tool.

As accepted by HSIB, the length of time it took to conclude the investigation into Theo Young’s death exceeded the expected timeframe. I note that this was one of the first investigations conducted by HSIB under its Maternity Investigation Programme. Since then, HSIB has made changes to its investigation methodology and processes to enable them to share early learning with Trusts.

HSIB has also confirmed that, through ongoing communication with the Trust, it provided opportunities for safety information to be shared and acted upon as the investigation into Theo’s death progressed.

In relation to the quality of the investigation by HSIB of Theo’s death, HSIB advises that this was conducted in line with the statutory Directions and disputes that inaccuracies were due to error on its part.

I am advised that HSIB’s investigation into the death of Theo Young made six recommendations to the Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust and I expect the Trust to take the necessary action to ensure these are addressed, as well as reflect on the findings of your investigation.

Finally, I wish to take the opportunity to emphasise the important work underway nationally to improve the safety of maternity services.

The Government’s Maternity Ambition is to halve the 2010 rate of stillbirths, neonatal and maternal deaths and brain injuries in babies occurring during or soon after birth by 2025. The ambition also includes reducing the rate of pre-terms births from eight to six per cent. The NHS Long-Term Plan includes new measures to improve safety, quality and continuity of care that will help achieve our Maternity Ambition. This includes every maternity service in the NHS in England actively implementing elements of the Saving Babies’ Lives Care Bundle which comprises key aspects of care such as, reducing smoking in pregnancy; risk assessment and surveillance for fetal growth restriction; raising awareness of reduced fetal movement; effective fetal monitoring during labour and reducing preterm birth.

I hope this reply is helpful. Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention.

NADINE DORRIES
the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch Other
22 May 2020 PDF
Disputed

The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) disputes the coroner's concerns, stating they provided opportunities for safety information to be shared and acted upon, and that inaccuracies were not due to their error. HSIB maintains its investigation was conducted in line with statutory directions. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Dr Henderson, RE: Matters of Concern regarding HSIB in The Inquest Touching the Death of Theo Benjamin Young: A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths Thank you for your report The Inquest Touching the Death of Theo Benjamin Young: A Regulation 28 Report – Action to Prevent Future Deaths which I received from your office by email on 20 April. Within it you have raised several Matters of Concern pertaining to the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB), requesting that we provide a response to you that contains details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for such action, or explanation of why no action is proposed. I appreciate the opportunity for HSIB to respond to your concerns and explain our processes for addressing safety risks identified during HSIB maternity investigations, both in general and with respect to our investigation into the neonatal death of baby Theo. We have thoroughly reviewed all our records and evidence collected by our investigation team during the investigation, providing a comprehensive explanation and clarification for each of the three concerns you have raised. Matter of Concern 1 “The HSIB specifically requested the Trust not to undertake their own investigation effectively preventing the recognition of causes of concern and therefore being unable to undertake any immediate and necessary remedial action at the earliest opportunity to prevent future deaths”. HSIB response HSIB places utmost importance on the need to ensure that rapid learning takes place for cases that fall within the eligibility criteria of HSIB’s maternity investigation programme. There are several stages throughout HSIB investigations where the opportunity for identifying and addressing safety risks is provided to trusts, and these were implemented during the investigation of baby Theo’s death.
1. It is HSIB policy that all NHS trusts are advised to complete 72-hour reports for cases that are referred as eligible for investigation. The purpose of this is to ensure that trusts can readily identify immediate safety concerns and take necessary actions while they await the commencement and outcome of HSIB’s more in-depth reviews. Trusts are not mandated to share their 72-hour reports, but many share them with HSIB voluntarily. HEALTHCARE SAFETY INVESTIGATION BRANCH HSIB, A1 Cody Technology Park Farnborough Hampshire

This enables HSIB to compare the Trust’s and our investigation’s early findings so that any areas for concern may be highlighted. With respect to baby Theo’s investigation, the Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (‘SaSH Trust’) undertook a 72-hour review, but they declined to share this review with HSIB. Following ongoing engagement with the senior management team at SaSH Trust, they now share their 72-hour reports with HSIB on request.

2. To further support trusts with rapidly addressing safety risks in their maternity services, HSIB investigators also immediately escalate any safety concerns uncovered during the investigation process to the Head of Midwifery and Clinical Director. This case was discussed at our clinical panel at the outset of the investigation, which identified key lines of enquiry, but the panel did not identify any preliminary findings which suggested an immediate risk to patient safety. Through our regular engagement processes, we ensure that prompt actions are taken by trusts in response to any matters raised through early escalation. Fortnightly written updates are sent to all Trust Heads of Midwifery to provide updates on the progress of HSIB’s local investigations and to seek support with addressing any barriers to progress. These fortnightly updates are specific to each local trust and detail the progress of all investigations relating to that trust.

3. HSIB held a roundtable review with SaSH Trust on 10 January 2019 which included a discussion of baby Theo’s case. A summary letter was sent to the Head of Midwifery on the same day and outlined HSIB’s concerns relating to staffing, escalation, interpretation services and debriefing.

4. Quarterly thematic reviews are also held with each trust where there are active investigations to share learning accruing from HSIB’s maternity investigations across the country, alongside identifying themes for each organisation where there are particular areas of concern. HSIB held quarterly review meetings with SaSH Trust on 10 May 2019, 6 September 2019 and 6 December 2019. Through these processes, HSIB provided sufficient, appropriate and timely information to support SaSH Trust’s early learning activity from baby Theo’s death. In terms of the role of HSIB’s maternity investigations, the DHSC Safer Maternity Report 2017 referenced HSIB maternity investigations, stating that, “These investigations will be the primary and, as far as possible, the only investigation of the individual case and may be informed if appropriate by tools that local providers will be using such as the Standardised Perinatal Mortality Review Tool for perinatal deaths. This will ensure consistency for all 'Each Baby Counts' cases nationally and avoid duplication and unnecessary complexity for families.”

Matter of Concern 2 “HSIB indicated to the Trust at the outset that their investigation would take approximately six months which is highly likely to delay the introduction of any immediate necessary measures by the Trust to prevent further deaths”.

HSIB response The timescale to produce HSIB reports is set in paragraph 4(1) of the HSIB Maternity Directions 20181 as follows: HSIB must, within a reasonable period of time, produce a report on the matters set out in sub- paragraph 3(2) and, as far as reasonably practicable, such period should not exceed six months from the date on which the qualifying maternity case in question was referred to it The timeline in this particular case is set out below:

This report did exceed our target timescale; however, HSIB communicated regularly with SaSH Trust and the family during the investigation process and provided the Trust with relevant safety information. This is a standard process in our investigations as detailed in the response above and enables trusts to introduce any immediately necessary measures to prevent future deaths before the sharing of our report. This was one of the first investigations of the HSIB Maternity Programme and many of the processes and systems had yet to mature. The HSIB has taken on board the feedback and is assured that the continuous development since this investigation has led to more rapid investigation times whilst maintaining the quality and communication with trusts and families.

1 The National Health Service Trust Development Authority (Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch) (Additional Investigatory Functions in respect of Maternity Cases) 2018 25/05/18 Incident date 12/06/18 Referral date 9/10/18 Draft report submitted for QA 15/02/19 Date draft report shared with trust 28/02/19 Trust response returned 8/03/19 Shared with the family and amendments made 08/03/19-17/05/19 Reviewed with family on three separate occasions, and shared with members of staff, further comments addressed 17/05/19 Final Trust amendments received and actioned 28/06/19 Final report completed and signed off

Matter of Concern 3 “The initial draft report contained factual errors and inaccuracies requiring considerable input by the Trust to resolve. The final report is insufficiently detailed and was completed 18 months after the death, during which time further deaths could have resulted”. HSIB response HSIB consider that the report provides detailed reflection of the investigation that was undertaken. Evidence was collated from the medical records, Trust guidelines and policies and interviews with the family and staff (as outlined as requirements in paragraph 3 (3) of the HSIB Maternity Directions 2018). The final report established the facts, having reviewed the sequence of events and contributory factors that led to the outcome for this baby, taking into consideration specific concerns raised by the family. The final report had six safety recommendations which were aligned to current best practice. HSIB were able to make these recommendations based on the information provided during the investigation. HSIB’s quality assurance process involves sharing the draft investigation report with the Trust and family for their comment on factual accuracy. With regard to baby Theo’s death, SaSH Trust made seven references to content being ‘factually incorrect’. Following HSIB’s review of the investigation evidence, only two of SaSH Trust’s factual accuracy submissions were found to be correct and these were due to information not being made available by the Trust to the investigation team at the time. A draft version of the report was shared with SaSH Trust 8 months after referral. The Trust returned the draft 13 days later with suggested amendments. Between 08/03/19 and 17/05/19 (10 weeks) the Trust continued to review the report and returned further amendments on 17/05/19. The final version of the HSIB investigation report was shared with the family and SaSH Trust 14 months after Theo’s death, not 18 months as stated. The ongoing communication processes between HSIB and the Trust during that time were designed to ensure that opportunities for identifying and addressing safety risks were not missed. Since this investigation, the HSIB are not aware of cases with similar themes repeated within this Trust. I trust this response provides you with explanations and assurance about HSIB’s investigation and report production processes, and our commitment to reducing patient safety risk in NHS maternity services.

Your sincerely

Chief Investigator

PA to

|
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS / Health Body
8 Jul 2020 PDF
Action Taken

Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust increased midwifery staffing, instituted daily staff allocation reviews, improved CTG monitoring and interpretation via training and audits, and recruited a Senior Lead Midwife. These actions led to an 'Outstanding' CQC rating in January 2019. (AI summary)

View full response
Dear Dr Henderson, Response to Regulation 28 Report – The Inquest Touching the Death of Theo Benjamin Young on 29.05.2018 from Surrey & Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

The Trust has received the Regulation 28 Report following the Inquest Touching the Death of Theo Benjamin Young. In this report you rightfully detailed eight failures in the care we provided to Theo and his mother during her labour for which we are truly sorry. We respectfully note that in the report you reported no matters of concern pertaining to the Trust and we also note that in the Inquest you concluded that you had heard considerable evidence on actions already taken by the Trust regarding preventing future deaths. You were satisfied that the Trust took this extremely seriously and commended the Trust for having independently taken steps to change practice following Theo’s death. In order to assure all stakeholders, the Trust sets out here the specific actions that have been taken to minimise the risk of similar failings happening in the future: In recognition of the effect staffing ratios and skill mix have on safety, we have increased midwifery staffing numbers by 10 full time equivalents and undertake a six monthly Board level review of midwifery staffing. We have instituted a daily review of staff allocation throughout the maternity department by the delivery suite co-ordinator and manager on call to ensure safe allocation and redeployment of staff. In recognition of the failings regarding CTG monitoring and interpretation we have completed the following:

Please reply to: Name: Michael Wilson Title: Chief Executive  : 01737

Email: @nhs.net

Headquarters East Surrey Hospital Canada Avenue Redhill RH1 5RH

Tel: 01737 768511

An Associated University Hospital of Brighton and Sussex Medical School All staff involved in the care of women in the maternity department complete a CTG online training package and an annual competency assessment. All new starters will complete this before caring for women in labour and all staff will repeat this training and competency assessment on an annual basis. We have reviewed the ‘fresh eyes’ approach to review fetal and maternal observations during labour so that independent review of CTG traces is a routine part of care. All staff are clear that if a satisfactory CTG trace cannot be obtained then fetal scalp electrodes are to be used and if this proves not possible then immediate escalation to the senior obstetric team is expected. The Trust has also recruited a Senior Lead Midwife whose role is to ensure daily monitoring and oversight of care on the labour ward. Since these actions were put in place, our Maternity Department was inspected by the Care Quality Commission and in January 2019 was rated ‘Outstanding’. The department has also been awarded compliance with the Maternity CNST incentive scheme last year which includes the provision of assurance in regard to the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle In the Regulation 28 Report you raised specific concerns regarding the role of HSIB in their conduct, investigation and conclusion. We agree that the requirement of HSIB not to undertake our own investigation could have prevented the timely undertaking of remedial action. In fact, as we have described, the Trust did formulate and complete an action plan long before the HSIB report was finalised. If we had not done this and instead waited for more than a year for the final report then potentially more babies could have been at risk. Our concern would be the potential response of other organisations to a request like this from HSIB. In addition, the request from HSIB for the Trust not to collect statements from the staff involved in the incident seems wrong in our view. It is self-evident that compiling contemporaneous records of what happened will be more accurate than relying on individual memories of the incident some months later. The Trust acknowledges that the timeline of HSIB investigations has improved since their investigation into the death of Theo Benjamin Young. Safety of our patients remains the Trust’s paramount focus and being open, honest and transparent are crucial factors in being an organisation that learns from incidents. We have shared this response with NHS England and the Care Quality Commission.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
The inquest into the death of Theo Benjamin Young was opened on 28th November 2018. It was resumed on 9th March 2020 and was concluded on 10th March 2020 The medical cause of death was found to be: 1a. Hypoxic ischaemic injury and hyaline membrane disease 1b. Perinatal hypoxia

Conclusion: perinatal hypoxia contributed to by neglect
Circumstances of the death
Theo’s mother was admitted to East Surrey Hospital on the 24th May 2018
Copies sent to
1. See names in paragraph 1 above

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2020-0094
Date of report
20 April 2020
Coroner
Karen Henderson
Coroner area
Surrey

Responses identified

Responses identified 3 of 4
1 response not yet linked

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 13 Jul 2020 (estimated).

Sent to

Department of Health and Social Care
East Surrey Hospital
HSIB
NHS England

Source links