Action Planned
The AEA and BAGMA would support proposals for change from the Department for Transport including extending mandatory roadworthiness testing to vehicles travelling below 25mph and requiring failsafe breakaway systems on all trailers. (AI summary)
View full response
AEA & BAGMA response to Report to Prevent Future Deaths in the case of Mr Jon-Paul Prigent The Agricultural Engineers Associaঞon (AEA) and the Briঞsh Agricultural and Garden Machinery Associaঞon (BAGMA) welcome the opportunity to respond to the coroner’s report on this important issue. BAGMA is owned by the AEA and we work together closely on industry-wide concerns such as this, so we are providing a joint response. This response is supported by the members of both organisaঞons. Exisঞng products and services Before turning to future acঞons, we wish to highlight our exisঞng products and services that are aimed at improving the safety of tractors and trailers used on UK roads. Given its importance to the safety record of our members’ products, this topic has been a big focus of our work over many years. While there is no requirement for the roadworthiness of tractors and trailers to be independently tested, BAGMA does operate a voluntary scheme. The Agricultural Tractor- Trailer Scheme (ATTS) incorporates both roadworthiness inspecঞon and brake performance tesঞng in one package. In our view, the ATTS is the only tesঞng regime that provides a robust assessment of the roadworthiness of agricultural tractors and trailers as no other scheme incorporates brake performance tesঞng alongside roadworthiness inspecঞon. Applicable to tractors, trailers, trailed implements or self-propelled agricultural machines, the ATTS tesঞng can be provided by experienced dealer technicians, larger farm and fleet users that have their own servicing personnel or independent service engineers. Each technician undertakes a 2-day training course, which includes both pracঞcal and ‘class-room’ training which concludes with a wrien examinaঞon. Every ATTS technician must aend refresher training a[er 5 years to ensure they keep abreast of tesঞng and inspecঞon procedures and legal requirements. Each trailer/trailed implement inspected under the ATTS is subject to a 37-point inspecঞon, based on HGV annual test inspecঞon criteria, complemented by a brake performance test. During vehicle inspecঞon and tesঞng the technician completes an inspecঞon record form that includes their own unique idenঞficaঞon number, to ensure traceability and recordability. The ATTS procedure will idenঞfy and assess any tractor or trailer defects which need to be addressed: it is then up to the vehicle owner to have these recঞfied. Recognising that much of the responsibility for ensuring the safety of tractor and trailer braking rests with the user and the service technicians that support them, the AEA has produced detailed guidance on both the legal requirements and the pracঞcal steps needed to ensure that braking systems are safe and well maintained. Our Look Behind You guide was first published in 2010 and was updated in 2020, incorporaঞng interacঞve elements, such as short videos and animaঞons, helping to improve understanding of key aspects of safety. The guide has been widely distributed through machinery dealers and is also available online at: hps://aea.uk.com/look-behind-you/. It was supported by most of the main suppliers of tractors and agricultural trailers to the UK market.
Roadworthiness Tesঞng Turning to future acঞons, as the coroner’s report notes, there is currently no requirement for independent roadworthiness tesঞng for agricultural tractors and trailers, where they are solely used for agricultural acঞviঞes. The AEA and BAGMA have long supported calls for such a regime to be introduced, parঞcularly for the larger and heavier vehicles that are now commonplace. While any decision on making such a scheme compulsory must be made by the Secretary of State for Transport, AEA and BAGMA would be happy to offer to take the lead in administering a scheme. In our view, the ATTS referred to above could form the basis of a mandatory tractor and trailer roadworthiness tesঞng scheme. As indicated above, we already have training programmes in place to assess and approve service technicians to be able to deliver the required tesঞng, with periodic refresher training required. We would have no difficulty in expanding that training programme to cover the larger number of approved technicians that would be required for a compulsory scheme. Furthermore, the AEA already has experience of administering a similar tesঞng scheme through the Naঞonal Sprayer Tesঞng Scheme (NSTS), which we run on behalf of government. This requires all crop sprayers in use by farms, horঞcultural growers and amenity providers to be tested periodically. As with the ATTS, inspectors are trained and approved by the AEA and all tests carried out are recorded on a naঞonal database, administered by the AEA, with cerঞficates issued to machinery owners as proof of compliance. We believe that the requirements of a tractor and trailer roadworthiness scheme would be similar to those of the NSTS. Therefore, we believe that our exisঞng experience of both tractor and trailer tesঞng and administering a similar scheme, means that the AEA and BAGMA would be well placed to take on the administraঞon of a new scheme, should government choose to introduce one. We would, of course, be happy to work with the Department for Transport and the DVSA on the details. Some iniঞal funding might be required to support the development of a scheme but once it is up and running, any costs should be covered by fees charged to carry out tesঞng. Changes to legislaঞon While roadworthiness tesঞng would go a long way to addressing the concerns idenঞfied in this case, the coroner’s report also idenঞfies deficiencies in the current legislaঞon around use of agricultural tractors and trailers on the road. The AEA and BAGMA would support changes to legislaঞon, in parঞcular to address the current lack of any requirement for either ‘Breakaway Failsafe’ trailer brakes or a secondary coupling (such as a safety chain) between the towed and towing vehicle, if the vehicles don’t exceed 40 km/h. Of course, any decision on amendments to legislaঞon rests with the Secretary of State for Transport. However, the AEA and BAGMA stand ready to provide any advice required to inform that decision. We believe that the proposed changes could be achieved with a relaঞvely simple amendment to the Road Vehicles (Construcࢼon and Use) Regulaࢼons 1986. Arঞcle 86a of those regulaঞons only currently applies to vehicles travelling above 40km/h (approximately 25mph). We suggest that this should be expanded to include vehicles travelling below that speed with a gross weight above a certain level. This could be modelled on regulaঞons in the Republic of
Ireland, which use 5 tonnes as the cut off but we have no parঞcular view on whether that would be the most appropriate limit in the UK circumstances. The Irish road vehicle legislaঞon was historically very similar to GB legislaঞon but was revised in January 2016 to address concerns similar to those expressed by the coroner. Several other EU countries have also updated their naঞonal legislaঞon, so could provide alternaঞve approaches for consideraঞon. While there would be some cost involved in ensuring that exisঞng trailers were able to comply with any change to the rules, we believe that these would not be parঞcularly onerous. In some cases, the fiমng of a secondary coupling is all that would be required, which can be done at low cost. The Irish market is typically supplied from the UK, so tractor and trailer manufacturers are already used to providing similar couplings there. In other cases, kits are available to convert trailer braking systems into ‘breakaway failsafe’ systems for below £1,000. These can be installed in a farm workshop. Most new trailers already incorporate such braking systems, so would not require and further modificaঞon. Therefore, we believe that the impact of any changes to the legislaঞon would be limited. Conclusion We would support any proposals for change from the Department for Transport in the two areas discussed above. We note that for the changes to achieve the safety improvements we are hoping for, there would also need to be effecঞve enforcement of the requirements. That hasn’t always been the case in the past; indeed, the case referred to in the coroner’s report shows that exisঞng requirements aren’t followed by all users. Nevertheless, we believe that the changes proposed would certainly reduce the likelihood of serious accidents taking place in future.