POH-14

Post Office to engage in negotiations during HSSA appeal period

Post Office Horizon Inquiry · Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry: Volume 1 Report · Issued 8 July 2025 · Addressed to: Post Office Ltd, Department for Business and Trade

Government responsePost Office Ltd: Accepted (Oct 2025)Department for Business and Trade: Accepted (Oct 2025)

DeliveryCabinet Office says completed (Mar 2026)

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

During the nine-month period afforded to claimants to submit an appeal to the Department in HSSA, the Post Office shall engage in negotiations and/or mediation with any claimants who notify the Post Office of a desire to seek a negotiated or mediated settlement of their claim.

Post Office Horizon Inquiry, Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry: Volume 1 Report · 8 Jul 2025 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

The Inquiry recommended negotiations or mediation with claimants during their appeal window. In an update of February 2026, published in March 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) had applied the recommendation by allowing claimants to hold good faith or escalation meetings with Post Office Limited during a revised three-month notification window (Cabinet Office, Mar 2026). In January 2026, the Business and Trade Select Committee questioned whether this three-month deadline gave claimants sufficient time, noting that over 4,000 claimants were still awaiting final settlement across all schemes (Business and Trade Select Committee, Jan 2026). In October 2025, Nigel Railton, Chair of the company, confirmed it was actively corresponding with legal advisers to resolve claims in that period (Nigel Railton response, Oct 2025).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 5 Oct 2026.

Government response

●Post Office Ltd · Accepted · 9 Oct 2025

Words of: Nigel Railton, Chair of Post Office Limited, in a letter to Sir Wyn Williams, 9 October 2025 (Inquiry evidence RESP0000001)

Prior to the publication of the Inquiry's report, DBT agreed that instead of a nine-month period for postmasters to submit a full appeal there should be a three-month deadline to notify the Department of an intention to appeal. Post Office will work with postmasters and their legal advisers to progress claims in the DRP during the three-month election window as advised by DBT and is actively corresponding with legal advisers to ensure that where postmasters wish to meet and try to settle their claims, we can do so in a timely manner.

Extract from: RESP0000001 - Letter from Nigel Railton to Sir Wyn Williams re Post Office Response to Volume 1 of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Final Report

●Department for Business and Trade · Accepted · 9 Oct 2025

Words of: Department for Business and Trade, Government response to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry report (volume 1), 9 October 2025

Prior to the publication of the Inquiry’s report, DBT had been in discussion with claimants’ legal representatives about the deadlines for submission of HSS Appeals. In the light of the representatives’ concerns, DBT has agreed that, instead of a 9 month period for postmasters to submit a full appeal, there should be a 3 month deadline to notify DBT of an intention to appeal. There will then be a further deadline for the submission of full papers. The deadline for notification of intention to appeal will be 3 months from the publication of this paper, for those who have settled or previously rejected their claim, or 3 months from the date of rejection of an HSS Independent Panel offer. These changes affect the context for implementation of the recommendation. DBT intends to apply it as fully as possible in the new context. Postmasters will therefore be able to engage in Good Faith or Escalation Meetings with the Post Office during the 3 month period whilst they decide whether to apply for HSSA.

Extract from: Government response to the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry report (volume 1)

Delivery

●Cabinet Office says completed · 2 Mar 2026

In light of concerns raised by claimants’ representatives, DBT had agreed prior to the publication of the Inquiry report that instead of a 9 month period for claimants to submit a full appeal, there should be a 3 month deadline to notify DBT of an intention to appeal. There will then be a further deadline for the submission of a full claim within six months of full disclosure being received from Post Office. DBT has applied the recommendation as fully as possible in the new context. Claimants will therefore be able to engage in Good Faith or Escalation Meetings with the Post Office during the 3 month period whilst they decide whether to register for HSSA. More information about the timelines for registration can be found in table 1 of the eligibility section of the HSS Appeals guidance and principles https://www.gov.uk/guidance/horizon-shortfall-scheme-appeals-process-guidance-and-principles#eligibility

From: Post Office (Horizon) Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, February 2026 (data file)

Published evidence

●Business and Trade Select Committee · 6 Jan 2026

Summary by this site of the published finding

Business and Trade Select Committee noted the government implemented a 3-month notification deadline rather than the 9-month appeal period recommended. The committee questioned whether this gave claimants sufficient time to consider their options before committing.

Read the finding in fullBusiness and Trade Committee held an evidence session on 6 January 2026 with witnesses from Fujitsu, the CCRC, DBT and MoJ. The CCRC revealed Horizon software may have been installed earlier than previously believed, potentially expanding the pool of eligible convictions. Over 4,000 claimants were still awaiting final settlement across all schemes at that date. Government accepted only 3 of 17 committee recommendations in full.

Business and Trade Committee evidence session, 6 January 2026View source →

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.