Clarify whether HCRS and OCS assessment processes differ

DBT confirms that the HCRS will apply the same principles as the previous OC scheme, ensuring no OC claimant is disadvantaged by the transfer to HCRS. DBT has published further guidance on GOV.UK about the roles of Dentons and Sir Gary Hickinbottom in the HCRS scheme, as well as on the Alternative Dispute Resolution process. You can read this in the guidance on Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS): alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS): Independent Panel terms of reference. DBT’s aim for the HCRS is to identify delays and move cases forward, similar to the OC scheme, with case management processes and an independent panel. Case management involves resolving disputes with an independent party when bilateral agreement is not reached. Dentons and Sir Gary Hickinbottom will manage cases as needed. Sir Gary will cover both pecuniary and non-pecuniary aspects of claims. Before case management, DBT will engage with claimants’ legal representatives to resolve claims early. DBT is engaging with OC claimants’ legal representatives to offer reassurance on the consistency of treatment between the HCRS and schemes.

DBT has confirmed that the HCRS will apply the same principles as the previous OC scheme, ensuring no OC claimant is disadvantaged by the transfer to HCRS. This recommendation was addressed through the publication of the Department’s response to Volume 1 of the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry report on 9 October 2025.

Business and Trade Select Committee noted DBT confirmed that HCRS applies identical principles to the previous OCS scheme, ensuring no OCS claimant would be disadvantaged by the transfer.