Source · Prevention of Future Deaths

Josh Tarrant (1)

Ref: 2026-0075 Date: 9 Feb 2026 Coroner: Scott Matthewson Area: Mid Kent & Medway Responses identified: 1 / 1 View PDF

Healthcare and prison staff lacked training to identify Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD), risking physiological collapse and death for individuals subjected to prolonged restraint.

Date 9 Feb 2026
56-day deadline 6 Apr 2026 est.
Responses identified 1 of 1
Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths State Custody related deaths

Coroner's concerns

AI summary
Healthcare and prison staff lacked training to identify Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD), risking physiological collapse and death for individuals subjected to prolonged restraint.
View full coroner's concerns
From about 11.30 pm on 31 October 2023 until moments before his death Mr Tarrant was displaying classic signs of Acute Behavioural Disturbance (“ABD”), which was formerly referred to as ‘Excited Delirium’. ABD is a well-known condition throughout the World. People suffering ABD can display a number of symptoms including apparent psychosis, repetitive shouting, random violence against people or objects, they tend to disrobe, be impervious to pain, demonstrate abnormal strength. They engage in bizarre behaviour and cannot be reasoned with. Expert evidence was given by Dr , a Consultant in Emergency Medicine and an acknowledged expert on restrain and ABD (who has been engaged by both eh Scottish Prison Service and HMPPS to advise in relation to these matters). Dr stated that Mr Tarrant’s presentation made it obvious that he was suffering ABD and that anybody who had been trained to spot the signs of it would have come to that conclusion within minutes of seeing him. People in a state of ABD are at risk of physiological collapse and death. It is believed that they become exhausted, acidotic, hyperthermic, hyperkaliaemic and hypoxic to the point at which they are unable to compensate by hyperventilating. The risk of death is particularly acute where a person suffering ABD is subjected to prolonged restraint because it increases their level of exertion (thereby exacerbating acidosis and hypoxia) and restricts the airway, chest and/or diaphragmatic movement. Dr expressed dismay that, in 2023, neither healthcare staff nor Prison staff had any training in respect of ABD and, as a result, appeared to have no idea that Mr Tarrant might be suffering from it. This is despite the fact that Prison Service Order 1600 (2005), written nearly two decades before, states in section 3 that:

Responses

2 respondents
NHS England NHS / Health Body
9 Feb 2026 PDF
Noted

No AI summary available.

View full response
Dear Coroner, Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Josh Yemi Tarrant who died on 1 November 2023.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 9 February 2026 concerning the death of John Yemi Tarrant on 1 November 2023. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Mr Tarrant’s family and loved ones. NHS England is keen to assure the family and yourself that the concerns raised about Mr Tarrant’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

I am grateful for the further time granted to respond to your Report, and I apologise for any anguish this delay may have caused to Mr Tarrant’s family and friends. I realise that responses to Coroners’ Reports can form part of the important process of family and friends coming to terms with what has happened to their loved ones, and I appreciate this will have been an incredibly difficult time for them.

Your report raised concerns around the lack of training provided to prison healthcare staff in relation to Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD) (despite the clear advice of Prison Service Order 1600 (2005)) and if prison nurses remain unaware of ABD and the need to treat it as a medical emergency, then further deaths are likely in future.

Background on Acute Behavioural Disturbance

The term ‘Acute Behavioural Disturbance' (ABD) is not a formal diagnosis within the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), which is the global diagnostic tool used in the NHS. ABD is generally used to describe behaviours linked with extreme agitation or distress, which may indicate a potentially life-threatening physical health emergency. NHS England recognises the importance of ensuring that individuals presenting in extreme distress receive timely, safe and effective care. ABD is not a specific condition with a set of defined symptoms. It is not common and it is very difficult to identify the difference between agitation, antisocial behaviour, deliberate violent behaviour and ABD. There is no reliable way to determine mild or severe ABD in the pre-hospital setting nor over the phone during a triage process. ABD is a Medical Director for Mental Health and Neurodiversity NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

20th April 2026

complex but known clinical presentation, and the Royal College of Psychiatrists has published guidelines on managing ABD.

We have considered your concerns to inform our learning and we have consulted with , Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist and member of NHS England Health and Justice Clinical Reference Group.

Given the rarity and complexity of ABD and the operational realities of prisons, it is not reasonable to expect prison healthcare staff to diagnose ABD reliably. The critical safety issue is recognition of severe agitation accompanied by physiological red flags and escalation as a medical emergency.

In 2025 NHS England developed a framework for healthcare roles and responsibilities for planned and unplanned use of force in adult prisons and immigration removal centres which was communicated to all healthcare providers in August 2025. This framework supports HMPPS and Home Office policy documents and makes clear healthcare requirement to attend all planned, and where possible, unplanned use of force incidents.

This framework strengthens the expectations of healthcare staff and provides explicit guidance around warning signs of ABD. This revised framework offers clearer boundaries and ensures that all staff involved in use of force events share a consistent approach to managing risk, including the risk of ABD. Use of force is the terminology used by HMPPS and Home Office and includes the use of physical, mechanical and chemical restraint.

We will be sharing the details of this report with all prison and Immigration Removal Centre healthcare providers with an action to ensure all establishments have a clear red flag criteria and emergency escalation pathway within existing healthcare training structures and operation briefings. This should include a focus on early recognition of deterioration, prompt ambulance activation where indicated, minimising restraint duration and maintaining continuous observation until handover, with routine governance review of such incidents.

In addition, the findings, information and any learning from this case will be tabled at a future NHS England Health and Justice Delivery Oversight Group (HJDOG). The HJDOG is the senior leadership forum, which holds responsibility for the oversight of delivery and continuous improvement in Health and Justice commissioned services, through both national and regional teams. All health and justice related Reports to Prevent Future Deaths are shared and discussed at the HJDOG, and assurance is sought from regions where learning and action is identified.

Regional Response

South East Regional Colleagues have shared reports around the Trust’s PSII and PPOs independent review. South East Regional Colleagues have advised that both sets of reports identify that clinical staff should receive training in managing violence, aggression and mental health crises, as well as the fact some actions taken by staff , particularly around restraint, were not with current guidance and policy. Neither report shared mentions ABD or ‘Excited Delirium’, suggesting that Mr Tarrant’s presentation

was directly related to cocaine use and exacerbated by a heart condition, which the prison staff had no knowledge of at the time, as it was only detected postmortem.

I would also like to provide further assurances on the national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around events, such as the sad death of Mr Tarrant, are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us to pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
PDF
Received

No AI summary available.

Report sections

Investigation and inquest
On 13 November 2023 the Area Coroner for Mid Kent & Medway commenced an investigation into the death of Josh Yemi Tarrant who died, aged 34, on 1 November 2023 at HMP Elmley (“the Prison”) on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent. The investigation concluded on 11 December 2025 at the end of an inquest conducted by me (sitting with a jury). The jury concluded that: “Josh Yemi Tarrant died as a result of Cocaine toxicity following a lengthy and challenging restraint. Josh was experiencing an acute behavioural disturbance which was not recognized by Healthcare staff. Healthcare’s failure to provide sufficient medical treatment at the earliest appropriate opportunity by calling an Ambulance by 23:29 was probably a significant contributing factor in Josh’s death. Josh’s death was contributed to by neglect.” The medical cause of death was: Ia. Cocaine intoxication II. Cardiac Hypertrophy and Exertion during Restraint
Circumstances of the death
Mr Tarrant was born on 1 March 1989. On Saturday 28 October 2023 he was arrested and charged with robbery, actual bodily harm and criminal damage. He was held in police custody until Tuesday 31 October 2023 when he attended court and was remanded in custody until his next court hearing. He was taken to the Prison in the early evening. Despite being searched by prison staff Mr Tarrant somehow managed to smuggle cocaine into the prison, He was initially calm, pleasant, complaint and engaged with staff. Mr Tarrant was taken to Houseblock 1 at around 7.30/8.00 pm and placed in a locked cell. The Officer Staff Grade (“OSG”) supervising Houseblock 1 during the night spoke to Mr Tarrant at about 10.30 pm when he remained calm and lucid. About an hour later his demeanour had completely changed. Mr Tarrant asked the OSG for help and said that he was hearing voices. He had taken his shirt off and was bare chested. He had probably ingested cocaine in the preceding hour. The OSG called for assistance and the Prison’s ‘Oscar 1’ (the most senior member of staff on site) attended with other officers. They entered Mr Tarrant’s cell to speak to him. He was standing up and looking out of the cell window. He did not respond and was speaking incoherently and repetitively, saying “help me, help me, help me” repeatedly. Mr Tarrant suddenly knocked a TV in his cell to the floor and ran out of his cell. He was restrained on the floor by a number of officers using Control and Restraint techniques. Mr Tarrant displayed unusual strength during this struggle and at one point lifted several officers off the ground as he got to his feet. The Oscar 1 called for the attendance of ‘Hotel 1’ (the nurse on duty at the Prison overnight) who attended after a short delay caused by the fact that she had no key to open locked gates. On arrival the Hotel 1 made little or no assessment of Mr Tarrant and, despite thinking he was having a psychotic episode, she did not declare a medical emergency (code blue) which would have triggered a 999 to the South East Coast Ambulance Service (“SECAmb”). The Oscar 1 decided that Mr Tarrant should be taken to the Prison’s healthcare unit where he could be kept under observation. The healthcare unit was aa short distance from Houseblock 1 and the journey on foot would normally take no more than a few minutes. However, Mr Tarrant was agitated and non-compliant and so the transfer took place under restraint During the next half an hour or so the officers were engaged in a extremely physically challenging transfer. Mr Tarrant was struggling throughout, allowing his body weight to drop and the officers had to stop form time to time to catch their breath and rotate staff. Throughout this episode Mr Tarrant was shouting incoherently and repetitively. He did not appear to know where he was (he kept asking for his mother) and displayed signs of severe distress. Officers finally managed to get Mr Tarrant into a observation cell in the healthcare unit. Once the door was locked he continued to be extremely distressed. He was shouting repeatedly and incoherently. He became violent and smashed the gate of his cell with his legs, arms and even his head. The force with which he did these things shocked some of the officers who witnessed it. Mr Tarrant also seemed to be oblivious to the pain that that he must have been experiencing. After about an hour, during which time Mr Tarrant did not seem to tire, he made a ligature out of his clothing material and put it around his neck and suspended himself. Officers entered the cell and removed the ligature. When closing the cell door, Mr Tarrant’s thumb was accidentally trapped between the metal gate and the door frame. Although this must have caused extreme pain, he did not seem to notice it. Mr Tarrant continued to be violent and the force of his blows eventually smashed the Perspex door cover. There were sharp pieces of broken Perspex both inside and outside the cell which officers were worried that Mr Tarrant might use to harm himself. They therefore relocated him into the next-door cell under restraint. Once again, Mr Tarrant struggled and the relocation was very physically challenging and took about 7/8 minutes to transport him no more than a few metres away. The officers exited the cell in a controlled way until there was one officer left. Whan the last officer made to exit the cell he sensed that something was wrong. He immediately re-entered the cell and saw that Mr Tarrant was unresponsive. He was not breathing and did not have a pulse. A Code Blue was called and an ambulance summoned at around 1.27 am on 1 November 2023. CPR was started immediately. Healthcare staff made a number of basic errors in providing CPR (failing to use the correct equipment, inserting an i-Gel in Mr Tarrant’s airway the wrong way around which blocked his airway). Although none of these failings ultimately caused or contributed to Mr Tarrant’s death the failures were shocking. In contrast, the Prison officers acquitted themselves very well and performed CPR to a high standard which was later complimented by paramedics. Paramedics arrived at the scene at 1.44 am and took over the management of Mr Tarrant’s airway form healthcare staff. They immediately noticed that the i-Gel had been placed incorrectly and rectified it. CPR was ultimately unsuccessful and Mr Tarrant was pronounced dead at 2.13 am on 1 November 2023.
Copies sent to
HMP ElmleyOxleas NHS Foundation TrustSouth East Coast Ambulance Service

Similar PFD reports

Shared signals

Related inquiry recommendations

Similar themes

Report details

Reference
2026-0075
Date of report
9 February 2026
Coroner
Scott Matthewson
Coroner area
Mid Kent & Medway

Responses identified

Responses identified 1 of 1
All listed responses identified

Organisations named in PFD reports are normally expected to respond within 56 days. Deadline: 6 Apr 2026 (estimated).

Sent to

NHS England

Source links