Home / Inquiries / Southport Inquiry / SP37
← SP36 SP38 →
SP37

Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions

Southport Inquiry · The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · Issued 13 April 2026 · Addressed to: Counter Terrorism Policing

Government responseHome Office: Accepted (Jul 2026)

DeliveryNo statement from Counter Terrorism Policing found

Recommendation, verbatim from the inquiry

●Inquiry recommendation

Prevent Supervisors should receive improved role specific training, including training on supervising decisions to close Prevent referrals and ensuring that all outstanding actions have been completed. This may be achieved by work currently underway but the effectiveness of new training in this area should be audited.

Southport Inquiry, The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 · 13 Apr 2026 Source PDF →

Published evidence summary

AI-generated evidence summary

HM Government stated in July 2026 that 27 inquiry recommendations require delivery by organisations outside central government (Home Office response, Jul 2026). It explained in July 2026 that it had written to all responsible organisations to highlight the inquiry's findings, pledging to work closely with them to facilitate delivery and report on progress as far as possible (Home Office response, Jul 2026). The record holds no update since the government's response of July 2026 (Home Office response, Jul 2026).

Sources

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 26 Sep 2026.

Report-level response context

The government's response to Phase 1 (CP 1623, 2 July 2026) agreed with all 67 recommendations in one sentence, and names only 39 of them individually. Where a recommendation is not named, the response shown is the passage the response gives for the group it belongs to (the recommendations for organisations outside central government, or the recommendations to policing bodies), which is not a response to that recommendation alone; the response does not list the members of any group. The 10 recommendations for Phase 2 of the Inquiry to consider show no response: the response introduces them (paragraph 20) but answers none of them. The government accepts the recommendations that are for central government to deliver. Where a recommendation is for an organisation outside central government, the government's agreement is not that organisation's acceptance.

Government response

●Home Office · Accepted · 2 Jul 2026

Words of: HM Government, Government Response to Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry (CP 1623), presented to Parliament by the Home Secretary, 2 July 2026

There are a further 27 recommendations that require delivery by organisations that sit outside central government. The government has written to all national, regional and local organisations responsible for delivering recommendations to highlight the findings of the Inquiry. The government will continue to work closely with these organisations to facilitate and support on delivery of these recommendations, and will report, as far as possible, on delivery of these recommendations alongside progress on the recommendations for central government.

Extract from: Government Response to Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry

Site note: The source gives this passage once, for paragraph 18, the 27 recommendations it says require delivery by organisations that sit outside central government. The response does not list those 27 or name this recommendation; the site places it in the group because the recommendation is addressed to a body outside central government. The same words are recorded on SP19, SP37, SP40, SP41, SP42, SP43, SP44, SP46, SP48, SP49 and SP61.

Delivery

No statement on delivery from Counter Terrorism Policing has been found in the sources searched. This is separate from the response above.

How this page is built

The recommendation and the government responses are verbatim from primary documents. Delivery statements and other bodies' findings are shown in their own words, each with its source. The summary is written by this site and labelled as such. The Index does not paraphrase sources or characterise intent; it records what has been published.