Public Inquiry

Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse

Completed · Chair: Professor Alexis Jay · Established March 2015 · Commissioned by Home Office

Wide-ranging inquiry into institutional failures to protect children from sexual abuse in England and Wales.

Where it stands

Public hearings were held on 316 days between March 2016 and December 2020.

The inquiry has published 16 reports, most recently The Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse on 20 October 2022.

The most recent government response on the record is Government response to the final report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, dated 22 May 2023.

45 of the 107 recommendations tracked here have no government response on the record yet.

Government response (107 recommendations)

Delivery (the addressees’ latest statements)

  • UK Government says in progress 11
  • Home Office says in progress 10
  • No statement from Church of England found in the sources searched 9
  • No statement from Department for Education found in the sources searched 6
  • Department for Education says in progress 6
  • Ministry of Justice says in progress 6
  • No statement from Catholic Bishops Conference found in the sources searched 5
  • No statement from Ministry of Justice found in the sources searched 5
  • Cabinet Office says in progress 4
  • Ministry of Justice says not accepted 4
  • Home Office says not accepted 3
  • No statement from London Borough of Lambeth found in the sources searched 3
  • No statement from UK Government found in the sources searched 3
  • No statement from Welsh Government found in the sources searched 3
  • No statement from Association of British Insurers found in the sources searched 2
  • No statement from Catholic Safeguarding Advisory Service found in the sources searched 2
  • No statement from Child Migration Institutions found in the sources searched 2
  • No statement from Church in Wales found in the sources searched 2
  • UK Government states no delivery position 2
  • No statement from Youth Custody Service found in the sources searched 2
  • Cabinet Office says partially delivered 1
  • Church of England says in progress 1
  • Department for Education says not accepted 1
  • Department for Education states no delivery position 1
  • Department for Science, Innovation and Technology says completed 1
  • Department for Science, Innovation and Technology says in progress 1
  • Department for Work and Pensions says in progress 1
  • Department of Health and Social Care says in progress 1
  • Home Office says completed 1
  • No statement from International Underwriting Association found in the sources searched 1
  • No statement from Judicial College found in the sources searched 1
  • No statement from Metropolitan Police Service found in the sources searched 1
  • No statement from National Police Chiefs Council found in the sources searched 1
  • No statement from Nottingham City Council found in the sources searched 1
  • No statement from Nottinghamshire Councils found in the sources searched 1
  • No statement from Religious Organisations found in the sources searched 1
  • The government states no delivery position 1

Record checked against the sources 2 October 2026. Latest activity 7 July 2026.

Latest on the recommendations

All 107 recommendations

Reports

Reports and timeline

Recent milestones

  • Government Response22 May 2023
  • Final Report Published20 October 2022
  • Last public hearing concluded11 December 2020
Full timeline

Costs

£189,963,980

Total reported cost to March 2023 Costs in detail

Parliament

115

mentions in Parliament Parliamentary activity

Recommendations

7 shown (filtered)
Clear filters

15: Research high child remand population

No response yet · No statement from Youth Custody Service found

Recommended

The Inquiry was told that children should only be placed in custody as a last resort. However, it was concerned to hear evidence that some children are remanded in custody because of a lack of appropriate community provision. Given that the proportion of children in custody on remand is so high, this is an issue of significant concern. The Chair and Panel recommend that the Youth Custody Service commissions research into why the child remand population is as high as it is. If the reason is a lack of appropriate community provision (nationally or in certain areas), or otherwise unrelated to a genuine need for those children to be remanded in custody, the Chair and Panel recommend that the Youth Custody Service, with appropriate partner agencies, puts an action plan in place to address this.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Youth Custody Service to research why child remand is high. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, summarising a Ministry of Justice response of July 2019 on a web page archived in October 2022, recorded that the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 received Royal Assent in April 2022, with section 157 tightening legal tests for remanding children to custody (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). In January 2022, the department published its review of custodial remand for children, which examined factors behind the rising remand proportion, highlighted the "ethnic disproportionality of remand", and committed to considering greater use of bail and local authority provision (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

Addressed to Youth Custody Service · Full record

16: Review mixed justice/welfare placement risk

Not accepted · Not Accepted

Recommended

The Chair and Panel recommend that the Department for Education and the Youth Custody Service conduct a full review of the practice of placing children for justice and welfare reasons together in SCHs to establish whether it increases the risk of sexual abuse to children. If so, appropriate action should be taken, including consideration of alternative models. The review should be completed within three months, and an action plan should be published within six months.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended reviewing mixed justice and welfare placements in secure children's homes. In May 2021, HM Government stated in a response published by the Department for Education that it had commissioned research and internal data analysis to review placement practice, finding no substantial evidence that mixed placements increase risk (Department for Education, May 2021). It concluded that "we do not believe the evidence supports the need to change placement practice at this time", while planning to keep the issue under review (Department for Education response, May 2021). The response described reviewing practice through internal research, but did not mention an action plan or alternative placement models (Department for Education response, May 2021; Department for Education, May 2021). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of May 2021 (Department for Education response, May 2021).

Addressed to Department for Education · Full record

17: Prohibit pain compliance techniques

No response yet · No statement from Ministry of Justice found

Recommended

The Chair and Panel consider that the use of pain compliance techniques should be seen as a form of child abuse, and that it is likely to contribute to a culture of violence, which may increase the risk of child sexual abuse. The Chair and Panel recommend that the Ministry of Justice prohibits the use of pain compliance techniques by withdrawing all policy permitting its use, and setting out that this practice is prohibited by way of regulation.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The recommendation asks the Ministry of Justice to prohibit pain compliance techniques. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, summarising a response of July 2019 on a web page archived in October 2022, recorded that the department confirmed in April 2021 that the Youth Custody Service had established the Independent Restraint and Behaviour Panel (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). It noted that in June 2020 the department published the Charlie Taylor Review alongside a response stating it would remove pain-inducing techniques from the Minimising and Managing Physical Restraint (MMPR) syllabus (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). However, the review recommended that staff may still use pain-inducing techniques to prevent serious physical harm, and the sources do not mention prohibition by regulation (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

Addressed to Ministry of Justice · Full record

18: Joint MoJ/DfE policy for children in custody

No response yet · No statement from Ministry of Justice found

Recommended

The Chair and Panel recommend that the Ministry of Justice and the Department for Education share policy responsibility for managing and safeguarding children in custodial institutions. This is to ensure that standards applied in relation to children in custody are jointly focussed on discipline and securing child welfare.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The recommendation asks the Ministry of Justice to share policy responsibility for children in custody. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, summarising a response of July 2019 on a web page archived in October 2022, reported that the department accepted the principle behind the recommendation (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). According to the Inquiry, the department stated its ambition was to replace all Youth Offender Institutions and Secure Training Centres with secure schools and Secure Children’s Homes, for which the Department for Education has policy responsibility, while interim work was being conducted to ensure a child-focused ethos (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

Addressed to Ministry of Justice · Full record

26: Youth Custody Service safeguarding training

No response yet · No statement from Youth Custody Service found

Recommended

The Chair and Panel recommend that the Youth Custody Service takes steps to ensure that its training provides staff with an appropriate understanding of safeguarding in the context of the secure estate, and that this is regularly reviewed and updated.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The recommendation asks the Youth Custody Service to regularly review and update staff safeguarding training. In October 2022, The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse recorded that the Ministry of Justice stated in May 2022 that the service was drafting guidance to complement mandatory safeguarding training for new staff, subject to targeted public consultation (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). The department also stated in May 2022 that the service intended to publish a Safeguarding Strategy outlining longer term training plans (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). In its October 2022 record, the inquiry noted that the service had published a national safeguarding review in October 2019 recommending localized training to address emerging sector needs (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

Addressed to Youth Custody Service · Full record

27: Professional registration for custodial care staff

No response yet · No statement from Ministry of Justice found

Recommended

As the Inquiry set out in its Interim Report, professional registration of the workforce in settings responsible for the care of vulnerable children complements regulation of institutions by a separate, independent regulator. The Government has agreed in principle that professional regulation of staff in children's homes in England could provide an effective additional means of protecting children. It has indicated that it will be conducting an evidence-gathering exercise to inform further action. The Chair and Panel now recommend that the Ministry of Justice introduces arrangements for the professional registration of staff in roles responsible for the care of children in YOIs and STCs. The Interim Report recommendation already applies to staff working with children in SCHs.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The recommendation asks the Ministry of Justice to introduce professional registration for custodial care staff. In an update archived in October 2022, The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse reported that the department stated in May 2022 that it was considering the review (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). The department had stated in November 2021 that it had concluded its review of evidence gathered through targeted stakeholder consultation across youth justice, and committed to notify the Inquiry of the outcome as soon as possible (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

Addressed to Ministry of Justice · Full record

28: Revise Prison Service safeguarding guidance

No response yet · No statement from Ministry of Justice found

Recommended

The Chair and Panel note that Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 08/2012, which sets out the mandatory actions for YOIs and STCs for 'maintaining a safe and secure environment', has expired. The Chair and Panel recommend that the Ministry of Justice revises and publishes this PSI to provide clear guidance on how custodial institutions must respond to allegations of child sexual abuse. This should include a requirement for all allegations to be referred to a child protection professional who is independent of the institution. The Chair and Panel also recommend that all institutions, including those which are privately run, publish their safeguarding local procedures in full as well as regular reports about their use, to aid scrutiny and increase transparency.

Since then (summary written by this site)

The recommendation asks for expired Prison Service safeguarding guidance to be revised and published. In an account archived in October 2022, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse recorded that the Ministry of Justice stated in May 2022 that early work had started on producing the Care and Management of Young People framework to replace Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 08/2012 (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). The department also confirmed that the Youth Custody Service was drafting "Keeping Children Safe in Secure Settings" guidance (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022). The account did not mention independent referrals of abuse allegations or requirements for institutions to publish safeguarding procedures and regular reports (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

Addressed to Ministry of Justice · Full record

Reports and timeline

Reports

The Residential Schools Investigation Report Residential Schools · 1 March 2022 · 7 recommendations · PDF

Timeline

Inquiry Announced

Home Secretary announced inquiry into institutional child sexual abuse.

Source

Terms of Reference Set

Broad terms examining institutional failures to protect children.

First preliminary hearing

Source

Chair Appointed

Professor Alexis Jay appointed as fourth and final Chair.

Public Hearings Begin

First public hearings commenced.

Source

Interim Report published

Source

Last public hearing concluded

Source

Final Report Published

Final report published with 20 principal recommendations.

Source

Show all 9 milestones

Government Response

Government published response to recommendations.

Source

Costs

Total reported cost: £189,963,980
Period Total Inquiry legal CP legal Source
Mar 2023 £6,971,878 £773,728 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2022-23

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2022 to 31 Mar 2023.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2022-23

Mar 2023 (cum.) £189,963,980 £52,079,728 Not reported

IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2015 to 31 Mar 2023.

Cumulative total over 8 years. The inquiry ran from 2015 to October 2022, with final report published 20 October 2022. Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements.

IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023

Mar 2022 £14,191,559 £2,606,000 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2021-22

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2021 to 31 Mar 2022.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2021-22

Mar 2021 £32,693,623 £8,393,000 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2020-21

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2020 to 31 Mar 2021.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2020-21

Mar 2020 £35,321,985 £11,018,000 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2019-20

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2019 to 31 Mar 2020.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2019-20

Mar 2019 £36,673,118 £10,871,000 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2018-19

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2018 to 31 Mar 2019.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2018-19

Mar 2018 £28,550,591 £8,820,000 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2017-18

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2017 to 31 Mar 2018.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2017-18

Mar 2017 £20,836,063 £5,628,000 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2016-17

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2016 to 31 Mar 2017.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2016-17

Mar 2016 £14,725,163 £3,970,000 Not reported

IICSA Financial Report 2015-16

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2015 to 31 Mar 2016.

Annual expenditure (not cumulative). Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements - they may be included within Legal or Other costs. Other costs include safeguarding services, consultancy, and stationery.

IICSA Financial Report 2015-16

1 Apr 2015 – 31 Mar 2023 · IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023

IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2015 to 31 Mar 2023.

Cumulative total over 8 years. The inquiry ran from 2015 to October 2022, with final report published 20 October 2022. Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements.

IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023

Detailed cost breakdown · to Mar 2023
Inquiry legal costs
£52,079,728
Panel remuneration
£4,808,410
Staff
£85,624,282
Accommodation
£10,234,048
Technology
£8,191,929
Safeguarding
£1,085,618
Other
£27,185,751

Parliamentary activity

115 mentions since Sep 2016
79 questions 36 statements

Offences against Children: Convictions and Prosecutions

Written Question House of Commons Rebecca Paul · Conservative

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people have been (a) prosecuted and (b) convicted for sexual offences committed in nursery, pre-school or other early years settings, broken down by (i) sex of the offender, (ii) offence type and (iii) age of …

Answered by Ministry of Justice: This Government is resolutely committed to delivering meaningful change for victims of child sexual abuse and will do everything in its power to prevent the horrors of these appalling crimes. Cases of such abuse committed in nurseries and early years settings are particularly shocking. The Ministry of Justice publishes data on prosecutions and convictions for a wide range of offences, …

Offences against Children: Care Homes

Written Question House of Commons Suella Braverman · Reform UK

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold discussions with the police on the potential merits of commissioning a further investigation into abuse at Grafton Close covering the full period the home was operational.

Answered by Home Office: The Government is committed to tackling all forms of child sexual abuse and exploitation, ensuring victims and survivors receive appropriate care and support and pursuing offenders and bringing them to justice. Operation Fernbridge was a police‑led investigation that has now closed. The Operation resulted in one conviction for the sexual assault of a child at Grafton Close. Decisions about the …

Offences against Children: Care Homes

Written Question House of Commons Suella Braverman · Reform UK

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of (a) the timeframe and (b) other aspects of Operation Fernbridge for investigating allegations of child sexual abuse at Grafton Close children’s home.

Answered by Home Office: The Government is committed to tackling all forms of child sexual abuse and exploitation, ensuring victims and survivors receive appropriate care and support and pursuing offenders and bringing them to justice. Operation Fernbridge was a police‑led investigation that has now closed. The Operation resulted in one conviction for the sexual assault of a child at Grafton Close. Decisions about the …

Church of England: Children

Written Question House of Commons Cameron Thomas · Liberal Democrat

Asked: To ask the hon. Member for Battersea, representing the Church Commissioners, what criteria are used to assess whether safeguarding arrangements in the Church of England are adequate.

Answered by Church Commissioners: In response to the recommendations made in the IICSA Enquiry, an independent audit programme delivered by INEQE was commissioned across all dioceses, cathedrals & the National Safeguarding Team. INEQE use the National Safeguarding Standards to measure progress. The standards are available here: https://www.churchofengland.org/safeguarding/national-safeguarding-standards To date, INEQE have reviewed the National Safeguarding Team and 22 dioceses, including their cathedrals. 17 of …

The Sentencing of Vincent Chan

Written Ministerial Statement House of Lords Baroness Smith of Malvern · Labour

Statement: My Rt Hon Friend, the Secretary of State for Education and Minister for Women and Equalities (Bridget Phillipson MP) has made the following statement:In December I gave a statement to the House on the Metropolitan police investigation into child sexual abuse in Camden. Today, Vincent …

The Sentencing of Vincent Chan

Written Ministerial Statement House of Commons Bridget Phillipson · Labour

Statement: In December I gave a statement to the House on the Metropolitan police investigation into child sexual abuse in Camden. Today, Vincent Chan is due to appear for sentencing at Wood Green Crown Court in relation to 56 offences, to which he has pleaded guilty.His …

Offences against Children

Written Question House of Commons Sarah Pochin · Reform UK

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department plans to commission a national public awareness programme on child sexual abuse.

Answered by Home Office: The Tackling Child Sexual Abuse Progress Update, published in April last year, set out clearly the actions the Government is taking to respond to IICSA’s recommendations. We are now delivering on those commitments overseen by an inter-ministerial group on child sexual abuse chaired by the Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls. Child Protection Authority Last month the …

Offences against Children: Disclosure of Information

Written Question House of Commons Sarah Pochin · Reform UK

Asked: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when the Government intends to bring forward legislation to introduce mandatory reporting of child sexual abuse by designated professionals, in the context of the recommendation of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.

Answered by Home Office: The Tackling Child Sexual Abuse Progress Update, published in April last year, set out clearly the actions the Government is taking to respond to IICSA’s recommendations. We are now delivering on those commitments overseen by an inter-ministerial group on child sexual abuse chaired by the Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls. Child Protection Authority Last month the …

View all 115 mentions →

Evidence & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, chaired by Professor Alexis Jay OBE, published its final report in October 2022 after seven years of investigation into institutional responses to child sexual abuse in England and Wales. The inquiry made 107 recommendations aimed at improving child protection across multiple sectors including criminal justice, education, religious institutions, and online safety.

The government's response shows 65 recommendations (61%) were accepted, 30 (28%) accepted in principle, and 12 (11%) not accepted. According to the progress updates, 41 recommendations (38%) are marked as completed, though this classification requires scrutiny of the actual evidence of implementation.

Published evidence indicates several concrete changes have occurred. The Online Safety Act 2023 incorporated provisions for age verification and child protection online. The Crime and Policing Bill introduced in February 2025 establishes mandatory reporting duties for child sexual abuse. The police complaints system removed time limits for historical abuse complaints in 2020. Religious institutions, particularly the Church of England and Church in Wales, introduced new safeguarding measures and governance structures.

However, significant gaps remain between acceptance and action. Many recommendations accepted in 2022 show limited published evidence of progress. The creation of a Child Protection Authority for England remains at consultation stage. Professional registration schemes for care workers and youth custody staff continue under review despite being recommended. The government rejected extending Disclosure and Barring Service checks to UK nationals working overseas, stating it could not legislate for employment practices in foreign countries.

The pattern emerging from the evidence suggests institutional willingness to accept recommendations but slower progress on implementation requiring legislative change or significant resource allocation. Where progress has occurred, it has often been in areas requiring policy updates rather than structural reform. The three-year gap since publication has seen movement on some fronts, particularly in online safety and mandatory reporting, but many core recommendations addressing systemic issues await substantive action beyond initial acceptance.
Reforms attributed to this inquiry · AI-generated- The Online Safety Act 2023 introduced provisions requiring providers of regulated services to conduct assessments of whether children are likely to access their service, with age verification provisions to be enforced from July 2025
- The Crime and Policing Bill (February 2025) introduced clauses establishing a mandatory reporting duty for child sexual abuse disclosures, with criminal offences for interfering with reports
- The Independent Office of Police Conduct published statutory guidance (February 2020) removing the 12-month time limit for child sexual abuse complaints against police
- The Church of England's Safeguarding (Code of Practice) Measure came into force (October 2021), replacing the existing duty to have 'due regard' with a statutory code
- The Cabinet Office updated honours forfeiture guidance (September 2021) allowing formal statements where forfeiture proceedings would have been initiated for deceased recipients
- The UK ratified the Lanzarote Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (June 2018)
- The Interim Code of Practice on Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation was published (December 2020)
Unfinished business · AI-generated- Recommendation for a Child Protection Authority in England remains pending, with consultation on a roadmap planned
- Professional registration of residential childcare staff and youth custody staff remains under review despite recommendations
- Extension of Disclosure and Barring Service scheme to UK nationals working overseas was not accepted, with government citing jurisdictional concerns
- Requirement for Electoral Commission to monitor safeguarding policies of political parties would require legislative change not yet pursued
- Three-year time limit for civil child sexual abuse claims remains in place, though government has committed to its removal
- Compensation scheme time limits for child sexual abuse victims remain unchanged despite recommendation for extension
- Many recommendations accepted in principle await final government responses beyond initial six-month deadline

Implementation reviewed by

Thirlwall Inquiry legal team (Feb 2026) ↗
The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026) sets out 4 of this inquiry's recommendations that this site holds, with its own notes on implementation. It colours a recommendation's Extent of Implementation cell green where it found evidence that the recommendation had been clearly implemented: 4 not coloured green.
Thirlwall Inquiry legal team (May 2024) ↗
The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024) sets out 4 of this inquiry's recommendations that this site holds, with its own notes on implementation. It colours a recommendation's Extent of Implementation cell green where it found evidence that the recommendation had been clearly implemented: 4 not coloured green.

Findings about the inquiry's recommendations as a whole

Home Affairs Select Committee (21 Jan 2025)
This site's summary of the finding: Professor Alexis Jay told Home Affairs Committee that £187m was spent on IICSA and "to date none of its final recommendations had been implemented." Called for "full implementation" saying "get it done."

Key facts

Duration: 7 years, 7 months Total reported cost: £190m Witnesses: 725 Hearing days: 325 Documents disclosed: 195,034