Ongoing
· Chair: Baroness Heather Hallett
· Established June 2022
· Commissioned by Cabinet Office
Public inquiry examining the UK's response to and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and learning lessons for the future.
More about this inquiry
Public inquiry examining the UK's response to and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and learning lessons for the future. The inquiry is examining preparedness, decision-making, health and social care, vaccines, and the impact on different communities.
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
The UK government and devolved administrations should ensure, within 12 months of the publication of this Report, that the pandemic stockpiles:
retain stock that is better aligned with the range and severity of pandemic risks identified in the National Security Risk Assessment;
maintain a minimum three-month supply of PPE for the entire health and social care system in the UK;
retain close-to-zero tolerance for expired stock;
better reflect the composition of the UK’s health and social care workforce, aligned with fit-testing and other sizing requirements;
maintain a simple and streamlined system of management and oversight; and
are stored in a wide range of accessible locations.
To demonstrate continued compliance with the above, inspection reports should be submitted to health and social care ministers at least annually. Any issues identified should be resolved within three months.
The inspection reports should be published with the preparedness and resilience reports (Module 1, Recommendation 8).
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked ministers to reform pandemic stockpile composition and introduce annual inspections. The Northern Ireland Executive had not published a response to the July 2026 Module 5 report when the Executive Office publications list was checked in September 2026 (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government had also not published a response to the report when its inquiry publications were reviewed in the same month (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). Similarly, the Welsh Government had not published a response to the module when its inquiry page was checked in September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Cabinet Office found
Recommended
The UK government and devolved administrations should evaluate the readiness of the structures, systems and processes for the emergency procurement and distribution of healthcare equipment as part of UK-wide pandemic response exercises.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked governments to evaluate emergency healthcare procurement systems during pandemic exercises across the UK. In September 2026, the Northern Ireland Executive had not published a formal reply to the July 2026 procurement report on the Executive Office publications list (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government also had not published a document addressing the report in its online collection of inquiry responses when checked in September 2026 (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). The Welsh Government had likewise not published a paper on its inquiry module reports page when reviewed in September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, within 12 months of the publication of this Report, should each have ready systems for the emergency procurement and distribution of healthcare equipment.
These new systems must:
integrate procurement and distribution;
have the ability rapidly to scale up efficient operations, including through integrated emergency procurement teams and automating the triaging and processing of offers of supply; and
be able to use market research, modelling and price benchmarking to ensure value for money.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended that UK administrations establish emergency healthcare equipment procurement and distribution systems. In September 2026, the Northern Ireland Executive had not published a response to the July 2026 report on its publications list (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government had likewise not published a response in its collection of inquiry responses as of September 2026 (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). Publications on the Welsh Government website in September 2026 also showed that it had not published a response to the report (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
The UK government and devolved administrations should publish simplified regulations for emergency healthcare equipment that are aligned with and cover the range and severity of pandemic risks identified in the National Security Risk Assessment.
The simplified regulations should:
establish the minimum technical specifications of healthcare equipment specifically for use in a pandemic, including international standards that are recognised in the UK;
clearly identify the regulator responsible for coordinating regulation, inspection and enforcement for each type of equipment; and
be accompanied by a buyer’s guide that is easily understood by procurement officials, suppliers and end-users in the health and social care sectors.
The emergency healthcare equipment regulations and the buyer’s guide should be kept under review and updated in line with relevant changes to the National Security Risk Assessment.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked governments to publish simplified emergency healthcare equipment regulations covering pandemic risks. The Northern Ireland Executive had not published a response to the Module 5 report of 14 July 2026 when the Executive Office's publications list was checked in September 2026 (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government had also not published a response to the report when its online collection was checked in September 2026 (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). In September 2026, the Welsh Government had likewise not published a response on its inquiry responses page (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Health and Safety Executive found
Recommended
UK regulators, including the Health and Safety Executive, the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland, the Office for Product Safety and Standards and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, should establish an emergency healthcare equipment cross-regulator plan for future pandemics.
The plan must include arrangements for:
coordination of written guidance from regulators to ensure that it is clear, concise and updated when required; and
increasing testing house capacity and the deployment of suitable inspection regimes both to reduce the quantity of non-compliant equipment entering the system and to improve enforcement.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked UK regulators to create an emergency healthcare equipment plan for future pandemics. When the Executive Office's publications list was checked in September 2026, the Northern Ireland Executive had not published a response to the Module 5 report of 14 July 2026 (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government had also not published a response to the report when its collection of inquiry responses was checked in September 2026 (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). Similarly, the Welsh Government had not published a response when its module reports page was checked in September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Health and Safety Executive; Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland; Office for Product Safety and Standards; Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
The UK government and devolved administrations should jointly commission a group of experts to develop blueprints for rapidly scalable critical care medical technology, aligned with the range and severity of pandemic risks identified in the National Security Risk Assessment, within 12 months of the publication of this Report.
The blueprints should be issued in accordance with the emergency healthcare equipment regulations and buyer’s guide (see Recommendation 4 of this Report) and regularly reviewed to ensure that they reflect technological advances.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended commissioning expert blueprints for scalable intensive care medical technology. In September 2026, the Northern Ireland Executive had not published a response to the Module 5 report when the Executive Office's publications list was checked (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). A check of gov.scot in September 2026 recorded that the Scottish Government had not published a response to the July 2026 report (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). The Welsh Government also had not published a response when its collection of inquiry module responses on GOV.WALES was checked in September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Cabinet Office found
Recommended
The UK-wide whole-system civil emergency strategy, which the Inquiry has recommended should be developed by the UK government and devolved administrations (see the Inquiry’s Module 1 Report, Recommendation 4), should include specific objectives for international trade and domestic industry during a pandemic.
These must include:
the establishment of trading alliances in advance of the next pandemic, to diversify overseas sources of raw materials and healthcare equipment;
contractual arrangements with domestic and international suppliers of raw materials and healthcare equipment manufacturers which activate when a pandemic is declared;
a robust plan to enable domestic manufacturers rapidly to retool and repurpose facilities for the production of healthcare equipment; and
supporting investment for research and development into advanced manufacturing of healthcare equipment in the UK.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked the Cabinet Office to incorporate trade and industry objectives into civil emergency planning. When the Executive Office's publications list was checked in September 2026, a response to the July 2026 Module 5 report from the Northern Ireland Executive remained unpublished (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). When the Scottish Government's online collection of inquiry responses was checked in September 2026, its response to the report also remained unpublished (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). When the Welsh Government's page of inquiry module responses was checked in September 2026, its response likewise remained unpublished (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
The UK government and devolved administrations should each establish a pool of officials who are trained in the emergency procurement and distribution of healthcare equipment.
Completion of the training should be mandatory for at least 20% of the workforce of each nation’s central healthcare equipment procurement bodies and kept up to date through annual refresher courses.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended establishing trained pools of officials for emergency healthcare equipment procurement and distribution. In September 2026, the Northern Ireland Executive's publications list indicated that a formal response to the July 2026 Module 5 report remained unpublished (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government's published records of inquiry responses similarly indicated in September 2026 that its formal response had not been published (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). The Welsh Government also had not published a formal response to the report on its website as of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
The UK government and devolved administrations should collaborate to establish a UK-wide commercial framework agreement of pre-approved external specialists in the emergency procurement and distribution of healthcare equipment.
The framework should be refreshed every three years.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended establishing a UK-wide commercial framework for emergency healthcare procurement specialists. The Northern Ireland Executive had not published a response to the Module 5 report of July 2026 when the Executive Office's publications list was checked in September 2026 (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government had not published a response to the report when its collection of inquiry responses was checked in September 2026 (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). The Welsh Government had likewise not published a response to the report when its module responses page was checked in September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
No response yet · No statement from Cabinet Office found
Recommended
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should improve transparency, governance and accountability for procurement in an emergency.
As a minimum, these improvements should include the following:
Enhancing transparency
Any central digital platform used for procurement must allow for the automated collation of contract information and must reduce the administrative burden involved in publishing contract information.
Contracting authorities across the UK should be required to publish contract award notices (in Scotland) and contract details notices in addition to contract award notices (in England, Wales and Northern Ireland) irrespective of the country in which the supplier is based.
Governance: Fairness in emergency procurement
There should be no high priority lane.
All offers to supply healthcare equipment during a pandemic should be assessed according to the application of objective criteria.
Accountability: Approval process for emergency spending on healthcare equipment
In advance of a pandemic, each health and social care department in each government should agree, with their respective treasuries or finance departments, a process to scrutinise and approve emergency spending on healthcare equipment to ensure that there is a balance between accountability and timely spending decisions.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry asked UK governments to improve emergency procurement transparency, governance, and accountability. In September 2026, the Northern Ireland Executive had yet to publish a reply to the July 2026 Module 5 report on the Executive Office publications list (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). A check of the Scottish Government website in September 2026 similarly showed that it had not published a reply to the report (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). The Welsh Government had likewise not published a reply when its website was reviewed in September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
No response yet · No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found
Recommended
Within three years of the publication of this Report, the systems for the procurement and distribution of healthcare equipment should be digitalised and interoperable across the UK government and devolved administrations.
As a minimum, these systems should be able to use technology to collect, share and analyse data across the UK in real time on:
pandemic stockpiles, health and social care sector inventories and usage rates;
offers of supply, enabling automated comparison, triaging and processing;
non-compliant healthcare equipment entering the market;
supply chains, including international delivery times and domestic logistics and distribution data;
procurement and distribution workforce capacity; and
spending – automatically identifying, collecting and collating key contract data for publication.
Since then (summary written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended digitalising healthcare equipment procurement systems across the United Kingdom (UK). In September 2026, the Northern Ireland Executive had not published a formal reply to the July 2026 report on its publications list (Northern Ireland Executive response, Sep 2026). The Scottish Government in September 2026 had likewise not published a formal reply within its online collection of inquiry responses (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026). The Welsh Government in September 2026 had also not published a formal reply on its inquiry module reports page (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2026 (Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).
Addressed to Department of Health and Social Care · Full record
Module 3 examining impact on healthcare systems began.
First Every Story Matters record published
The Inquiry published the first record of what it heard through Every Story Matters, on people's experiences of the UK's healthcare systems. The records gather contributors' accounts and are submitted as evidence; they carry no findings or recommendations of their own.
Financial Report to 30 June 2026 (Q1 FY26/27): cumulative expenditure
Source and qualifications
Accounting period: start not stated; to 30 Jun 2026.
Cumulative expenditure to 30 June 2026, from the inquiry's financial report for the first quarter of 2026/27. This is a later figure, not a correction of the £213.708m reported to March 2026. The report gives figures in £000, converted here to pounds; they exclude VAT where applicable and include estimates for work completed but not yet invoiced. They are audited as part of the Cabinet Office accounts, not as a separate final account for the inquiry. The report does not state the start date of the cumulative total; earlier reports include costs from 2021/22. Technology (£9.991m) is evidence management £9.281m, IT £0.316m and telecoms £0.394m. The report's operational and cross-cutting total of £30.514m is shown here as accommodation (£17.169m), support and safeguarding (£2.587m) and technology (£9.991m), with the remaining £0.767m under Other, so nothing is counted twice. Other also includes modules (£9.022m), Every Story Matters, the website and engagement (£15.689m, of which the website is £2.607m) and the report's own other costs (£4.502m). Government departments' own costs of responding to the inquiry, including legal and litigation costs, are not included.
Source-label correction recorded 9 October 2026: in the Q4 FY2025/26 report to 31 March 2026, £15.584m is Every Story Matters, engagement and commemoration, not the Support and safeguarding line. The Support and safeguarding cumulative amount is £2.491m. Other is £55.484m: Modules £8.930m + ESM/engagement £15.584m + Operational £29.528m minus Support/safeguarding £2.491m + source Other £3.933m. This disjoint allocation preserves the reported £213.708m March total. The earlier mapping of ESM as safeguarding is superseded. The prior claim “Most expensive UK inquiry ever” is not substantiated by the reviewed sources and is withdrawn as a current factual claim. The prior notes below are retained unchanged solely as a historical audit record; their retention does not validate any other statement.
Prior notes (unchanged): Hearings concluded 5 March 2026 (end of Module 10). Figures exclude VAT. Most expensive UK inquiry ever. Chair £1.1m; Counsel & Solicitors £67.3m; Section 40 (CP legal) £54.8m; Secretariat £32.5m; Every Story Matters/engagement £15.6m; Modules £8.9m; Operational £29.5m; Other £3.9m.
Annual figures calculated from quarterly reports. Category structure changed over time - accommodation, technology, safeguarding only tracked separately in FY22-23, later absorbed into Operational/Other.
Financial Report to 30 June 2026 (Q1 FY26/27): cumulative expenditure
Source and qualifications
Accounting period: start not stated; to 30 Jun 2026.
Cumulative expenditure to 30 June 2026, from the inquiry's financial report for the first quarter of 2026/27. This is a later figure, not a correction of the £213.708m reported to March 2026. The report gives figures in £000, converted here to pounds; they exclude VAT where applicable and include estimates for work completed but not yet invoiced. They are audited as part of the Cabinet Office accounts, not as a separate final account for the inquiry. The report does not state the start date of the cumulative total; earlier reports include costs from 2021/22. Technology (£9.991m) is evidence management £9.281m, IT £0.316m and telecoms £0.394m. The report's operational and cross-cutting total of £30.514m is shown here as accommodation (£17.169m), support and safeguarding (£2.587m) and technology (£9.991m), with the remaining £0.767m under Other, so nothing is counted twice. Other also includes modules (£9.022m), Every Story Matters, the website and engagement (£15.689m, of which the website is £2.607m) and the report's own other costs (£4.502m). Government departments' own costs of responding to the inquiry, including legal and litigation costs, are not included.
Written Ministerial StatementHouse of CommonsYvette Cooper · Labour
Statement: On Thursday 16 April 2026, the Covid-19 Inquiry published its fourth report, which focussed on the role of vaccines and therapeutics throughout the pandemic and put forward 5 recommendations for the Government to consider. Today, the Government published its response and set out the actions …
Written Ministerial StatementHouse of LordsBaroness Merron · Labour
Statement: My Right Honourable Friend the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (Yvette Cooper MP) has made the following statement:On Thursday 19 March 2026, the Covid-19 Inquiry published its third report, which focussed on the impact of the pandemic on the healthcare systems of …
Written Ministerial StatementHouse of CommonsYvette Cooper · Labour
Statement: On Thursday 19 March 2026, the Covid-19 Inquiry published its third report, which focussed on the impact of the pandemic on the healthcare systems of the UK and put forward ten recommendations for the Government to consider. Today, the Government is publishing its response to …
Written QuestionHouse of LordsBaroness Linforth · Labour
Asked: To ask His Majesty's Government how much of the £1.5 billion Estates Safety Fund funding announced on 9 September will be allocated towards implementing the conclusion in the Module 3 report from the UK Covid-19 Inquiry that "in the short term, the use of HEPA …
Answered by Department of Health and Social Care: Estates Safety Fund schemes were selected by the National Health Service working with trusts and integrated care boards to prioritise the most urgent operational and safety risks, including ventilation requirements, and the schemes that will make the greatest difference to patients and staff. No data is held on the proportion of the funding that will be directed towards the use …
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsHelen Maguire · Liberal Democrat
Asked: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the safeguards recommended by the Covid Inquiry will be put in place to prevent political connections from being used to secure privileged access to public contracts.
Answered by Cabinet Office: The Government is fully committed to supporting the work of the Covid-19 Inquiry and to learning lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic to ensure the UK is better prepared for a future pandemic. The Inquiry published its report on Module 5 (Procurement) in July. The Government will consider its findings and recommendations in detail and respond in due course.
Written QuestionHouse of CommonsMike Wood · Conservative
Asked: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, with reference to the Answer of 24 September 2025 to Question 71230 on Cabinet Office: Calder Conferences, what the (a) title and (b) purpose were of the (i) The Old Ship Hotel, (ii) Westminster Chapel and (iii) …
Answered by Cabinet Office: The title and purposes of the specified events booked through Calder Conferences Limited are as follows: (i) The Old Ship Hotel on 29 May 2025: “Covid 19 Inquiry - Listening Event”. This was part of the Covid-19 Inquiry’s public listening initiatives which enabled bereaved individuals to share their personal experiences and impacts of the pandemic, to be used as evidence …
Written Ministerial StatementHouse of CommonsNick Thomas-Symonds · Labour
Statement: The UK COVID-19 Inquiry is examining the UK’s response to and impact of the pandemic. The government is fully committed to supporting the work of the COVID-19 Inquiry and to learning lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure the UK is better prepared for a …
Written Ministerial StatementHouse of LordsBaroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent · Labour
Statement: My Right Honourable friend, the Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office, the Rt Hon. Nick Thomas-Symonds MP, has today made the following statement:The UK COVID-19 Inquiry is examining the UK’s response to and impact of the pandemic. The government is fully committed to …