Blueprints for Critical Care Medical Technology
COVID-19 Inquiry · Module 5: Procurement · Issued 14 July 2026 · Addressed to: Department of Health and Social Care
Source — verbatim from the inquiry
●Inquiry recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should jointly commission a group of experts to develop blueprints for rapidly scalable critical care medical technology, aligned with the range and severity of pandemic risks identified in the National Security Risk Assessment, within 12 months of the publication of this Report.
The blueprints should be issued in accordance with the emergency healthcare equipment regulations and buyer’s guide (see Recommendation 4 of this Report) and regularly reviewed to ensure that they reflect technological advances.
COVID-19 Inquiry, Module 5: Procurement · 14 Jul 2026 Source PDF →
Published evidence summary
Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:
- The Module 5 report was published on 14 July 2026 and contains 11 recommendations (UK Covid-19 Inquiry, Module 5: Procurement).
- Searches of GOV.UK and Inquiry publications found no government response or recommendation-specific implementation update as at 23 July 2026.
How was this evidence gathered?
Response — verbatim from government
●Scottish Government — initial response
No formal response published by this government.
Scottish Government · 14 Jul 2026
●Welsh Government — follow-up
No formal response published by this government.
Welsh Government · 14 Jul 2026
●Northern Ireland Executive — follow-up
No formal response published by this government.
Northern Ireland Executive · 14 Jul 2026
Evidence trail — what's actually happened since
- 14 Jul 2026 Status: Pending. No government response yet received. Module 5 report published 14 July 2026. Source →
Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.
How this page is built
Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.
This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.