Public Inquiry

Ronan Point Inquiry

Status: Completed Chair: Hugh Griffiths QC Established: May 1968 Report: Nov 1968 Commissioned by: Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government

Inquiry into the partial collapse of Ronan Point tower block in Canning Town on 16 May 1968 following a gas explosion which killed four people.

Historical inquiry (pre-Inquiries Act 2005). Listed for reference — recommendation progress is not actively tracked.

Response status

This is a historical inquiry. Per-recommendation tracking is not available. See the Legacy & Impact section below.

Data verified: 27 Feb 2026 (Claude)

Legacy & impact

AI-generated · 26 Mar 2026
The Ronan Point inquiry examined the partial collapse of a 22-storey tower block in Canning Town on 16 May 1968, following a gas explosion that killed four people. Chair Hugh Griffiths QC concluded that both the design and construction of the large panel system building were inadequate. The inquiry's 19 recommendations focused on preventing progressive collapse in high-rise buildings and managing explosion risks.

The inquiry's most significant documented legacy is the Building Regulations 1970 (5th Amendment), which introduced the concept of resistance to disproportionate collapse. This principle remains embedded in Part A of the current Building Regulations. The inquiry also led to the disconnection of piped gas from high-rise residential buildings and requirements for structural engineering assessments of buildings over six storeys.

The disaster effectively ended large panel system construction in the UK. However, when Ronan Point was demolished in 1986, investigators found structural joints packed with rubbish and that post-collapse strengthening works had been ineffective. This discovery raised questions about the implementation and enforcement of safety measures.

The Ronan Point inquiry occupies a significant place in the history of UK building safety regulation. Its focus on preventing disproportionate collapse established principles that continue to shape building standards. The 2017 Grenfell Tower fire renewed attention to questions about building safety regulation and enforcement that the Ronan Point inquiry had raised nearly five decades earlier.

Key legislation

Building Regulations 1970 (5th Amendment — Disproportionate Collapse) Primary
Introduced the concept of resistance to disproportionate collapse, now embedded in Part A of the Building Regulations.

Influence & connections

Informed or shaped Grenfell Tower Inquiry
Ronan Point introduced the concept of resistance to disproportionate collapse in building regulations. The Grenfell Tower fire raised the same fundamental question about the gap between building regulation and safety in practice.

Key facts

Duration: 5 months

Reports & milestones

Reports

Timeline

No milestones recorded.

Recommendations

18 shown (filtered)
Clear
Code Recommendation Addressed to
RONA-12
Ronan Point should be strengthened, in particular by making the joints tougher and more continuous, so that local damage to the load-bearing …
View →
RONA-13
Until the building has been strengthened the gas supply to it should be disconnected (paragraph 131).
View →
RONA-19
Gas supplies should be disconnected from those existing tall buildings, the design of which renders them liable to progressive collapse, until they …
View →
RONA-20
In order to reduce the risk of town gas explosions still further, consideration should be given to a statutory requirement, based on …
View →
RONA-21
Consideration should be given to means of improving ventilation in flats in high blocks (paragraph 172).
View →
RONA-22
The Regulations governing the storage of other potentially explosive materials in high blocks of flats should be reviewed (paragraph 173).
View →
RONA-29
All blocks over six storeys in height should be appraised by a structural engineer who should consider: (a) whether they are susceptible …
View →
RONA-30
In blocks that are judged to be susceptible to progressive collapse, measures must be taken to strengthen them to eliminate this risk, …
View →
RONA-31
Blocks which have not been designed to deal adequately with wind loads, or where progressive collapse may too readily be precipitated by …
View →
RONA-32
Designers of new blocks must design the building so that it is not susceptible to progressive collapse, paying particular attention to introducing …
View →
RONA-33
Until the new wind loading Code is produced, designers should have regard to the results of recent research into the frequency and …
View →
RONA-34
Until the new Building Regulations dealing with fire precautions are produced, designers should have regard to the possible effects of fire on …
View →
RONA-36
Owners of tall post-war blocks (say over 100 feet high) that are not system-built should inquire into the wind loads for which …
View →
RONA-43
The Building Regulations should include provisions dealing with progressive collapse (paragraph 208).
View →
RONA-44
A Code of Practice applicable specifically to large concrete panel construction should be prepared and published as a matter of urgency (paragraph …
View →
RONA-45
Code of Practice 3: Chapter V: Loading, must, as a matter of urgency, be brought up to date and should take account …
View →
RONA-46
The Fire Regulations should be revised to take account of the effect of heat arising from a domestic fire of normal intensity …
View →
RONA-47
The Minister of Housing and Local Government, who is responsible for the Building Regulations, must accept responsibility for seeing that the British …
View →