RONA-29 Historic

Structural appraisal of all blocks over six storeys

Ronan Point Inquiry · Ronan Point Inquiry — Final Report · Issued 6 November 1968

Source — verbatim from the inquiry

Inquiry recommendation, Chapter 8, Recommendations for existing tall blocks, item (29)

All blocks over six storeys in height should be appraised by a structural engineer who should consider: (a) whether they are susceptible to progressive collapse (paragraph 191); (b) whether they have been designed to resist adequately the maximum wind loadings which they may experience (paragraph 214); (c) their behaviour in the event of fire (paragraph 216).

Ronan Point Inquiry, Ronan Point Inquiry — Final Report · 6 Nov 1968 Source PDF, page 63 →

Published evidence summary

Publicly available evidence relating to this recommendation:

No formal government response has been recorded for this recommendation. No independent verification has been carried out.

Sources

Based on tracking data in the inquiry database.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by baseline-data-v1 on 17 Aug 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The evidence above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.

Response — verbatim from government

No formal government response recorded

The Index has not yet recorded a verbatim government response to this recommendation.

Evidence trail — what's actually happened since

No published activity has been recorded against this recommendation yet.

Each entry above links to a primary source — gov.uk written statement, consultation response document, or inspection report. The Index does not characterise government intent; it tracks what has been published.

How this page is built

Source and Response are verbatim from primary documents. The Evidence trail records published activity since — written statements, consultation outcomes, inspection findings, parliamentary references. The Index does not paraphrase or characterise intent; it tracks what has been published. Where the evidence is the absence of action (a missed deadline, a slipped timetable), that absence is documented from primary sources rather than inferred.

This recommendation's data is verified periodically against primary sources. The Index is monitored for staleness weekly.