Recommendations & Conclusions
12 items
2
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
In its response to this report, the Government should set out how and when the Prime Minister and other Cabinet Ministers will be involved in the Review process. Additionally, we seek clarity regarding: a. Which Cabinet Minister will chair the Review process in the Prime Minister’s absence b. What role …
Read more
In its response to this report, the Government should set out how and when the Prime Minister and other Cabinet Ministers will be involved in the Review process. Additionally, we seek clarity regarding: a. Which Cabinet Minister will chair the Review process in the Prime Minister’s absence b. What role the No 10 Policy Unit and Specialist Advisers will play in the Review process The Government should: c. Set out the respective roles and responsibilities of the NSC and its relevant sub-committees, the Cabinet and Government Departments in the Review process d. Explain what role the National Security Adviser and NSC(O) will play in the Review process and what role the National Security Strategy and Implementation Group will play in driving integration at an official level, and e. Explain whether thematic workstreams have been identified.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government details the leadership structure of the Integrated Review, including the roles of the Prime Minister, Foreign Secretary, NSC, and specific taskforces. It also confirms that five thematic workstreams have been identified for the Review.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
3
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
The Review should assess and report on the effectiveness of existing Government structures and policies designed to facilitate cross- Government collaboration. This should include a review of the National Security Council and associated policy frameworks and funds, such as the Fusion Doctrine and the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund. If …
Read more
The Review should assess and report on the effectiveness of existing Government structures and policies designed to facilitate cross- Government collaboration. This should include a review of the National Security Council and associated policy frameworks and funds, such as the Fusion Doctrine and the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund. If existing collaboration is inadequate, the Review should identify ways to ensure greater cross-Government collaboration in the future.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government states that the Integrated Review is currently considering all cross-Government collaboration and assessing the effectiveness of all relevant structures and systems in the context of national security and international policy.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
4
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
To ensure lessons are learned from previous security and defence Reviews, the Integrated Review should engage with a wide range of stakeholders who were engaged in or scrutinised previous Reviews and the policies, programmes and military deployments that flowed from them.
Read more
To ensure lessons are learned from previous security and defence Reviews, the Integrated Review should engage with a wide range of stakeholders who were engaged in or scrutinised previous Reviews and the policies, programmes and military deployments that flowed from them.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government states that officials have met and will continue to meet with a wide range of stakeholders, including former Ministers, national security and defence officials, allies, the defence industry, civil society, think tanks, and academia, to ensure openness and transparency.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
6
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
We welcome the Government’s ambition to conduct the “deepest” and “most radical review since the Cold War.” At a time of such geopolitical and economic uncertainty, it is vital that the Review involves thorough consideration of the desired “ends” of the UK’s security, defence, development and foreign policy as well …
Read more
We welcome the Government’s ambition to conduct the “deepest” and “most radical review since the Cold War.” At a time of such geopolitical and economic uncertainty, it is vital that the Review involves thorough consideration of the desired “ends” of the UK’s security, defence, development and foreign policy as well as the “ways” and “means” required to achieve them. To realise its ambition, Government must identify and overcome the factors that contribute to a Review becoming a “business as usual” exercise. By answering the questions laid out in this report, the Review can overcome the tensions inherent in the Review process and identify and question assumptions at the heart of the UK’s security, defence, development and foreign policy. In response to this Report, Government should: a. Set out the mechanisms and approach to challenging assumptions underpinning the UK’s defence strategy b. Explain what role the Dstl’s Defence Wargaming Centre and MoD’s Strategic Net Assessment Unit will play
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government agrees that challenging assumptions is critical and outlines mechanisms for this, including external workshops, an integrated whole-of-government approach, and MOD internal processes. It also confirms that expertise from the DSTL Wargaming Centre and the Strategic Net Assessment Team has been used to inform …
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
10
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
It remains to be seen whether the forthcoming Review will include an update to the National Security Risk Assessment (NSRA) or whether a new approach will emerge. Whether or not the Review uses the terminology of the NSRA, we suggest that if this aspect of the Review is to provide …
Read more
It remains to be seen whether the forthcoming Review will include an update to the National Security Risk Assessment (NSRA) or whether a new approach will emerge. Whether or not the Review uses the terminology of the NSRA, we suggest that if this aspect of the Review is to provide a useful guide to inform the UK’s defence posture, it should adhere to the following principles: In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integrated Review 57 Input Output Review • Draws on a wide • Establishes broad • Subject to robust range of sources threat and risk challenge from categories within and outside • Considers the Government capability and • Distinguishes intent of the UK’s between short term • Communicated adversaries and allies and long-term risks to Parliament and and threats the public in a way • Considers that balances the the impact and • Includes a need for secrecy threats posed by clear and realistic with the benefits of new and emerging prioritisation transparency technologies • Recognises the drivers of conflict and instability • Takes account of the changing character of warfare
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that the existing National Security Risk Assessment (NSRA) is regularly updated and integral to building resilience and informing defence posture. Recommendations from the Integrated Review will be incorporated into the NSRA as appropriate.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
11
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
We welcome the Review’s focus on intensifying geopolitical competition in light of COVID-19. To deliver a robust assessment of the capabilities and short and long term ambitions of hostile foreign states, the Review must consider the full range of Russia and China’s economic, diplomatic and military activities and include a …
Read more
We welcome the Review’s focus on intensifying geopolitical competition in light of COVID-19. To deliver a robust assessment of the capabilities and short and long term ambitions of hostile foreign states, the Review must consider the full range of Russia and China’s economic, diplomatic and military activities and include a thorough assessment of their internal political dynamics
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that the Integrated Review has already drawn on all-source assessments of many countries' capabilities, intent, and internal dynamics, addressing the committee's recommendation.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
12
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
Existing spending commitments are a necessary but insufficient basis for approaching funding decisions in the Integrated Review. Whilst the economic outlook for the UK remains uncertain, it is imperative that funding considerations are informed by the Review’s strategic analysis and not the other way around. The Integrated Review should look …
Read more
Existing spending commitments are a necessary but insufficient basis for approaching funding decisions in the Integrated Review. Whilst the economic outlook for the UK remains uncertain, it is imperative that funding considerations are informed by the Review’s strategic analysis and not the other way around. The Integrated Review should look beyond the NATO target of spending 2% of GDP on defence to consider what financial resources are required to ensure that defence can contribute to achieving the priorities of the UK’s security.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government states it has not limited its thinking and is running the Comprehensive Spending Review in parallel with the Integrated Review to ensure resources are informed by strategic analysis. It views the 2% GDP defence spending target as a floor, not a ceiling, and …
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
13
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
To ensure that the Review considers the ways, ends and means of the UK’s security, defence, development and foreign policy in the round, the Government must set out the mechanisms that will be used to ensure the alignment between the Integrated Review and the Comprehensive Spending Review and clarify the …
Read more
To ensure that the Review considers the ways, ends and means of the UK’s security, defence, development and foreign policy in the round, the Government must set out the mechanisms that will be used to ensure the alignment between the Integrated Review and the Comprehensive Spending Review and clarify the baseline for increases in defence spending.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government states that the Integrated Review and Comprehensive Spending Review will remain closely aligned, with MOD's CSR submission reflecting the IR's policy propositions. It also clarifies that all MOD business areas are engaged to ensure a robust and deliverable financial baseline to meet future …
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
14
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
We urge the Government to consider a long-term multi-year financial settlement for defence, in order to ensure that the Integrated Review provides a reliable basis for planning the UK’s future defence posture. In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integrated Review 58 Without this assurance, ongoing issues with the affordability …
Read more
We urge the Government to consider a long-term multi-year financial settlement for defence, in order to ensure that the Integrated Review provides a reliable basis for planning the UK’s future defence posture. In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integrated Review 58 Without this assurance, ongoing issues with the affordability and availability of the UK’s defence capabilities will persist and our role in the world diminished.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government confirms that the Comprehensive Spending Review will provide a multi-year financial settlement for Defence to enable the delivery of policy priorities set out in the Integrated Review, stating its position has not changed.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
15
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
The Integrated Review is an opportunity for the Ministry of Defence to explain how our Armed Forces will fight in the future. It is promising that work is underway to develop new operating concepts but it is vitally important that this work is communicated to wider Government stakeholders involved in …
Read more
The Integrated Review is an opportunity for the Ministry of Defence to explain how our Armed Forces will fight in the future. It is promising that work is underway to develop new operating concepts but it is vitally important that this work is communicated to wider Government stakeholders involved in the Review before its completion. As demonstrated by COVID-19, our Armed Forces are required to fulfil a diverse range of domestic and international tasks. Their concept of operations must realistically reflect what commitments are possible with the resources and capabilities available. These concepts should inform capability and funding decisions made as part of the Review and, given their significance, one key output of the Review should be to formally record these new operating concepts in doctrine.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights the Integrated Operating Concept 2025, launched in September 2020, which outlines a new approach to military operations and is actively informing Defence's contribution to the Integrated Review, including capability and resource decisions.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
17
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
Given that systemic challenges have not been resolved in the previous thirteen reviews of defence procurement, we doubt that the Integrated Review will come up with even a short-term fix. We believe that the Review ought to address the strategic issues that should underpin the UK’s approach to defence procurement, …
Read more
Given that systemic challenges have not been resolved in the previous thirteen reviews of defence procurement, we doubt that the Integrated Review will come up with even a short-term fix. We believe that the Review ought to address the strategic issues that should underpin the UK’s approach to defence procurement, in order to provide a sound basis to address these challenges in the future. The UK’s capability priorities and force structure should inform the answers to the following strategic questions on the procurement process: a. What capabilities and skills must remain sovereign and what can be bought “off-the-shelf”? What are the implications for operational advantage, freedom of action, cost and national prosperity? ) b. How does the UK define value for money in defence procurement? In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integrated Review 59 c. How can UK defence procurement ensure the resilience of logistics and supply? d. How can the procurement process be used to foster innovation and ensure access to intellectual property? e. Is defence procurement, research and development keeping pace with future requirements? f. How will lessons from procurement failures be captured and addressed? The Committee welcomes ongoing work to review the UK’s Defence Industrial Strategy. This strategy should be informed by the strategic decisions made as part of the Integrated Review. The Committee will continue to explore the UK’s defence industrial policy in our ongoing parallel inquiry on this topic.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The Government details a cross-Government review of the defence and security industry (a), states its procurement approach considers all relevant costs and benefits (b), and describes upgraded investment decision-making processes, including three-step approvals and improved lessons learned initiatives, to address strategic issues in procurement (c-f).
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence
18
Recommendation
In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integr…
Accepted
We have heard that external engagement in the Review process provides a challenge function to the Government’s understanding, can act as an early signpost to stakeholders who can contribute to achieving the UK’s security and defence priorities and contributes to the legitimacy of the review’s outcomes. External consultation must be …
Read more
We have heard that external engagement in the Review process provides a challenge function to the Government’s understanding, can act as an early signpost to stakeholders who can contribute to achieving the UK’s security and defence priorities and contributes to the legitimacy of the review’s outcomes. External consultation must be structured in a clear and transparent way so that all interested stakeholders can contribute. In some cases, there may be existing mechanisms for Government to solicit the views of external stakeholders (such as the Defence Suppliers Forum, the CDS’ Strategy Forum, and the Defence Policy Board) and in other cases new mechanisms and approaches should be explored. In its response to this report, Government should describe the process by which the following constituencies will be involved in the Review: a. Parliament (including relevant Select Committees) b. The public c. Civil society and academia d. International allies and partners e. Industry and trade associations f. Serving Armed Forces personnel of all ranks (Paragraph 130) In Search of Strategy — The 2020 Integrated Review 60
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlines the extensive external engagement process for the Integrated Review, including briefings for Parliament, a public call for evidence, engagement with civil society, academia, international partners, industry, and input from serving Armed Forces personnel.
Read full response →
Ministry of Defence