Recommendations & Conclusions
45 items
1
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We would encourage every family court in England and Wales to invite their local MPs to visit so that they can hear accounts of the issues facing the family justice system from those who are responsible for delivering justice on a daily basis.
Government response AI summary
The government highlights that the President of the Family Division already encouraged District Family Judges to invite local MPs to visit their courts, and HMCTS will support and facilitate such visits.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
2
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice should consider producing a White Paper that clarifies and publicises the right of the public to attend court hearings and access information on court proceedings in the digital age.
Government response AI summary
The government states it has already taken considerable steps to improve access to court information and hearings, detailing initiatives like the new Court and Tribunal Hearings service (CATHs) and existing guidance and legislation.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
3
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
Open justice is a common law principle, and it is for the courts to determine its requirements in particular cases. However, responsibility for deciding how the principle should operate should not be left to the courts alone. Deciding the proper limits of open justice can often give rise to significant …
Read more
Open justice is a common law principle, and it is for the courts to determine its requirements in particular cases. However, responsibility for deciding how the principle should operate should not be left to the courts alone. Deciding the proper limits of open justice can often give rise to significant policy questions that Government and Parliament can only tackle through legislation.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejects the need for new legislation, stating that the principle of open justice is amply provided by existing common law, Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Human Rights Act 1998), and other established statutes.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
4
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The internet and social media are changing the way that the public access court proceedings, which is making the work of the courts more accessible; but this also presents dangers for the administration of justice. In the digital age, it is vital the Government, Parliament and the Judiciary work together …
Read more
The internet and social media are changing the way that the public access court proceedings, which is making the work of the courts more accessible; but this also presents dangers for the administration of justice. In the digital age, it is vital the Government, Parliament and the Judiciary work together to ensure that a balanced approach to open justice is achieved so that public scrutiny of justice can be secured without damaging the quality of the justice administered in the courts. (Paragraph 20) Court reporting in the digital age
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government commits to continuing close collaboration with the judiciary to monitor the impact of remote observation legislation and broader technology, and will bring forward further measures, including legislation, if required to safeguard justice.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
5
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The well-documented decline in the news media’s coverage of the courts, particularly the Magistrates’ courts, is concerning. In acting as the eyes and ears of the public, the media perform a vital role in keeping the public informed on the operation of the justice system.
Read more
The well-documented decline in the news media’s coverage of the courts, particularly the Magistrates’ courts, is concerning. In acting as the eyes and ears of the public, the media perform a vital role in keeping the public informed on the operation of the justice system.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlines steps already taken to increase court transparency, such as broadcasting sentencing remarks from Crown Courts and HMCTS providing information to the public. They acknowledge the media's vital role but state the state cannot replace it, focusing on improving direct access to court …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
6
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The decline in court reporting has had a negative effect on open justice in England and Wales.
Government response AI summary
The government refers to existing steps to make court information more accessible, highlights the already implemented legislation allowing broadcast of judges' sentencing remarks, and notes ongoing training for HMCTS staff to facilitate media access.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
7
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted in Part
As the public receives less information through the media on the work of the courts, HMCTS should do more to enable the courts to communicate information on court proceedings directly to the public. In addition, HMCTS needs to use technology and organisational reform, building on the work done with Courtsdesk …
Read more
As the public receives less information through the media on the work of the courts, HMCTS should do more to enable the courts to communicate information on court proceedings directly to the public. In addition, HMCTS needs to use technology and organisational reform, building on the work done with Courtsdesk News, to provide the media with the information it needs in a consistent manner, as soon as possible, to facilitate court reporting. HMCTS should also pilot the use of regional communication and information officers to support media and public access to hearings. Furthermore, the decrease in the media’s coverage of the courts also strengthens the case for the re- establishment of a courts’ inspectorate, which could help to identify wider issues within the justice system, particularly in the Magistrates’ courts and the Family Court, which are not well covered by the media. (Paragraph 33) 52 Open justice: court reporting in the digital age The barriers to open justice
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights the implementation of legislation in July 2022 to allow broadcasting of Crown Court sentencing remarks, aiding public understanding. It also mentions an ongoing pilot with Courtsdesk to evaluate enhanced provision of magistrates’ court lists for media, with findings to be considered for …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
8
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The evidence from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism on its experience of attempting to access possession hearings presents a concerning picture of the practical reality of open justice in England and Wales. The legal and constitutional status of open justice is immaterial if journalists face the sort of hurdles experienced …
Read more
The evidence from the Bureau of Investigative Journalism on its experience of attempting to access possession hearings presents a concerning picture of the practical reality of open justice in England and Wales. The legal and constitutional status of open justice is immaterial if journalists face the sort of hurdles experienced by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Those barriers have the potential to create a chilling effect for journalists and the public by discouraging them from exercising their right to attend hearings. Everyone working within the justice system, especially judges and court staff, has a role to play in translating the principle of open justice into reality.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that HMCTS already has guidance for staff to support media access, and that the Lord Chief Justice has drawn attention to the Reporters’ Charter. It asserts that HMCTS continues to provide support and guidance through various engagements to ensure accessibility.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
9
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We welcome the publication of the Reporters’ Charter, which for the first time sets out the rights and obligations of journalists reporting on court proceedings. We note, however, that the rights of access that flow from the principle of open justice are not exclusively for reporters’—it is vital that members …
Read more
We welcome the publication of the Reporters’ Charter, which for the first time sets out the rights and obligations of journalists reporting on court proceedings. We note, however, that the rights of access that flow from the principle of open justice are not exclusively for reporters’—it is vital that members of the public are also aware of their right to attend proceedings and access information.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights the launch of the Court and Tribunal Hearings service (CATHs) in July 2022, which digitises and standardises hearing lists to make information more accessible for both the public and media. It also plans a wider call for evidence in 2023 exploring open …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
10
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
HMCTS should publish a citizens’ charter that outlines the public’s rights to access information on the courts.
Government response AI summary
HMCTS commits to developing and publishing a charter for members of the public in 2023 that will summarise existing rules for public access to court hearings and information.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
11
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Not Addressed
The Reporters’ Charter helpfully directs the media to the MOJ press office and the Judicial Press Office to deal with enquiries and issues on accessing court proceedings and information. There should be a single point of contact for all accessibility and open justice inquiries from the media and from the …
Read more
The Reporters’ Charter helpfully directs the media to the MOJ press office and the Judicial Press Office to deal with enquiries and issues on accessing court proceedings and information. There should be a single point of contact for all accessibility and open justice inquiries from the media and from the public. The Lord Chief Justice told us that, if a journalist encounters an issue accessing a court, he or she should “get in touch with their local court and ask why”. In reality, at present there is no formal official mechanism for the media or the public to raise accessibility enquiries or complaints in relation to the courts. The creation of regional communication and information officers within HMCTS could provide that point of contact for reporters and the public. The courts’ inspectorate, as we proposed in our report on court capacity, could have a specific remit to examine the operation of open justice.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The response text provided is incomplete, but it appears to be restating the recommendation.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
12
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
HMCTS should institute a programme of open days to encourage the public to visit their local courts, for example during Justice Week. This programme should be used to improve the awareness of both the public and HMCTS staff of the public’s right to attend court proceedings. Furthermore, there should be …
Read more
HMCTS should institute a programme of open days to encourage the public to visit their local courts, for example during Justice Week. This programme should be used to improve the awareness of both the public and HMCTS staff of the public’s right to attend court proceedings. Furthermore, there should be a programme to encourage schools to organise visits to their local courts to improve public legal education.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlights existing locally-led community outreach, school visits, mock trial competitions, and judicial engagement programmes already in place to improve public legal education and court awareness.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
13
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
Every court should list an email address on its website to enable the media and the public to request access to remote hearings.
Government response AI summary
The government states that its existing Find a Court or Tribunal (FCT) service and the new Court and Tribunal Hearings (CATH) service already provide contact details, including email addresses, for requesting remote hearing access.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
14
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Deferred
Remote hearings are still a relatively new and innovative feature of the justice system in England and Wales. The evidence to our inquiry suggests that there is a problem with a lack of coherence and consistency in relation to the ability of the media and the public to access remote …
Read more
Remote hearings are still a relatively new and innovative feature of the justice system in England and Wales. The evidence to our inquiry suggests that there is a problem with a lack of coherence and consistency in relation to the ability of the media and the public to access remote court hearings. (Paragraph 49) Open justice: court reporting in the digital age 53
Show less
Government response AI summary
The MoJ will undertake a qualitative review, work with HMCTS’ Media Working Group, and include remote observation in a call for evidence in 2023 to understand its impact and gather feedback, before considering further action.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
15
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We recommend that HMCTS gathers and publishes data on requests to observe proceedings remotely. In particular, it would be useful to know the number of requests received and the number of requests granted by jurisdiction.
Government response AI summary
HMCTS commits to making the Video Hearing (VH) service its sole platform for all remote and hybrid hearings, and as it is developed, it will have in-built functionality to automatically collect anonymised data on the number of observers at each hearing.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
16
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Acknowledged
HMCTS should ensure that the Crown Court provides the same level of information to journalists on the outcome of cases as is currently provided by the Magistrates’ court.
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges that Crown Court information is currently provided reactively compared to magistrates' courts but will only keep this under review and consider future alignment of practice.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
17
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We welcome the planned digitisation of the publication of court and tribunal lists and the consolidation into a single service in one location.
Government response AI summary
The government states it has already launched the first phase of its new Court and Tribunal Hearings service (CATHs) in July 2022, which digitises, consolidates, and standardises hearing lists as welcomed by the committee.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
18
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
We request further information on when this service will go live and what improvements are planned to the level of information on the lists and the accessibility of the service. We recommend that HMCTS considers whether the proposed digital portal should be expanded to include all court information, including results, …
Read more
We request further information on when this service will go live and what improvements are planned to the level of information on the lists and the accessibility of the service. We recommend that HMCTS considers whether the proposed digital portal should be expanded to include all court information, including results, reporting restrictions and court documents.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government confirmed the new CATH service is live for SJP lists and will expand to civil, family, and other tribunals throughout 2023, but stated it has no plans to publish results, reporting restrictions, or court documents via this service due to resource implications.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
19
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Deferred
The Committee would welcome an update on the work being undertaken by the Civil Procedure Rule Committee to improve access to documents in civil proceedings.
Government response AI summary
The government redirected to its response to JSC3 (paragraphs 29 to 31) for an update on the Civil Procedure Rule Committee's work to improve access to documents.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
20
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
The Government and HMCTS should establish a streamlined process for accessing court documents, including courts lists, using a digital portal modelled on Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) in the United States. This should also be used to inform the media of reporting restrictions, including automatic restrictions and notice …
Read more
The Government and HMCTS should establish a streamlined process for accessing court documents, including courts lists, using a digital portal modelled on Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) in the United States. This should also be used to inform the media of reporting restrictions, including automatic restrictions and notice of applications for reporting restrictions.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government rejected establishing a digital portal for all court documents modelled on PACER due to resource and suitability concerns, but plans to explore access to case files in a call for evidence in 2023.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
21
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Deferred
The Government and HMCTS should conduct, or ask the Law Commission to conduct, a comprehensive review on access to documents referred to in open court and propose legislation if necessary to clarify the position.
Government response AI summary
The government stated it plans to consult on access to documents referred to in open court via a call for evidence and will consider feedback before making any future decisions, rather than committing to a comprehensive review or proposing legislation.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
22
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
Reporting restrictions play a key role in securing the fairness of the justice system. However, it is clear that there is inconsistency in the courts’ approach to notifying the media when restrictions are in place, and they are often not effective at ensuring compliance, particularly on social media. This is …
Read more
Reporting restrictions play a key role in securing the fairness of the justice system. However, it is clear that there is inconsistency in the courts’ approach to notifying the media when restrictions are in place, and they are often not effective at ensuring compliance, particularly on social media. This is an important example of where the modernisation of the infrastructure of open justice is long overdue
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges inconsistency in courts' approach to reporting restrictions and commits to embedding greater consistency and improving service to the media. They highlight updated AGO guidance on contempt of court referrals and bespoke training for HMCTS operational staff and court ushers as measures to …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
23
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The proposed new digital portal should also enable access to a centralised database of reporting restrictions on cases.
Government response AI summary
The government did not commit to creating a centralised database of reporting restrictions on a digital portal but outlined existing guidance and protocols and stated HMCTS has developed bespoke training for operational staff to improve consistency.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
24
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
The current situation on court transcripts is unsatisfactory.
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledged court transcripts are not routinely accessible and rejected routine recording of magistrates' courts hearings as disproportionate due to cost, stating it will seek stakeholders' views via a call for evidence before making future decisions.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
25
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
HMCTS should explore whether greater use of technology, such as AI-powered transcription, could be piloted to see whether it can be used to reduce the cost of producing court transcripts. HMCTS should also consider whether the sentencing remarks in the Magistrates’ courts could be routinely recorded and transcribed on request. …
Read more
HMCTS should explore whether greater use of technology, such as AI-powered transcription, could be piloted to see whether it can be used to reduce the cost of producing court transcripts. HMCTS should also consider whether the sentencing remarks in the Magistrates’ courts could be routinely recorded and transcribed on request. HMCTS should also review its existing contracts for transcription services to ensure that transcripts are more accessible to the media and the public.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states it intends to run further pilots for AI-powered transcription, subject to future funding decisions. However, it explicitly considers routine recording and transcription of magistrates’ court hearings to be disproportionate, though it will seek stakeholders' views via a call for evidence in 2023 …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
26
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We welcome the establishment of the National Archives Find Case Law Service. However, this service should represent the first step in improving the public accessibility of judgments. (Paragraph 93) 54 Open justice: court reporting in the digital age
Government response AI summary
The government acknowledges the Find Case Law service is in early stages with incremental improvements underway and shares the ambition for greater access to judgments. It will use a 2023 call for evidence to gauge public views on expanding the service, with a long-term goal …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
27
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
HMCTS should reform the way that judgments are collected, stored and published so that there is less reliance on commercial legal publishers. The judgments of courts are the product of a publicly funded justice system and the public, the media and the legal sector should not have to pay significant …
Read more
HMCTS should reform the way that judgments are collected, stored and published so that there is less reliance on commercial legal publishers. The judgments of courts are the product of a publicly funded justice system and the public, the media and the legal sector should not have to pay significant sums for access.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government highlighted the recently launched free-to-access FCL (Find Case Law) service, which provides public access to over 2,700 judgments since April 2022, and stated it will use a 2023 call for evidence to gauge views on further expansion.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
28
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Acknowledged
All Crown Court sentencing remarks should be published in audio and/or written form. HMCTS should ensure that the necessary resources are made available to enable sentencing remarks to be published.
Government response AI summary
The government stated it is exploring the option of incorporating Crown Court sentencing remarks into the FCL service as part of its expansion and is monitoring the service's use to inform future decisions.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
29
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We are concerned over whether the Ministry of Justice has allocated sufficient funding to ensure that the court reform programme can overcome some of the barriers to public and media access to information on courts. We ask the Government to provide a status update on any ongoing projects that are …
Read more
We are concerned over whether the Ministry of Justice has allocated sufficient funding to ensure that the court reform programme can overcome some of the barriers to public and media access to information on courts. We ask the Government to provide a status update on any ongoing projects that are designed to enhance open justice, outlining how much funding has been allocated to deliver them and providing a date by which they will be completed. (Paragraph 98) Court reform and open justice
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlined its £1.3bn HMCTS reform programme, launched in 2016, which includes projects like the CATH service, Video Hearings, Single Justice Procedure, and Common Platform, stating these are designed to make the courts system more accessible and efficient.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
30
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We welcome the new legislative framework for remote observation of court proceedings. The combination of this framework and improvement of the technological facilities of courts has the potential to enhance open justice by making it easier for the public and the media to observe proceedings.
Read more
We welcome the new legislative framework for remote observation of court proceedings. The combination of this framework and improvement of the technological facilities of courts has the potential to enhance open justice by making it easier for the public and the media to observe proceedings.
Show less
Government response AI summary
In response to the welcomed legislative framework for remote observation, the MoJ commits to undertaking a qualitative review in 2023, engaging with the HMCTS Media Working Group, and including the framework in a public call for evidence to understand its impact.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
31
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
It is right that judges are in control of the decision as to whether to allow remote observation. In some cases, judges will find these decisions difficult to make. It is crucial therefore that the effect of this new framework is evaluated. The concerns raised by the Lord Chief Justice …
Read more
It is right that judges are in control of the decision as to whether to allow remote observation. In some cases, judges will find these decisions difficult to make. It is crucial therefore that the effect of this new framework is evaluated. The concerns raised by the Lord Chief Justice and the Senior President of Tribunals, in particular in relation to the impact on court resources and the potential for unauthorised transmissions, will need to be followed up by an evaluation of how this new framework is operating in practice.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The MoJ will undertake a light-touch qualitative review in 2023, work with HMCTS’ Media Working Group, and include the remote observation framework in a call for evidence, to evaluate the impact and operation of the new framework as recommended.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
32
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
HMCTS should commission an evaluation in June 2023 to examine how the new framework has worked in its first year of operation.
Government response AI summary
The MoJ will undertake a light-touch qualitative review with court and tribunal staff and the judiciary in 2023, work with the Media Working Group, and include the remote observation framework in a 2023 call for evidence to understand its impact.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
33
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Acknowledged
The power to allow the transmission of proceedings to designated livestreaming premises has great potential to enable more people to observe court proceedings and enhance open justice. If students were able to observe cases in classrooms and lecture halls, or if community centres could host livestreams of court proceedings, the …
Read more
The power to allow the transmission of proceedings to designated livestreaming premises has great potential to enable more people to observe court proceedings and enhance open justice. If students were able to observe cases in classrooms and lecture halls, or if community centres could host livestreams of court proceedings, the accessibility of court proceedings would be greatly enhanced.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees the power exists through remote observation legislation but has not yet been used; they will explore the appetite for its use in a forthcoming call for evidence.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
34
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Deferred
We welcome the broadcasting of Crown Court sentencing remarks. It is a positive step for both open justice and the public understanding of sentencing.
Government response AI summary
The government states it will carefully monitor the impact of the broadcasting changes introduced in summer 2022, and may use a call for evidence to gather views on expanding the current broadcasting regime before deciding on further interventions.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
35
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Acknowledged
More widely, we recommend that HMCTS and the Judiciary commission research to determine which civil and criminal proceedings could be suitable for broadcast and video archiving. In principle, we would support the extension of broadcasting and recording to civil trials that do not involve oral evidence. In the criminal context, …
Read more
More widely, we recommend that HMCTS and the Judiciary commission research to determine which civil and criminal proceedings could be suitable for broadcast and video archiving. In principle, we would support the extension of broadcasting and recording to civil trials that do not involve oral evidence. In the criminal context, the broadcast and recording of sentencing in Magistrates’ courts could also be beneficial. However, we do not support the broadcasting of any elements of criminal trials other than the sentencing remarks of the judge. (Paragraph 119) Open justice: court reporting in the digital age 55
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will monitor the impact of Crown Court broadcasting changes introduced in 2022 before making further interventions and *may* use a call for evidence to gather views on expanding the current regime.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
36
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The changes to criminal procedure in the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 should be carefully monitored. After one year of their operation, the Ministry of Justice should initiate an evaluation of how the changes are operating in practice, including their impact on open justice.
Read more
The changes to criminal procedure in the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 should be carefully monitored. After one year of their operation, the Ministry of Justice should initiate an evaluation of how the changes are operating in practice, including their impact on open justice.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that these changes, as part of the HMCTS reform programme, will be subject to a review in line with HMCTS’s public commitment to evaluate reform measures after a reasonable operating period.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
37
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The potential effect of these changes on open justice might also be mitigated by ensuring that the relevant information that would have otherwise been said in open court is documented and published online in a timely fashion.
Government response AI summary
The government states that information about cases dealt with via the new criminal procedures in the JRCA 2022 will be made available to the media and other interested parties in line with existing Criminal Procedure Rules.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
38
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We remain concerned by the Single Justice Procedure’s lack of transparency.
Government response AI summary
The government claims existing provisions for the Single Justice Procedure already provide more information to the public and media than traditional open court proceedings, citing online publication of case lists and detailed information for media. It states it may explore the SJP further through a …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
39
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
The Government should review the procedure and seek to enhance its transparency by ensuring that any information that would have been available had the cases been heard in open court is published in a timely fashion.
Government response AI summary
The government states that courts already provide more detailed information on SJP cases than traditional proceedings, and *may* explore SJP transparency further through a 2023 call for evidence.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
40
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
The Government should clarify and strengthen the governance structures on open justice. The Senior Data Governance Panel should be formalised and its powers and remit should be defined and published. It is vital that the decisions made by the Panel are as transparent as possible. The positive work of the …
Read more
The Government should clarify and strengthen the governance structures on open justice. The Senior Data Governance Panel should be formalised and its powers and remit should be defined and published. It is vital that the decisions made by the Panel are as transparent as possible. The positive work of the Media Working Group should be built upon and it should be empowered to make recommendations that are then considered and decided upon by the Senior Data Governance Panel. A separate court information user group should be established to represent the interests of groups other than the media, such as court observers, NGOs, researchers and law tech that can also make recommendations that are considered and decided upon by the Senior Data Governance Panel. (Paragraph 134) The Family Court
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has formalized the Senior Data Governance Panel and will publish its terms of reference and work information in early 2023. However, they do not plan to empower the Media Working Group with policy functions or establish a new court information users’ group, but …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
41
Recommendation
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Acknowledged
We agree with the President of the Family Division that there should be a review of section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960. In our view section 12 of the Act should be reviewed and reformed so that it can replaced with a much more targeted measure that …
Read more
We agree with the President of the Family Division that there should be a review of section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960. In our view section 12 of the Act should be reviewed and reformed so that it can replaced with a much more targeted measure that respects the principle of open justice. The Government should ask the Law Commission to produce a proposal for the reform of section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 that provides a better balance between transparency and confidentiality.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government is working with the President of the Family Division as part of the Transparency Implementation Group and remains committed to increasing transparency, but does not commit to asking the Law Commission to review Section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
42
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Acknowledged
In broad terms, we support the Transparency Review’s principal recommendation that media representative and bloggers should be able to report, subject to the relevant restrictions, on the cases they observe in the Family Court. We would caution, however, that given the decline in the number of court reporters in recent …
Read more
In broad terms, we support the Transparency Review’s principal recommendation that media representative and bloggers should be able to report, subject to the relevant restrictions, on the cases they observe in the Family Court. We would caution, however, that given the decline in the number of court reporters in recent years, it is unclear whether media outlets will necessarily dedicate greater resources to reporting on the family courts as a result of these changes. We look forward to seeing the results of the pilots.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that decisions on media and blogger reporting in family courts are ultimately for the judiciary, but they are working alongside the President of the Family Division to establish media reporting pilots.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
43
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Accepted
We welcome the commitment to produce more informative family court lists. The success of the proposed pilot will depend on journalists and bloggers being able to identity cases that will generate wider public interest.
Government response AI summary
Family court lists are currently available on CourtServe, and in 2023 they will also be available on the new CATH service to ensure consistent publication.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
44
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
We welcome the Transparency Review’s proposal to set a target of every judge publishing 10% of their judgments. If achieved, this would make a significant 56 Open justice: court reporting in the digital age contribution to the transparency of the Family Court and to open justice. It is crucial that …
Read more
We welcome the Transparency Review’s proposal to set a target of every judge publishing 10% of their judgments. If achieved, this would make a significant 56 Open justice: court reporting in the digital age contribution to the transparency of the Family Court and to open justice. It is crucial that the public and the media are able to access a greater number of judgments from the Family Court. However, we share the concern raised by witnesses as to whether sufficient resources will be allocated to enable the proposed anonymisation unit to function as effectively as it needs to in order to ensure that a consistent and representative number of judgments are published and to minimise the number of anonymisation errors.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states that setting the 10% judgment publication target and resourcing the anonymisation unit would require considerable resources, which must be balanced against existing commitments and priorities, especially reducing the family court backlog. They are exploring other options instead of committing to the proposed …
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice
45
Conclusion
Fifth Report - Open justice: court repo…
Rejected
His Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service should ensure that the requisite resources are provided to enable the establishment of an anonymisation unit that facilitates the publication of at least 10% of Family Court judgments without the risk of identification of the parties involved. (Paragraph 155) Open justice: court reporting in …
Read more
His Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service should ensure that the requisite resources are provided to enable the establishment of an anonymisation unit that facilitates the publication of at least 10% of Family Court judgments without the risk of identification of the parties involved. (Paragraph 155) Open justice: court reporting in the digital age 57
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government does not commit to establishing an anonymisation unit for Family Court judgments due to significant resource requirements and conflicting priorities, stating its main focus is on reducing the family court backlog. It is exploring other options for increasing transparency.
Read full response →
Ministry of Justice