Source · Select Committees · Home Affairs Committee

Fourth Report: Home Office preparedness for COVID-19 (Coronavirus): institutional accommodation

Home Affairs Committee HC 562 Published 28 July 2020
Report Status
Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations
54 items (38 recs)
Government Response
AI assessment · 54 of 54 classified
Accepted 18
Accepted in Part 6
Acknowledged 8
Deferred 1
Not Addressed 14
Rejected 7
Government response
Fifth Special Report: Home Office preparedness for COVID-19 (coronavirus): institutional accommodation: Government Response to the Committee’s Fourth Report · published 13 Nov 2020
Read the government response ↗ Response on the Index
Filter by: Clear

Recommendations & Conclusions

7 items
9 Recommendation Rejected
Para 47

The risks posed to vulnerable individuals by Covid-19 make more urgent the necessity of a...

Recommendation
The risks posed to vulnerable individuals by Covid-19 make more urgent the necessity of a complete end to room sharing by unrelated adults. While the first peak of infection has passed in some parts of the UK, there continues to … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to end room sharing for unrelated adults, stating that existing contractual criteria prohibit it for vulnerable persons and that further restrictions would not assist providers.
Home Office
View Details →
10 Recommendation Rejected
Para 48

The Home Office must take appropriate action, including contract variation if necessary, to ensure room...

Recommendation
The Home Office must take appropriate action, including contract variation if necessary, to ensure room sharing across the whole estate is phased out. The Department must also ensure that additional accommodation obtained to meet this requirement is of a high … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to phase out room sharing for unrelated adults, stating there are no plans for contractual changes and they do not agree further restrictions would assist providers in securing accommodation.
Home Office
View Details →
14 Recommendation Rejected
Para 59

We are appalled that the Home Office response to the communication support requirements of service...

Recommendation
We are appalled that the Home Office response to the communication support requirements of service users who are not accommodated in hotels or large IA facilities was simply to gather information about where free Wi-Fi might be provided locally—thus encouraging … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the committee's assertion that it encouraged vulnerable people to access public Wi-Fi, stating such information was part of general induction and that Wi-Fi or SIM cards are provided in initial accommodation and hotels.
Home Office
View Details →
31 Recommendation Rejected
Para 126

We support the NAO’s recommendation that the Government should consider whether its performance framework effectively...

Recommendation
We support the NAO’s recommendation that the Government should consider whether its performance framework effectively incentivises providers to move service users into dispersal accommodation within agreed timescales; the Government should also reassess the value for money provided by contingency accommodation … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to review its performance framework, reassess value for money, and consult stakeholders, stating existing KPIs and time limits are in place and there are no plans to review or redesign asylum contracts at this point.
Home Office
View Details →
34 Recommendation Rejected
Para 142

In 2018 our predecessors recommended that the Government “must provide dispersal authorities with dedicated funding...

Recommendation
In 2018 our predecessors recommended that the Government “must provide dispersal authorities with dedicated funding to better manage dispersal and the related impact on services” and to give currently non-participating authorities confidence that they would be fully supported were they … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges that lack of direct funding is an issue but rejects the recommendation to directly fund local authorities, instead focusing on collaborative work to increase dispersed accommodation procurement.
Home Office
View Details →
53 Recommendation Rejected
Para 206

We urge the Home Office to set out a full, public, Covid-19 strategy which addresses...

Recommendation
We urge the Home Office to set out a full, public, Covid-19 strategy which addresses the key concerns outlined in this chapter in relation to asylum accommodation and immigration detention. The strategy should cover further periods of local or national … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejected the recommendation for a single, consolidated COVID-19 strategy for asylum accommodation and immigration detention, stating it does not believe a combined approach is appropriate or helpful.
Home Office
View Details →
55 Recommendation Rejected

The Home Office should conduct a full review of its management of Covid-19 impacts on...

Recommendation
The Home Office should conduct a full review of its management of Covid-19 impacts on asylum accommodation and immigration detention in conjunction with its providers and other government departments. It should evaluate the impact of the temporary measures put in … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government rejects conducting a consolidated review of its COVID-19 management across both asylum accommodation and immigration detention, stating it is not helpful to compare them. They instead refer to ongoing daily management and review of temporary measures and published guidance by UKVI and IE.
Home Office
View Details →