Recommendations & Conclusions
9 items
4
Conclusion
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
We are concerned, however, about the Government’s decision to extend the statutory right to buy to all tenants of private social housing providers. The existing policy has reduced the number of homes available for social rent and increased the proportion of the social housing stock that is hard to maintain, …
Read more
We are concerned, however, about the Government’s decision to extend the statutory right to buy to all tenants of private social housing providers. The existing policy has reduced the number of homes available for social rent and increased the proportion of the social housing stock that is hard to maintain, as most of the properties bought have been in suburban areas, rather than inner-city areas, where much of the harder- to-maintain stock is concentrated. It is impossible to properly assess the proposal for extending the right, however, as it lacks detail. If it does amount to a genuine right to buy for tenants of private providers, it must surely amount to far greater central government interference in the sector than did the measures that prompted the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in 2015 to reclassify private providers as part of the public sector.
Show less
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
5
Recommendation
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
Not Addressed
To reduce the social housing sector’s reliance on outdated stock, we recommend that the Government introduce funding specifically for regeneration that does not require the delivery of net additional housing and deliver on its commitment to increase the supply of homes for social rent. We also recommend that it amend …
Read more
To reduce the social housing sector’s reliance on outdated stock, we recommend that the Government introduce funding specifically for regeneration that does not require the delivery of net additional housing and deliver on its commitment to increase the supply of homes for social rent. We also recommend that it amend the Affordable Homes Programme to remove the requirement to deliver net additional housing.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The response focuses on setting clear outcome-based expectations for registered providers and seeking assurance that they are achieving them, but it does not address the specific recommendations regarding funding for regeneration or amending the Affordable Homes Programme.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
6
Recommendation
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
Not Addressed
To prevent the further erosion of the social housing stock, we urge the Government to set out how it plans to fully fund the one-for-one and like-for-like replacement of every home sold under the proposed extension of the statutory right to buy to tenants of private social housing providers. One-for-one …
Read more
To prevent the further erosion of the social housing stock, we urge the Government to set out how it plans to fully fund the one-for-one and like-for-like replacement of every home sold under the proposed extension of the statutory right to buy to tenants of private social housing providers. One-for-one replacement must be completed within The Regulation of Social Housing 69 three years of the sale. We also call on the Government to publish its assessment of whether extending a genuine right to buy to tenants of private providers might result in the ONS reclassifying the sector as part of the public sector.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The response focuses on setting clear outcome-based expectations for registered providers and seeking assurance that they are achieving them, but it does not address the specific recommendations regarding funding for regeneration or amending the Affordable Homes Programme.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
7
Conclusion
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
Not Addressed
The social housing sector is under serious financial pressure, and the Government is asking it to do far too much without sufficient resources. We therefore welcome the progress made towards finding a financial solution to the building safety crisis and the Government’s commitment to exploring ways of exempting social housing …
Read more
The social housing sector is under serious financial pressure, and the Government is asking it to do far too much without sufficient resources. We therefore welcome the progress made towards finding a financial solution to the building safety crisis and the Government’s commitment to exploring ways of exempting social housing providers from the building safety levy. The Government says the Building Safety Fund is available to social housing providers if they can demonstrate that the costs of remediation are unaffordable or present a threat to financial stability, but it is not clear how easily a provider could demonstrate this. Social housing providers must have exactly the same access to funds for building safety remediation as private sector landlords. There must be no discrimination against social housing.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The response discusses the new standards to set clear outcome-based expectations for registered providers, but it does not address the financial pressures on the social housing sector or the need for equal access to building safety remediation funds.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
8
Recommendation
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
Not Addressed
We recommend that the Government provide an update on social housing providers’ access to funds for building safety remediation and commit to ensuring they have exactly the same access to funds as private landlords. It should also provide an assessment of the total cost of remediating the social housing stock, …
Read more
We recommend that the Government provide an update on social housing providers’ access to funds for building safety remediation and commit to ensuring they have exactly the same access to funds as private landlords. It should also provide an assessment of the total cost of remediating the social housing stock, and the gap between this and the funds that are available, from whatever source, to carry out the remediation work. The Government should then work with the sector to identify how the funding gap can be bridged. We also call on the Government to provide an update on the impact of the Social Housing Decarbonisation Fund and on the ability of social housing providers to decarbonise their housing stock.
Show less
Government response AI summary
The response discusses the roles of the RSH and the Housing Ombudsman, not addressing the recommendation about funding for building safety remediation and decarbonisation.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
19
Conclusion
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
We are pleased the Government is setting up the Social Housing Quality Resident Panel, but we believe there is a strong argument for committing now to making it a permanent national voice for tenants, or at least to establishing such a body in The Regulation of Social Housing 71 one …
Read more
We are pleased the Government is setting up the Social Housing Quality Resident Panel, but we believe there is a strong argument for committing now to making it a permanent national voice for tenants, or at least to establishing such a body in The Regulation of Social Housing 71 one form or another. We also have significant concerns about how residents will be selected. If the panel is to speak for tenants, it must be genuinely representative.
Show less
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
20
Recommendation
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
We recommend that the Government establish the Social Housing Quality Resident Panel on a permanent basis as the national tenant voice body that tenants representatives have been calling for. The Government should send the strongest possible signal to tenants that it is determined to involve them in the national conversation …
Read more
We recommend that the Government establish the Social Housing Quality Resident Panel on a permanent basis as the national tenant voice body that tenants representatives have been calling for. The Government should send the strongest possible signal to tenants that it is determined to involve them in the national conversation about how to drive up standards in social housing. To ensure the panel can truly speak for tenants, the Government must also ensure that the selection process is transparent and that the panel includes as broad a mix of tenants as possible.
Show less
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
24
Conclusion
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
Not Addressed
Whatever external or impersonal forces might be contributing to the very poor treatment some tenants have to endure, ultimate responsibility must lie first with the individuals concerned and then with senior management. We therefore strongly welcome the Government’s review of qualifications and professional training. Ensuring those working in the sector …
Read more
Whatever external or impersonal forces might be contributing to the very poor treatment some tenants have to endure, ultimate responsibility must lie first with the individuals concerned and then with senior management. We therefore strongly welcome the Government’s review of qualifications and professional training. Ensuring those working in the sector are properly qualified will be critical, as the most important step in improving service standards must be preventing the wrong people from entering the profession in the first place. We also welcome the announcement of an independent quality panel by the National Housing Federation and the Chartered Institute of Housing. (Paragraph 102) 72 The Regulation of Social Housing
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government outlines its existing outcome-focused, co-regulatory approach to social housing standards, emphasizing that providers' boards are responsible for meeting these standards to achieve a cultural shift, but does not directly address the committee's welcome of a review of qualifications or an independent quality panel.
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
25
Recommendation
First Report - The Regulation of Social…
Not Addressed
We call on the Government to provide an update on the progress of its review of qualifications and professional training in the social housing sector, including a timeline for implementation of any new qualifications. (Paragraph 103) The Housing Ombudsman
Read more
We call on the Government to provide an update on the progress of its review of qualifications and professional training in the social housing sector, including a timeline for implementation of any new qualifications. (Paragraph 103) The Housing Ombudsman
Show less
Government response AI summary
The response states that they look forward to continuing to work with tenants and other stakeholders as they develop a new proactive consumer regulation regime, but does not provide an update on the progress of its review of qualifications and professional training in the social …
Read full response →
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government