Recommendations & Conclusions
6 items
4
Recommendation
2nd Report - Gridlock or growth? Avoidi…
Accepted in Part
Given that the Government, in its Planning and Infrastructure Bill, is seeking to disapply the current requirement for the Secretary of State to respond to any resolutions made by a committee in either House of Parliament, we recommend that the Government, in future, ensures that: a. Select Committees are provided …
Read more
Given that the Government, in its Planning and Infrastructure Bill, is seeking to disapply the current requirement for the Secretary of State to respond to any resolutions made by a committee in either House of Parliament, we recommend that the Government, in future, ensures that: a. Select Committees are provided with at least ten sitting weeks in which to consider future National Policy Statements and proposed amendments to an existing NPS, b. this period should never commence before the conclusion of the department’s related public consultation process, and c. Parliament has a period of at least ten sitting days, in which consideration of the recommendations of a Select Committee can take place, before the NPS or amended NPS is designated by the relevant Secretary of State. (Recommendation, Paragraph 9) The new strategic framework for energy infrastructure planning
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government agrees that Select Committees should have sufficient time for scrutiny but rejects committing to a fixed minimum review period of ten sitting weeks due to the need for flexibility and pace in energy delivery. It commits to ensuring that future scrutiny periods will …
Read full response →
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
6
Conclusion
2nd Report - Gridlock or growth? Avoidi…
Accepted in Part
The Government’s new strategic framework for energy infrastructure planning represents a significant departure from the existing market-led approach to development by industry. The National Policy Statements should define what is set centrally and what is expected from industry plainly and transparently, to give certainty and avoid ambiguity. (Conclusion, Paragraph 24)
Read more
The Government’s new strategic framework for energy infrastructure planning represents a significant departure from the existing market-led approach to development by industry. The National Policy Statements should define what is set centrally and what is expected from industry plainly and transparently, to give certainty and avoid ambiguity. (Conclusion, Paragraph 24)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government clarifies its intention for a hybrid system, with NESO recommendations in the NPS covering high-level strategic parameters and project-level details subject to local planning, thereby partially defining roles.
Read full response →
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
12
Conclusion
2nd Report - Gridlock or growth? Avoidi…
Accepted in Part
We welcome the decision to endorse the Centralised Strategic Network Plan (CSNP) in the National Policy Statements. However, we are concerned that the proposed guidance in paragraphs 3.3.78 to 3.3.80 of EN-1 is not clear enough about what, precisely, it is from the CSNP that is being endorsed. This must …
Read more
We welcome the decision to endorse the Centralised Strategic Network Plan (CSNP) in the National Policy Statements. However, we are concerned that the proposed guidance in paragraphs 3.3.78 to 3.3.80 of EN-1 is not clear enough about what, precisely, it is from the CSNP that is being endorsed. This must be unambiguous, to avoid unnecessary argument about the issue during the development consent process. (Conclusion, Paragraph 40)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government clarifies that the NPS will endorse the CSNP's strategic parameters, such as location and technology choice, with further exact details to be defined in the methodology published early 2026.
Read full response →
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
13
Recommendation
2nd Report - Gridlock or growth? Avoidi…
Accepted in Part
The Government should review and, if necessary, amend the proposed guidance endorsing the CSNP in paragraphs 3.3.78 to 3.3.80 of EN-1, to make the language more consistent, unambiguous, and more in keeping with current understandings of the intended purpose of the CSNP. This may involve: • reviewing the reference to …
Read more
The Government should review and, if necessary, amend the proposed guidance endorsing the CSNP in paragraphs 3.3.78 to 3.3.80 of EN-1, to make the language more consistent, unambiguous, and more in keeping with current understandings of the intended purpose of the CSNP. This may involve: • reviewing the reference to the CSNP displaying “indicative routes” in paragraph 3.3.80; • removing the reference in paragraph 3.3.79 to a “strategic solution”, an undefined term distinct from “strategic parameters”; and/or • replacing “strategic parameters” with “strategic corridors” until the CSNP is complete and a more precise definition can be adopted. (Recommendation, Paragraph 41)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government has removed the term "strategic solution" from the guidance as recommended but maintained "indicative routes" and "strategic parameters" with justifications for their continued use.
Read full response →
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
14
Recommendation
2nd Report - Gridlock or growth? Avoidi…
Accepted in Part
The National Policy Statements should clarify that adjustments may be made to the “strategic parameters” for new electricity transmission infrastructure set out in the Centralised Strategic Network Plan where this is justified following detailed design development, community consultations or environmental surveys. (Recommendation, Paragraph 42)
Read more
The National Policy Statements should clarify that adjustments may be made to the “strategic parameters” for new electricity transmission infrastructure set out in the Centralised Strategic Network Plan where this is justified following detailed design development, community consultations or environmental surveys. (Recommendation, Paragraph 42)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government will review if full endorsement of the ETDP within EN-5 is appropriate after the 2025 NPS EN-5 update publication, implying a partial acceptance of adjustments to strategic parameters following consultations and surveys.
Read full response →
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
45
Recommendation
2nd Report - Gridlock or growth? Avoidi…
Accepted in Part
The Government should review and amend this guidance to: • The Government should reaffirm its commitment to developing solar on developed land, brownfield land, contaminated land and industrial land before agricultural land. The Government should also consider innovative ways to develop solar energy without agricultural land. • Clarify more precisely …
Read more
The Government should review and amend this guidance to: • The Government should reaffirm its commitment to developing solar on developed land, brownfield land, contaminated land and industrial land before agricultural land. The Government should also consider innovative ways to develop solar energy without agricultural land. • Clarify more precisely how applicants and decision-makers should assess land type and agricultural land classification, including the use of BMV agricultural land. 58 • Refer explicitly to food security and explain how decision-makers should take this consideration into account. • Clarify when site surveys are necessary to verify agricultural land classification. • Recognise that BMV agricultural land may not all be clustered in one single area but may instead be located in a patchwork of field parcels, mixed with lower-grade land. (Recommendation, Paragraph 108)
Show less
Government response AI summary
The government states NPS guidance already prioritises brownfield and lower-quality agricultural land and has added a reference to Natural England's guidance on assessing agricultural land classification in the NPS for clarity, including soil surveys. However, it does not explicitly commit to referring to food security …
Read full response →
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero