Select committee: Health and Social Care Committee
Healthy Ageing: physical activity in an ageing society
Open
Opened 26 Jun 2025
12 recommendations
15 conclusions
Health and Social Care Committee Inquiry on parliament.uk ↗
Inquiry scope (the committee's words)
The Committee is undertaking an inquiry into the role of physical activity in improving the health and wellbeing of our older population. Progress on improving healthy life expectancy in England has stalled and people are spending longer living with ill health in their older years. Physical activity can help prevent ill health, but activity levels in England are decreasing and are lowest among older people. A small increase in activity by an older person can be substantially beneficial in improving health and reducing or delaying the development of multiple long-term health conditions. This inquiry will focus on the ways that physical activity can prevent and reduce ill health, pushing it further into older age. The Committee will also explore how increasing physical activity levels could have an impact on reducing the gap in healthy life expectancy between older people in the most and least deprived regions. Call for evidence closed at 23:59pm on Thursday 7 August 2025.
Where it stands
The inquiry is open, opened 26 June 2025.
The committee has published 1 report, most recently 8th Report – Healthy Ageing: physical activity in an ageing society on 22 May 2026.
The government's response
No government response linked yet: deadline 22 July 2026, 102 days ago.
Recommendations and conclusions
- Conclusion 1Conclusion
- Conclusion 2Conclusion
- Conclusion 3Conclusion
Reports
- 8th Report – Healthy Ageing: physical activity in an ageing society22 May 2026 · 27 items
Evidence
- 3 oral evidence sessionsLatest 10 December 2025
- 143 written submissions
- 17 witnesses
Recent activity
- 8th Report – Healthy Ageing: physical activity in an ageing society22 May 2026, Report published
- London South Bank University31 March 2026, Written evidence · HAP0058
- South Northants Volunteer Bureau4 February 2026, Written evidence · HAP0019
Recommendations and conclusions 27 shown
Physical activity remains insufficiently prioritised across health and care systems despite its clear contribution to preventing illness, improving population health and reducing inequalities. While some integrated care boards (ICBs) have embedded physical activity into strategies, this is not yet consistent or widespread, with physical activity too often being treated as an optional add-on, rather than a core, evidence-based intervention. (Conclusion, Paragraph 12)
Conclusion 2
Concluded (the committee's words)The Department should require ICBs to embed physical activity as a core preventive intervention within population health strategies. ICBs should demonstrate how physical activity is being integrated into healthy ageing, long-term condition management and health inequalities frameworks, with clear accountability for delivery. (Recommendation, Paragraph 13)
Conclusion 3
Concluded (the committee's words)Physical activity can be more effective than drugs in preventing, treating and managing many long-term conditions. Health and care professionals have an important role in encouraging and supporting people to include physical activity in the management of their health. Conversations about physical activity must become a core component of clinical practice to implement current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on physical activity. We welcome the recognition from NHS England that health and care staff must be supported to gain the skills and confidence to discuss and prescribe physical activity. However, for this to happen health leaders must demonstrate that it is a priority and ensure all staff have access to training and examples of best practice. The NHS will need to go further than encouragement alone and begin rebalancing how it invests in prevention—recognising that evidence-based physical activity can be as effective as drug treatment for many conditions—and shifting resources and spend towards its routine promotion and prescription. (Conclusion, Paragraph 17) 41
Recommendation 4
Recommended (the committee's words)We recommend that the Department work with integrated care boards (ICBs) to develop a national roll-out of existing best-practice models to support clinicians to have conversations about physical activity with patients, particularly older patients. This should include a communication strategy to reach all health professionals, clear messaging about the benefit and priority assigned to these conversations and resources to support managers to promote it to their staff. (Recommendation, Paragraph 18)
Recommendation 5
Recommended (the committee's words)In addition, we recommend that ICBs explore methods for increasing investment in the prescription of physical activity as part of a broader shift towards prevention. This should be pursued alongside appropriate clinical treatments, ensuring patients benefit from the full range of evidence-based interventions available. (Recommendation, Paragraph 19)
Conclusion 6
Concluded (the committee's words)Frailty is not an inevitable or irreversible aspect of ageing, and early intervention offers significant opportunities to prevent or slow its progression. Exercise programmes can reverse frailty, reduce the risk of developing dementia and improve outcomes for people living with dementia. However, these benefits will only be realised at scale if underpinned by a coherent national strategy. These interventions must also be understood by commissioners, and prescribed and delivered by health professionals, in a comparable way to drug treatments. (Conclusion, Paragraph 26)
Recommendation 7
Recommended (the committee's words)We recommend that as part of the Modern Service Framework (MSF) for frailty and dementia, the government identifies and sets clear standards for delivering exercise programmes to prevent and reverse frailty. This should include a requirement for integrated care boards (ICBs) to commission evidence-based exercise programmes at the duration and intensity necessary to deliver outcomes. We also ask that the government sets out the accountability arrangements that will accompany the MSF for frailty and dementia in its response to this report. This should include how the government will ensure consistent uptake of evidence-based exercise programmes among ICBs to remove the current national variation in access. (Recommendation, Paragraph 27)
Conclusion 8
Concluded (the committee's words)Addressing inequalities in healthy life expectancy will require integrated care boards (ICBs) to take a targeted approach with specific interventions targeting communities where inactivity and poor health outcomes are most concentrated. Successful development of population health delivery methods, using hyper-local insight, will ensure maximum value for money is achieved by delivering the most effective interventions in the areas where the need and the benefits are greatest. (Conclusion, Paragraph 33)
Recommendation 9
Recommended (the committee's words)We welcome the publication of the model ICB blueprint and the intention that ICBs will move towards population health delivery models, which should support more targeted intervention to address health inequalities in 42 ageing. In its response to this report, the government should set out how it will judge whether ICBs are successfully moving towards this approach. This should include how the government will ensure ICBs’ monitoring and data collection are standardised to allow for meaningful evaluation and learning of interventions across ICBs. (Recommendation, Paragraph 34)
Recommendation 10
Recommended (the committee's words)Partnerships between health services and the physical activity sector can deliver effective programmes in local settings, support long-term condition management and improve older people’s health and wellbeing. Expanding these approaches could also ease pressure on hospital-based services and support the government’s ambition to shift care from hospitals into the community. A lack of national strategy and the deterioration of leisure facilities mean opportunities to embed physical activity in community-based care remain limited. We welcome the £400 million the government has announced to support grassroots sports facilities. The government must use this funding strategically to support the infrastructure that the NHS will rely on to deliver care—particularly physical activity-based interventions—in the community. (Conclusion, Paragraph 42)
Conclusion 11
Concluded (the committee's words)The Department should develop a national framework to support integrated care boards and local authorities to commission and scale health interventions delivered in leisure and physical activity settings. This should include preventive, treatment and long-term condition management programmes to support healthy ageing. It should also set out how appropriately qualified physical activity professionals can be safely integrated into care pathways and promote understanding among health professionals of the role this workforce can play. (Recommendation, Paragraph 43)
Conclusion 12
Concluded (the committee's words)If the NHS is serious about prevention, it seems perverse to reduce support for social prescribing. The benefits of social prescribing will only be realised at scale if it is recognised by the Department as a core mechanism for increasing physical activity, particularly among older people and those with long-term conditions. To fulfil its potential, social prescribing must be prioritised within the health system and supported with the workforce development, infrastructure and national leadership necessary to prescribe physical activity routinely and confidently. Social prescribing link workers are a vital bridge between the health system and the community-based organisations that deliver physical activity opportunities to older people. By connecting people to local programmes that reflect their interests and circumstances, link workers can turn clinical advice to become more active into meaningful, sustained behaviour change. (Conclusion, Paragraph 47)
Conclusion 13
Concluded (the committee's words)The Department should assess whether the overall funding, infrastructure and training available to social prescribing are sufficient to reflect its growing role in promoting physical activity and reducing demand 43 on health services and set out how it will ensure social prescribing is consistently embedded, prioritised and supported across the health system. (Recommendation, Paragraph 48)
Recommendation 14
Recommended (the committee's words)We were disappointed to hear of the reduced support that NHS England is providing for social prescribing. This is directly impacting on the quality of related training and development for link workers. As part of the ongoing merger between NHS England and the Department, we recommend that the Department review and strengthen the support it provides for social prescribing. This should include ensuring the National Academy for Social Prescribing has the resources it needs to continue promoting best practice, supporting workforce development and acting as a national centre of expertise. (Recommendation, Paragraph 49)
Conclusion 15
Concluded (the committee's words)The voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) sector plays a vital role in engaging older people—particularly those at greatest risk of inactivity and poor health. However, VCSE organisations lack sustainable funding to plan for the future and continue delivering the physical activity programmes that health services rely on to achieve their prevention objectives. (Conclusion, Paragraph 54)
Conclusion 16
Concluded (the committee's words)We welcome the intention in the strategic commissioning framework for integrated care boards (ICB) to treat VCSE organisations as partners in the development and delivery of a neighbourhood health service. In its response to this report, we ask that the government provide more details on what support from the strategic commissioning development programme will look like in practice. This should include details of any training or guidance that will be offered to ICBs. (Recommendation, Paragraph 55)
Conclusion 17
Concluded (the committee's words)Physical activity must be recognised as an essential part of adult social care delivery—not an optional additional leisure activity. Equal weight must be given to the risks of inactivity as to the benefits of staying active so that older people receiving social care, whether at home or in a care setting, can remain healthy and confident. A preventive, strengths-based model of care can help older people maintain the abilities that underpin their health, wellbeing and independence. This will require a change in how the social care sector thinks about risk to support older people to remain active. Social care staff equipped with the right skills, and an approach that focuses on what people receiving care can and want to do, will be essential. (Conclusion, Paragraph 62)
Recommendation 18
Recommended (the committee's words)We recommend that Baroness Casey, as part of the Independent Commission on Adult Social Care, prioritise opportunities for physical activity to support a new, prevention-focused vision for the system. This should identify how government can support the social care sector to embed physical activity into the delivery of adult social care. It should 44 include how local authorities, the NHS and social care providers can work together to identify older people at risk of sedentary behaviour and offer early, tailored interventions. (Recommendation, Paragraph 63)
Conclusion 19
Concluded (the committee's words)We also recommend that the Department work with social care providers to develop a national training programme for social care workers to improve their confidence and skills in supporting older people to be active, including understanding deconditioning and how to prevent it. This should include supporting the workforce to take a strengths-based approach to physical activity, with care assessments focusing on what older people can do. (Recommendation, Paragraph 64)
Conclusion 20
Concluded (the committee's words)The Department should work with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to set national standards for the delivery of physical activity in social care settings, with physical activity being provided in line with the Chief Medical Officers’ guidance. We also recommend that the CQC places a greater emphasis on physical activity in its assessment framework and inspections of social care provision. (Recommendation, Paragraph 65) Embedding physical activity in society
Recommendation 21
Recommended (the committee's words)The government must start a national conversation about ageing which talks about getting older in a more positive way, challenges assumptions about unavoidable and irreversible decline and motivates people to remain active. (Conclusion, Paragraph 74)
Recommendation 22
Recommended (the committee's words)We recommend that the Department’s “national movement campaign” include targeted messaging aimed at the least active and people approaching older age. These messages should demonstrate how movement can be incorporated into daily habits, use relatable role models and focus on examples of movement that will increase strength and balance. (Recommendation, Paragraph 75)
Conclusion 23
Concluded (the committee's words)Poorly designed built environments prevent older people from being able to leave their homes and actively participate in their communities. By embedding principles that promote physical activity into planning guidance, the government can ensure the creation of healthy places that support people to age well. (Conclusion, Paragraph 79)
Recommendation 24
Recommended (the committee's words)Designing a built environment that promotes physical activity for everyone, including older people, must become a core requirement when designing public spaces. We recommend that the revised National Planning Policy Framework and the Design and Placemaking Planning Practice Guidance embed Sport England’s active design principles. (Recommendation, Paragraph 80) 45
Conclusion 25
Concluded (the committee's words)Physical activity remains insufficiently prioritised across government despite extensive evidence of its central role in prevention and healthy ageing. Tackling physical inactivity requires political leadership and cross-departmental collaboration—recognising that supporting people to age well will not be achieved by health alone. To make this a reality the government needs to create mechanisms that incentivise Departments and local government to jointly address traditionally siloed and fragmented efforts. (Conclusion, Paragraph 86)
Recommendation 26
Recommended (the committee's words)The government should restore the health mission and develop a cross- government 10-year plan to embed prevention and reduce inequalities in healthy life expectancy, that prioritises physical activity. This should include creating pooled budgets that require multi-department bids to access, supported by shared outcome and accountability measures to encourage joined up action to address public health challenges, such as addressing barriers to healthy aging. (Recommendation, Paragraph 87)
Recommendation 27
Recommended (the committee's words)While we welcome the government’s recent increase to the public health grant, we remain concerned that public health teams have been left with inadequate funds to carry out preventive interventions vital to healthy ageing. The shift to prevention will require a long-term, whole-system response. As part of this shift, the government must commit to shifting resources towards preventive interventions, including an immediate commitment to restoring the public health grant to 2016–17 levels in real terms. Such an investment is proven to save money, by preventing people developing ill health and reducing demand on health services. (Recommendation, Paragraph 90) 46
Reports
8th Report – Healthy Ageing: physical activity in an ageing society
- HC No.
- HC 1180
- Published
- 22 May 2026
- Items
- 27
- Government response
- No government response linked yet: deadline 22 July 2026, 102 days ago.
Oral evidence sessions
On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.
| Date | Session and witnesses | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Dec 2025 |
Oral Evidence
Bethany Badrock · Greater Manchester Combined Authority,
Charlotte Osborn-Forde · National Academy for Social Prescribing,
Graeme Sinnott · Active Partnerships National Organisation,
Huw Edwards · UKactive,
Jeanette Bain-Burnett · Sport England,
Ryan Hughes · Active Norfolk,
Siobhan Farmer · Gloucestershire County Council
|
View ↗ |
| 12 Nov 2025 |
Oral Evidence
Adam Blaze · Activity Alliance,
Emma Hutchins · Richmond Group of Charities,
Professor Chris Todd · NIHR Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing,
Professor Dawn Skelton · Glasgow Caledonian University,
Professor Elizabeth Orton · The University of Nottingham,
Professor Martin Green OBE · Care England
|
View ↗ |
| 29 Oct 2025 |
Oral Evidence
Dr Carole Easton · Centre for Ageing Better,
Dr Lis Boulton · Age UK,
Professor Chris Whitty · Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC),
Sir Muir Gray · University of Oxford
|
View ↗ |
Written evidence
On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.
| Reference | Date | Submitter |
|---|---|---|
| HAP0058 | 31 Mar 2026 | London South Bank University |
| HAP0019 | 4 Feb 2026 | South Northants Volunteer Bureau |
| HAP0126 | 4 Feb 2026 | The Richmond Group of Charities |
| HAP0125 | 4 Feb 2026 | Alzheimer's Research UK |
| HAP0120 | 4 Feb 2026 | Nuffield Council on Bioethics |
| HAP0119 | 4 Feb 2026 | Versus Arthritis |
| HAP0116 | 4 Feb 2026 | UKactive |
| HAP0114 | 4 Feb 2026 | College of Paramedics |
| HAP0112 | 4 Feb 2026 | Professor Linda Clare, University of Exeter |
| HAP0111 | 4 Feb 2026 | Chester Zoo |
| HAP0110 | 4 Feb 2026 | CLOSER, the home of longitudinal research (UCL Social Research Institute) |
| HAP0105 | 4 Feb 2026 | The Welsh Institute of Physical Activity, Health and Sport |
| HAP0104 | 4 Feb 2026 | Royal college of podiatry |
| HAP0101 | 4 Feb 2026 | Carers UK |
| HAP0099 | 4 Feb 2026 | Health & Independent Living Support |
| HAP0097 | 4 Feb 2026 | Mind |
| HAP0094 | 4 Feb 2026 | Dr Nichola Clarke, n/a |
| HAP0092 | 4 Feb 2026 | NHS Horizons |
| HAP0089 | 4 Feb 2026 | Dr Patricia Jackman, University of Lincoln |
| HAP0087 | 4 Feb 2026 | Local Government Association |
| HAP0086 | 4 Feb 2026 | Horticultural Trades Association (HTA) |
| HAP0083 | 4 Feb 2026 | Professor Afroditi Stathi, University of Birmingham |
| HAP0082 | 4 Feb 2026 | British Geriatrics Society |
| HAP0081 | 4 Feb 2026 | Mrs Helen Ginman-Love, Healthy Dialogues |
| HAP0079 | 4 Feb 2026 | Later Life Training |
| HAP0075 | 4 Feb 2026 | Professor Sarah Astill , University of Leeds |
| HAP0074 | 4 Feb 2026 | Dr Arezoo Amirpourabasi, Univeristy of Hertfordshire |
| HAP0073 | 4 Feb 2026 | Dr. Yasina Somani, University of Leeds |
| HAP0065 | 4 Feb 2026 | Chartered Society of Physiotherapy |
| HAP0063 | 4 Feb 2026 | British Association of Prosthetics and Orthotics |
| HAP0062 | 4 Feb 2026 | Get Berkshire Active |
| HAP0061 | 4 Feb 2026 | British Nordic Walking |
| HAP0060 | 4 Feb 2026 | Seniors Helping Seniors |
| HAP0059 | 4 Feb 2026 | Dr Christopher Hurst, Newcastle University |
| HAP0057 | 4 Feb 2026 | Professor Valerie Gladwell, University of Suffolk |
| HAP0056 | 4 Feb 2026 | Burns Gym LTD |
| HAP0054 | 4 Feb 2026 | Mrs. Cris Fawcus, Royal Devon University Health Care NHS Foundation Trust |
| HAP0053 | 4 Feb 2026 | Professor Michael Callan, University of Hertfordshire |
| HAP0052 | 4 Feb 2026 | Move it or Lose it |
| HAP0050 | 4 Feb 2026 | Norfolk and Waveney ICB |
| HAP0049 | 4 Feb 2026 | Newcastle University (Jennifer Liddle) |
| HAP0048 | 4 Feb 2026 | Activity Alliance |
| HAP0047 | 4 Feb 2026 | Care Quality Commission |
| HAP0066 | 27 Jan 2026 | Derbyshire County Council, Public Health |
| HAP0152 | 27 Jan 2026 | National Activity Providers Association |
| HAP0151 | 27 Jan 2026 | University of Nottingham |
| HAP0150 | 27 Jan 2026 | People's Health Trust |
| HAP0149 | 27 Jan 2026 | Age UK |
| HAP0148 | 27 Jan 2026 | GLL |
| HAP0147 | 27 Jan 2026 | British Gymnastics Foundation |
Who gave evidence
On smaller screens, scroll horizontally to read every column. Keyboard users can focus the table region and use the arrow keys.
| Witness | Organisation | Sessions |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Blaze · Chief Executive | Activity Alliance | 1 |
| Bethany Badrock · Ageing Well Programme Manager, GM Ageing Hub | Greater Manchester Combined Authority | 1 |
| Charlotte Osborn-Forde · CEO | National Academy for Social Prescribing | 1 |
| Dr Carole Easton · Chief Executive | Centre for Ageing Better | 1 |
| Dr Lis Boulton · Health and Care Policy Manager | Age UK | 1 |
| Emma Hutchins · Physical Activity and Health Influencing Manager | Richmond Group of Charities | 1 |
| Graeme Sinnott · Director of Place and Strategy and Deputy CEO | Active Partnerships National Organisation | 1 |
| Huw Edwards · Chief Executive | UKactive | 1 |
| Jeanette Bain-Burnett · Executive Director of Policy & Integrity | Sport England | 1 |
| Professor Chris Todd · Deputy-Director | NIHR Policy Research Unit in Healthy Ageing | 1 |
| Professor Chris Whitty · Chief Medical Officer | Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) | 1 |
| Professor Dawn Skelton · Professor of Ageing and Health | Glasgow Caledonian University | 1 |
| Professor Elizabeth Orton · Professor of Public Health | The University of Nottingham | 1 |
| Professor Martin Green OBE · Chief Executive | Care England | 1 |
| Ryan Hughes · Head of Programmes and Partnerships | Active Norfolk | 1 |
| Siobhan Farmer · Director of Public Health | Gloucestershire County Council | 1 |
| Sir Muir Gray · Director of the Optimal Ageing Programme | University of Oxford | 1 |