Intimate image abuse time limits
Inadequate statutory time limits for intimate image abuse offences, particularly concerning when the time limit begins.
Source spread
Where this theme appears
This theme appears in multiple source types, suggesting a recurring issue across the public record.
18 committee recs
2 DHR recs
Browse by source
Source-grouped records are useful for tracing where a concern came from. Large sections show the 50 strongest matches for that source; counts still show the full theme total.
Select committee recommendations(18)
#29 — Criminalise use of nudification apps as synthetic NCII and hold platforms accountable.
Recommendation: There is no legitimate reason whatsoever for the use or existence of nudification apps. The Government should ensure that the use of such an app is considered creation of synthetic NCII and therefore also a criminal offence and Ofcom should …
Response attribution not verified
#27 — Mandate consent-based offence for deepfake creation, including cultural intimate image abuse.
Recommendation: The Government’s plans to criminalise the creation of sexually explicit deepfakes/NCII, even if they are not shared, are very welcome and worthy of praise. However, the Government must ensure that the offence is consent- based and does not require the …
Response attribution not verified
#18 — Introduce statutory time limit extension for intimate image abuse, starting from victim awareness.
Recommendation: The Government should introduce an extension to the statutory time limits that apply to current and forthcoming intimate image abuse offences, such that the time limit begins only once the victim(s) is/are aware of the abuse. (Recommendation, Paragraph 93)
Response attribution not verified
#7 — Amend the Crime and Policing Bill to make possession of non-consensual intimate images an offence.
Recommendation: The Government should bring forward an amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill to make possession of NCII an offence, in addition to its creation. This will put NCII on the same footing as CSAM in how it is treated …
Response attribution not verified
#5 — Ofcom's powers insufficient for timely removal of individual NCII abuse content
Recommendation: Ofcom’s current enforcement powers, while welcome, are far too slow and not designed to help individual victims get abusive images of themselves on non-compliant websites taken down or have access to them restricted. The duties under the regulatory regime created …
Response attribution not verified
#3 — Amend Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme eligibility to include online sexual offence claims
Recommendation: The Ministry of Justice must amend the eligibility criteria of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme to bring claims from victims of sexual offences perpetrated online, specifically non-consensual intimate image abuse, within its scope. (Recommendation, Paragraph 26)
Response attribution not verified
#33 — Online Safety Act contains loophole failing to legislate against non-consensual intimate imagery possession.
Recommendation: The Online Safety Act, introduced in October 2023, was designed to ensure that people are protected from harmful online content, notably children and young people. The Act legislates the removal harmful content from social media platforms.77 As of 16 March …
Response attribution not verified
#23 — Include non-consensual intimate image abuse in VAWG definition and identify prevalence data.
Recommendation: The Government should ensure that NCII abuse is included when creating a common definition of VAWG, as part of its mission to reduce it by 50% within the next decade. It should also identify what data can be used to …
Response attribution not verified
#17 — Extend legal definition of intimate image to include religious or cultural attire removal.
Recommendation: The Government should extend the legal definition of an intimate image to include images where “because of the person’s religious or cultural background, the person commonly wears particular attire of religious or cultural significance when in public; and the material …
Response attribution not verified
#13 — Establish an Online Safety Commission to support individuals and oversee non-consensual intimate image content registry.
Recommendation: The Government should set up an Online Safety Commission, similar to the eSafety Commission in Australia, with a focus on support for individuals. The new Commission would act as a trusted flagger of NCII content on behalf of individuals that …
Response attribution not verified
#12 — Regulatory framework lacks a statutory body to support non-consensual intimate image abuse victims.
Recommendation: There is a gap in the UK’s online regulatory framework for a statutory body to support and champion the rights of individuals affected by non- consensual intimate image abuse, and to work alongside the courts in the civil regime. Such …
Response attribution not verified
#11 — Introduce a swift, inexpensive statutory civil process for non-consensual intimate image abuse.
Recommendation: The Government should take a holistic approach to legislating against NCII abuse by introducing a swift, inexpensive statutory civil process, as has been established in other jurisdictions such as British Columbia in Canada. Doing so would recognise survivors’ wishes to …
Response attribution not verified
#10 — Expand the Data Bill's solicitation clause to criminalise all image-based abuse offences.
Recommendation: The law on solicitation was unclear, incomplete and open to misinterpretation by law enforcement agencies and others. We welcome the Government’s proposals to introduce a specific offence of solicitation for synthetic content via an amendment to the Data (Use and …
Response attribution not verified
#2 — Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme's offence list outdated, excludes online harms
Recommendation: The list of offences that are within scope of the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme is out of date. Crimes perpetrated online, such as non-consensual intimate image abuse, can be just as damaging to a person as those involving physical violence. …
Response attribution not verified
#16 — Non-consensual intimate image abuse extends beyond sexually explicit content.
Recommendation: Non-consensual intimate image abuse is not always limited to sexually explicit content. For example, in some cultures, countries, or religions, sharing a photograph of someone without their religious clothing—or with their arm around another person—can be disastrous for the victim. …
Response attribution not verified
#14 — Discuss Online Safety Commission proposals with Revenge Porn Helpline for potential collaboration or expanded role.
Recommendation: The UK already has an excellent organisation doing some of this work in the form of the Revenge Porn Helpline. The Government should discuss the proposals set out above with the RPH to determine what relationship the RPH could have …
Response attribution not verified
#4 — New Crime and Policing Bill offences mark significant progress against NCII abuse
Recommendation: We welcome the inclusion in the Crime and Policing Bill of the new offences of taking an intimate image without consent and of installing equipment for the purposes of enabling the commission of those offences. We also welcome the Government’s …
Response attribution not verified
#15 — Explore funding options for the Online Safety Commission, including a levy on relevant bodies.
Recommendation: The Government should explore whether the funding for such a Commission could be generated, at least in part, by a levy on bodies within scope of the OSA on a similar basis to that which exists in other regulated environments. …
Response attribution not verified
Domestic Homicide Reviews(2)
Gateshead — recommendation 4
Home Office to consider the creation of a specific criminal offence in relation to threat of posting intimate images without consent;
Home Office
Home Office
Bassetlaw — recommendation 5.3
It is recommended that the Government revisits the current laws in relation to image-based abuse with a view to introducing a comprehensive law covering all forms of non-consensual taking and/or sharing of private sexual images, including threats and fake images.
Her Majesty’s Government