Source · Select Committees · Women and Equalities Committee
Recommendation 13
13
Rejected
Establish an Online Safety Commission to support individuals and oversee non-consensual intimate image content registry.
Recommendation
The Government should set up an Online Safety Commission, similar to the eSafety Commission in Australia, with a focus on support for individuals. The new Commission would act as a trusted flagger of NCII content on behalf of individuals that report it to them. The Commission would be able to apply for and send court orders, generated following a statutory civil process, for example demanding that NCII content is taken down from the websites hosting it. The Commission would oversee a registry of designated NCII content, against which it would be able to recommend that internet infrastructure providers—including ISPs, web browsers, registries, and Mobile Network Operators and others—take steps to block access to NCII content. (Recommendation, Paragraph 76)
Government Response Summary
The government rejects the recommendation to establish an Online Safety Commission, arguing that the existing Online Safety Act provides strong user redress mechanisms. It states Ofcom's codes of practice already require service providers to enable reporting and complaints for illegal content, and that trusted flaggers can play a valuable role.
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
Reject The Online Safety Act contains strong provisions for user redress designed to support individuals, including those who are victims of NCII abuse. It requires all user-to-user and search services regulated by the Act to enable users and affected persons, such as a victim of NCII, to report illegal content, including illegally shared or reshared NCII content and to complain to the service provider if they consider that a provider is not complying with any of their relevant duties, which include putting in place systems and processes designed to remove illegal content, including NCII. The Act specifies that this complaints system must be accessible, easy to use and transparent with appropriate action taken. Ofcom has made it clear in its codes of practice for illegal content duties that, where a provider receives a report from a user (victim) stating that an item of content is a NCII, a provider following one of these Codes should consider that this is sufficient evidence that the content is indeed NCII and should then take it down. These illegal content duties have been in force since 17 March. The Government believes that the duties requiring providers of regulated services to take steps to take down NCII, combined with mandating that victims are provided with a direct user redress mechanism, is an effective way to ensure illegal NCII content is removed. As a result, the Government does not believe it is necessary to implement this recommendation. Trusted flaggers Under the Online Safety Act regime, Ofcom can recommend that services should set up dedicated reporting routes for certain organisations as ‘trusted flaggers’, in order to comply with their safety duties. For example, Ofcom’s current codes of practice set out that services with a significant risk of fraud should establish and maintain a dedicated reporting channel for specified recommended trusted flaggers. These include the police, the National Cyber Security Centre, the Financial Conduct Authority and others. Beyond fraud, there are organisations that offer support services for UK users who have been victimised by intimate image abuse and by other kinds of crimes that can be facilitated through online content. There is scope under the Act for Ofcom to set out that relevant services should designate these organisations as trusted flaggers for intimate image abuse, and other kinds of in-scope harms, where they have evidence that this is a proportionate measure to tackle harm. Ofcom’s current codes of practice are the first versions. Ofcom has said it intends to develop the codes iteratively. Ofcom has stated that trusted flaggers can play a valuable role in improving detection of illegal content and that they could be used to address a wide range of harms.