Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Cambridge City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-007-329 Sector Benefits And Tax Category Council Tax Decided 21 October 2025

View Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of Mr X’s council tax account nor its failure to make its telephone line more accessible for disabled users. This is because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome for Mr X.

The complaint

Mr X complained about the Council’s management of his council tax account. He also complained that the Council’s telephone line was not accessible for disabled users.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide: we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X complained to the Council after he received a reminder notice for arrears on a new council tax account he had not been informed about. He also complained that contacting the Council was inaccessible for him and other users who shared his disability.

The Council apologised and explained it did not receive information showing Mr X had become a sole occupant at the property until several months later and this was when it created the account. The Council confirmed it sent Mr X a letter informing him of this and could not explain why he did not receive it.

The Council apologised for Mr X’s experience of trying to contact it and explained it would discuss the matter with its third-party supplier and update him on the outcome. The Council also gave Mr X a process to follow to make it easier for him to contact the Council in the future.

Mr X remains unhappy with the Council’s actions and wants us to find it at fault. The evidence shows the Council has explained the actions it took on Mr X’s account and apologised for the experience he had. It has also taken on board Mr X’s unhappiness regarding its accessibility and has provided Mr X with a work around whilst it is investigating ways to improve the service. These actions are in line with what we would expect the Council to do. An investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Cambridge City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-026-632 Other
25-008-114 13 Jan 2026 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to inform the complainants about changes to the Right … Other
25-008-589 12 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of public bins. This is because there is not … Other
25-010-011 08 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his homelessness application and its management of … Other
25-011-547 18 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to refund Mr X’s payment for parking following the … Other
View all decisions for this organisation