Source · LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman)

Cambridge City Council

LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other Reference 25-026-632 Sector Other Categories Category Other Decided 31 March 2026

View Cambridge City Council scorecard

Full decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a subject access request. The Information Commissioner is better placed to consider complaints about data protection.

The complaint

Mr X, represented by Ms Y, complained there has been unacceptable delay in processing his subject access request (SAR).

Ms Y said this has prevented Mr X from complaining to us about a separate matter.

Ms Y wants the Council to process the SAR, review its processes and pay a financial remedy in recognition of the delay.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)) We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Ms Y.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

The Information Commissioner (ICO) enforces data protection legislation. The main functions of the ICO are to uphold information rights in the public interest by promoting openness by public bodies and protecting the privacy of individuals.

We will not investigate this complaint. The ICO is better placed to consider and decide complaints about data protection, including delay in processing a SAR. Mr X has already complained to the ICO.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider and decide complaints about data protection.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

View original on LGO (Local Governme… website

Other decisions involving Cambridge City Council

Reference Date Summary Outcome
25-012-406 25 May 2026 Miss X complained the Council delayed in dealing with her homelessness application despite her priority need due to domestic violence. … Upheld
25-008-114 13 Jan 2026 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to inform the complainants about changes to the Right … Other
25-008-589 12 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of public bins. This is because there is not … Other
25-010-011 08 Dec 2025 Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his homelessness application and its management of … Other
25-011-547 18 Nov 2025 Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to refund Mr X’s payment for parking following the … Other
View all decisions for this organisation