Source · IMB Annual Report
Lancaster Farms
AI-generated report summary HMP Lancaster Farms, a Category C prison for up to 560 men, maintained a largely safe and humane environment despite operating at maximum capacity. The report highlights successes in healthcare provision and purposeful activity, alongside ongoing issues with staffing shortages that curtail the regime. Key concerns include high self-harm rates, increased violence, estate maintenance, ineffective key worker schemes, and significant waiting times for healthcare and mental health transfers.
Year: 2024
Published: 9 Jul 2024
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 560
Recommendations: 9
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 2 | — |
| Prisoner assaults | 158 | — |
| Assaults on staff | 28 | — |
| Use of force | 497 | 254 |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board found that staff at HMP Lancaster Farms generally provide a safe, humane, and respectful environment, effectively managing risks and collaborating with various teams. In-cell telephony works well, and primary healthcare provision is largely good. Mental health staff offer excellent support despite challenges, and there are positive initiatives for physical fitness and rehabilitation, such as Project 180/CrossFit. The employment hub is developing new opportunities, and reception/induction processes are efficient. The library is popular, and chaplaincy provides comprehensive support, including courses for debt management and family engagement.
Key concerns
The continuation of high levels of self-harm among a small handful of prisoners, many of whom have challenging and complex mental health needs, yet continue to be accommodated at the establishment rather than transferred to more specialist and secure mental health facilities.
Spikes in the levels of violence, prisoner debt and substance misuse, with incidents of the use of force almost doubling.
A minority of prisoners continue to be accommodated on occasions in double cells, with limited toilet screening and/or no toilet seats, and during lockdowns, prisoners are forced to eat inside their cells next to their toilets.
Several outstanding estate issues, such as poor ventilation in some cells, absence of door screens, broken equipment on exercise yards, and overflows and poor drainage in wet weather.
Delayed responses to complaints, especially those related to previous prisons, and prisoners are sometimes not kept updated on progress.
The treatment of prisoners’ property remains an issue of concern, especially when they transfer from other prisons, leading to delays or loss of personal possessions.
Difficulties remain in finding suitable alternative specialist accommodation at other prisons for those with serious mental health difficulties.
However, the Board is concerned that we regularly find half-empty classrooms and few prisoners in workshops.
With an increasing number of prisoners living at a distance from families, the Board is concerned by the time/cost of visits to Lancaster Farms: social video calls between prisoners and families are available, but there are constraints on their use.
The prison regime is curtailed because of limited staff availability, with a serious impact on evening and weekend activities.
Ineffective key working, with prisoners having no awareness of their key worker, long lists of prisoners with the same key worker, and no regular meetings.
The chaplaincy team continues to provide a comprehensive support service to prisoners and staff at Lancaster Farms, but it is under-resourced. Not all faith groups have a designated chaplain, and it is disappointing to note that no Anglican chaplain has been in post for a year, despite efforts to recruit to the post.
The waiting times for GP services have varied throughout the reporting year but, typically, have been up to three weeks; however, there are regular nurse-led triage clinics that will support urgent cases and refer to the GP as quickly as possible, where appropriate. Whilst the waiting time for routine dentistry improved during 2023-24, to just three weeks, by January 2024, it stood at 17 weeks.
A high number of neurodivergent prisoners (43% of the population) requiring additional assessment, staff training, and review of incentive schemes and CSIPs.
Source wording under review
Staff from Lancaster Farms are deployed to support other prisons whilst Lancaster Farms has activities curtailed due to lack of staff availability.
Recommendations
When will the Minister increase the number of specialist secure prison settings for prisoners with complex and/or enduring mental health conditions?
Government response
I fully understand and share the Board’s continued concerns about specialist settings for prisoners with mental health issues. There is a role for the Government on this and we at the Ministry of Justice are working with the Department of Health and Social Care to introduce the Mental Health Bill as soon as possible. This will include a range of reforms to support people suffering with severe mental illness in the criminal justice system and aims to speed up access to specialist inpatient treatment so that those affected are able to access the timely care they need. I do recognise that some prisoners are experiencing delays in accessing secure inpatient hospital settings but I want to reassure the Board that the placement of prisoners into segregation during this wait will only take place following a risk assessment involving clinicians at the prison, but may be considered appropriate where a prisoner is deemed a risk to themselves or others. NHS England Health and Justice North West continues to maintain oversight of those prisoners in the region that are waiting. Any delays are being escalated both regionally and nationally, given this is a widespread issue which is not just being experienced at HMP Lancaster Farms. NHS England are working strategically across the systems to improve the pathways into treatment. It is though pleasing to read that the range of mental health care support services at the prison have increased in response to prisoners’ needs.
Recommendation 2
When will the Minister accelerate resolution for prisoners with outstanding Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences?
Government response
I do sympathise with the Board’s continued concerns for prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP), but hope the Board are now aware that the IPP sentence has been reformed in the Victims and Prisoners Act which gained Royal Assent on 24 May 2024. On 5 September 2024 the Lord Chancellor announced the timings for these changes which will provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and sentence. From 1 November 2024, anyone who was released on an IPP E https://contact-moj.service.justice.gov.uk/ T +4420 3334 3555 102 Petty France www.gov.uk/moj F +44870 761 7753 London SW1H 9AJ licence for the first time five or more years ago and has spent at least the last two years of that period continuously in the community without being recalled will have their IPP licence terminated without the need for a review by the Parole Board. The Secretary of State will also have two new Risk Assessed Recall Review powers allowing the 2-year period after someone is re-released from a recall not to be reset and to re-release people who have been recalled at any point without referring the case to the Parole Board. I hope the Board will welcome that there is also support for those in custody, with the HMPPS Director General of Operations commissioning Area Executive Directors for England and Wales, (as well as the Long-Term High Security Estate, the Women’s Estate, and Contracted Prisons) to develop operational IPP delivery plans. These directly target front-line delivery to support those serving IPP sentences to work to achieve the objectives within their sentence plans and move towards a future sustainable release. The IPP prisoners located at HMP Lancaster Farms, are also continuing to have their progression supported via the local IPP policy, which manages each prisoner on an individual basis to reduce their risk.
Recommendation 3
How does the Minister plan to ensure adequate resources for the day-to-day running of prisons and maintenance of a prison now over 30 years old?
Government response
Turning to the Board’s funding request to maintain the environment within prisons, it may be helpful if I clarify that all project bid requests are being considered, but HMPPS is having to prioritise the works very carefully to make best use of the funding focusing on risk to life and risk to capacity and decency, given demands for maintenance are much greater than the funding available. HMPPS is continually reviewing the investment required across the estate, using recent condition surveys which assessed the fabric, cells, and critical assets at each prison to inform priorities against future capital budgets. Hopefully the Board will be pleased that there are currently two capital projects in design and development at HMP Lancaster Farms, with the aim of commencing delivery this financial year. The first being fire safety improvements across the prison and the second an upgrade to cell doors in the Segregation Unit. In addition, the Small Secure Houseblock programme has begun early works on the delivery of the 240 new single-occupancy cells which will be in self-contained 60-bed units, each with their own association space, pharmacy, dispensary and kitchen servery.
Recommendation 4
Ensure better tracking of prisoner’s personal property transferring between prisons.
Government response
The emphasis must remain on prisoners complying with volumetric control limits, since any property within these limits will be transferred with them by the Prisoner Escort and Custody Services (PECS) suppliers, including items which are exempt such as legal papers. During the last 12 months there have been no complaints received from HMP Lancaster Farms regarding the loss of property attributed to PECS. It is not possible to transfer with a prisoner all the excess property which they might have accrued above volumetric limits. Where the limit of items allowed in possession has been reached then responsibility for transfer of any remaining items remains with the sending prison and there has been a requirement since the introduction of the Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework for prisons to transfer any excess items within four weeks. However, the Board’s concerns are recognised and HMPPS is aware of the problems around property and continues to look at what further can be done.
Recommendation 5
Increase overall prison staffing across England and Wales and remove the anomaly whereby staff from Lancaster Farms are deployed to support other prisons whilst Lancaster Farms has activities curtailed due to lack of staff availability.
Government response
Recruitment and retention actions continue to strengthen the operational line which has resulted in improvements in the staffing position amongst Band 3-5 Prison Officers nationally. This has included incentivised recruitment schemes where applicants are offered additional remuneration to locate to ‘hard-to-staff’ sites, and the Prison Officer Alumni Network, where former staff have been fast tracked back into the service. National Detached Duty (NDD) continues to be deployed as one option to support short term resourcing particularly at prisons experiencing staffing challenges. NDD is approved and governed by the HMPPS Operational Resourcing and Stability Panel (ORSP) where it is necessary for the safety and stability of the prison. The process to determine where the supply of NDD is taken remains unchanged and is determined each month following an in-depth validation process, taking account of non-effective staff at prisons and is approved by Prison Group Directors (PGD) and Area Executive Directors operational judgement before consideration at the wider ORSP panel. The threshold for supplying NDD is adjusted dependent on available supply against current demand with the current threshold at 99% of a prisons target staffing. HMP Lancaster Farms would not be a supplier of NDD based on their staffing position but have been supplying one Prison Officer which is a local decision approved by the PGD. HMP Lancaster Farm’s own weekly Regime Management Plan meeting monitors staffing levels with mitigations put in place to prevent curtailments to the regime which have significantly reduced with no plan closures in 2024 due to improved staffing recruitment and retention.
Recommendation 6
Ensure the substantial majority of prisoners at Lancaster Farms are from Lancashire and Cumbria in order to maximise the strong links and opportunities that the prison already has with local employers and accommodation agencies.
Government response
HMPPS has continued to strive to maintain offender flows despite population pressures across the entire adult male prison estate during the Board’s reporting period. The remand population has grown to unprecedented levels because of the courts backlog and previous industrial action taken by the Criminal Bar Association. This impact has been felt in the training estate and because of these pressures affecting the northwest in particular, prisons have been asked to show flexibility with their prisoner cohorts. It is acknowledged that there is a large proportion of prisoners at HMP Lancaster Farms from the Greater Manchester and Merseyside. This has impacted on the prisons ability to provide its resettlement provision and ensure family ties are maintained which has been exacerbated by the length of time some individuals have left to serve when arriving at the prison. However, it is pleasing that the Board commends the prisons innovation and good practice in resettlement planning. The prison is striving to improve the resettlement outcomes for its population to aid successful reintegration into the community through its education, skills and work opportunities, substance misuse interventions and housing and employment support. To help reduce the pressure on prisons places, on 12 July 2024 the Lord Chancellor announced temporary changes to standard determinate sentences. The HMPPS Capacity Management team will also continue to work with HMP Lancaster Farms to review and support alignment of their population with Offender Flows. There are wide-ranging considerations involved in transferring prisoners, and where practicable, prisoners are accommodated as close as possible to their home probation region to maintain family ties. Whilst this is a priority, it is not always possible due to a variety of factors including the wider population pressures, security concerns or specific sentence planning needs which can only be met at certain prisons.
Recommendation 7
Increase the amount of purposeful activity (90% of men in regular education/training/employment) and association time for prisoners.
Government response
Although the Board’s concerns are repeated matters, I was nevertheless reassured to receive your comments that prisoners are treated fairly, humanely and with decency and respect within a safe environment. I was really pleased to note that there are good relationship between staff and prisoners, as well as positive attitudes shown by staff working with the most challenging prisoners in the Segregation Unit. I was also encouraged to read about the increased time prisoners are now receiving out of cell to engage in the education, skills and work opportunities that are on offer as this provides them with a greater chance of success once released from prison.
Recommendation 8
Increase the amount and effective use of key working at the prison with demonstrable targets and outcomes.
Government response
None. Still a major concern to the Board.
Recommendation 9
Increase the use of existing facilities (e.g. classrooms, the gym and railtrack facilities).
Government response
Although the Board’s concerns are repeated matters, I was nevertheless reassured to receive your comments that prisoners are treated fairly, humanely and with decency and respect within a safe environment. I was really pleased to note that there are good relationship between staff and prisoners, as well as positive attitudes shown by staff working with the most challenging prisoners in the Segregation Unit. I was also encouraged to read about the increased time prisoners are now receiving out of cell to engage in the education, skills and work opportunities that are on offer as this provides them with a greater chance of success once released from prison.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 59 | 50 |
| Clothing | 3 | 3 |
| Disciplinary (adjudications) | 10 | 14 |
| Discrimination | 2 | 2 |
| Finance/Canteen | 4 | 3 |
| Food | 6 | 7 |
| Healthcare | 43 | 38 |
| Other | 46 | 46 |
| Property | 57 | 59 |
| Security | 1 | 2 |
| Staff Conduct | 8 | 10 |
| Visits | 3 | 3 |
| Work/Education/Training | 5 | 4 |
Related inspections & investigations
Gerard Doyle · Other non-natural
Nathan Walters · Natural causes
Martin Brown · State Custody related deaths
Other reports for Lancaster Farms
Population 560
· Self-harm 418
· Concerns
Population 560
· Self-harm 357
· Concerns
Population 540
· Concerns
Population 560
· Self-harm 220
· Concerns
Population 460
· Self-harm 399
· Concerns
Population 560
· Concerns