Source · IMB Annual Report
Kirkham
AI-generated report summary HMP Kirkham, a Category D open prison, faced significant challenges during the reporting period (Jan 2024 - Jul 2025) due to high prisoner churn from temporary release schemes, which disrupted its resettlement function and exhausted staff. Despite this, the Board found the prison to be a safe environment, with improvements in healthcare, purposeful activity, and complaints management. Key concerns remain around illicit substances, staffing, budget cuts impacting education, and the aging estate.
Year: 2025
Published: 13 Jan 2026
Type: Prison · Cat D open
Population: 692
Recommendations: 9
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 2 | — |
| Self-harm incidents | 7 | — |
| ACCT cases opened | 28 | — |
| Prisoner assaults | 13 | 12 |
| Assaults on staff | 2 | — |
| Use of force | 45 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board considers Kirkham to be a safe environment, despite high prisoner churn, and commend staff for coping well with these pressures. Healthcare, particularly mental health services, has improved due to increased staffing. The new gym facilities are well-utilised, and a range of enrichment activities has enhanced prisoner-staff engagement. The Offender Management Unit (OMU) is now functioning cohesively, and significant improvements have been made to the complaints tracking system. The Board also commends the chaplaincy, the positive approach to the equality advisor role, and the success of the recent jobs fair.
Key concerns
There continued to be a growing issue with illicit substances in the prison, despite enhanced security measures.
TPRS and early release schemes had a huge impact on HMP Kirkham having difficulty to fulfil its purpose as a resettlement prison, receiving the highest proportion of these prisoners.
The IMB feels that to assist with the additional challenges prison staffing level should better reflect the current cohort of prisoners.
Recent budget reductions effecting education and vocational work are not supportive to the mission of a rehabilitation and resettlement prison.
The IMB believes that having additional processes that would differentiate between short, and long-term prisoners within a resettlement prison would be significantly beneficial.
The absence of in-cell telephony.
The IMB believes that the prison should have more choice in deciding if prisoners are suitable to come to Kirkham.
Lack of heating and hot water for long durations during winter continued to be a significant issue, creating damp living and working conditions for prisoners and staff awaiting protracted repair by AMEY maintenance contractors, despite being under the focus of special measures.
In the Board’s opinion, wait times for referrals to psychological wellbeing practitioners are too long.
Opportunities for outside work had been seriously hindered by ROTL processes arising from the increased workload on the offender management unit (OMU) through TPRS.
Concerns have arisen around the issues of accommodation on release. Previously the prison had its own accommodation officer. This had been removed and although the prison made every effort to ensure that no prisoner was released with no fixed abode (NFA), this was not always guaranteed.
Recommendations
TPRS and early release schemes had a huge impact on HMP Kirkham having difficulty to fulfil its purpose as a resettlement prison, receiving the highest proportion of these prisoners. What additional support is planned to support the prison in managing the continued repercussions of an influx of prisoners?
Government response
Acute prison capacity pressures are well documented, and I recognise the impact various early release schemes have had on HMP Kirkham. Whilst the Standard Determinate Sentence 40 Initiative (SDS40) provided the intended medium-term relief to the system, this was only ever a temporary change as a bridge to a more sustainable solution. That is why this Government has overseen the passing of the Sentencing Act, which takes forward recommendations from the Independent Sentencing Review. The new Progression Model is a key part of delivering a more sustainable solution to the prison capacity crisis to ensure there are always enough places for the courts to be able to send people to custody in order to keep the public safe. SDS40 will therefore be replaced as we start to implement the new Sentencing Act.
Recommendation 2
The IMB feels that to assist with the additional challenges prison staffing level should better reflect the current cohort of prisoners. Will the Minister commit to ensuring appropriate staffing levels at HMP Kirkham?
Government response
To ensure appropriate staffing levels, work has recently been completed as part of HM Prisons and Probation Service’s (HMPPS) Workforce Delivery Project to review the underpinning staffing model for adult public sector prisons, including HMP Kirkham. This review has included consideration of the impact of prisoner cohort complexity, physical infrastructure, and a number of other factors that affect daily resourcing requirements. This work is ongoing and subject to affordability decisions. I am therefore unable to comment on any site-specific planned resource changes at this stage.
Recommendation 3
Recent budget reductions effecting education and vocational work are not supportive to the mission of a rehabilitation and resettlement prison. Will the Minister reconsider his plans to reduce the education budget, in light of the need for rehabilitation support across the prison estate?
Government response
Turning to education budgets, whilst there have been no cuts to the national prison education budget, the cost of delivering high-quality education has risen significantly in recent years, and I recognise that any increases have not kept pace with rising costs. Consequently, some reductions in the volume of Core Education delivery have been necessary from October 2025. Subject to final analysis, we anticipate a national reduction in delivery volume of around 20-25%. A revised funding formula has also been applied to ensure fair allocation based on prison population and regional cost differences. This redistribution means that some prisons will see greater delivery reductions, while others will see increases. Open prisons such as HMP Kirkham may therefore see changes in their education and purposeful activity budgets as a result of these adjustments. While I recognise that this can impact the breadth of curriculum and opportunities for purposeful activity, the aim of the revised funding approach is to ensure fairness and alignment with current operational realities across the estate. In addition to the Annual Delivery Plan commissioned at site level for Core Education, the Prison Education Dynamic Purchasing System remains available to Governors to commission provision to meet the needs of their local prisoner cohort. Core Education delivery reductions are only applicable to contracts and do not affect other education services such as libraries, careers advice, distance learning or vocational training delivered through industries and workshops. We are also investing in digital infrastructure, new assessment tools, and specialist staff to ensure that every pound spent delivers the greatest possible impact for learners.
Recommendation 4
The IMB believes that having additional processes that would differentiate between short, and long-term prisoners within a resettlement prison would be significantly beneficial. How does the Minister plan to address this issue?
Government response
I appreciate the Board’s concerns about short and long-term prisoners at resettlement prisons. Following Royal Assent of the Sentencing Bill, together with the findings of the Independent Review of Criminal Courts (when available), a HMPPS Estate Configuration Review will consider the implications of these changes. This will inform future requirements for the entire prison estate, the function of prisons and offender flows, and will consider what more can be done to improve rehabilitation and reduce reoffending.
Recommendation 5
The IMB and the prison would welcome a Ministerial visit. Will the Minister schedule a visit in 2026?
Government response
I am grateful to the Board for extending an invitation to visit HMP Kirkham. My calendar for visits is quite full at the moment, particularly for the first quarter of this year. Whilst I cannot promise a visit, I have tasked my team to explore the possibility of visiting HMP Kirkham at some point during 2026.
Recommendation 6
The IMB and the prison would welcome investment in in-cell technology, as recommended by the recent inspectorate report. When will the recommendation be carried out?
Government response
In-Cell Technology It remains the intention to pilot the use of mobile PIN phones that could be used in those parts of the open estate without in-cell/room telephony. It is hoped approval will be received soon and a pilot can commence at HMP Leyhill. HMPPS’ in-cell technology programme, Launchpad, has now been delivered in 19 public sector prisons and Young Offender Institutions, reaching a total of approximately 12,900 prisoners and children. Launchpad is modernising the prison estate, helps promote prisoner autonomy, and improve wellbeing by allowing prisoners to self-serve and providing access to digital tools that support rehabilitation. Launchpad roll out is prioritised where it can deliver the greatest operational and rehabilitative benefit. All Launchpad funding has so far focused on the closed estate. Open prisons do not currently have Launchpad and currently there are no plans to expand Launchpad into HMP Kirkham. Any decisions on future delivery will be taken as and when funding becomes available and consider several factors such as the need to alleviate operational and capacity pressures together with the specific needs of different prisoner cohorts.
Recommendation 7
The IMB believes that the prison should have more choice in deciding if prisoners are suitable to come to Kirkham. How does the Prison Service propose to work in partnership with HMP Kirkham regarding prisoner transfers?
Government response
Prisoner Cohorts and Allocation HMPPS recognises the Board’s interest in ensuring appropriate transfers to open conditions. HMP Kirkham already assess all transfer reports and determine whether individuals are suitable for placement at the prison. Headquarters’ teams will continue to work closely with HMP Kirkham on population pressures and suitability criteria. This will support safe, appropriate progression for prisoners while ensuring the open estate is used effectively.
Recommendation 8
The IMB would like to see a firmer approach to those taking drugs.
Recommendation 9
The IMB would like to see effective action taken to prevent availability of drugs.
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions | 4 | 1 |
| Canteen, facility list, catalogues | 0 | 0 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, incentives scheme, sanctions | 3 | 2 |
| Equality | 0 | 0 |
| Finance, including pay, private monies, spends | 2 | 0 |
| Food and kitchens | 4 | 0 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 12 | 8 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection, restrictions | 0 | 0 |
| Miscellaneous | 1 | 3 |
| Property during transfer or in another facility | 5 | 0 |
| Property within the establishment | 1 | 0 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, time out of cell | 3 | 2 |
| Sentence management, including HDC (home detention curfew), ROTL (release on temporary licence), parole, release dates, recategorisation | 36 | 1 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 0 | 1 |
| Transfers | 1 | 0 |
Related inspections & investigations
Other reports for Kirkham
Population 696
· Self-harm 5
· Concerns
Population 470
· Self-harm 3
· Concerns
Population 469
· Self-harm 3
· Concerns
Population 553
· Self-harm 1
· Concerns