Independent Monitoring Boards annual report

Erlestoke

Report year 2020 Published 4 Aug 2020 Type Prison, category C Population 484 Responsible body HMP Erlestoke 8 recommendations

The summary and positive findings below were written from the report by an AI model. The Board's own wording is in the report linked above.

Summary

Summary written by this site (AI-generated)
HMP Erlestoke, a Category C rehabilitation prison, maintained fair and humane treatment for the most part, despite significant impacts from the COVID-19 lockdown. The report highlights improvements in education and offender management, and notes a decrease in self-harm incidents. However, key concerns persist regarding GFSL's maintenance performance, the prison's ageing infrastructure, and healthcare waiting times.

Positive findings

Summary written by this site (AI-generated)
The board applauded the establishment of a Drug Recovery Unit and welcomed improvements in education provision and the Offender Management in Custody (OMIC) system. They noted a decrease in self-harm incidents and commended management for their handling of the lockdown and the aftermath of deaths in custody. Staff dedication in the CSU, improvements in prison cleanliness, and the commitment of education and PE staff during lockdown were also highlighted positively.

Recommendations

All 8 recommendations

Key concerns

All 10 key concerns

Recommendations 8 items · 6 repeated

Recommendations were extracted from the report by AI, and responses and their status from the ministerial response by AI. Each recommendation shows whether its wording has been checked against the report.

Recommendation 1

Response: In progress

Addressee: Ministry of Justice · Topic: Estate · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
GFSL continues to disappoint (see paragraphs 7.2 to 7.6). Will the Minister consider ways in which radical changes can be made to ensure a responsive and well-managed system for repairs and improvement?
Government response (as published)
I was disappointed to learn that repairs and improvements at HMP Erlestoke continues to be an issue and note the Board’s concerns about Government Facility Services Limited (GFSL) senior management team. It is the responsibility of GFSL Senior Management to ensure that site teams are properly supported and there are plans to employ a further regional support manager to address any shortfalls. Any change will be monitored and evaluated to measure the improvement on site. There are currently three vacancies at the site and one supervisor is on long-term sick absence. GFSL has informed the Regional Estates Manager that they are recruiting for these positions to ensure staffing levels meet the work demands at HMP Erlestoke.
Turning to the Board’s concerns about GFSL’s ability to manage large contracts and projects, it is acknowledged that historically the contractors have been slow with project delivery at the site. As mentioned in my response last year, since August 2019 HMP Erlestoke has had a Service Delivery Manager (SDM) who has worked alongside the new GFSL Projects Manager to ensure all largescale projects are delivered in a timely manner. Projects delivered within that time have been the Kennet Unit kitchen, new gated access from the Silbury Unit, floodlighting to the Silbury Unit walkway, enhanced security to the Care and Separation Unit and works on the main water tanks. Projects that are in the process of completion are the Healthcare Unit and Reception screening room. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic some project works have had to be deferred to the 2020/21 financial year, some of which are now due to start this Autumn.
The Board’s report notes that there has been an improvement in reactive repairs, although preventative maintenance at the prison remains unsatisfactory. GFSL is monitored using information from Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and Compliance Assurance data. My officials have confirmed that the on-site team currently have 97% statutory compliance and 66% overall compliance rating and have passed all KPI Statutory, Mandatory Compliance and reactive repairs at the site for June 2020. This is an improving picture and will continue to be monitored.
The painting programme had been arranged over a five-year schedule. However, given the volume of wear and tear experienced in the wings it is not surprising to see that some areas need repainting on a bi-annual basis. Currently the GFSL site team has one dedicated painter to cover this work. This professional painter works with a small team of prisoners to deliver the programme and some accommodation units have their own dedicated wing painters. GFSL is contracted to provide the paint within the five-year programme, however, if the volume of paint needs to be increased this must be reviewed with the Senior Management Team, SDM and Regional Estates Manager. This is an area that needs to be monitored and supervised due to the large volumes of paint required and it is recognised that the programme requires improvement.

Source text verified

Recommendation 2

Response: In progress

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Estate · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
As reported last year, some of the fabric of the prison is ageing and of poor quality. Can plans be put in place to establish a rolling schedule of repairs and improvement? (see paragraph 7.1)
Government response (as published)
I was disappointed to learn that repairs and improvements at HMP Erlestoke continues to be an issue and note the Board’s concerns about Government Facility Services Limited (GFSL) senior management team. It is the responsibility of GFSL Senior Management to ensure that site teams are properly supported and there are plans to employ a further regional support manager to address any shortfalls. Any change will be monitored and evaluated to measure the improvement on site. There are currently three vacancies at the site and one supervisor is on long-term sick absence. GFSL has informed the Regional Estates Manager that they are recruiting for these positions to ensure staffing levels meet the work demands at HMP Erlestoke.
Turning to the Board’s concerns about GFSL’s ability to manage large contracts and projects, it is acknowledged that historically the contractors have been slow with project delivery at the site. As mentioned in my response last year, since August 2019 HMP Erlestoke has had a Service Delivery Manager (SDM) who has worked alongside the new GFSL Projects Manager to ensure all largescale projects are delivered in a timely manner. Projects delivered within that time have been the Kennet Unit kitchen, new gated access from the Silbury Unit, floodlighting to the Silbury Unit walkway, enhanced security to the Care and Separation Unit and works on the main water tanks. Projects that are in the process of completion are the Healthcare Unit and Reception screening room. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic some project works have had to be deferred to the 2020/21 financial year, some of which are now due to start this Autumn.
The Board’s report notes that there has been an improvement in reactive repairs, although preventative maintenance at the prison remains unsatisfactory. GFSL is monitored using information from Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and Compliance Assurance data. My officials have confirmed that the on-site team currently have 97% statutory compliance and 66% overall compliance rating and have passed all KPI Statutory, Mandatory Compliance and reactive repairs at the site for June 2020. This is an improving picture and will continue to be monitored.
The painting programme had been arranged over a five-year schedule. However, given the volume of wear and tear experienced in the wings it is not surprising to see that some areas need repainting on a bi-annual basis. Currently the GFSL site team has one dedicated painter to cover this work. This professional painter works with a small team of prisoners to deliver the programme and some accommodation units have their own dedicated wing painters. GFSL is contracted to provide the paint within the five-year programme, however, if the volume of paint needs to be increased this must be reviewed with the Senior Management Team, SDM and Regional Estates Manager. This is an area that needs to be monitored and supervised due to the large volumes of paint required and it is recognised that the programme requires improvement.
Improvements to buildings are ordinarily identified according to site priorities. These are usually discussions between the Governor, GFSL and the SDM. Asset Investment Bids and Major Maintenance bids are submitted on an annual or bi-annual basis to improve the fabric/security of buildings. An investment bid for recladding works for Avebury Unit was lodged previously, however, this was unsuccessful. HMPPS is pleased to advise that funding for the showers has been confirmed and allocated, but has not yet been received at the prison. Current Asset Investment Bids have been lodged for Malborough wing pipework and Alfred and Wessex safer zones. HMPPS spending for HMP Erlestoke for 2019/20 was approximately £854,551 excluding VAT.

Source text verified

Recommendation 3

Response: In progress

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Substance Misuse · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Drugs continue to represent a problem within the prison (see paragraph 4.15). What steps are proposed to assist the prison in intercepting drugs being brought into the prison?
Government response (as published)
At a national level the HMPPS Security Investment Programme is investing significantly in dog handler provision this financial year, bolstering both regional and national teams. Work is also ongoing exploring how best to ensure that dogs are as capable and up-to-date as possible in terms of detection of the most prevalent and concerning narcotic threats. Separately, work is continuing to obtain approval for the Drug Testing Exceptional Delivery Management Plan for the reintroduction of mandatory drug testing. This is currently in consultation with Trade Unions. Locally, HMP Erlestoke is currently waiting for the work to commence on the enhanced gate facilities which will benefit the prison with the ingress of drugs. The prison is also currently awaiting delivery of an itemiser and a body scanner to provide further elements of security for the establishment. The prison also continues to work closely with police and has seen an increase in the level of crime detected together with arrests.

Source text verified

Recommendation 4

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Mental Health · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
You have improved procedures with regard to ACCT reviews and in particular attendance by healthcare at first ACCT reviews. However, a system that sees healthcare more frequently absent from reviews than present, is unsatisfactory (see paragraph 8.5); what do you intend to do to rectify the situation?

Source text verified

Recommendation 5

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Healthcare

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Communication between Prison Reception Staff and Healthcare Reception Staff is unsatisfactory (see paragraph 8.7). Will this problem be addressed?

Source text verified

Recommendation 6

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Equality

Recommendation (the Board's words)
The monitoring of Equality and Fairness requires improvement (see paragraph 5.2). What steps will you take to give the system the robustness that is needed?

Source text verified

Recommendation 7

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Staffing · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
What steps do you intend to take to improve line management, quality control, training and mentoring for Key Working? (see paragraph 11.7.2)

Source text verified

Recommendation 8

Addressee: Other, other · Topic: Healthcare · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
To the Governor, and Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership Trust: What is intended to be done to improve the waiting time for routine GP appointments? (see paragraph 8.6)

Source text verified

Key concerns 10 items

Key concerns were extracted from the report text by an AI model.

Key concern 1

Estate/Conditions · Repeated from a previous year

GFSL continues to disappoint. Will the Minister consider ways in which radical changes can be made to ensure a responsive and well-managed system for repairs and improvement?

Key concern 2

Estate/Conditions · Repeated from a previous year

As reported last year, some of the fabric of the prison is ageing and of poor quality. Can plans be put in place to establish a rolling schedule of repairs and improvement?

Key concern 3

Substance Misuse · Repeated from a previous year

Drugs continue to represent a problem within the prison. What steps are proposed to assist the prison in intercepting drugs being brought into the prison?

Key concern 4

Mental Health · Repeated from a previous year

You have improved procedures with regard to ACCT reviews and in particular attendance by healthcare at first ACCT reviews. However, a system that sees healthcare more frequently absent from reviews than present, is unsatisfactory; what do you intend to do to rectify the situation?

Key concern 5

Healthcare

Communication between Prison Reception Staff and Healthcare Reception Staff is unsatisfactory. Will this problem be addressed?

Key concern 6

Equality/Diversity

The monitoring of Equality and Fairness requires improvement. What steps will you take to give the system the robustness that is needed?

Key concern 7

Staffing · Repeated from a previous year

What steps do you intend to take to improve line management, quality control, training and mentoring for Key Working?

Key concern 8

Healthcare · Repeated from a previous year

What is intended to be done to improve the waiting time for routine GP appointments?

Key concern 9

Segregation

The Board is concerned at the length of time that some prisoners spend in segregation; during the year there were 18 prisoners held for more than 42 days.

Key concern 10

Complaints/Property

The prison complaints process, other than DIRFs, has been observed to be overly bureaucratic and slow, leading to unnecessary frustrations among prisoners.

Safety statistics

Incidents during the reporting year.

IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody20
Self-harm incidents211326
ACCT cases opened270248
Prisoner assaults12391
Assaults on staff5258
Use of force108not recorded

Population

Population484
Operational capacity524

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation including laundry, clothing, ablutions 4 6
Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) 3 0
Discipline including adjudications, IEP, sanctions 6 10
Equality 6 2
Finance including pay, private monies, spends 6 5
Food and kitchens 0 4
Health including physical, mental, social care 9 28
Letters, visits, phones, public protection restrictions 7 8
Miscellaneous 3 not recorded
Property during transfer or in another establishment or location 17 37
Property within this establishment 16 23
Purposeful Activity including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell 4 11
Sentence management including HDC, ROTL, parole, release dates, re-categorisation 16 11
Staff/prisoner concerns including bullying 12 16
Transfers 5 14

Report details

Establishment
Erlestoke
Type
Prison, category C
Report year
2020
Published
4 August 2020
Responsible body
HMP Erlestoke
Recommendations
8
MoJ rating (2025/26)
3, Good

Service providers

ServiceProvider
Careers AdviceProspects
Charity Partner (Bicycle Shop)Sue Ryder Charity
EducationMilton Keynes College
Employment OpportunitiesNew Futures Network
Family SupportPACT
HealthcareInspire Better Health
MaintenanceGFSL
Resettlement/CRC SubcontractorCatch 22

Related inspections and investigations

HMIP inspection, 22 Apr 2025

IRP

HMIP inspection, 10 Jun 2024

Unannounced · Safety 2 · Respect 2 · Activity 1 · Release 3

HMIP inspection, 24 May 2022

IRP

HMIP inspection, 16 Aug 2021

Unannounced

HMIP inspection, 18 Aug 2020

Inspection

Liam Darby

PPO fatal incident · 21 Jul 2023 · Other non-natural

Davide Parra

PPO fatal incident · 5 Aug 2019 · Self-inflicted

Other reports for Erlestoke

2026

Published 21 Aug 2026 · Self-harm 275 · Key concerns recorded

2025

Published 14 Aug 2025 · Population 515 · Self-harm 318 · Key concerns recorded

2024

Published 6 Aug 2024 · Self-harm 468 · Key concerns recorded

2023

Published 16 Aug 2023 · Population 467 · Self-harm 215 · Key concerns recorded

2022

Published 8 Aug 2022 · Population 443 · Self-harm 358 · Key concerns recorded

2021

Published 15 Oct 2021 · Population 428 · Self-harm 392 · Key concerns recorded