Source · IMB Annual Report
Rochester
Year: 2020
Published: 13 Aug 2020
Type: Prison · Cat C, YOI, Resettlement
Population: 667
Recommendations: 7
Key concerns
Positive findings
HMP/YOI Rochester remains a Category C resettlement prison providing a safe and decent environment, with commendations for its Key Worker system and effective response to Covid-19. Despite challenges such as drug availability and deteriorating buildings, the prison offers a humane regime with good work activity engagement and mental healthcare. Key concerns include persistent staffing shortages, issues with prisoner property transfers, and a critical lack of suitable accommodation for prisoners upon release.
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 0 | 1 |
| ACCT cases opened | 300 | — |
| Prisoner assaults | 275 | — |
| Use of force | 485 | — |
| Drug finds | 278 | 222 |
Positive findings
HMP/YOI Rochester provides a largely safe and decent environment, with gradually falling violence levels and effective Key Worker and Incentives Policy Framework implementations. The prison is commended for its swift creation of the Annex for Category D prisoners. Healthcare and mental health services are well-regarded, and education attendance in work activities exceeds national targets. The Board notes good staff-prisoner relationships, particularly during lockdown, and an efficiently run complaints system.
Key concerns
Substance Misuse
Increased funding for resources should be allocated across the entire prison estate for tackling drug-use by prisoners. This includes improvements in security technology and intervention programmes.
Resettlement/Release
Repeated
Re-offending rates cannot be reduced unless there is suitable accommodation for all prisoners who have completed their sentence; too many prisoners are released from Rochester to become homeless rough sleepers. The recent initiative for prisons to refer those at risk of homelessness to local authorities, as referred to by the Minister in replying to previous reports, does not seem to be producing any improvement.
Other
Repeated
Property losses on transfer: As raised on previous reports, there appears to have been no progress in resolving the problems which occur when a prisoner and their property are transferred from other establishments. Frustratingly items are still going missing and unnecessary delays occurring. This is a transport issue, not one of volumetric control. Is there any likelihood of a revised framework for ensuring transferring prisoners’ property is handled more effectively?
Segregation
When a prisoner is re-categorised from C to B, they are retained in the CSU awaiting transfer. This year transfers have taken too long to arrange due mainly to lack of co-operation from receiving prisons. It means the individual is kept in confined conditions rather than returning to normal location in a Cat B prison. Can this be addressed so there is more co-operation between prisons managers about these kinds of transfers?
Overcrowding
Similarly there were too many Category D prisoners in Rochester awaiting transfer to Category D conditions. The creation of the Annex has mitigated this during the lockdown period, but it is a temporary fix and more Category D accommodation needs to be resourced.
Other
Repeated
Cell clearance checks are still haphazard and many are not conducted properly, particularly when an individual is moved to the CSU from a double cell.
Regime/Time Out of Cell
Roll Count Difficulties: The change in procedure has been difficult to implement at Rochester with its open estate. Obviously the whereabouts of prisoners must be known, but prior to lockdown this was causing unnecessary stress and disruption to many parts of the prison. As lockdown restrictions relax, can this situation be addressed so that the disruption experienced in January and February 2020 does not return?
Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Addressee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
The Board retains the view that to enable a better outcome for prisoners and reduce re-offending, increased funding for resources should be allocated across the entire prison estate for tackling drug-use by prisoners. This includes improvements in security technology and intervention programmes.
Response
I understand the Board’s continued concern about drugs and the need to improve technology and interventions to tackle their use in prisons. HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) is investing in enhanced gate security and x-ray body scanners on an unprecedented scale as part of the £100m investment announced by the Prime Minister last summer. The technology will be used to detect and deter the entry of contraband into prisons via prisoners, visitors and staff, as well as expanding HMPPS Counter Corruption Unit so that prison staff are more resilient to attempts to influence them to help supply drugs. This linked with closer working with police and health colleagues will support those leaving prisons to continue to engage with services to manage their substance issues. The enhanced gate security includes the installation of archway metal detectors and x-ray baggage scanners, additional staff and drug dogs to increase the level of searching. A rigorous site selection process to implement the investment in up to 50 prisons is underway with the first wave of 16 sites announced in January 2020. Further sites will be announced as implementation progresses and HMP/YOI Rochester is being considered. Locally, new security cameras are assisting HMP/YOI Rochester to identify illicit items thrown over the prison wall and a support visit from the National Drug Strategy Team helped identify other supply access routes. The Head of Security and Drug Strategy also continues to engage with the national team to ensure the prison is up to date with best practice to support prisoners both in custody and on release. While the prison has sufficient work and education places for all prisoners to occupy them, as the regime continues to safely return as part of the Exceptional Delivery Models, the previous focus which saw attendance improve to an average of 85% at these activities, will continue. A review of A Wing as the Drug Recovery Unit is ongoing and the intention is to implement a dedicated workshop for A Wing, as well as different movement times to minimise mixing with prisoners from other wings. In addition to the Serenity Garden which was a positive introduction during the year, the Reducing Reoffending Team are devising other wing activity provisions and wings managers are working with the Forward Trust to improve and develop wing based interventions. It is recognised that the substance misuse services at HMP/YOI Rochester use a different staffing model to other Kent prisons due to the procurement exercise taking place when HMP Rochester was thought to be closing. However, this will be rectified in the forthcoming NHS England and Improvement (NHSEI) Kent Adult Prisons procurement for a Prime Provider model 2020/21 to bring all healthcare contracts into one service, which has unfortunately been delayed due to Covid-19. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 2 |
Re-offending rates cannot be reduced unless there is suitable accommodation for all prisoners who have completed their sentence; too many prisoners are released from Rochester to become homeless rough sleepers. The recent initiative for prisons to refer those at risk of homelessness to local authorities, as referred to by the Minister in replying to previous reports, does not seem to be producing any improvement.
Repeated
Response
Turning to the Board’s continued concern about the number of prisoners that are released with no fixed abode. I would like to assure you that it is a priority for the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to ensure that offenders find somewhere safe and secure to live following their release from custody. My officials are working closely across Government to access the elements that are not directly within our control. As the Board will be aware the Government published its Rough Sleeping Strategy in August 2018, launching a £100 million initiative to reduce and ultimately eliminate rough sleeping across England. As part of this strategy the MoJ and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, invested approximately £6.4 million in a pilot scheme which operated between August 2019 and July 2020. The pilot aimed to help ex-offenders secure suitable accommodation from three prisons, namely HMPs Pentonville, Bristol and Leeds. It focused on male prisoners who were sentenced to 36 months or less and identified as being at risk of homelessness. Around 300 individuals enrolled onto the pilot and subject to its evaluation, lessons learned will be used to inform future accommodation provision for offenders via the new Probation model. HMPPS has also recently published its national Accommodation Framework that sets out the Agency’s and its partners’ responsibilities including local authorities, as well as how to build on successes and work together to ensure that offenders can access and maintain settled accommodation. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the MoJ secured £8.5 million to support the provision of accommodation for eligible individuals released from prison during this unprecedented period. The scheme ran between May and August 2020 providing up to 56 nights’ accommodation ensuring some offenders can be accommodated in to late October 2020. The MoJ & HMPPS will utilise the learning gathered from this scheme to help develop longer-term improvements and as part of wider reforms to probation services. Locally, the Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) now has a full time member of staff leading on housing issues following ending their contract with NACRO and whilst the prison regime has been restricted due to Covid-19 the CRC has attended the prison each week providing housing support. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 3 |
Property losses on transfer: As raised on previous reports, there appears to have been no progress in resolving the problems which occur when a prisoner and their property are transferred from other establishments. Frustratingly items are still going missing and unnecessary delays occurring. This is a transport issue, not one of volumetric control. Is there any likelihood of a revised framework for ensuring transferring prisoners’ property is handled more effectively?
Repeated
Response
As the Board will be aware, the development of the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework involved a large project undertaken in summer 2019. Following the conclusion of the project, HMPPS has worked closely with stakeholders to consult on proposed changes to the policy. Discussions ahead of consultation with IMB members began with the IMB Secretariat in late February 2020, who proposed meetings take place with Board members in April. In light of the pressures placed on Boards by Covid-19, HMPPS agreed with the IMB Secretariat to pause this consultation until August and September. This work is now moving forward again and the feedback received from IMB members at these meetings will be considered alongside the comments received earlier this year from other stakeholders, with the intention that the revised draft policy framework will be circulated for wider consultation at the end of 2020. It should be noted that sending prisons are responsible for recording property and sealing bags before they become the responsibility of Prisoner Escort and Custody Service (PECS). The PECS 4 Generation contract also began during August 2020 with a new fleet of vehicles which allow for an additional half box of consumable items to the limit of 7.5kg to be carried for each prisoner on top of the existing agreed volumetric limits. In addition to this, HMPPS is looking at what more can be done to encourage prisoners to send out or dispose of excess items to reduce the amount of property that cannot transfer with them. Steps are also being taken to ensure there is a consistent approach when prison staff forward on any excess items to prisoners at their new establishment after a transfer has taken place. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 4 |
When a prisoner is re-categorised from C to B, they are retained in the CSU awaiting transfer. This year transfers have taken too long to arrange due mainly to lack of co-operation from receiving prisons. It means the individual is kept in confined conditions rather than returning to normal location in a Cat B prison. Can this be addressed so there is more co-operation between prisons managers about these kinds of transfers?
Response
As part of reconfiguration of the adult male estate, which introduces new offender flows as well as addressing the imbalance of supply and demand, a new allocation protocol will be introduced. The allocation protocol principles support movement of prisoners to the right prison at the right time. This includes people who are recategorised. The allocation protocol seeks to reduce the number of people being directed back to a local prison and instead directs prisons to consider the most suitable prison for the individual to most effectively meet their needs. An escalation route through the operational line has been established into the protocol to manage any transfer issues. It is recognised that the speed at which transfers take place can be subject to space constraints in appropriate parts of the prison estate becoming available. However, in 2019 HMP Woodhill began its transition from a core local to a Cat B training prison with a Cat A trial function and specialist units. In addition, at the beginning of February 2020, HMP Manchester also started its transition from a core local to a Cat B trainer prison with a Cat A remand function. When both prisons have fully transitioned this will provide approximately 1300 Cat B training places to the prison estate. Due to Covid-19 there are currently restrictions on transfers taking place to maintain safety, with a national agreement in place to accommodate exceptional requests which ensure an appropriate destination is agreed. Where prisoners are awaiting transfer and have to be located in the Care and Separation Unit at HMP/YOI Rochester they are seen daily by healthcare, chaplaincy and the Duty Governor, as well as continuing to receive visits from their key worker. Staff also ensure the individual is provided with regular updates and has activities to keep them occupied such as distractions packs, reading and writing material. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 5 |
Similarly there were too many Category D prisoners in Rochester awaiting transfer to Category D conditions. The creation of the Annex has mitigated this during the lockdown period, but it is a temporary fix and more Category D accommodation needs to be resourced.
Response
HMPPS shares the Board’s views on how important a role open prisons play in testing and furthering an individual’s rehabilitation, especially those who have spent many years in closed conditions. HMPPS also acknowledges the importance of effective management of prisoner transfers to open prisons to ensure they are held in prisons that match their security category and associated level of risk to the public. In January 2020 HMP Haverigg changed from a Category C prison capable of holding up to 268 category C men, to a Category D open prison initially holding up to 458 category D men, with the potential to increase to 570. Whilst it is accepted these places are not in the south this change has provide extra capacity and opened up other space in the adult male open estate. As part of the programme to deliver 10,000 additional prison places this also includes the expansion of the Category D estate and HMPPS are currently assessing which prisons may be suitable for expansion. Separately, as the Board is aware the former Medway Secure Training Centre, which closed in March, was temporarily reopened as an annex to HMP/YOI Rochester, housing up to 70 category D prisoners and was successful in providing a steady flow of transfers in to the category D estate. HMPPS has since successfully completed the decant of the annex in August, with prisoners transitioning to Category D prisons or reaching the end of their sentence which is enabling HMPPS to decommission the annex in preparation to hand the site back to the Youth Custody Service at the end of October. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 6 |
The Board strongly recommends more effective control is required over cell checks on all wings.
Repeated
Response
Locally at HMP/YOI Rochester it is recognised that on occasions the quality of cell clearances has been impacted by work pressures and available staffing. However, the Heads of Residence have devised new wing management checks and cell clearances have been incorporated within these checks undertaken by custodial managers to providing weekly assurance. |
Governor / Director | In progress |
| 7 |
Roll Count Difficulties: The change in procedure has been difficult to implement at Rochester with its open estate. Obviously the whereabouts of prisoners must be known, but prior to lockdown this was causing unnecessary stress and disruption to many parts of the prison. As lockdown restrictions relax, can this situation be addressed so that the disruption experienced in January and February 2020 does not return?
Response
The changes in the roll check procedures were implemented due to a national requirement however, due to the layout of HMP/YOI Rochester it is recognised that these changes created challenges at times for the prison. Therefore, an alternative approach was introduced at the prison and appeared to be successful immediately prior to Covid-19 curtailing regimes across all prisons. As the regime at HMP/YOI Rochester continues to safely return at part of the Exceptional Deliver Models the previously successful roll check procedure will continue to be used. |
Governor / Director | Implemented |
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, ablutions | 14 | 8 |
| Discipline, including adjudications, IEP, sanctions | 16 | 8 |
| Equality | 3 | 6 |
| Food and kitchens | 7 | 0 |
| Health, including physical, mental, social care | 58 | 42 |
| Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions | 25 | 17 |
| Miscellaneous, including complaints system | 41 | 27 |
| Property within this establishment | 60 | 67 |
| Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell | 32 | 21 |
| Sentence management, including HDC, release on temporary licence, parole, release dates, recategorisation | 36 | 48 |
| Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying | 26 | 12 |
| Transfers | 21 | 17 |
Related inspections & investigations
2 Jun 2025
HMIP · IRP
30 Aug 2024
HMIP · Urgent Notification
12 Aug 2024
HMIP · Unannounced
Safety 2
· Respect 1
· Activity 1
· Release 1
11 Mar 2025
PFD
Sean Higgins · State Custody related deaths | Mental Health related deaths | Suicide (from 2015)
19 Jul 2024
PFD
Benjamin Harrison · State Custody related deaths | Alcohol, drug and medication related deaths
Other reports for Rochester
Report details
- Establishment
- Rochester
- Type
- Prison · Cat C, YOI, Resettlement
- Report year
- 2020
- Published
- 13 August 2020
- Responsible body
- HMP Rochester
- Recommendations
- 7
- MoJ rating (2024/25)
- 1 — Serious concern
Population
| Population | 667 |
| Operational capacity | 695 |
Service providers
Drug Recovery
The Forward Trust
Education
Weston College
Healthcare (Mental Health)
NHS/Oxleas Inreach
Healthcare (Primary)
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Maintenance
GFSL
Resettlement
Kent Surrey and Sussex Community Rehabilitation Company
Visiting Arrangements
Spurgeons charity