Source · IMB Annual Report
Wandsworth
Year: 2020
Published: 22 Sep 2020
Type: Prison · Cat B, local, C resettlement
Population: 1,450
Recommendations: 15
Key concerns
Positive findings
HMP Wandsworth, a Category B local prison, reported significant challenges during a year heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, including a rapid lockdown response. The Board found the prison's overcrowded, 169-year-old Victorian buildings created inhumane living conditions for prisoners. Key concerns included high levels of violence and self-harm, poor resettlement outcomes, and persistent delays in mental health transfers, with the Addison unit deemed unfit for purpose.
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 4 | 6 |
| Self-harm incidents | 774 | — |
| ACCT cases opened | 836 | 851 |
| Prisoner assaults | 352 | 294 |
| Assaults on staff | 270 | 244 |
| Use of force | 1,255 | 896 |
| Drug finds | 360 | — |
Positive findings
The Board commended staff for their sensitive and imaginative response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which included rapid implementation of new systems and good communication. HMIP also reported positively on visible leadership and staff support during this time. The Board also noted improvements in violence reduction strategies, the introduction of a Rapiscan machine to detect drugs in mail, and efforts to increase the use of the IEP scheme. There was also progress in sentence calculations and a reduction in the backlog of categorisations and OASys assessments, and the chaplaincy team successfully used iPads for family contact during bereavements.
Key concerns
Estate/Conditions
Repeated
The inhumane living conditions, stemming from overcrowding and the dilapidated 169-year-old Victorian buildings.
Safety
High levels of violence (prisoner-on-prisoner and prisoner-on-staff assaults) and self-harm incidents.
Resettlement/Release
Repeated
The poor quality and effectiveness of resettlement provision, resulting in very low rates of prisoners securing employment, training, or housing upon release.
Mental Health
Repeated
Persistent, long-standing delays in transferring mentally ill prisoners to secure psychiatric accommodation.
Mental Health
Repeated
The unsuitability and inadequacy of the 12-bed Addison mental health unit, compounded by insufficient adapted cells for wheelchair users.
Safety
Unreliable CCTV system.
Other
Repeated
Significant issues with missing prisoner property.
Recommendations
| # | Recommendation | Addressee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Does the Government have a timetable for building a new prison to replace the existing one, which has inhumane conditions and is unfit for purpose? If this is not possible, should all HMP Wandsworth’s cells be used for single occupancy?
Repeated
Response
I understand the Board’s concerns about the age and condition of HMP Wandsworth and the request for cells to be single occupancy if it is not possible to replace the existing prison with a new build. Although there are currently no plans to reduce the operating capacity at HMP Wandsworth which would allow for all cells to be used for single occupancy, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) recognises the concerns raised about the use of crowded cells. While these places meet HMPPS standards for crowded accommodation, holding two prisoners in a cell designed for one prisoner in order to accommodate national population pressures is not desirable. However, the Government’s announcement of up to £2.5 billion investment in new prison construction to create up to 10,000 prison places is welcomed. Construction is already underway at HMP Five Wells and at the former HMP Glen Parva site. In addition, it has been announced that one of four new prisons will be built at HMP Full Sutton alongside the existing site. New houseblocks are also due to be built at HMPs Guys Marsh, Stocken and Rye Hill, as well as a new workshop at High Down to free up existing space. These will increase capacity by more than 930 places. |
Ministry of Justice | Noted |
| 2 |
Delays in transfers to secure psychiatric accommodation, reported by the Board each year since 2009, remained a problem. The Minister responded to the Board in 2019 that the 14-day target had not been agreed with NHS England, Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service’s (HMPPS) primary partner. Has it now been agreed?
Repeated
Response
Regarding the Board’s ongoing concern about the delays in transferring those with mental ill health, I would like to reassure you that the MoJ and HMPPS are determined to improve the transfer process, ensure delays are reduced and avoid prison being used inappropriately. The Secretary of State for Justice is committed to working with the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and health partners to articulate a coherent picture of how healthcare is delivered throughout the criminal justice pathway. The Government is also committed to reforming the Mental Health Act and we are working closely with Department for Health and Social Care to respond to the recommendations of the independent review, chaired by Professor Simon Wessely which includes recommendations about improving the secure transfer process. A joint White Paper will be published in the coming months. Further to my letter in January 2020 in response to last year’s report, the 2011 Prison Transfer and Remission guidance has been amended following the comprehensive consultation process and is waiting publication as the planned publication in March 2020 was impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic. In the meantime, NHS England and NHS Improvement (NHSE&I) continue to monitor the time taken from referral to transfer and provide support where needed. The Health and Justice team in the London region is currently working more closely with the Mental Health Trusts, the Provider Collaboratives and NHSE&I Specialised Commissioning team to ensure that the prison population remain a priority for transfer and to strengthen existing relationships with key stakeholders and partner agencies. Where there are any challenges delaying the transfer of care these are escalated within the Trusts and the Clinical Commissioning Groups on an individual basis. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 3 |
The Board was very concerned that the 12-bed Addison unit remained unfit for purpose, with insufficient beds and cells frequently awaiting repair. The waiting time for a bed in the unit was up to seven days. What is being done to improve capacity for mentally ill prisoners?
Repeated
Response
Turning to the Board’s concern about the Addison Unit, it is recognised that there are periods where cells are out of action usually due to damage by patients on account of their mental health presentation. Repairs are always undertaken by the Facilities Management Provider, Gov Facility Services Limited, but it is acknowledged that the Unit now lacks enough rooms for the number of prisoners that currently require the level of supervision of a clinical setting and the damage caused to cells can emphasise this capacity issue. For this reason a business case has been submitted to NHSE&I to consider an expansion of the Unit. In the meantime, the Mental Health In-reach staff continue to closely monitor patients on the waiting list for admission to the Addison Unit and patients are prioritised by their clinical need. |
Ministry of Justice | In progress |
| 4 |
The lack of progress regarding the provision of adapted cells for wheelchair users was disappointing; consequently, beds were occupied in the Jones unit by otherwise healthy prisoners. What is being done to increase the number of adapted cells?
Repeated
Response
Further to the response in January 2020 to last year’s report, two further adapted cells are being funded during the 2020/21 financial year and will be progressing to commercial tender in due course. Whilst this will bring the total of adapted cells to seven, HMP Wandsworth will also continue to bid for improvements to meet the clinical needs of its prisoner population. In addition, both the disabled platform lifts have been reinstated and are now fully functional. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 5 |
Is there an opportunity to invest in a national electronic prison property system that might replace the current archaic paper-based operation? This is an opportunity not only to save money and human resource, but also to ensure that prisoners have a fairer and more decent experience in prison.
Response
While digital improvements are being explored, the nature of that work means that any digital changes are likely to take longer to develop. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 6 |
Although some improvements have been made, should the relationship with DHL, the provider of canteen products for prisoners, be reviewed, based on the poor performance experienced this year?
Response
The relationship with the national retail provider, DHL, is already formally reviewed on a monthly basis. This involves HMPPS Prison Retail who have oversight of the service and performance, including that at HMP Wandsworth. The shortfall of DHL distribution staff at HMP Wandsworth has been a result of recruitment difficulties and DHL continues to use every avenue to recruit staff to these posts. In addition, the Covid-19 outbreak has prevented progress with consistency in delivery due to workforce impacts. However, DHL management has been working on improvement plans with the prison and HMPPS Prison Retail in order to support HMP Wandsworth in providing an improved canteen service. The most recent recruitment campaign is also beginning to result in improvements. |
HMPPS | Implemented |
| 7 |
An audit of ‘through-the-gate’ services was conducted during February by HMPPS’s operational and system assurance group (OSAG) following concerns about the ongoing poor quality of the basic custody screening tool (BCST)2 and review of resettlement plans provided by the CRC in HMP Wandsworth. While the OSAG report was commissioned at the request of the prison, a full version of its findings was not provided. The IMB also requested a copy, but to date it had not been received. When will a copy of the report be available?
Response
With regard to the audit report that the Board wishes to have sight of, this was not commissioned at the request of the prison but was a contractual management commission to audit the services provided by delivery partners of the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs). The Board were informed on 21 August 2020 following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that the report would not be disclosed as it is exempt from disclosure under section 43(2) of the FOIA, because it would, or would be likely to, prejudice the commercial interests of any person. I understand that the London CRC Director of Interventions separately wrote to the Board on 31 July 2020 providing an update on their plans for HMP Wandsworth resettlement services which provided a summary of the findings of the audit report. The HMPPS Senior Contract Manager for Thames Valley and London also wrote to the Board on 24 August 2020 providing a commitment to discuss and work through the concerns that the Board has regarding delivery of services by the London CRC for HMP Wandsworth. |
HMPPS | Rejected |
| 8 |
The poor quality of the resettlement provision continued to be of serious concern. What is being done to improve this?
Repeated
Response
It is recognised that resettlement planning was not always of sufficient quality and undertaken in sufficient time to address all the identified needs of individuals for their release. However, the London CRC has taken important steps to ensure improvement. As noted above, the CRC wrote to the Board on 31 July 2020 explaining its work with its supply chain providers to develop and strengthen Through the Gate (TTG) delivery arrangements. Since the 1 August 2020, Catch 22, a provider with a proven track record in resettlement work with prisoners, took over these services from the CRCs previous supplier, Penrose. The CRC plans to embed some of the providers wider services into the services that HMP Wandsworth offer, including a London gang exit service, employability service and peer mentoring opportunities for those coming to the end of their sentences. The CRC has also introduced improved quality assurance processes across all its London prisons, which will allow it to continue to monitor areas for improvement and identify good practice. HMP Wandsworth is hopeful that the introduction of a new provider will result in an improvement in delivery and early indications at the prison are positive. In terms of performance, for probation the latest data was published on 30 July 2020 which covers the 18 CRC performance measures as part of the Community Performance quarterly statistics - https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-performance-quarterly-update-to-march-2020. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 9 |
The CCTV system throughout the prison was unreliable and not fit for purpose. The Ministry of Justice has authorised funding for an upgrade. When will work commence?
Response
As the Board is aware funding for the full replacement of the CCTV and PIDS Systems at HMP Wandsworth has been approved. Commercial tenders are currently being evaluated and it is anticipated that work will commence within the 2020/21 financial year. |
HMPPS | In progress |
| 10 | Each year the Board has difficulty collecting data from across the prison; often it was either unavailable or inaccurate. Would the Governor consider creating a centralised data unit responsible for obtaining and collating reliable data? Repeated | Governor / Director | |
| 11 | Many of the induction meetings observed by Board members were of a low quality. The presentations were often unsympathetic and inconsistent, with inadequate slides and handouts. The Board was very disappointed that this counterproductive and poorly managed situation had continued, despite similar criticism in four previous annual reports. Repeated | Governor / Director | |
| 12 |
The Board was very concerned about property going missing either on prisoners’ arrival or when they transferred to new cells. This was the third year the Board had expressed its concern; what is being done to resolve this problem?
Repeated
Response
It is unfortunate and regrettable that prisoners’ property continues to be an issue. The development of the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework involved a large project undertaken in summer 2019. Following the conclusion of the project, HMPPS has worked closely with stakeholders to consult on proposed changes to the policy. Discussions ahead of consultation with IMB members began with the IMB Secretariat in late February 2020, who proposed meetings take place with Board members in April. In light of the pressures placed on Boards by Covid-19, HMPPS agreed with the IMB Secretariat to pause this consultation. This work is now moving forward again and consultation with IMB members took place in August. Consultation with operational colleagues is also expected to resume soon, subject to any further Covid-19 impacts on recovery. The feedback received will be considered alongside the comments received earlier this year from other stakeholders, with the intention that the revised draft policy framework will be circulated for wider consultation at the end of 2020. While digital improvements are being explored, the nature of that work means that any digital changes are likely to take longer to develop. It should be noted that sending prisons are responsible for recording property and sealing bags before they become the responsibility of Prisoner Escort and Custody Service (PECS). The PECS 4 Generation contract also began during August 2020 with a new fleet of vehicles which allow for an additional half box of consumable items to the limit of 7.5kg to be carried for each prisoner on top of the existing agreed volumetric limits. In addition to this, HMPPS is looking at what more can be done to encourage prisoners to send out or dispose of excess items to reduce the amount of property that cannot transfer with them. Steps are also being taken to ensure there is a consistent approach when prison staff forward on any excess items to prisoners at their new establishment after a transfer has taken place. Locally the prison has adapted processes within Reception to try and mitigate lost property and the response time in answering complaints has been improved. Due to the Covid-19 outbreak resulting in regime changes and less property being handed in to the prison it has made it difficult for HMP Wandsworth to make comparisons with previous years to assess the impact of the improvements made, however, the prison is continuing to monitor the situation. |
Governor / Director | In progress |
| 13 |
The Board was surprised to be informed by Novus that individual learning plans did not follow prisoners on transfer to other prisons or outside. Why is this?
Response
HMPPS is currently enhancing and upgrading the functionality of the Virtual Campus in prisons. As part of this work a digital ILP for all learners has been implemented that can be transferred between prisons as learners move around the estate. While a version is available to all establishments now a new enhanced version is due to be released this calendar year. Prisoners are currently able to access a record of any learning they have undertaken in custody which is held on the Virtual Campus via a facility that enables continued access following their release from prison. |
Other | Implemented |
| 14 |
A very low proportion of the BCST3 meetings with prisoners took place in the 12 weeks prior to release, and many were discharged without an agreed work, training or education place. What is being done to rectify this?
Response
It is recognised that resettlement planning was not always of sufficient quality and undertaken in sufficient time to address all the identified needs of individuals for their release. However, the London CRC has taken important steps to ensure improvement. As noted above, the CRC wrote to the Board on 31 July 2020 explaining its work with its supply chain providers to develop and strengthen Through the Gate (TTG) delivery arrangements. Since the 1 August 2020, Catch 22, a provider with a proven track record in resettlement work with prisoners, took over these services from the CRCs previous supplier, Penrose. The CRC plans to embed some of the providers wider services into the services that HMP Wandsworth offer, including a London gang exit service, employability service and peer mentoring opportunities for those coming to the end of their sentences. The CRC has also introduced improved quality assurance processes across all its London prisons, which will allow it to continue to monitor areas for improvement and identify good practice. HMP Wandsworth is hopeful that the introduction of a new provider will result in an improvement in delivery and early indications at the prison are positive. In terms of performance, for probation the latest data was published on 30 July 2020 which covers the 18 CRC performance measures as part of the Community Performance quarterly statistics - https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-performance-quarterly-update-to-march-2020. |
Other | In progress |
| 15 |
Once again, it was difficult to get access to consistent CRC data regarding key performance targets. What is being done to improve this?
Repeated
Response
It is recognised that resettlement planning was not always of sufficient quality and undertaken in sufficient time to address all the identified needs of individuals for their release. However, the London CRC has taken important steps to ensure improvement. As noted above, the CRC wrote to the Board on 31 July 2020 explaining its work with its supply chain providers to develop and strengthen Through the Gate (TTG) delivery arrangements. Since the 1 August 2020, Catch 22, a provider with a proven track record in resettlement work with prisoners, took over these services from the CRCs previous supplier, Penrose. The CRC plans to embed some of the providers wider services into the services that HMP Wandsworth offer, including a London gang exit service, employability service and peer mentoring opportunities for those coming to the end of their sentences. The CRC has also introduced improved quality assurance processes across all its London prisons, which will allow it to continue to monitor areas for improvement and identify good practice. HMP Wandsworth is hopeful that the introduction of a new provider will result in an improvement in delivery and early indications at the prison are positive. In terms of performance, for probation the latest data was published on 30 July 2020 which covers the 18 CRC performance measures as part of the Community Performance quarterly statistics - https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-performance-quarterly-update-to-march-2020. |
Other | Implemented |
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation (including transfers) | 45 | 38 |
| Discipline (adjudications, lost property, general complaints etc.) | 55 | 63 |
| Family and personal | 28 | 27 |
| Food | 10 | 12 |
| Healthcare (doctors, dentists etc.) | 52 | 68 |
| Legal (visits, letters, courts etc.) | 13 | 11 |
| Money and earnings | 8 | 9 |
| Other | 54 | 59 |
| Property (including lost property) | 101 | 105 |
| Sentence (licences, parole, release etc.) | 72 | 71 |
| Staff (conduct, attitude etc.) | 10 | 11 |
| Total applications | 454 | 501 |
| Work and training | 6 | 7 |
Related inspections & investigations
31 Mar 2025
HMIP · IRP
8 May 2024
HMIP · Urgent Notification
22 Apr 2024
HMIP · Unannounced
Safety 1
· Respect 1
· Activity 1
· Release 2
Other reports for Wandsworth
Report details
- Establishment
- Wandsworth
- Type
- Prison · Cat B, local, C resettlement
- Report year
- 2020
- Published
- 22 September 2020
- Responsible body
- HMP Wandsworth
- Recommendations
- 15
- MoJ rating (2024/25)
- 1 — Serious concern
Population
| Population | 1,450 |
| Operational capacity | 1,628 |
| CNA (designed for) | 961 151% |
Service providers
Canteen
DHL
Education
Novus
Facilities Services
Gov Facilities Services Ltd (GFSL)
Physical Health and Substance Misuse Services
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Resettlement
London Community Rehabilitation Company (Penrose)
Substance Misuse
CGL (Change Grow Live)