Independent Monitoring Boards annual report

Ranby

Report year 2022 Published 4 Aug 2022 Type Prison, category C Responsible body HMP Ranby 4 recommendations

The summary and positive findings below were written from the report by an AI model. The Board's own wording is in the report linked above.

Summary

Summary written by this site (AI-generated)
HMP Ranby, a Category C male training prison, concluded its reporting year ending March 2022 with a CNA of 892 and operational capacity of 1,025. The Board noted improved safety statistics, but highlighted significant concerns regarding prolonged waits for mental health transfers, the effective closure of the resettlement department, and persistent issues with property management for transferring prisoners. The regime was heavily impacted by Covid-19 restrictions, limiting purposeful activity and gym use, while the IMB itself faced operational challenges due to staffing and equipment shortages.

Positive findings

Summary written by this site (AI-generated)
The Board noted HMP Ranby's improved safety statistics, with a 60% reduction in incidents year-on-year. The healthcare service was generally satisfactory and in line with public provision. Positive developments included the ABC strategy, potential for new category D accommodation, and the introduction of in-cell laptops and telephones for family contact. Staff in the segregation unit were commended for their care, and the library regime was fully operational and well-used.

Recommendations

All 4 recommendations

Key concerns

All 8 key concerns

Recommendations 4 items · 1 repeated

Recommendations were extracted from the report by AI, and responses and their status from the ministerial response by AI. Each recommendation shows whether its wording has been checked against the report.

Recommendation 1

Response: In progress

Addressee: Other, minister · Topic: Mental Health · Repeated from a previous year

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Could the minister assure the Board that this situation is receiving their urgent attention and that something is being done about it?
Government response (as published)
I appreciate the Board’s ongoing concerns about transfers to specialist mental health facilities and would like to assure you that NHS England Midlands Health Team continue to do all they can to facilitate transfers within the required timeframes. The pathway to secure beds is complex and the responsibility for the commissioning and provision of all levels of service sits within NHS England’s Specialised Commissioning team. As such, the healthcare provider and HMP Ranby are working closely with key stakeholders to ensure access to secure hospital beds. As mentioned in last year’s response, the pandemic affected services and this included closures within the mental health hospital estate. This resulted in many prisoners incurring further delays to admission and significant waiting times for access to secure hospital provision.
To reduce waiting times for admission to secure hospitals, NHS England (Midlands) Governance team and Commissioners continue to implement their fortnightly Clinical Case review meetings. This is clinically led and seeks to proactively manage those waiting for secure beds and every case on the waiting list is risk assessed. The meeting covers the whole Midlands Region and incorporates all prisoners that have exceeded the 28-day timeframe. This is a multi-agency meeting to ensure there is a whole systems approach to supporting the most vulnerable and high-risk prisoners. I understand that these meetings are now positively effecting prioritisation. However, on occasion, HMP Ranby will continue to need to segregate prisoners that require specialist treatment for mental health and this will be minimised as reasonably as possible.

Source text verified

Recommendation 2

Response: In progress

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Property

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Will the Prison Service explain why several prisoners transferred from other prisons are continuing to arrive without all their property?
Government response (as published)
Prisoners’ Property
The new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework was published on 1 August 2022 with an implementation date of 5 September 2022. The Framework is the result of extensive consultation, including with the IMB. It has been designed with procedural justice at its core and aims to ensure consistency and fairness and enhance prisoners’ satisfaction with processes and outcomes. Given the nature of property, and the movement of prisoners between establishments, the Framework looks to provide greater direction and standardisation on a national basis. It strengthens processes in relation to the main problem areas identified by IMBs and staff including the handling of valuable property, managing cell clearances, compliance with volumetric control and forwarding on excess property following a prisoner’s transfer.
As mentioned in last year’s response, the Prisoner Escort and Custody Services (PECS) vehicle fleet is designed to carry the number of prisoners it is intended for together with their property in line with the volumetric limit which is currently governed by Prison Service Instruction 12/2011 (to be replaced by the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework in due course). The introduction of digitally recorded Person Escort Records (PERs), including property tags, will assist with investigations for property that is lost in transit with PECS suppliers. HMPPS is also considering what more can be done to encourage prisoners to send out or dispose of excess items to reduce the amount of their property that cannot transfer with them. Steps are being taken to ensure a consistent approach when prisons forward on any excess items to prisoners at their new establishments after transfers have taken place. PECS continues to monitor all aspects of the contractor’s performance and on occasions where it fails to meet the agreed levels, this will be raised with the contractor for improvement.

Source text verified

Recommendation 3

Response: In progress

Addressee: HMPPS · Topic: Regime and Resettlement

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Will the Prison Service explain when HMP Ranby will be returned to a training prison with prisoners who are able to complete courses according to their sentence plan and with adequate funding to prepare them for release?
Government response (as published)
Prison Function
The Reconfiguration Project has modelled the estate into three core functions: reception, training and resettlement. This was done to give establishments clarity of function and ensure prisoners are located in the right establishment at the right point in their sentences. HMP Ranby is a dual-function prison modelled to hold a population mix of 65% training places and 35% resettlement. The current situation of increased resettlement prisoners being held at HMP Ranby is part of a national picture of misalignment as a result of the pandemic, which has affected both the make-up of the population and the flow of prisoners through the estate.
HMP Five Wells has now opened (HMP Fosse Way to follow) and will hold regional resettlement prisoners, allowing these men to progress from HMP Ranby. In the meantime, the Reconfiguration Project is working to support prisons in addressing the misalignment, adhering to offender flow rules and making best use of space as it becomes available.
Rehabilitation Courses
During the pandemic there was limited access to accredited courses for prisoners. HMP Ranby is now running the Thinking Skills Programme and Kaizen courses and is in the process of recruiting further facilitators to ensure the prison maximises the delivery of these programmes over the next twelve months.

Source text verified

Recommendation 4

Response: In progress

Addressee: Governor / Director · Topic: Property

Recommendation (the Board's words)
Could the Governor explain why the system of recording incoming property has changed? This has made it very difficult for the Board to address prisoners’ concerns about their missing property.
Government response (as published)
Prisoners’ Property
The new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework was published on 1 August 2022 with an implementation date of 5 September 2022. The Framework is the result of extensive consultation, including with the IMB. It has been designed with procedural justice at its core and aims to ensure consistency and fairness and enhance prisoners’ satisfaction with processes and outcomes. Given the nature of property, and the movement of prisoners between establishments, the Framework looks to provide greater direction and standardisation on a national basis. It strengthens processes in relation to the main problem areas identified by IMBs and staff including the handling of valuable property, managing cell clearances, compliance with volumetric control and forwarding on excess property following a prisoner’s transfer.
As mentioned in last year’s response, the Prisoner Escort and Custody Services (PECS) vehicle fleet is designed to carry the number of prisoners it is intended for together with their property in line with the volumetric limit which is currently governed by Prison Service Instruction 12/2011 (to be replaced by the new Prisoners’ Property Policy Framework in due course). The introduction of digitally recorded Person Escort Records (PERs), including property tags, will assist with investigations for property that is lost in transit with PECS suppliers. HMPPS is also considering what more can be done to encourage prisoners to send out or dispose of excess items to reduce the amount of their property that cannot transfer with them. Steps are being taken to ensure a consistent approach when prisons forward on any excess items to prisoners at their new establishments after transfers have taken place. PECS continues to monitor all aspects of the contractor’s performance and on occasions where it fails to meet the agreed levels, this will be raised with the contractor for improvement.

Source text verified

Key concerns 8 items

Key concerns were extracted from the report text by an AI model.

Key concern 1

Mental Health · Repeated from a previous year

Prisoners are still being held for far too long when they should be in specialist mental health facilities.

Key concern 2

Regime/Time Out of Cell

An ongoing problem continues to be the lack of courses to facilitate a prisoner’s sentence plan. Also, some courses are not available to some men as they do not have sufficient time left to serve. 3.3 Main areas for development The Board has previously reported on the changing population of HMP Ranby. HMP Ranby is currently designated as a category C training prison. However, it is routinely receiving many prisoners with a very short time to serve. The Governor reports this situation has been exacerbated by Covid, which has diverted HMP Ranby and its staff away from its primary purpose which is to function as a training prison.

Key concern 3

Other

8 Property The management of prisoners’ property continues to be a considerable concern. Property not arriving from other prisons is still causing problems and aggravation. When prisoners arrive from other prisons their property card is not always being correctly annotated, and this also causes problems.

Key concern 4

Resettlement/Release

In the later part of the reporting year the Board is aware that the resettlement department at Ranby has ceased to operate. Some residual work is still being done via the Department for Work and Pensions and other agencies on site.

Key concern 5

Resettlement/Release

Prisoners are not able to transfer to a category D prison due to lack of accommodation in the category D estate.

Key concern 6

Other

The lack of a dedicated Clerk for the IMB and functioning office equipment has been a significant problem for the IMB during this reporting period.

Key concern 7

Overcrowding · Repeated from a previous year

The Board continued to be concerned about the use of cell sharing.

Key concern 8

Complaints/Property · Repeated from a previous year

It is the opinion of the Board that the prisoners within the confines of HMP Ranby are generally treated fairly and with humanity, however, there are exceptions that remain and that we repeat, including: staff communication, cell sharing, cell clearing, and canteen via DHL. The Board considers that the prison system, and not necessarily HMP Ranby, fails to provide fair and humane treatment to prisoners.

Safety statistics

Incidents during the reporting year.

IndicatorThis yearPrevious
Deaths in custody2not recorded
Self-harm incidents258not recorded
Prisoner assaults152not recorded
Assaults on staff41not recorded
Use of force450not recorded

Population

Operational capacity1,025
CNA (designed for)892

Applications to the IMB

CategoryCurrentPrevious
Accommodation, including laundry, clothing, Ablutions 15 1
Canteen, facility list, catalogue(s) 26 4
Discipline, including adjudications, IEP, sanctions 3 3
Equality 9 0
Finance, including pay, private monies, spends 9 2
Food and kitchens 3 3
Health, including physical, mental, social care 26 16
Letters, visits, telephones, public protection restrictions 34 14
Property during transfer or in another establishment or location 47 12
Property within this establishment 54 14
Purposeful activity, including education, work, training, library, regime, time out of cell 4 3
Sentence management, including HDC, release on temporary licence, parole, release dates, re categorization 45 19
Staff/prisoner concerns, including bullying 28 6
Transfers 7 0

Report details

Establishment
Ranby
Type
Prison, category C
Report year
2022
Published
4 August 2022
Responsible body
HMP Ranby
Recommendations
4
MoJ rating (2025/26)
2, Concern

Related inspections and investigations

HMIP inspection, 20 Oct 2025

IRP

HMIP inspection, 10 Feb 2025

Unannounced · Safety 2 · Respect 2 · Activity 2 · Release 2

HMIP inspection, 3 Jan 2023

IRP

HMIP inspection, 4 Apr 2022

Unannounced

Mark Beresford

Prevention of future deaths report · 25 Oct 2024 · State Custody related deaths | Mental Health related deaths

Steven May

Prevention of future deaths report · 16 Mar 2016 · State Custody related deaths

Other reports for Ranby

2026

Published 26 Jun 2026 · Self-harm 522 · Key concerns recorded

2025

Published 6 Aug 2025 · Self-harm 533 · Key concerns recorded

2024

Published 5 Jul 2024 · Self-harm 747 · Key concerns recorded

2023

Published 25 Aug 2023 · Self-harm 425 · Key concerns recorded

2021

Published 29 Nov 2021 · Population 1,092 · Self-harm 336 · Key concerns recorded

2020

Published 21 Sep 2020 · Population 1,092 · Self-harm 624 · Key concerns recorded