Source · IMB Annual Report
Dartmoor
AI-generated report summary HMP Dartmoor continues to suffer from underinvestment, management instability, and a slow recovery from Covid restrictions, leading to extensive lockups and a sub-optimal rehabilitative regime. While some aspects of healthcare are commendable, the prison struggles to meet the complex needs of its older and chronically ill population due to environmental and contractual limitations. Staffing shortages and issues with key working persist, alongside concerns about safety, bullying, and the effectiveness of equality and diversity mechanisms.
Year: 2022
Published: 6 Jan 2023
Type: Prison · Cat C
Population: 635
Recommendations: 15
Key concerns
Positive findings
Safety statistics
| Indicator | This year | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Deaths in custody | 4 | — |
| ACCT cases opened | 112 | — |
Positive findings
AI-generated summaryThe Board commends the management and officers for their commitment in limiting Covid-19 infections, and the current focus on improving regimes and key worker sessions. Healthcare provision is generally of a good standard, and successful resettlement initiatives, including resettlement boards and a new employment hub, are welcomed. The Care and Separation Unit (CSU) team is praised for their kindness and empathy. Regular meetings for Black, Asian, and minority ethnic prisoners are now established, and the chaplaincy provides appreciated faith and pastoral support, including enabling live streaming of funerals.
Key concerns
The lack of recovery from the protracted threat of closure and consequential uncertainties and lack of investment, impacting prisoner experience and staff morale, and hindering essential upgrades to infrastructure and facilities.
Source wording under review
A lack of management stability and a fully functioning senior leadership team (SLT) throughout most of the reporting year, making it almost impossible to maintain consistent focus and direction on prisoner wellbeing and rehabilitation.
11 Of particular concern to the Board this year has been the very slow recovery towards normal regime since Covid restrictions were removed. Positively, education class sizes returned to the classroom capacity of eight as soon as it was permitted. However, industry numbers have been held back by staffing vacancies, sickness and a lack of working machinery. It is only very recently that increased wing staff numbers have begun to permit a reduction of extensive lockup times for prisoners to anywhere near the pre-Covid levels. Key working, which provides vital support to prisoners, has at best only restarted in a minimal way for a few prisoners. Important on-wing association activities at weekends, such as pool or table tennis, have only recently begun to re-emerge and at the end of the reporting year were still not available on all wings.
We find that although the prison is generally a safe place in absolute terms, it is significantly less safe than last year, a view generally supported by the many prisoners we have spoken to throughout the year. We are being told of more incidents of prisoner-on-prisoner bullying, prisoners with offences of a sexual nature feeling unsafe and older prisoners being threatened.
3 A concern throughout this and the previous reporting years has been the poor quality and obsolescent body-worn video cameras (BWVCs) that remain in use within Dartmoor. There have been significant periods when no cameras were available, because of obsolescent equipment failures. Incidents then went unrecorded, removing important safeguards for both prisoners and staff.
Prisoners have been treated neither fairly nor humanely due to excessively long lockup times and reduced access to activities, education, family communications, showers, and association across the year.
Inadequate healthcare provision for a significant proportion of older, chronically sick prisoners with acute and special needs, compounded by an unsuitable physical environment (e.g., no wheelchair access) and a healthcare contract that does not cover 24-hour care.
Source wording under review
The Board is of the opinion that it would be better if prisoners due for release were transferred in adequate time to a resettlement prison where they can be given the full resources and advice that HMP Dartmoor is unable to provide, primarily because it is not funded adequately to provide the courses and support necessary to ensure successful resettlement. The alternative would be to redesignate Dartmoor and fully resource it as a training and resettlement prison.
1 Staffing - Despite the withdrawal of the closure notice, HMP Dartmoor’s location continues to affect staff recruitment and retention, both officer support grades (OSG) and non-operational. We are also being told by management that recruitment in non-operational grades has become problematic. Over the course of the reporting year the Board learnt of difficulties in filling vacancies in the kitchens, industries and health care. This impacts on prisoner welfare as there is reduced prisoner/staff contact.
Investment - The Board’s monitoring continues to show that a lack of investment in buildings, staff and equipment is resulting in a shortage of work placements for prisoners and increasing their time in cells and on the wing. This has not changed, even as the regime has been relaxed. Recent examples here include the lack of a functioning laundry and essential machines in the carpentry workshop being out of service, both of which have reduced prisoner employment opportunities.
Very few key work sessions have been carried out during the reporting year, despite lockdown restrictions being relaxed, removing an important lifeline for prisoner support and rehabilitation.
2 The Board reported last year that: ‘monitoring indicates that prison management and staff generally place a high priority on fair treatment and equal access to services for all prisoners. However, this generally high personal commitment from management and officers is not well supported or overseen by management processes’. We are pleased to note that since then the Governor has identified diversity and inclusion as one of his priority areas to drive improvements. 5.4.3 The Board is disappointed that, despite clear commitment by the leadership team to this area and considerable attention from the Governor, necessary changes have not this year gained traction or begun to be embedded throughout the organisation. Prisoner-led forums have not been fully re-established since Covid restrictions ended, and prisoners tell us that the discrimination incident reporting form (DIRF) process lacks prisoner confidence and is ineffective.
A lack of systemic understanding or planning for the needs of disabled and older prisoners, leading to reactive support and negative impacts on the welfare of all prisoners due to unplanned bed watches.
Source wording under review
Dental provision and waiting times continue to be a challenge with waiting times of up to three years. Dental provision for an additional 33 sessions has been approved, with eight to 10 so far implemented. While accepting that this reflects the situation in the community, nonetheless it remains a concern.
Recommendations
What reassurance can the Minister offer that prisoners currently in Dartmoor will not be further harmed or discriminated against, compared with other prisoners elsewhere in the national prison estate, due to a lack of staff and a failure to invest in the infrastructure, security, kitchens, laundry, in-cell telephony, TV systems, new showers and other equipment?
Recommendation 2
HMP Dartmoor still had nine prisoners over tariff and serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP) at the end of the reporting year and a further 22 have been subject to IPP recall. What changes are in the pipeline for these individuals? How will their release be achieved and how will they be supported on release, so that they do not endlessly return to prison under recall?
Recommendation 3
What specific actions are planned to enable Dartmoor to achieve the same basic standards achieved in most other prisons so that prisoners are not disadvantaged compared to the rest of the estate? Will this include funding next year for in-cell telephony, BWVC, replacement showers on all wings, new TV infrastructure, central laundry facilities, and fixes to damp/leaking buildings?
Recommendation 4
When is the prison going to receive the funding necessary to help return towards fuller prisoner employment and what new activities/industries are planned?
Recommendation 5
If staff reprofiling is scheduled, when is it due to be completed and will the reprofiling recognise the increased bed watches and hospital visits that Dartmoor has due to its prisoner age profile?
Recommendation 6
Will Dartmoor continue both as a category C training prison and one that releases a significant number of prisoners each year? If so, what additional funding will be made available to support the full range of resettlement activities not currently available to stop prisoners being disadvantaged?
Recommendation 7
What steps will the Prison Service take to support the new senior leadership team at Dartmoor by suggesting best practice from other prisons in areas such as resettlement, diversity and inclusion, and the care of prisoners with special needs?
Recommendation 8
Does the Prison Service consider long-term, part-time work as an acceptable long-term solution to prisoner underemployment within Dartmoor, and what guidance is available based on experiences learned elsewhere in implementing this at other prisons?
Recommendation 9
When will the older prisoners strategy be published and what practical assistance and pathways will be provided for Dartmoor prisoners in 2023 because of this?
Recommendation 10
What is the path for Dartmoor prisoners who require 24-hour health or social care support, or other special equipment or support that Dartmoor is unable to provide?
Recommendation 11
Can the Prison Service advise on what HMPPS considers as reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act, in the light of previous experience across the prison estate? What help is available, including funding, to enable Dartmoor to make these adjustments in 2023?
Recommendation 12
With the appointment of the new head of business assurance, will the Governor continue to track and report on the implementation of the recommendations from the IMB, HMIP and other report recommendations?
Recommendation 13
Given the perceived lack of prisoner confidence in discrimination incident reporting form (DIRF) and complaints processes (1, 1A and 2), what steps will be taken to strengthen and quality assure them to rebuild confidence?
Recommendation 14
Can the prison explain clearly to staff and prisoners what the purpose is of a challenge, support and intervention plan (CSIP), how to refer on to it, what the prisoner can expect to get from it and what completion looks like?
Recommendation 15
What can be done to hasten the reopening of the Two Bridges facility to provide for older prisoners and/or prisoners with special needs?
Applications to the IMB
| Category | Current | Previous |
|---|---|---|
| Accommodation | 5 | 10 |
| Property lost in transit to prison | 19 | — |
| Property lost within prison | 11 | 6 |
| Staff-prisoner relationships (including bullying) | 40 | — |
Related inspections & investigations
Safety 3
· Respect 2
· Activity 1
· Release 3
John Phillips · Self-inflicted
Sidney Jenkins · Natural causes
Michael Waters · Natural causes
Frederick Vickery · Natural causes
Graham Taylor · Self-inflicted
Corin Bonaparte · State Custody related deaths | Mental Health related deaths
Other reports for Dartmoor
Population 648
· Concerns
Population 682
· Concerns
Population 617
· Self-harm 96
· Concerns
· Concerns